氟代溶剂在锂金属电池中的应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202205005

物理化学学报 >> 2022, Vol. 38 >> Issue (11): 2205005.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202205005

所属专题：新锐科学家专刊

氟代溶剂在锂金属电池中的应用

何子旭, 陈亚威, 黄凡洋, 揭育林, 李新鹏, 曹瑞国, 焦淑红()

中国科学技术大学, 中国科学院能量转换材料重点实验室, 材料科学与工程系, 合肥微尺度物质科学国家研究中心, 合肥 230026

收稿日期:2022-05-03 录用日期:2022-05-27 发布日期:2022-06-06
通讯作者: 焦淑红 E-mail:jiaosh@ustc.edu.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFA206703);国家自然科学基金(51902304);国家自然科学基金(52072358);国家自然科学基金(U21A2082);安徽省自然科学基金(1908085ME122);中央高校基本科研基金(WK2060140026)

Fluorinated Solvents for Lithium Metal Batteries

Zixu He, Yawei Chen, Fanyang Huang, Yulin Jie, Xinpeng Li, Ruiguo Cao, Shuhong Jiao()

Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2022-05-03 Accepted:2022-05-27 Published:2022-06-06
Contact: Shuhong Jiao E-mail:jiaosh@ustc.edu.cn
About author:Shuhong Jiao, Email: jiaosh@ustc.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-551-63607418
Supported by:
the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFA206703);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51902304);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52072358);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U21A2082);the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China(1908085ME122);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China(WK2060140026)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，锂金属电池由于具有较高的能量密度而成为储能领域的研究热点。电解液作为锂金属电池的“血液”发挥着至关重要的作用。在传统锂离子电池电解液中，锂金属负极与电解液之间的界面副反应严重并伴随着锂枝晶生长，从而导致安全隐患以及循环寿命缩短等问题。在解决锂金属负极问题上，电解液调控策略具有易操作性和有效性，因而在推动锂金属电池发展方面具有举足轻重的地位。氟代电解液是目前重要的研究方向，氟代电解液在循环过程中能够在电极表面形成富含LiF的固体电解质界面膜(SEI)；该界面膜不仅可以有效抑制负极锂枝晶的形成，并且在正极方面能够大幅提高电解液的氧化稳定性，从而提升高电压正极的适配性和锂金属电池的循环稳定性。氟代电解液中氟代溶剂/氟代锂盐的分子结构对电解液的溶剂化结构有重要影响。当氟代溶剂分子中氟原子的位置与数量不同时，氟代溶剂的物理化学性质也会随之发生变化，进而改变了电解液与电极的界面反应性。因此，氟代溶剂能够起到调制SEI膜成分和结构的作用，是决定电池性能的关键因素。本文总结了应用于锂金属电池的主要氟代溶剂，尤其是近几年来发展的新型氟代溶剂；着重介绍了高度氟代的溶剂分子作为局域超浓电解液的稀释剂，以及对溶剂进行精准分子设计得到的部分氟代溶剂等。此外，本文还分析探讨了氟代溶剂分子与电池性能之间的构效关系，展望了构建新型氟代溶剂分子的策略，希望能对电解液溶剂分子的结构设计以及构效关系的评估有一定的启发意义。

关键词: 锂金属电池, 氟代电解液, 氟代溶剂, 溶剂化结构, 固体电解质界面膜

Abstract:

