锂离子电池快充石墨负极研究与应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202204057

物理化学学报 >> 2022, Vol. 38 >> Issue (11): 2204057.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202204057

所属专题：新锐科学家专刊

锂离子电池快充石墨负极研究与应用

丁晓博, 黄倩晖, 熊训辉()

华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广州 510006

收稿日期:2022-04-29 录用日期:2022-06-06 发布日期:2022-06-13
通讯作者: 熊训辉 E-mail:esxxiong@scut.edu.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51874142);中央高校基本科研基金(2019JQ09);广东特支计划“科技创新青年拔尖人才”项目(2019TQ05L903);中国科协青年托举人才项目(2019QNRC001)

Research and Application of Fast-Charging Graphite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Xiaobo Ding, Qianhui Huang, Xunhui Xiong()

School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2022-04-29 Accepted:2022-06-06 Published:2022-06-13
Contact: Xunhui Xiong E-mail:esxxiong@scut.edu.cn
About author:Xunhui Xiong, Email: esxxiong@scut.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51874142);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2019JQ09);the Tip-top Scientific and Technical Innovative Youth Talents of Guangdong Special Support Program(2019TQ05L903);the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST(2019QNRC001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

相较于传统燃油汽车，电动汽车缓慢的充电速度始终制约了其进一步推广。为电动汽车实现“加油式”快速充电能够缓解充电桩的使用压力，增加电动汽车的应用场景和市场占有率。因此，亟需开发出具有快速充放电能力的高性能锂离子电池。石墨因其低廉的价格和优异的电化学性能已经在锂离子电池负极领域得到了广泛的商业化应用，然而其较低的嵌锂电位导致在快充过程中出现析锂，损害电化学性能的同时会带来安全隐患。因此，必须对石墨进行改良处理，以适应快充技术的需要。本文系统介绍了近年来石墨负极快充化改良领域的研究进展，从成分设计，形貌调控，结构优化，电解液适配等方面进行了评述，并总结了快充石墨面临的挑战，展望了其发展前景，为推动快充技术的商业化应用提供了借鉴。

关键词: 石墨, 负极, 快充, 锂离子电池

Abstract:

Driven by the excessive environmental pollution caused by the over-use of non-renewable fossil-derived energy, renewable energy and electrochemical energy storage devices have made great progress in the past decades. Electrochemical energy storage devices, such as lithium-ion batteries, have the advantages of high capacity, long life cycle, and good safety performance; therefore, they have been used in various applications. For example, economical and environment-friendly electric vehicles have recently taken up increasing market share. However, when compared with vehicles propelled using fossil-derived energy, the slow charging speed of electric vehicles has always restricted their further promotion. The realization of rapid charging for electric vehicles can alleviate the high-pressure usage of charging piles as well as increase the application and market share of electric vehicles. Therefore, it is important to develop high-performance lithium-ion batteries with rapid charge and discharge capacities. The fast-charging capacity of lithium-ion batteries is limited by the slow migration of lithium ions in the electrode and the electrode/electrolyte interface. Therefore, the key to developing fast-charging lithium-ion batteries lies in the successful design of suitable electrode materials. Because of its low cost and excellent electrochemical performance, graphite has been widely used to develop the cathode of lithium-ion batteries. However, the migration of lithium ions in graphite is slow, resulting in large polarization during the high-current charge and discharge processes. In addition, the low lithium intercalation potential of graphite leads to lithium precipitation during fast charging, which can decrease the electrochemical performance and cause potential safety hazards. Therefore, graphite must be improved to meet the needs of such fast-charging devices. In this article, we systematically introduce the research progress made in recent years within the scope of rapid-charging improvement of graphite(-based) cathodes and then highlight the modification strategies for graphite with the goal of achieving functional coating, desired morphological and structural design, optimized electrolyte properties, and an improved charging protocol. Additionally, this article evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of the modification strategies as well as their application prospects. The scheme of functional coating for modifying graphite must simplify the process and improve production efficiency to meet the needs of industrial development. Morphology design should ensure satisfactory initial Coulomb efficiency, while the improvement of the electrolyte properties and optimization of the charging protocol need to consider the commercialization costs. Finally, this paper proposes further evaluation of the effects of the modification strategies based on soft-pack or cylindrical batteries to strengthen the commercialization prospect of the modification strategies.

