非共价作用对气相中B-DNA双螺旋结构稳定性的贡献:基于GEBF方法的密度泛函理论计算

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201505111

物理化学学报 >> 2015, Vol. 31 >> Issue (7): 1309-1314.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201505111

非共价作用对气相中B-DNA双螺旋结构稳定性的贡献:基于GEBF方法的密度泛函理论计算

花书贵¹, 金浩¹, 欧阳永中²

1 江苏第二师范学院生命科学与化学化工学院, 江苏省生物功能分子重点建设实验室, 南京210013;
2 东华理工大学软件学院, 南昌市气相分子科学重点实验室, 南昌330013

收稿日期:2015-03-16 修回日期:2015-05-11 发布日期:2015-07-08
通讯作者: 花书贵 E-mail:shugui.hua@gmail.com
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金(BK20130748), 江苏省高校自然科学研究项目(13KJB150012), 江西省自然科学基金(20142BAB213010)和国家自然科学基金(21405013)资助项目

Contribution of Non-Covalent Interactions to the Gas-Phase Stability of the Double-Helix of B-DNA: A Density Functional Theory Study with GEBF Approach

HUA Shu-Gui¹, JIN Hao¹, OUYANG Yong-Zhong²

1 College of Life Science and Chemistry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biological Functional Molecules, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing 210013, P. R. China;
2 Software College, Nanchang Key Laboratory for Gas Phase Molecular Science, East China Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330013, P. R. China

Received:2015-03-16 Revised:2015-05-11 Published:2015-07-08
Contact: HUA Shu-Gu E-mail:shugui.hua@gmail.com
Supported by:
The project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation in Jiangsu Province of China (BK20130748), Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province of China (13KJB150012), Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (20142BAB213010), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (21405013).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用密度泛函理论, 将基于能量的分子片方法(GEBF)应用于气相中优化B型脱氧核糖核酸(碱基对数目N=2, 5, 10)双螺旋构型的结构. 通过比较M06-2X泛函和其他方法(B3LYP、B3LYP-vdW和TPSS泛函)的结果, 发现不考虑碱基之间的π-π堆积作用将会导致碱基之间的纵向距离拉长. 随着体系双螺旋链长的增加, 没有考虑碱基堆积作用而导致的相邻碱基纵向距离拉长的程度快速衰减. 计算表明, 气相中B-DNA双螺旋结构的稳定性来源于其作用力(主要是氢键和π-π堆积作用)的协同性, 对不多于10组碱基对的体系而言, 其氢键的贡献明显大于碱基堆积作用.

关键词: 碱基对, 氢键, 基于能量的分子片方法, π-π堆积作用

Abstract:

We employed the generalized energy-based fragmentation (GEBF) approach to investigate the gas-phase structures of B-DNA double-helices up to 10 base pairs at several theoretical levels. By comparing the results obtained using the M06-2X functional and other methods (including the B3LYP, B3LYP-vdW, and TPSS functionals), we found that the absence of stacking interactions could lead to the enlargement of the vertical distance between adjacent bases. The magnitude of this enlargement of the vertical distance quickly decreases as the length of the double-helix increases. The gas-phase stabilization of the double-helical structure of B-DNA is a cooperative effect, in which hydrogen bonding plays a more important role than stacking interaction does up to 10 base pairs.

Key words: Base pair, Hydrogen bond, Generalized energy-based fragmentation approach, π-π stacking interaction

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

花书贵, 金浩, 欧阳永中. 非共价作用对气相中B-DNA双螺旋结构稳定性的贡献:基于GEBF方法的密度泛函理论计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(7): 1309-1314.