Lithium metal batteries, which use lithium metal as the anode, have attracted tremendous research interest in recent years, owing to their high energy density and potential for future energy storage applications. Despite their advantages such as high energy density, the safety concerns and short lifespan significantly impede their practical applications in transportation and electronic devices. Tremendous efforts have been devoted to overcoming these problems, including materials design, interface modification, and electrolyte engineering. Among these strategies, electrolyte regulation plays a key role in improving the efficiency, stability, and safety of lithium metal anodes. As an important class of electrolyte components, fluorinated solvents, which can decompose to form LiF-rich interphase layers on both anode and cathode, have been proven to enhance the stability of lithium metal anodes and improve the oxidative stability of the electrolytes. Meanwhile, the spatial structure of fluorinated solvents, such as the number and sites of fluorine atoms, can influence the physicochemical properties of the electrolytes and the compositions/structure of the solid-electrolyte interphase, which eventually dictates the cycling performance of Li metal batteries. Recently, many fluorinated solvents with different molecular structures have been designed to regulate the solvation structure of electrolytes, and these solvents exhibit novel electrochemical properties in lithium metal batteries. However, there are few comprehensive reviews that summarize the fluorinated solvents used in Li metal batteries and discuss their functions in electrolytes and their physicochemical properties. This review summarizes the novel fluorinated solvents used in lithium metal batteries in recent years, which have been classified into three parts: diluents, traditional solvents, and novel molecules, based on their functions in the electrolytes. In every part, the understanding of the interactions between fluorinated solvents and Li ions, the decomposition mechanism of fluorinated solvents at the interface of the electrode, the functions of fluorinated solvents in the electrolytes, and the structure-activity relationship between the fluorinated solvents and battery performance have been comprehensively summarized and discussed. Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of fluorinated solvents have been discussed, and the importance of precisely controlling the number of fluorine atoms and the structure of fluorinated solvents has been emphasized. At the end of this review, a perspective for designing new fluorinated solvents has been proposed. We believe that this review can provide insights on designing novel fluorinated solvents for high-performance Li metal batteries.

Key words: Lithium metal battery, Fluorinated electrolyte, Fluorinated solvent, Solvation structure, Solid electrolyte interphase

何子旭, 陈亚威, 黄凡洋, 揭育林, 李新鹏, 曹瑞国, 焦淑红. 氟代溶剂在锂金属电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2205005.

Zixu He, Yawei Chen, Fanyang Huang, Yulin Jie, Xinpeng Li, Ruiguo Cao, Shuhong Jiao. Fluorinated Solvents for Lithium Metal Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2205005.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202205005

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V38/I11/2205005

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

表1

局域超浓电解液配方与性能"

Electrolyte Formula	Coulombic Efficiency	Cell Configuration	Protocol	Discharge Capacity	Ref.
3 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DME/TTE (8:2 by vol.) + 1% (w) FEC	500 cycles, 99.3%	100 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.9 mA?cm^?2, 1/2C	197.4 mAh?g^?1	50
3 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DME/TTE (8:2 by vol.) + 1% (w) FEC	500 cycles, 99.3%	20 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.9 mA?cm^?2, 1/2C	119 cycles, 84.2%	50
LiFSI/DME/TTE (1 : 1.2 : 3 by mol)	300 cycles, 99.3%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	250 cycles, 82%	51
		50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.42 mA?cm^?2, 1/10C	155 cycles, 80%	51
		Li\|\|NMC811 anode free	0.42 mA?cm^?2, 1/10C	70 cycles, 77%	51
LiFSI/DMC/TTE (1 : 1.2 : 3 by mol)	99.3%	Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles, 56%	52
LiFSI/TMS/TTE (1 : 3 : 3 by mol)	99.2%	Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles, 13%	52
LiFSI/TEP/TTE (1 : 1.4 : 3 by mol)	99.1%	Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles, 85%	52
LiFSI/DME/TTE (1:1:3 by mol)	99.5%	Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles, 90%	52
2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DMC/1, 2dfBen (3 : 7 by vol.)	288 cycles, > 90%	40 μm Li \|\|NMC523	1.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/2C	80 cycles	53
2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DMC/BTFE (3 : 7 by vol.)	159 cycles, > 90%	40 μm Li \|\|NMC523	1.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/2C	70 cycles, 111 mAh·g^-1	53
1.28 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/FEMC/FEC in D2	100 cycles, 99.4%	Li\|\|NMA	0.4 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	450 cycles, 150 mAh?g^?1	54
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DMC/BTFE (0.75 : 1 : 3 by mol)	99.2%	Li\|\|NMC622	1.6 mA?cm^?2, 1C	600 cycles, 97%	49
LiFSI/TMS/TTE (1 : 3 : 3 by mol)	150 cycles, 98.8%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC333	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles	48
1 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DME/TFEO (1.2 : 3 by mol)	99.5%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	300 cycles, 80%	55
LiFSI/DMC/TTE (1 : 1.5 : 1.5 by mol)	400 cycles, 98.6%	Li\|\|NMC622	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/2C	100 cycles, 93.5%	56
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DMC/BTFE (1 : 2 by mol)	99.3%	Li\|\|NMC333	2 mA?cm^?2, 1C	300 cycles, 95%	57
LiFSI/DME/BTFE (1 : 1.2 : 3 by mol)	99.4%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	162 cycles, 80%	57
LiFSI/DME/TTE (1 : 1.2 : 3 by mol)	99.5%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	262 cycles, 80%	57
LiFSI/DME/BTFEC (1 : 1.2 : 3 by mol)	96.8%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	50 cycles, 80%	57
LiFSI/DME/TFEB (1 : 1.4 : 3 by mol)	95.4%	450 μm Li\|\|NMC811	0.5 mA?cm^?2, 1/3C	32 cycles, 80%	57

