基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009033

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (7): 2009033.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009033

所属专题：电催化

基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原

郝磊端, 孙振宇()

有机-无机复合材料国家重点实验室，北京化工大学化学工程学院，北京 100029

收稿日期:2020-09-09 录用日期:2020-11-05 发布日期:2020-11-16
通讯作者: 孙振宇 E-mail:sunzy@mail.buct.edu.cn
作者简介:Zhenyu Sun was born in April 1977. He is currently a full professor in the College of Chemical Engineering at Beijing University of Chemical Technology (China). He completed his Ph.D. at Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2006. He did postdoctoral research in Trinity College Dublin (Ireland) from 2006 to 2008, at Ruhr University, Bochum (Germany) from 2011 to 2014, and University of Oxford from 2014 to 2015. He has obtained a Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers (Germany). His current research focuses on energy conversion reactions using two-dimensional materials
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21972010);北京市自然科学基金(2192039)

Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction

Leiduan Hao, Zhenyu Sun()

State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2020-09-09 Accepted:2020-11-05 Published:2020-11-16
Contact: Zhenyu Sun E-mail:sunzy@mail.buct.edu.cn
About author:Zhenyu Sun, Email: sunzy@mail.buct.edu.cn. Tel.: +86-13301308339
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21972010);Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China(2192039)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

电催化方法还原二氧化碳制备高附加值化学品，在降低二氧化碳浓度、平衡碳循环和储存可再生途径产生的电能等方面展现较大潜力。通过设计高效电催化剂来降低二氧化碳电催化还原过程所需的过电位并提高产物的选择性和电流密度，对电催化还原二氧化碳的发展和应用具有重要意义。本文总结了金属氧化物基材料作为电催化剂在二氧化碳电还原中的最新研究进展，深入探讨了金属氧化物在催化反应中的作用、稳定性及结构性能关系，并对金属氧化物基材料在二氧化碳电还原中未来的设计和研究方向做出思考。

关键词: 二氧化碳电化学还原, 金属氧化物, 电催化剂, 选择性, 稳定性

Abstract:

The CO₂ level in the atmosphere has been increasing since the industrial revolution owing to anthropogenic activities. The increased CO₂ level has led to global warming and also has detrimental effects on human beings. Reducing the CO₂ level in the atmosphere is urgent for balancing the carbon cycle. In this regard, reduction in CO₂ emission and CO₂ storage and usage are the main strategies. Among these, CO₂ usage has been extensively explored, because it can reduce the CO₂ level and simultaneously provide opportunities for the development in catalysts and industries to convert CO₂ as a carbon source for preparing valuable products. However, transformation of CO₂ to other chemicals is challenging owing to its thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities. Among the CO₂ utilization techniques, electrochemical CO₂ reduction (ECR) is a promising alternative because it is generally conducted under ambient conditions, and water is used as the economical hydrogen source. Moreover, ECR offers a potential route to store electrical energy from renewable sources in the form of chemical energy, through generation of CO₂ reduction products. To improve the energy efficiency and viability of ECR, it is important to decrease the operational overpotential and maintain large current densities and high product selectivities; the development of efficient electrocatalysts is a critical aspect in this regard. To date, many kinds of materials have been designed and studied for application in ECR. Among these materials, metal oxide-based materials exhibit excellent performance as electrocatalysts for ECR and are attracting increasing attention in recent years. Investigation of the mechanism of reactions that involve metallic electrocatalysts has revealed the function of trace amount of oxidized metal species—it has been suggested that the presence of metal oxides and metal-oxygen bonds facilitates the activation of CO₂ and the subsequent formation and stabilization of the reaction intermediates, thereby resulting in high efficiency and selectivity of the ECR. Although the stability of metal oxides is a concern as they are prone to reduction under a cathodic potential, the catalytic performance of metal oxide-based catalysts can be maintained through careful designing of the morphology and structure of the materials. In addition, introducing other metal species to metal oxides and fabricating composites of metal oxides and other materials are effective strategies to achieve enhanced performance in ECR. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in the use of metal oxide-based materials as electrocatalysts and their application in ECR. The critical role, stability, and structure-performance relationship of the metal oxide-based materials for ECR are highlighted in the discussion. In the final part, we propose the future prospects for the development of metal oxide-based electrocatalysts for ECR.

