室温光驱动甲烷活化

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

如何在较温和的条件下将甲烷转化为其它更有价值的有机衍生物，如醇、芳烃、长链烷烃和烯烃等，长期以来是催化、化学及化工领域的热点课题和难点课题之一。为了提高甲烷的转化效率，过去几十年里，研究人员不断开发新的催化剂和新的反应路径。与传统高温热催化方法相比，如果能利用自然界中丰富的太阳能驱动甲烷转化，将同时满足能源和环保两方面的要求，是各种新型非常规策略中比较令人期待的一种。本文从光催化材料的组成、结构及催化路线、催化机制等方面进行总结，对当前室温光活化甲烷分子的研究现状加以论述。

关键词: 甲烷转化, C―H键活化, 光催化, 无氧脱氢, 分子筛, 半导体

Abstract:

Methane, the most abundant constituent of natural gas, is a potential substitute for the dwindling petroleum resources for the chemical industry as a carbon-based feedstock. Over the last two decades, global research endeavors have focused on the development of more efficient and selective catalysts for the conversion of ubiquitous but inert methane. In addition, the transportation of gaseous methane in pipelines is unavoidably accompanied by leakage, and methane is recognized as a potent greenhouse gas (20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide per molecule). Thus, the conversion of methane into heavier derivatives is also of crucial environmental concern. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of economical and practical routes for methane conversion. Currently, the major route for methane conversion is the steam reforming of methane into synthetic gases, which is a multistep and energy-consuming route. Another option is to use photoenergy to drive the conversion of methane, which has significant advantages such as the capacity to minimize coking by running at room temperature. A promising approach to photocatalytic methane conversion is the photo-powered direct coupling or oxidation of methane to form ethane, methanol and hydrogen. The ethane or methanol produced can, in turn, be converted into ethene or liquid fuels through metathesis or dehydrogenation, respectively. Furthermore, the direct dehydrogenation of methane is the best way to produce clean H₂ energy from fossil fuels since methane has the highest H/C ratio among hydrocarbons. However, the methane conversion efficiency of previously reported photocatalysts is low. Furthermore, the wavelength of light used in previously reported photocatalytic systems usually needs to be less than 270 nm, which is beyond the range of the solar spectrum (wavelength λ > 290 nm) reaching the Earth's surface. To achieve substantial yield and selectivity, and to exploit solar energy effectively, the development of photocatalytic systems with distinctly higher activity, higher selectivity, and lower photon energy threshold is desired. Over the past decades, many efforts have been made to activate the strong C―H bond in methane by light at room temperature. Based on the current state of research on photocatalytic methane conversion, we have focused our review on the following aspects: non-oxidative coupling of methane, dehydroaromatization of methane, and total and partial oxidation of methane. Finally, we summarize the difference between photocatalysis and thermal catalysis in the methane conversion reaction.

Key words: Methane conversion, C―H bond activation, Photocatalysis, Non-oxidative dehydrogenation, Zeolites, Semiconductors

母晓玥,李路. 室温光驱动甲烷活化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9), 968-976. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810007

Xiaoyue MU,Lu LI. Photo-Induced Activation of Methane at Room Temperature[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2019, 35(9), 968-976. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810007