表1

图4

图5

图6

表2

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 99

1	Evarts E. C. Nature 2015, 526, S93. doi: 10.1038/526S93a
2	Winter M. ; Barnett B. ; Xu K. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11433. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422
3	Janek J. ; Zeier W. G. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16141. doi: 10.1038/Nenergy.2016.141
4	Cano Z. P. ; Banham D. ; Ye S. Y. ; Hintennach A. ; Lu J. ; Fowler M. ; Chen Z. W. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 279. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1
5	Huang F. Y. ; Jie Y. L. ; Li X. P. ; Chen Y. W. ; Cao R. G. ; Zhang G. Q. ; Jiao S. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2008081. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008081
	黄凡洋; 揭育林; 李新鹏; 陈亚威; 曹瑞国; 章根强; 焦淑红. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2008081. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008081
6	Niu C. J. ; Pan H. L. ; Xu W. ; Xiao J. ; Zhang J. G. ; Luo L. L. ; Wang C. M. ; Mei D. H. ; Meng J. S. ; Wang X. P. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 594. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0427-9
7	Li M. ; Lu J. ; Chen Z. W. ; Amine K. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800561
8	Zhang C. ; Wang F. ; Han J. ; Bai S. ; Tan J. ; Liu J. ; Li F. Small Structures 2021, 2, 2100009. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202100009
9	Zhang J. G. ; Xu W. ; Xiao J. ; Cao X. ; Liu J. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 13312. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00275
10	Jiao S. H. ; Zheng J. M. ; Li Q. Y. ; Li X. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Cao R. G. ; Zhang J. G. ; Xu W. Joule 2018, 2, 110. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.007
11	Liu F. F. ; Zhang Z. W. ; Ye S. F. ; Yao Y. ; Yu Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2006021. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006021
	刘凡凡; 张志文; 叶淑芬; 姚雨; 余彦. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2006021. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006021
12	Chen C. -Y. ; Tsuda T. ; Oshima Y. ; Kuwabata S. Small Structures 2021, 2, 2100018. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202100018
13	Cheng X. B. ; Zhang R. ; Zhao C. Z. ; Zhang Q. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10403. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115
14	Fang C. C. ; Li J. X. ; Zhang M. H. ; Zhang Y. H. ; Yang F. ; Lee J. Z. ; Lee M. H. ; Alvarado J. ; Schroeder M. A. ; Yang Y. Y. C. ; et al Nature 2019, 572, 511. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z
15	Ding J. F. ; Xu R. ; Ma X. X. ; Xiao Y. ; Yao Y. X. ; Yan C. ; Huang J. Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e2021156. doi: 10.1002/anie.202115602
16	Li W. D. ; Song B. H. ; Manthiram A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3006. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00875E
17	Wang Y. ; Liu Y. ; Tu Y. ; Wang Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 9099. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10535
18	Goodenough J. B. ; Kim Y. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587. doi: 10.1021/cm901452z
19	Manthiram A. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1550. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15355-0
20	Lyu Y. C. ; Wu X. ; Wang K. ; Feng Z. J. ; Cheng T. ; Liu Y. ; Wang M. ; Chen R. M. ; Xu L. M. ; Zhou J. J. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2000982. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000982
21	Asl H. Y. ; Manthiram A. Science 2020, 369, 140. doi: 10.1126/science.abc5454
22	Yu Z. ; Wang H. S. ; Kong X. ; Huang W. ; Tsao Y. C. ; Mackanic D. G. ; Wang K. C. ; Wang X. C. ; Huang W. X. ; Choudhury S. ; et al Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 526. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0634-5
23	Yu Z. ; Rudnicki P. E. ; Zhang Z. W. ; Huang Z. J. ; Celik H. ; Oyakhire S. T. ; Chen Y. L. ; Kong X. ; Kim S. C. ; Xiao X. ; et al Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 94. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00962-y
24	Zhang H. ; Eshetu G. G. ; Judez X. ; Li C. ; Rodriguez-Martinez L. M. ; Armand M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15002. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712702
25	Lee S. H. ; Hwang J. Y. ; Ming J. ; Cao Z. ; Nguyen H. A. ; Jung H. G. ; Kim J. ; Sun Y. K. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000567. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000567
26	Zhang S. ; Yang G. ; Liu Z. ; Li X. ; Wang X. ; Chen R. ; Wu F. ; Wang Z. ; Chen L. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 3310. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00848