Key words: Graphite, Negative pole, Fast charging, Lithium ion battery

丁晓博, 黄倩晖, 熊训辉. 锂离子电池快充石墨负极研究与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11), 2204057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202204057

Xiaobo Ding, Qianhui Huang, Xunhui Xiong. Research and Application of Fast-Charging Graphite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(11), 2204057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202204057

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202204057

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V38/I11/2204057

图/表 11

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 94

1	(a) Chen, C.; Liang, Q. W.; Chen, Z. X.; Zhu, W. Y.; Wang, Z. J.; Li, Y.; Wu, X. W.; Xiong, X. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (51), 26718. doi: 10.1002/anie.202110441
	(b) Wu, F. X.; Maier, J.; Yu, Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (5), 1569. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00863e
	(c) Chen, C.; Liang, Q. W.; Wang, G.; Liu, D. D.; Xiong, X. H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32 (4), 2107249. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202107249
2	(a) Collin, R.; Miao, Y.; Yokochi, A.; Enjeti, P.; von Jouanne, A. Energies 2019, 12 (10), 1839. doi: 10.3390/en12101839
	(b) Deb, N.; Singh, R.; Brooks, R. R.; Bai, K. Energies 2021, 14 (22), 7566. doi: 10.3390/en14227566
3	Cai W. L. ; Yao Y. X. ; Zhu G. L. ; Yan C. ; Jiang L. L. ; He C. X. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (12), 3806. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00728h
4	Zhang S. S. Chemelectrochem 2020, 7 (17), 3569. doi: 10.1002/celc.202000650
5	Huang S. ; Wu X. Y. ; Cavalheiro G. M. ; Du X. N. ; Liu B. Z. ; Du Z. J. ; Zhang G. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (14), A3254. doi: 10.1149/2.0441914jes
6	Tanim T. R. ; Dufek E. J. ; Evans M. ; Dickerson C. ; Jansen A. N. ; Polzin B. J. ; Dunlop A. R. ; Trask S. E. ; Jackman R. ; Bloom I. ; et al J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (10), A1926. doi: 10.1149/2.0731910jes
7	Deb S. ; Tammi K. ; Kalita K. ; Mahanta P. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2018, 7 (6), e306. doi: 10.1002/wene.306
8	Previati G. ; Mastinu G. ; Gobbi M. Energies 2022, 15 (4), 1326. doi: 10.3390/en15041326
9	Ahmed S. ; Bloom I. ; Jansen A. N. ; Tanim T. ; Dufek E. J. ; Pesaran A. ; Burnham A. ; Carlson R. B. ; Dias F. ; Hardy K. ; et al J. Power Sources 2017, 367, 250. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.055
10	Raboaca M. S. ; Meheden M. ; Musat A. ; Viziteu A. ; Creanga A. ; Vlad V. ; Filote C. ; Rata M. ; Lavric A. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46 (2), 523. doi: 10.1002/er.7206
11	Li L. ; Zhang D. ; Deng J. P. ; Gou Y. C. ; Fang J. F. ; Cui H. ; Zhao Y. Q. ; Cao M. H. Carbon 2021, 183, 721. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.053
12	Logan E. R. ; Dahn J. R. Trends Chem. 2020, 2 (4), 354. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.011
13	Liu Y. Y. ; Zhu Y. Y. ; Cui Y. Nat. Energy 2019, 4 (7), 540. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0405-3
14	Weiss M. ; Ruess R. ; Kasnatscheew J. ; Levartovsky Y. ; Levy N. R. ; Minnmann P. ; Stolz L. ; Waldmann T. ; Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M. ; Aurbach D. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11 (33), 2101126. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101126
15	Xie W. L. ; Liu X. H. ; He R. ; Li Y. L. ; Gao X. L. ; Li X. H. ; Peng Z. X. ; Feng S. W. ; Feng X. N. ; Yang S. C. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101837. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101837
16	Cai W. L. ; Yan C. ; Yao Y. X. ; Xu L. ; Xu R. ; Jiang L. L. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Small Struct. 2020, 1 (1), 2000010. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202000010
17	Zhao L. ; Ding B. C. ; Qin X. Y. ; Wang Z. J. ; Lv W. ; He Y. B. ; Yang Q. H. ; Kang F. Y. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2106704. doi: 10.1002/adma.202106704
18	Rangom Y. ; Duignan T. T. ; Zhao X. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (36), 42662. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c09559