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810007

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V35/I9/968

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 54

1	Choudhary V. R. ; Kinage A. K. ; Choudhary T. V. Science 1997, 275, 1286. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1286
2	Lunsford J. H. Catal. Today 2000, 63, 165. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00456-9
3	Holmen A. Catal. Today 2009, 142, 2. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.01.004
4	Schwach P. ; Pan X. L. ; Bao X. H. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8497. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00715
5	Gunsalus N. J. ; Koppaka A. ; Park S. H. ; Bischof S. M. ; Hashiguchi B. G. ; Periana R. A. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8521. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00739
6	Tang P. ; Zhu Q. J. ; Wu Z. X. ; Ma D. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2580. doi: 10.1039/C4EE00604F
7	Richard A. K. Science 2010, 328, 1624. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5986.1624
8	Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10096. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006424
9	Lelieveld J. ; Lechtenböhmer S. ; Assonov S. S. ; Brenninkmeijer C. A. M. ; Dienst C. ; Fischedick M. ; Hanke T. Nature 2005, 434, 841. doi: 10.1038/434841a
10	Bergman R. G. Nature 2007, 446, 391. doi: 10.1038/446391a
11	Arora S. ; Prasad R. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 108668. doi: 10.1039/C6RA20450C
12	Pakhare D. ; Spivey J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7813. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60395D
13	Jones G. ; Jakobsen J. G. ; Shim S. S. ; Kleis J. ; Andersson M. P. ; Rossmeisl J. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Bligaard T. ; Helveg S. ; Hinnemann B. ; et al J. Catal. 2008, 259, 147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.08.003
14	Hook J. P. V. Catal. Rev. -Sci. Eng. 1980, 21, 1. doi: 10.1080/03602458008068059
15	Latimer A. A. ; Kulkarni A. R. ; AljamaH. ; Montoya J. H. ; Yoo J. S. ; Tsai C. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Studt F. ; Nørskov J. K. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 225. doi: 10.1038/nmat4760
16	Liang Z. ; Li T. ; Kim M. ; Asthagiri A. ; Weaver J. F. Science 2017, 356, 299. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9147
17	Labinger J. A. ; Bercaw J. E. Nature 2002, 417, 507. doi: 10.1038/417507a
18	Sushkevich V. L. ; Palagin D. ; Ranocchiari M. ; van Bokhoven J. A. Science 2017, 356, 523. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9035
19	Berndt H. ; Martin A. ; Brückner A. ; Schreier E. ; Müller D. ; Kosslick H. ; Wolf G.-U. ; Lücke B. J. Catal. 2000, 191, 384. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1999.2786
20	Periana R. A. ; Mironov O. ; Taube D. ; Bhalla G.C.J. J. Science 2003, 301, 814. doi: 10.1126/science.1086466
21	Lunsford J. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 970. doi: 10.1002/anie.199509701
22	Spivey J. J. ; Hutchings G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 792. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60259A
23	Zheng H. ; Ma D. ; Bao X. H. ; Hu J. Z. ; Kwak J. H. ; Wang Y. ; Peden C. H. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3722. doi: 10.1021/ja7110916
24	Wang L. ; Tao L. ; Xie M. ; Xu G. Catal. Lett. 1993, 21, 35. doi: 10.1007/BF00767368
25	Guo X. G. ; Fang G. Z. ; Li G. ; Ma H. ; Fan H. J. ; Yu L. ; Ma C. ; Wu X. ; Deng D. H. ; Wei M. M. ; et al Science 2014, 344, 616. doi: 10.1126/science.1253150
26	Cui X. J. ; Li H. B. ; Wang Y. ; Hu Y. L. ; Hua L. ; Li H. Y. ; Han X. W. ; Liu Q. F. ; Yang F. ; He L. M. ; et al Chem 2018, 4, 1902. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.006
27	Xu Y. D. ; Bao X. H. ; Lin L. W. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 386. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00124-0
28	Kato Y. ; Yoshida H. ; Hattori T. Chem. Commun. 1998, 21, 2389. doi: 10.1039/A806825I
29	Yuliati L. ; Yoshida H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1592. doi: 10.1039/B710575B
30	Yoshida H. ; Matsushita N. ; Kato Y. ; Hattori T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8355.
31	Li L. ; Li G.-D. ; Yan C. ; Mu X.-Y. ; Pan X.-L. ; Zou X.-X. ; Wang K.-X. ; Chen J.-S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8299. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102320
32	Dietl N. ; Engeser M. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4861. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901596
33	Copéret C. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 656. doi: 10.1021/cr900122p
34	Yuliati L. ; Hamajima T. ; Hattori T. ; Yoshida H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 7223. doi: 10.1021/jp712029w
35	Anderson M. W. ; Terasaki O. ; Ohsuna T. ; Philippou A. ; Mackay S. P. ; Ferreira A. ; Rocha J. ; Lidin S. Nature 1994, 367, 347. doi: 10.1038/367347a0
36	Li L. ; Cai Y.-Y. ; Li G.-D. ; Mu X.-Y. ; Wang K.-X. ; Chen J.-S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4702. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200045
37	Li L. ; Fan S. ; Mu X. ; Mi Z. ; Li C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7793. doi: 10.1021/ja5004119
38	Li L. ; Mu X. ; Liu W. ; Kong X. ; Fan S. ; Mi Z. ; Li C. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14106. doi: 10.1002/anie.201408754
39	Goldberger J. ; He R. R. ; Zhang Y. F. ; Lee S. ; Yan H. Q. ; Choi H. J. ; Yang P. D. Nature 2003, 422, 599. doi: 10.1038/nature01551
40	Ibbetson J. P. ; Fini P. T. ; Ness K. D. ; DenBaars S. P. ; Speck J. S. ; Mishra U. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 250. doi: 10.1063/1.126940
41	Eller B. S. ; Yang J. L. ; Nemanich R. J. J. Electron. Mat. 2014, 43, 4560. doi: 10.1007/s11664-014-3383-z
42	Meng L. ; Chen Z. ; Ma Z. ; He S. ; Hou Y. ; Li H. ; Yuan R. ; Huang X. ; Wang X. ; Wang X. ;et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459
43	Yu L. H. ; Shao Y. ; Li D. Z. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2017, 204, 216. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.039
44	Kaliaguine S. L. ; Shelimov B. N. ; Kazansky V. B. J. Catal. 1978, 55, 384. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(78)90225-7
45	Chen X. ; Li Y. ; Pan X. ; Cortie D. ; Huang X. ; Yi Z. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12273. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12273
46	Wada K. ; Yamada H. ; Watanabe Y. ; Mitsudo T. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1998, 94, 1771. doi: 10.1007/s10562-008-9491-8
47	López H. H. ; Martínez A. Catal. Lett. 2002, 83, 37. doi: 10.1023/A:1020649313699
48	Thampi K. R. ; Kiwi J. ; Grätzel M. Catal. Lett. 1988, 1, 109. doi: 10.1007/BF00765891
49	Ward M. D. ; Brazdil J. F. ; Mehandru S. P. ; Anderson A. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6515. doi: 10.1021/j100310a019
50	Wada K. ; Yoshida K. ; Watanabe Y. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 1647. doi: 10.1039/FT9959101647
51	Noceti R. P. ; Taylor C. E. ; D'Este J. R. Catal. Today 1997, 33, 199. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00155-1
52	Villa K. ; Murcia-López M. ; Andreu T. ; Morante J. R. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 163, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.055
53	Murcia-López S. ; Bacariza M. C. ; Villa K. ; Lopes J. M. ; Henriques C. ; Morante J. R. ; Andreu T. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2878. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03535
54	Hu A. H. ; Guo J. J. ; Pan H. ; Zuo Z. W. Science 2018. doi: 10.1126/science.aat9750