27	Jiao S. ; Ren X. ; Cao R. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Liu Y. ; Hu D. ; Mei D. ; Zheng J. ; Zhao W. ; Li Q. ; et al Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 739. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0199-8
28	Pham T. D. ; Bin Faheem A. ; Chun S. Y. ; Rho J. R. ; Kwak K. ; Lee K. K. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003520. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202003520
29	Fan X. ; Chen L. ; Borodin O. ; Ji X. ; Chen J. ; Hou S. ; Deng T. ; Zheng J. ; Yang C. ; Liou S. C. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 715. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0183-2
30	Cao X. ; Zou L. ; Matthews B. E. ; Zhang L. ; He X. ; Ren X. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Burton S. D. ; El-Khoury P. Z. ; Lim H. -S. ; et al Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 34, 76. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.08.035
31	He M. ; Hu L. ; Xue Z. ; Su C. C. ; Redfern P. ; Curtiss L. A. ; Polzin B. ; von Cresce A. ; Xu K. ; Zhang Z. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A1725. doi: 10.1149/2.0231509jes
32	Markevich E. ; Salitra G. ; Aurbach D. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1337. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00163
33	Zhang X. -Q. ; Cheng X. -B. ; Chen X. ; Yan C. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605989. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201605989
34	Zhang Z. ; Hu L. ; Wu H. ; Weng W. ; Koh M. ; Redfern P. C. ; Curtiss L. A. ; Amine K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1806. doi: 10.1039/c3ee24414h
35	von Aspern N. ; Roschenthaler G. V. ; Winter M. ; Cekic-Laskovic I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15978. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901381
36	Cao X. ; Jia H. ; Xu W. ; Zhang J. -G. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 010522. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e
37	Xue W. ; Huang M. ; Li Y. ; Zhu Y. G. ; Gao R. ; Xiao X. ; Zhang W. ; Li S. ; Xu G. ; Yu Y. ; et al Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 495. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00792-y
38	Yamada Y. ; Yamada A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A2406. doi: 10.1149/2.0041514jes
39	Wu C. ; Zhou Y. ; Zhu X. L. ; Zhan M. Z. ; Yang H. X. ; Qian J. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2008044. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008044
	吴晨; 周颖; 朱晓龙; 詹忞之; 杨汉西; 钱江锋. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2008044. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008044
40	Yamada Y. ; Wang J. ; Ko S. ; Watanabe E. ; Yamada A. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 269. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z
41	Qian J. F. ; Henderson W. A. ; Xu W. ; Bhattacharya P. ; Engelhard M. ; Borodin O. ; Zhang J. G. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6362. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7362(2015
42	Suo L. ; Xue W. ; Gobet M. ; Greenbaum S. G. ; Wang C. ; Chen Y. ; Yang W. ; Li Y. ; Li J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712895115
43	Ren X. ; Zou L. ; Jiao S. ; Mei D. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Li Q. ; Lee H. ; Niu C. ; Adams B. D. ; Wang C. ; et al ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 896. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00381
44	Wang J. ; Yamada Y. ; Sodeyama K. ; Chiang C. H. ; Tateyama Y. ; Yamada A. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12032. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12032
45	Wang J. ; Yamada Y. ; Sodeyama K. ; Watanabe E. ; Takada K. ; Tateyama Y. ; Yamada A. Nat. Energy 2017, 3, 22. doi: 10.1038/s41560-017-0033-8
46	Wang A. A. ; Gunnarsdottir A. B. ; Fawdon J. ; Pasta M. ; Grey C. P. ; Monroe C. W. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 3086. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01213
47	Jiang G. ; Li F. ; Wang H. ; Wu M. ; Qi S. ; Liu X. ; Yang S. ; Ma J. Small Structures 2021, 2, 2000122. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202000122
48	Ren X. ; Chen S. ; Lee H. ; Mei D. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Burton S. D. ; Zhao W. ; Zheng J. ; Li Q. ; Ding M. S. ; et al Chem. 2018, 4, 1877. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.002
49	Chen S. ; Zheng J. ; Mei D. ; Han K. S. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Zhao W. ; Xu W. ; Liu J. ; Zhang J. G. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1706102. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706102
50	Lee Y. ; Lee T. K. ; Kim S. ; Lee J. ; Ahn Y. ; Kim K. ; Ma H. ; Park G. ; Lee S. -M. ; Kwak S. K. ; et al Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104309. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104309