19	Kabra V. ; Parmananda M. ; Fear C. ; Usseglio-Viretta F. L. E. ; Colclasure A. ; Smith K. ; Mukherjee P. P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (50), 55795. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c15144
20	Liu Q. ; Du C. ; Shen B. ; Zuo P. ; Cheng X. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (18), 88683. doi: 10.1039/c6ra19482f
21	Kim N. ; Chae S. ; Ma J. ; Ko M. ; Cho J. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 812. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y
22	Zou Y. G. ; Cao Z. ; Zhang J. L. ; Wahyudi W. ; Wu Y. Q. ; Liu G. ; Li Q. ; Cheng H. R. ; Zhang D. Y. ; Park G. T. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2021, 33 (43), 2102964. doi: 10.1002/adma.202102964
23	Yao F. ; Gunes F. ; Ta H. Q. ; Lee S. M. ; Chae S. J. ; Sheem K. Y. ; Cojocaru C. S. ; Xie S. S. ; Lee Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (20), 8646. doi: 10.1021/ja301586m
24	Kaskhedikar N. A. ; Maier J. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21 (25–26), 2664. doi: 10.1002/adma.200901079
25	Yu D. D. ; Zhu Q. N. ; Cheng L. W. ; Dong S. ; Zhang X. H. ; Wang H. ; Yang N. J. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6 (3), 949. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00043
26	Li F. S. ; Wu Y. S. ; Chou J. ; Winter M. ; Wu N. L. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (1), 13. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403880
27	Shim J. H. ; Lee S. J. Power Sources 2016, 324, 475. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.094
28	Wang R. H. ; Li X. H. ; Wang Z. X. ; Zhang H. Nano Energy 2017, 34, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.037
29	Xu M. ; Wang R. ; Reichman B. ; Wang X. J. Energy Storage 2018, 20, 298. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2018.09.004
30	Kim H. ; Lim K. ; Yoon G. ; Park J. H. ; Ku K. ; Lim H. D. ; Sung Y. E. ; Kang K. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7 (19), 1700418. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700418
31	Yamada Y. ; Furukawa K. ; Sodeyama K. ; Kikuchi K. ; Yaegashi M. ; Tateyama Y. ; Yamada A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (13), 5039. doi: 10.1021/ja412807w
32	Lu M. ; Tian Y. Y. ; Zheng X. D. ; Gao J. ; Huang B. J. Power Sources 2012, 219, 188. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.044
33	Billaud J. ; Bouville F. ; Magrini T. ; Villevieille C. ; Studart A. R Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16097. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.97
34	Ko M. ; Chae S. ; Ma J. ; Kim N. ; Lee H. W. ; Cui Y. ; Cho J. Nat. Energy 2020, 5 (4), 34. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0587-8
35	Kottegoda I. R. M. ; Kadoma Y. ; Ikuta H. ; Uchimoto Y. ; Wakihara M. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2002, 5 (12), A275. doi: 10.1149/1.1516410
36	Wang J. H. ; Yamada Y. ; Sodeyama K. ; Chiang C. H. ; Tateyama Y. ; Yamada A. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12032. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12032
37	Okoshi M. ; Yamada Y. ; Yamada A. ; Nakai H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160 (11), A2160. doi: 10.1149/2.074311jes
38	Kim K. E. ; Jang J. Y. ; Park I. ; Woo M. H. ; Jeong M. H. ; Shin W. C. ; Ue M. ; Choi N. S. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 61, 121. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.10.013
39	Han Y. J. ; Kim J. ; Yeo J. S. ; An J. C. ; Hong I. P. ; Nakabayashi K. ; Miyawaki J. ; Jung J. D. ; Yoon S. H. Carbon 2015, 94, 432. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.030
40	Qi W. B. ; Ben L. B. ; Yu H. L. ; Zhan Y. J. ; Zhao W. W. ; Huang X. J. J. Power Sources 2019, 424, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.077
41	Yang X. G. ; Zhang G. S. ; Ge S. H. ; Wang C. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (28), 7266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807115115
42	Tan D. H. S. ; Wu E. A. ; Nguyen H. ; Chen Z. ; Marple M. A. T. ; Doux J. M. ; Wang X. F. ; Yang H. D. ; Banerjee A. ; Meng Y. S. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4 (10), 2418. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01693