Key words: Electrochemical CO₂ reduction, Metal oxides, Electrocatalysts, Selectivity, Stability

郝磊端, 孙振宇. 基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009033.

Leiduan Hao, Zhenyu Sun. Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2009033.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009033

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I7/2009033

图/表 20

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

Fig 15

Fig 16

Fig 17

Fig 18

Fig 19

Table 1

Summary of representative metal oxide-based materials for ECR."

Electrocatalyst	Electrolyte	Major product and maximum FE	Current density ^b	Stability	Ref.
O₂ plasma treated Cu	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	C₂H₄, 60.0% at −0.9 V versus RHE	N.A.	1 h	22
Cyclic voltammetry (CV)-treated Cu	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	C₂H₄, 40.0% at −1.0 V versus RHE	N.A.	N.A.	45
Multihollow Cu₂O	2 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	C₂₊ (C₂H₄, ethanol, propanol, acetic acid), 75.2% at −0.61 V versus RHE	C₂₊: 267 mA·cm⁻² at −0.61 V versus RHE	> 3 h	47
Cu-Cu₂O/Cu	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KCl	C₂ (ethanol, acetic acid), 80.7% at −0.4 V versus RHE	C₂: 11.5 mA·cm⁻² at −0.4 V versus RHE	24 h	48
Cu₂O@CuMOF	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	CH₄, 63.2% at −1.71 V versus RHE	CH₄: 8.4 mA·cm⁻² at −1.71 V versus RHE	1 h	50
Cu₂O-MWCNTs	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ NaHCO₃	CH₃OH, 38.0% at −0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl	7.5 mA·cm⁻² at −0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl	> 20 min	51
Cu₃NiOC	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 95.9% at −0.57 V versus RHE	HCOO⁻: 10.9 mA·cm⁻² at −0.57 V versus RHE	25 h	64
Cu/La₂CuO₄	1 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	CH₄, 56.3% at −1.4 V versus RHE	CH₄: 117 mA·cm⁻² at −1.4 V versus RHE	> 20 min	67
SnO_x	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 64.0% at −1.2 V versus Ag/AgCl	3 mA·cm⁻² at −1.2 V versus Ag/AgCl	2 h	74
SnO_x/Sn	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 89.0% at −1.7 V versus Ag/AgCl	6 mA·cm⁻² at −1.7 V versus Ag/AgCl	10 times of reuse	75
Cu/SnO₂	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	CO, 93.0% at −0.7 V versus RHE	4.6 mA·cm⁻² at −0.7 V versus RHE	N.A.	83
Cu/SnO_x	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	CO, 89.0% at −0.99 V versus RHE	CO: 11.3 mA·cm⁻² at −0.99 V versus RHE	N.A.	84
PbSnO₃/C	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ nBu₄NPF₆ in PC ^a	C₂O₄²⁻, 85.1% at −1.9 V versus Ag/Ag⁺	C₂O₄²⁻: 2.0 mA·cm⁻² at −1.9 V versus Ag/Ag⁺	N.A.	85
Zn₂SnO₄/SnO₂	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 77.0% at −1.08 V versus RHE	HCOO⁻: 5.77 mA·cm⁻² at −1.18 V versus RHE	24 h	86
1D wire in tube SnO₂	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 63.0% at −0.99 V versus RHE	N.A.	14 h	87
SnO₂ quantum wires	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 87.3% at −1.156 V versus RHE	HCOO⁻: 13.7 mA·cm⁻² at −1.156 V versus RHE	7	88
3D SnO₂ nanosheets on carbon cloth	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ NaHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 87.0% at −1.6 V versus Ag/AgCl	50 mA·cm⁻² at −1.6 V versus Ag/AgCl	24 h	89
Co₃O₄ layer of 1.72 nm thickness	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 64.3% at −0.88 V versus SCE	0.68 mA·cm⁻² at −0.88 V versus SCE	20 h	95
Bi₂O₃	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 91.0% at −0.9 V versus RHE	HCOO⁻: 8 mA·cm⁻² at −0.9 V versus RHE	24 h	102
Bi₂O₃@C	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 92.0% at −0.9 V versus RHE	HCOO⁻: 7.5 mA·cm⁻² at −0.9 V versus RHE	10 h	103
In₂O₃@C	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	HCOO⁻, 87.6% at −0.9 V versus RHE	14.8 mA·cm⁻² at −0.9 V versus RHE	12 h	111
ZnO nanosheets	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	CO, 83.0% at −1.1 V versus RHE	CO: 16.1 mA·cm⁻² at −1.1 V versus RHE	8 h	117
ZrO₂/N-doped carbon	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ KHCO₃	CO, 64.0% at −0.4 V versus RHE	2.6 mA·cm⁻² at −0.4 V versus RHE	5 h	119
Ga₂O₃	3.0 mol∙L⁻¹ KCl	HCOOH, 80.0% at −2 V versus Ag/AgCl	0.3 mA·cm⁻² at −2 V versus Ag/AgCl	50 cycles	120
RuO₂-coated diamond	pH = 3.9 aqueous solution	HCOOH, 40.0% at −0.6 V versus SCE	N.A.	N.A.	123