51	Ren X. ; Zou L. ; Cao X. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Liu W. ; Burton S. D. ; Lee H. ; Niu C. ; Matthews B. E. ; Zhu Z. ; et al Joule 2019, 3, 1662. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.006
52	Ren X. ; Gao P. ; Zou L. ; Jiao S. ; Cao X. ; Zhang X. ; Jia H. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Matthews B. E. ; Wu H. ; et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 28603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010852117
53	Yoo D. J. ; Yang S. ; Kim K. J. ; Choi J. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14869. doi: 10.1002/anie.202003663
54	Fan X. ; Ji X. ; Chen L. ; Chen J. ; Deng T. ; Han F. ; Yue J. ; Piao N. ; Wang R. ; Zhou X. ; et al Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 882. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3
55	Cao X. ; Ren X. ; Zou L. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Huang W. ; Wang H. ; Matthews B. E. ; Lee H. ; Niu C. ; Arey B. W. ; et al Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 796. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0464-5
56	Piao N. ; Ji X. ; Xu H. ; Fan X. ; Chen L. ; Liu S. ; Garaga M. N. ; Greenbaum S. G. ; Wang L. ; Wang C. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903568. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903568
57	Cao X. ; Gao P. ; Ren X. ; Zou L. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Matthews B. E. ; Hu J. ; Niu C. ; Liu D. ; Arey B. W. ; et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, 9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020357118
58	Yao N. ; Chen X. ; Shen X. ; Zhang R. ; Fu Z. H. ; Ma X. X. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Li B. Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21473. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107657
59	Ding J. F. ; Xu R. ; Yao N. ; Chen X. ; Xiao Y. ; Yao Y. X. ; Yan C. ; Xie J. ; Huang J. Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11442. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101627
60	Gupta A. ; Manthiram A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001972. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202001972
61	Zhao F. P. ; Zhang S. M. ; Li Y. G. ; Sun X. L. Small Structures 2022, 3, 2100146. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202100146
62	Ren F. ; Li Z. ; Chen J. ; Huguet P. ; Peng Z. ; Deabate S. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 4211. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c21638
63	Amanchukwu C. V. ; Kong X. ; Qin J. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. N. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1902116. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902116
64	Perez Beltran S. ; Cao X. ; Zhang J. -G. ; Balbuena P. B. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 5973. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00987
65	Perez Beltran S. ; Cao X. ; Zhang J. -G. ; El-Khoury P. Z. ; Balbuena P. B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 17459. doi: 10.1039/d1ta04737j
66	Dong L. ; Liu Y. ; Wen K. ; Chen D. ; Rao D. ; Liu J. ; Yuan B. ; Dong Y. ; Wu Z. ; Liang Y. ; et al Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2104699. doi: 10.1002/advs.202104699
67	Zheng Y. ; Balbuena P. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 104702. doi: 10.1063/5.0042896
68	Jiang Z. P. ; Zeng Z. Q. ; Liang X. M. ; Yang L. ; Hu W. ; Zhang C. ; Han Z. L. ; Feng J. W. ; Xie J. Adv. Func. Mater. 2021, 31, 2005991. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202005991
69	Jiang Z. P. ; Zeng Z. Q. ; Zhai B. Y. ; Li X. ; Hu W. ; Zhang H. ; Cheng S. J. ; Xie J. J. Power Sources 2021, 506, 230086. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230086
70	Chang Z. ; Qiao Y. ; Deng H. ; Yang H. ; He P. ; Zhou H. Joule 2020, 4, 1776. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.011
71	Zhu X. ; Chang Z. ; Yang H. ; Qian Y. ; He P. ; Zhou H. Energy Stor. Mater. 2022, 44, 360. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.022
72	Li T. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Yao N. ; Yao Y. X. ; Hou L. P. ; Chen X. ; Zhou M. Y. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22683. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107732
73	Holoubek J. ; Liu H. ; Wu Z. ; Yin Y. ; Xing X. ; Cai G. ; Yu S. ; Zhou H. ; Pascal T. A. ; Chen Z. ; et al Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 303. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00783-z
74	Yao Y. X. ; Chen X. ; Yan C. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Cai W. L. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 4090. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011482