43	Ma Z. ; Zhuang Y. C. ; Deng Y. M. ; Song X. N. ; Zuo X. X. ; Xiao X. ; Nan J. M. J. Power Sources 2018, 376, 91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.038
44	Carrillo A. ; Swartz J. A. ; Gamba J. M. ; Kane R. S. ; Chakrapani N. ; Wei B. Q. ; Ajayan P. M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3 (10), 1437. doi: 10.1021/nl034376x
45	Lee S. M. ; Kim J. ; Moon J. ; Jung K. N. ; Kim J. H. ; Park G. J. ; Choi J. H. ; Rhee D. Y. ; Kim J. S. ; Lee J. W. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1), 39. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20297-8
46	Chen K. H. ; Goel V. ; Namkoong M. J. ; Wied M. ; Muller S. ; Wood V. ; Sakamoto J. ; Thornton K. ; Dasgupta N. P. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11 (5), 2003336. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202003336
47	Kim D. S. ; Chung D. J. ; Bae J. ; Jeong G. ; Kim H. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 258, 336. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.056
48	Kim D. S. ; Kim Y. E. ; Kim H. J. Power Sources 2019, 422, 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.027
49	Zhou J. H. ; Ma K. N. ; Lian X. Y. ; Shi Q. T. ; Wang J. Q. ; Chen Z. J. ; Guo L. L. ; Liu Y. ; Bachmatiuk A. ; Sun J. Y. ; et al Small 2022, 18, 15. doi: 10.1002/smll.202107460
50	Lei X. F. ; Wang C. W. ; Yi Z. H. ; Liang Y. G. ; Sun J. T. J. Alloy. Compd. 2007, 429 (1–2), 311. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.019
51	Zhang W. ; Fang L. ; Yue M. ; Yu Z. Chin. J. Power Sources 2006, 30 (2), 100. doi: 10.1198/108571106X99751
52	Lu Y. ; Ye D. ; Sun X. ; Wang Y. Battery Bimonthly 2014, 44 (3), 171. doi: 10.1198/10cr04152215
53	Ma S. Q. ; Li Y. K. ; Lan J. ; Liu Y. E. ; Yin L. S. Chin. J. Power Sources 2020, 44 (11), 1580. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-087X.2020.11.005
54	Yoshio M. ; Wang H. Y. ; Fukuda K. ; Umeno T. ; Abe T. ; Ogumi Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14 (11), 1754. doi: 10.1039/b316702j
55	Cheng Q. ; Yuge R. ; Nakahara K. ; Tamura N. ; Miyamoto S. J. Power Sources 2015, 284, 258. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.036
56	Kim J. ; Jeghan S. M. N. ; Lee G. Microporous Mesoporous Mat. 2020, 305, 110325. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110325
57	Son D. K. ; Kim J. ; Raj M. R. ; Lee G. Carbon 2021, 175, 187. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.01.015
58	Zou L. ; Kang F. Y. ; Zheng Y. P. ; Shen W. C. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54 (15), 3930. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.012
59	Zhao Q. ; Hao X. G. ; Su S. M. ; Ma J. B. ; Hu Y. ; Liu Y. ; Kang F. Y. ; He Y. B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (26), 15871. doi: 10.1039/c9ta04240g
60	Lin Y. X. ; Huang Z. H. ; Yu X. L. ; Shen W. C. ; Zheng Y. P. ; Kang F. Y. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 116, 170. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.057
61	Li J. H. ; Hou S. Y. ; Su J. R. ; Li K. ; Wei L. B. ; Ma L. Q. ; Shen W. C. ; Kang F. Y. ; Huang Z. H. New Carbon Mater. 2019, 34 (2), 205. doi: 10.1016/s1872-5805(19)60012-0
62	Xu J. ; Wang X. ; Yuan N. Y. ; Hu B. Q. ; Ding J. N. ; Ge S. H. J. Power Sources 2019, 430, 74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.024
63	Kim T. H. ; Jeon E. K. ; Ko Y. ; Jang B. Y. ; Kim B. S. ; Song H. K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2 (20), 7600. doi: 10.1039/c3ta15360f
64	Cheng Q. ; Zhang Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165 (5), A1104. doi: 10.1149/2.1171805jes
65	Yeo J. S. ; Park T. H. ; Seo M. H. ; Miyawaki J. ; Mochida I. ; Yoon S. H. Int. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 8 (1), 1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.02.009
66	Park M. S. ; Kim J. H. ; Jo Y. N. ; Oh S. H. ; Kim H. ; Kim Y. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (44), 17960. doi: 10.1039/c1jm13158c
67	Zhang S. S. Infomat 2021, 3 (1), 125. doi: 10.1002/inf2.12159
68	Gao N. ; Kim S. ; Chinnam P. ; Dufek E. J. ; Colclasure A. M. ; Jansen A. ; Son S. B. ; Bloom I. ; Dunlop A. ; Trask S. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 44, 296. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.011