HUA Shu-Gui, JIN Hao, OUYANG Yong-Zhong. Contribution of Non-Covalent Interactions to the Gas-Phase Stability of the Double-Helix of B-DNA: A Density Functional Theory Study with GEBF Approach[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2015, 31(7): 1309-1314.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201505111

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V31/I7/1309

参考文献

(1) Šponer, J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 2595. doi: 10.1039/b719370j
(2) Gil, A.; Branchadell, V.; Bertran, J.; Oliva, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 4907. doi: 10.1021/jp809737c
(3) Banáš, P.; Mládek, A.; Otyepka, M.; Zgarbová, M.; Jure?ka, P.; Svozil, D.; Lankaš, F.; Šponer, J. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2448. doi: 10.1021/ct3001238
(4) Sedlák, R.; Jure?ka, P.; Hobza, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 075104. doi: 10.1063/1.2759207
(5) Pitoňák, M.; Neogrády, P.; Hobza, P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1369. doi: 10.1039/B919354E
(6) Riley, K. E.; Pionak, M.; Jurecka, P.; Hobza, P. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5023. doi: 10.1021/cr1000173
(7) Zhang, Y.; Ma, N.; Wang, W. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2012, 11, 1165. doi: 10.1142/S0219633612500770
(8) Jones, G. J.; Robertazzi, A.; Platts, J. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 3315. doi: 10.1021/jp400345s
(9) Wilson, K. A.; Kellie, J. L.; Wetmore, S. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 6726. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku269
(10) Elstner, M.; Hobza, P.; Frauenheim, T.; Suhai, S.; Kaxiras, E. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 5149. doi: 10.1063/1.1329889
(11) ?erný, J.; Kabelá?, M.; Hobza, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16055. doi: 10.1021/ja805428q
(12) Cooper, V. R.; Thonhauser, T.; Langreth, D. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 204102. doi: 10.1063/1.2924133
(13) Cooper, V. R.; Thonhauser, T.; Puzder, A.; Schröder, E.; Lundqvist, B. I.; Langreth, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1305.
(14) Šponer, J.; Mládek, A.; Špa?ková, N.; Cang, X.; Cheatham, T.; Grimme, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9785. doi: 10.1021/ja402525c
(15) Barone, G.; Guerra, C.; Bickelhaupt, F. ChemistryOpen 2013, 2, 186. doi: 10.1002/open.v2.5/6
(16) Grunenberg, J.; Barone, G.; Spinello, A. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 2901. doi: 10.1021/ct500329f
(17) Hesselmann, A.; Jansen, G.; Schütz, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11730. doi: 10.1021/ja0633363
(18) Fiethen, A.; Jansen, G.; Hesselmann, A.; Schütz, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1802. doi: 10.1021/ja076781m
(19) Koby?ecka, M.; Leszczynski, J.; Rak, J. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 085103. doi: 10.1063/1.3204939
(20) Churchill, C. D. M.; Wetmore, S. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 16046. doi: 10.1021/jp907887y
(21) Svozil, D.; Hobza, P.; Šponer, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 1191.
(22) Sharma, P.; Lait, L. A.; Wetmore, S. D. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 2435. doi: 10.1039/c2cp43910g
(23) Sharma, P.; Lait, L. A.; Wetmore, S. D. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 15538. doi: 10.1039/c3cp52656a
(24) Šponer, J.; Florián, J.; Ng, H. L.; Šponer, J. E.; Špacková, N. Nucleic Acids Research 2000, 28, 4893. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.24.4893
(25) Yakovchuk, P.; Protozanova, E.; Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34, 564. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj454
(26) Vijayaraghavan, R.; Izgorodin, A.; Ganesh, V.; Surianarayanan, M.; MacFarlane, D. R. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2010, 49, 1631. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906610
(27) Li, W.; Li, S.; Jiang, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 2193. doi: 10.1021/jp067721q
(28) Deev, V.; Collins, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154102. doi: 10.1063/1.1879792
(29) Collins, M. A.; Deev, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 104104. doi: 10.1063/1.2347710
(30) Addicoat, M. A.; Collins, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 104103. doi: 10.1063/1.3222639
(31) Ganesh, V.; Dongare, R. K.; Balanarayan, P.; Gadre, S. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 104109. doi: 10.1063/1.2339019
(32) Deshmukh, M. M.; Gadre, S. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 7927.
(33) Ahalkar, A. P.; Katouda, M.; Gadre, S. R.; Nagase, S. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 2405.
(34) Bettens, R. P. A.; Lee, A. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 8777.
(35) Hua, W.; Fang, T.; Li, W.; Yu, J.; Li, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 10864. doi: 10.1021/jp8026385
(36) Dong, H.; Hua, S.; Li, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1335. doi: 10.1021/jp8071525
(37) Hua, S.; Hua, W.; Li, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 8126.
(38) Li, W. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 9.
(39) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H. B.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.01; Gaussian Inc.:Wallingford, CT, 2009.
(40) Li, S.; Li, W.; Fang, T.; Ma, J.; Hua, W.; Hua, S.; Jiang, Y. Low- Scaling Quantum Chemistry (LSQC), Version 2.2; Nanjing University: Nanjing, 2012.
(41) http://www.rcsb.org/.
(42) Wu, Q.; Yang, W. T. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 515. doi: 10.1063/1.1424928
(43) Rapacioli, M.; Spiegelman, F.; Talbi, D.; Mineva, T.; Goursot, A.; Heine, T.; Seifert, G. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 244304. doi: 10.1063/1.3152882