75	Wang H. ; Yu Z. ; Kong X. ; Huang W. ; Zhang Z. ; Mackanic D. G. ; Huang X. ; Qin J. ; Bao Z. ; Cui Y. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2008619. doi: 10.1002/adma.202008619
76	Amanchukwu C. V. ; Yu Z. ; Kong X. ; Qin J. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7393. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11056
77	Chen Y. ; Yu Z. ; Rudnicki P. ; Gong H. ; Huang Z. ; Kim S. C. ; Lai J. C. ; Kong X. ; Qin J. ; Cui Y. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 18703. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c09006
78	Kim S. C. ; Kong X. ; Vila R. A. ; Huang W. ; Chen Y. ; Boyle D. T. ; Yu Z. ; Wang H. ; Bao Z. ; Qin J. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 10301. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03868
79	Zhang Z. W. ; Li Y. Z. ; Xu R. ; Zhou W. J. ; Li Y. B. ; Oyakhire S. T. ; Wu Y. C. ; Xu J. W. ; Wang H. S. ; Yu Z. A. ; et al Science 2022, 375, 66. doi: 10.1126/science.abi8703
80	Ma P. ; Mirmira P. ; Amanchukwu C. V. ACS. Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1232. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00503
81	Han H. B. ; Zhou S. S. ; Zhang D. J. ; Feng S. W. ; Li L. F. ; Liu K. ; Feng W. F. ; Nie J. ; Li H. ; Huang X. J. ; et al J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 3623. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.040
82	Dahbi M. ; Ghamouss F. ; Tran-Van F. ; Lemordant D. ; Anouti M. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 9743. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.071
83	Shyamsunder A. ; Beichel W. ; Klose P. ; Pang Q. ; Scherer H. ; Hoffmann A. ; Murphy G. K. ; Krossing I. ; Nazar L. F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6192. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701026
84	Feng S. ; Huang M. ; Lamb J. R. ; Zhang W. ; Tatara R. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhu Y. G. ; Perkinson C. F. ; Johnson J. A. ; Shao-Horn Y. Chem. 2019, 5, 2630. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.003
85	Xue W. ; Shi Z. ; Huang M. ; Feng S. ; Wang C. ; Wang F. ; Lopez J. ; Qiao B. ; Xu G. ; Zhang W. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 212. doi: 10.1039/c9ee02538c
86	Xue W. ; Gao R. ; Shi Z. ; Xiao X. ; Zhang W. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhu Y. G. ; Waluyo I. ; Li Y. ; Hill M. R. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 6030. doi: 10.1039/d1ee01265g
87	Zhang Y. ; Viswanathan V. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 5821. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01522
88	Su C. -C. ; He M. ; Amine R. ; Chen Z. ; Sahore R. ; Dietz Rago N. ; Amine K. Energy Stor. Mater. 2019, 17, 284. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.003
89	Markevich E. ; Salitra G. ; Chesneau F. ; Schmidt M. ; Aurbach D. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1321. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00300
90	Zhang X. Q. ; Chen X. ; Cheng X. B. ; Li B. Q. ; Shen X. ; Yan C. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5301. doi: 10.1002/anie.201801513
91	Zhang Y. M. ; Krishnamurthy D. ; Viswanathan V. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 070554. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab836b
92	Zhu Y. Y. ; Pande V. ; Li L. S. ; Wen B. H. ; Pan M. S. ; Wang D. ; Ma Z. F. ; Viswanathan V. ; Chiang Y. M. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001923117
93	Su C. C. ; He M. N. ; Cai M. ; Shi J. Y. ; Amine R. ; Rago N. D. ; Guo J. C. ; Rojas T. ; Ngo A. T. ; Amine K. Nano Energy 2022, 92, 106720. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106720
94	Xiao P. T. ; Zhao Y. ; Piao Z. H. ; Li B. H. ; Zhou G. M. ; Cheng H. M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, doi: 10.1039/d1ee02959b
95	Yang Y. ; Yan C. ; Huang J. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37 (11), 2010076.
	杨毅; 闫崇; 黄佳琦. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37 (11), 2010076. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010076
96	Yu L. ; Wang J. ; Xu Z. J. Small Structures 2020, 2, 2000043. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202000043
97	Liu H. ; Li T. ; Xu X. Q. ; Shi P. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Xu R. ; Cheng X. B. ; Huang J. Q. Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 37, 152. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2021.03.021
98	Hobold G. M. ; Lopez J. ; Guo R. ; Minafra N. ; Banerjee A. ; Shirley Meng Y. ; Shao-Horn Y. ; Gallant B. M. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 951. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00910-w
99	Xu Y. ; Dong K. ; Jie Y. ; Adelhelm P. ; Chen Y. ; Xu L. ; Yu P. ; Kim J. ; Kochovski Z. ; Yu Z. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200398. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202200398