69	Liu T. C. ; Lin L. P. ; Bi X. X. ; Tian L. L. ; Yang K. ; Liu J. J. ; Li M. F. ; Chen Z. H. ; Lu J. ; Amine K. ; et al Nat. Nanotech. 2019, 14 (1), 50. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0284-y
70	Wang Z. X. ; Qi F. L. ; Yin L. C. ; Shi Y. ; Sun C. G. ; An B. G. ; Cheng H. M. ; Li F. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10 (14), 1903843. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903843
71	Jiang L. L. ; Yan C. ; Yao Y. X. ; Cai W. L. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (7), 3402. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009738
72	Mallarapu A. ; Bharadwaj V. S. ; Santhanagopalan S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (8), 4858. doi: 10.1039/d0ta10166d
73	Xu K. ; von Cresce A. ; Lee U. Langmuir 2010, 26 (13), 11538. doi: 10.1021/la1009994
74	Moon H. ; Mandai T. ; Tatara R. ; Ueno K. ; Yamazaki A. ; Yoshida K. ; Seki S. ; Dokko K. ; Watanabe M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119 (8), 3957. doi: 10.1021/jp5128578
75	Okoshi M. ; Yamada Y. ; Komaba S. ; Yamada A. ; Nakai H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164 (2), A54. doi: 10.1149/2.0211702jes
76	Du Z. J. ; Wood D. L. ; Belharouak I. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 103, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.04.013
77	Zhang L. F. ; Chai L. L. ; Zhang L. ; Shen M. ; Zhang X. L. ; Battaglia V. S. ; Stephenson T. ; Zheng H. H. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 127, 39- 44. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.008
78	Chen Z. H. ; Lu W. Q. ; Liu J. ; Amine K. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51 (16), 3322. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.09.027
79	Wrodnigg G. H. ; Besenhard J. O. ; Winter M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146 (2), 47. doi: 10.1149/1.1391630
80	Matsuo Y. ; Fumita K. ; Fukutsuka T. ; Sugie Y. ; Koyama H. ; Inoue K. J. Power Sources 2003, 119, 373. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00271-4
81	Son H. B. ; Jeong M. Y. ; Han J. G. ; Kim K. ; Kim K. H. ; Jeong K. M. ; Choi N. S. J. Power Sources 2018, 400, 147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.022
82	Shi J. L. ; Ehteshami N. ; Ma J. L. ; Zhang H. ; Liu H. D. ; Zhang X. ; Li J. ; Paillard E. J. Power Sources 2019, 429, 67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.113
83	Komaba S. ; Itabashi T. ; Kaplan B. ; Groult H. ; Kumagai N. Electrochem. Commun. 2003, 5 (11), 962. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2003.09.003
84	Honghe Z. ; Yanbao F. ; Hucheng Z. ; Abe T. ; Ogumi Z. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2006, 9 (3), A115. doi: 10.1149/1.2161447
85	Zheng J. M. ; Yan P. F. ; Cao R. G. ; Xiang H. F. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Polzin B. J. ; Wang C. M. ; Zhang J. G. ; Xu W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (8), 5715. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12517
86	Wu M. S. ; Lin J. C. ; Chiang P. C. J. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2004, 7 (7), A206. doi: 10.1149/1.1739313
87	Yoon T. ; Chapman N. ; Seo D. M. ; Lucht B. L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164 (9), A2082. doi: 10.1149/2.1421709jes
88	Jeong S. K. ; Inaba M. ; Iriyama Y. ; Abe T. ; Ogumi Z. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2003, 6 (1), A1. doi: 10.1149/1.1526781
89	Yamada Y. ; Wang J. H. ; Ko S. ; Watanabe E. ; Yamada A. Nat. Energy 2019, 4 (5), 42. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0375-5
90	Chen S. R. ; Yu Z. X. ; Gordin M. L. ; Yi R. ; Song J. X. ; Wang D. H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (8), 6959. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11008
91	Zhang S. S. J. Power Sources 2006, 161 (2), 1385. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.040
92	Keil P. ; Jossen A. J. Energy Storage 2016, 6, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2016.02.005
93	Li J. ; Murphy E. ; Winnick J. ; Kohl P. A. J. Power Sources 2001, 102 (1–2), 302. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00820-5
94	Yang X. G. ; Liu T. ; Gao Y. ; Ge S. H. ; Leng Y. J. ; Wang D. H. ; Wang C. Y. Joule 2019, 3 (12), 3002. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.021