[1]	韩慧贤, 陈澜, 赵建成, 于海涛, 汪洋, 闫何恋, 王英雄, 薛智敏, 牟天成. 生物质基酸性低共熔溶剂用于高效溶解木质素及溶解机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212043 -0 .
[2]	李若宁, 张雪, 薛娜, 李杰, 吴天昊, 徐榛, 王一帆, 李娜, 唐浩, 侯士敏, 王永锋. Ag(111)表面Ag配位结构的分等级组装[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2011060 - .
[3]	曹冲, 张裴, 曹立冬, 刘铭鑫, 宋玉莹, 陈鹏, 黄啟良, 韩布兴. 液滴在超疏水植物叶面的沉积：实验和分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2207006 - .
[4]	高学庆, 杨树姣, 张伟, 曹睿. 胺和水插层磷酸锰仿生模拟氢键网络用于电催化水氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2007031 - .
[5]	吴智伟, 丁伟璐, 张雅琴, 王艳磊, 何宏艳. 咪唑类离子液体与酪氨酸相互作用及机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2002021 - .
[6]	刘小龙, 王强, 王超, 徐君, 邓风. Silicalite-1分子筛氢键诱导晶化机制的固体核磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905035 - .
[7]	李玉红,吴新平,刘聪,王萌,宋本腾,郁桂云,杨刚,侯文华,龚学庆,彭路明. 部分还原二氧化钛的NMR和EPR研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905021 - .
[8]	王粉粉, 王芃, 牛洪瑶, 余莹凤, 孙平川. 固体NMR研究PAA/PEO共混物中氢键相互作用与结构演化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1912016 - .
[9]	刘璐, 徐玉萍, 陈霞, 洪梅, 佟静. 1-烷基-3-甲基咪唑氯化物焓变的热重分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 2004014 - .
[10]	胡媛媛,王从洋. 双金属促进的均相碳氢键活化反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 913 -922 .
[11]	朱月路,赵鑫阳,吴谦,陈颖,赵劲. 多功能氧酰胺导向基在碳氢键活化反应中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 989 -1004 .
[12]	王庆兵,郭政伟,陈弓,何刚. 1, 1'-双(二苯基膦基)二茂铁介导的芳烃碳氢键芳基化反应制备联芳基骨架[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1021 -1026 .
[13]	潘明光,赵永升,曾小勤,邹建新. 偶氮苯基型离子液体溶液对空气中湿度的变色响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 624 -629 .
[14]	陈雯慧,陈胜利. 墨水溶剂对低铂含量质子交换膜燃料电池性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 517 -522 .
[15]	陈文君,薛智敏,王晋芳,蒋静云,赵新辉,牟天成. 低共熔溶剂的热稳定性研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 904 -911 .

非共价作用对气相中B-DNA双螺旋结构稳定性的贡献:基于GEBF方法的密度泛函理论计算

Contribution of Non-Covalent Interactions to the Gas-Phase Stability of the Double-Helix of B-DNA: A Density Functional Theory Study with GEBF Approach

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0