Electrolyte Formula	Coulombic Efficiency	Cell Configuration	Protocol	Discharge Capacity	Ref.
1 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/FDMB	99.52%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC532	3.0–4.2 V, N/P ~6, E/C ~30 g?Ah^?1, 1/3C	420 cycles, 90%	22
		20 μm Li\|\|NMC532	2.7–4.2 V, N/P ~2.5, E/C ~6 g?Ah^?1, 1/3C	210 cycles, 100%	22
		Li\|\|NMC532 anode free	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~2 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–1/3C	100 cycles, 80%	22
1 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/FDMH/DME	99.5%	20 μm Li\|\|NMC532	3.0–4.2 V, N/P ~1.6, 1/3C	250 cycles, 84%	75
		20 μm Li\|\|NMC532	2.8–4.4 V, N/P ~2, 1/2C	250 cycles, 76%	75
		Li\|\|NMC811 anode free	2.8–4.2 V, 40–50 mA	120 cycles, 75%	75
4 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DME	99.04%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, 0.8–1.3 mA?cm^?2	94 cycles, 80%	77
4 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/DEE	99.38%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, 0.8–1.3 mA?cm^?2	182 cycles, 80%	77
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/F3DEE	99.3%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~8 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–1/3C	120 cycles, 80%	23
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/F6DEE	99.3%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~8 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–1/3C	120 cycles, 80%	23
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/F4DEE	99.5%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~8 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–1/3C	170 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C ~2.4 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–2C	110 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C ~2.4 g?Ah^?1, 1/2C–2C	110 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C ~2.4·g?Ah^?1, 1C–2C	80–90 cycles	23
1.2 mol?L^?1 LiFSI/F5DEE	99.5%	50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~8 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–1/3C	200 cycles, 80%	23
		50 μm Li\|\|NMC811	2.8–4.4 V, E/C ~8 g?Ah^?1, 1/10C–1/3C	270 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C ~2.4 g?Ah^?1, 1/5C–2C	140 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C~2.4 g?Ah^?1, 1/2C–2C	110 cycles, 80%	23
		Cu\|\|LFP	2.5–3.84 V, E/C~2.4 g?Ah^?1, 1C–2C	80-90 cycles	23