Modification strategy	Electrochemical performance (capacity/corresponding current density)	Reference
Edge-plane activated graphite coated by an amorphous Si nanolayer	100 mAh?g^?1/1 A?g^?1 200 mAh?g^?1/0.67 A?g^?1	21
The electrolyte consists of 1.0 M lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiTF) in DEGDME	~100 mAh?g^?1/1 A?g^?1	30
The electrolyte consists of a superconcentrated 4.5 M LiFSA/AN solution	~278 mAh?g^?1/1.86 A?g^?1	31
LTO coated graphite	~143 mAh?g^?1/2.14 A?g^?1	32
PEGPE coated natural graphite	298 mAh?g^?1/0.186 A?g^?1	26
Graphite particles oriented perpendicularly to the current collector	83 mAh?g^?1/0.74 A?g^?1	33
Silicon-nanolayer-embedded graphite/carbon composite	~260 mAh?g^?1/1.86 A?g^?1	34
Zirconia film coated graphite	~370 mAh?g^?1/1.12 A?g^?1	35
Superconcentrated (1 : 1.1) LiFSA/DMC electrolytes	~243 mAh?g^?1/1.86 A?g^?1	36
The electrolyte consists of 3.6 M LiFSA in DME	~108 mAh?g^?1/1.86 A?g^?1 ~250 mAh?g^?1/0.74 A?g^?1	37
Using a combination of lithium difluorophosphate (LiDFP) and vinylene carbonate (VC) as electrolyte additives	250 mAh?g^?1/1.8 A?g^?1	38
Amorphous carbon coating on the graphite surface	263 mAh?g^?1/1.86 A?g^?1	39
Adding LiNO₃ into the graphite electrode	291.7 mAh?g^?1/0.68 A?g^?1	40
A rapid cell internal heating step	80% SOC acquired in 15 min at 50 ℃	41
An asymmetric temperature modulation method	6C charge to 80% SOC	42