[1]	陈轼逸, 付家龙, 裘建平, 常国菊, 郝仕油. 废弃医用口罩衍生的碳量子点增强BiOBr/g-C₃N₄ S型异质结光催化降解聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100135 - .
[2]	黄火帅, 韦之栋, 严嘉玮, 池家晟, 苏千翔, 陈铭夏, 江治, 孙洋洲, 上官文峰. 揭示Zn_xCd_1−xS固溶体光催化析氢中的直接-间接带隙跃迁机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100141 - .
[3]	赵呈孝, 李昭霖, 吴东方, 杨小飞. SBA-15模板化共价三嗪框架增强光催化产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100149 - .
[4]	陈芸, 邓代洁, 徐丽, 朱兴旺, 李赫楠, 孙成明. 共价键调控电荷转移以实现自供能电化学传感平台对重金属离子的灵敏分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100144 - .
[5]	张凤英, 梅杨林, 蒋毓蔓, 郑申申, 郑凯波, 周莹. 瞬态吸收光谱在太阳能转化利用中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100118 - .
[6]	王文龙, 郝文韬, 何浪, 乔佳, 李宁, 陈朝秋, 覃勇. 碳量子点/TiO₂ S型异质结的能带和吸附工程促进光催化CO₂甲烷化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100116 - .
[7]	韦梦兰, 欧晓霞, 王艺濛, 张梦圆, 滕飞, 王凯旋. S型异质结g-C₃N₄/Bi₂WO₆高效降解左氧氟沙星：性能、机理及降解路径[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100105 - .
[8]	李静萍, 严素定, 吴佳曦, 程强, 王楷. LiFePO₄改善无机/有机S型光催化剂的过氧化氢光合作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100104 - .
[9]	吴琦, 王长华, 李莹莹, 张昕彤. 增强g-C₃N₄@BN范德华异质结界面上的三重态电子转移增强光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100107 - .
[10]	蔡家杰, 程畅, 刘博文, 张建军, 姜传佳, 程蓓. CdS/DBTSO-BDTO S型异质结光催化制氢及其电荷转移动力学[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100084 - .
[11]	袁乐汪, 彭垚垚, 管宗杰, 方煜. 二维共价有机框架作为光催化剂在有机合成中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100086 - .
[12]	王玉, 石海洋, 陈子涵, 陈峰, 王苹, 王雪飞. 具有富电子Pt^δ−壳层的空心AgPt@Pt核壳催化剂：提升光催化H₂O₂生成选择性与活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100081 - .
[13]	刘方璇, 刘子妍, 周国伟, 高婷婷, 刘文宇, 孙彬. 中空结构光催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100071 - .
[14]	罗雅丹, 郑浩, 李鑫, 李锋民, 唐华, 佘希林. 调节O, S共掺杂C₃N₄中的活性氧生成以促进光催化降解微塑料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(6): 100052 - .
[15]	宋相海, 刘晓颖, 任智祥, 刘想, 汪梅, 吴元锋, 周伟强, 朱志, 霍鹏伟. 氮掺杂显著提升BiOBr光催化还原CO₂性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(6): 100055 - .