[1]	薛国勇, 李静, 陈俊超, 陈代前, 胡晨吉, 唐凌飞, 陈博文, 易若玮, 沈炎宾, 陈立桅. 单离子聚合物快离子导体[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2205012 -0 .
[2]	齐亚娥, 夏永姚. 电解液调控策略提升水系锌离子电池正极材料电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2205045 -0 .
[3]	朱迎迎, 王勇, 徐淼, 吴勇民, 汤卫平, 朱地, 何雨石, 马紫峰, 李林森. 追踪锂金属负极的压力与形貌变化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2110040 -0 .
[4]	赵雨萌, 任凌霄, 王澳轩, 罗加严. 锂金属电池中的复合负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008090 - .
[5]	吴晨, 周颖, 朱晓龙, 詹忞之, 杨汉西, 钱江锋. 锂金属电池用高浓度电解液体系研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008044 - .
[6]	杨毅, 闫崇, 黄佳琦. 锂电池中固体电解质界面研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(11): 2010076 - .
[7]	郑国瑞, 向宇轩, 杨勇. 中子深度剖析技术研究可充锂金属负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2008094 - .
[8]	王木钦, 彭哲, 林欢, 李振东, 刘健, 任重民, 何海勇, 王德宇. 一种有助于稳定锂金属循环的富氟化位点框架结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2007016 - .
[9]	刘凡凡, 张志文, 叶淑芬, 姚雨, 余彦. 锂金属负极的挑战与改善策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2006021 - .
[10]	刘兴蕊,严会娟,王栋,万立骏. 单晶硅片负极界面形貌的原位AFM探测[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(1): 283 -289 .
[11]	袁铮, 崔永丽, 沈明芳, 强颖怀, 庄全超. LiTi₂(PO₄)₃/C 复合材料的制备及电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(05): 1169 -1176 .

氟代溶剂在锂金属电池中的应用

Fluorinated Solvents for Lithium Metal Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 99

相关文章 11

Metrics

推荐阅读 0