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	夏求应, 蔡雨, 刘威, 王金石, 吴川智, 昝峰, 徐璟, 夏晖. 锂负极失效的全固态薄膜锂电池的直接回收再利用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212051 -0 .
[3]	唐生龙, 王春蕾, 蒲想俊, 顾向奎, 陈重学. 水系锌离子电池嵌入负极材料TiX₂ (X = S, Se)的储锌机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212037 -0 .
[4]	鲁航语, 侯瑞林, 褚世勇, 周豪慎, 郭少华. 高比能锂离子电池层状富锂正极材料改性策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2211057 -0 .
[5]	吕浩亮, 王雪杰, 杨宇, 刘涛, 张留洋. 还原氧化石墨烯包覆MOF衍生In₂Se₃用于钠离子电池负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2210014 -0 .
[6]	汪茹, 刘志康, 严超, 伽龙, 黄云辉. 高安全锂离子电池复合集流体的界面强化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2203043 -0 .
[7]	王正慜, 洪庆玲, 王晓慧, 黄昊, 陈煜, 李淑妮. 氮掺杂石墨烯气凝胶锚定RuP纳米粒子用于水合肼氧化辅助产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2303028 - .
[8]	李晓慧, 李晓东, 孙全虎, 何建江, 杨泽, 肖金冲, 黄长水. 石墨炔衍生物的合成与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2206029 -0 .
[9]	朱迎迎, 王勇, 徐淼, 吴勇民, 汤卫平, 朱地, 何雨石, 马紫峰, 李林森. 追踪锂金属负极的压力与形貌变化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2110040 -0 .
[10]	刘若娟, 刘冰之, 孙靖宇, 刘忠范. 气相助剂辅助绝缘衬底上石墨烯生长：现状与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2111011 -0 .
[11]	刘汉卿, 周锋, 师晓宇, 史全, 吴忠帅. 石墨烯基纤维储能器件的研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204017 - .
[12]	贺文娅, 程虎虎, 曲良体. 烯碳纤维基能源器件的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2203004 - .
[13]	夏洲, 邵元龙. 湿法纺制石墨烯纤维：工艺、结构、性能与智能应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2103046 - .
[14]	何文倩, 邸亚, 姜南, 刘遵峰, 陈永胜. 石墨烯诱导水凝胶成核的高强韧人造蛛丝[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204059 - .
[15]	沈荣晨, 郝磊, 陈晴, 郑巧清, 张鹏, 李鑫. 高分散Co_0.2Ni_1.6Fe_0.2P助催化剂改性P掺杂g-C₃N₄纳米片高效光催化析氢的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(7): 2110014 - .

锂离子电池快充石墨负极研究与应用

Research and Application of Fast-Charging Graphite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 94

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0