Table 1

参考文献 125

1	He M. ; Sun Y. ; Han B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9620. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209384
2	Shih C. F. ; Zhang T. ; Li J. ; Bai C. Joule 2018, 2, 1925. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.016
3	Bushuyev O. S. ; De Luna P. ; Dinh C. T. ; Tao L. ; Saur G. ; van de Lagemaat J. ; Kelley S. O. ; Sargent E. H. Joule 2018, 2, 825. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003
4	Zheng Y. ; Vasileff A. ; Zhou X. ; Jiao Y. ; Jaroniec M. ; Qiao S. -Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7646. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02124
5	Ning H. ; Wang W. H. ; Mao Q. H. ; Zheng S. R. ; Yang Z. X. ; Zhao Q. S. ; Wu M. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 938.
	宁汇; 王文行; 毛勤虎; 郑诗瑞; 杨中学; 赵青山; 吴明铂. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 938. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801263
6	Gao Y. N. ; Liu S. Z. ; Zhao Z. Q. ; Tao H. C. ; Sun Z. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 858.
	高云楠; 刘世桢; 赵振清; 陶亨聪; 孙振宇. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 858. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201802061
7	Fan Q. ; Zhang M. ; Jia M. ; Liu S. ; Qiu J. ; Sun Z. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 10, 280. doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.10.003
8	Xie H. ; Wang T. ; Liang J. ; Li Q. ; Sun S. Nano Today 2018, 21, 41. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.05.001
9	Zhu W. ; Michalsky R. ; Metin Ö. ; Lv H. ; Guo S. ; Wright C. J. ; Sun X. ; Peterson A. A. ; Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16833. doi: 10.1021/ja409445p
10	Yang M. ; Zhang J. ; Cao Y. ; Wu M. ; Qian K. ; Zhang Z. ; Liu H. ; Wang J. ; Chen W. ; Huang W. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 5128. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201801423
11	Chen Z. ; Yao S. ; Liu L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24651. doi: 10.1039/C7TA07495F
12	Zhang T. ; Qiu Y. ; Yao P. ; Li X. ; Zhang H. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15190. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01985
13	Meng Y. C. ; Kuang S. Y. ; Liu H. ; Fan Q. ; Ma X. B. ; Zhang S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2006034.
	孟怡辰; 况思宇; 刘海; 范群; 马新宾; 张生. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2006034. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006034
14	Jia M. ; Fan Q. ; Liu S. ; Qiu J. ; Sun Z. Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem. 2019, 16, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.11.002
15	Angamuthu R. ; Byers P. ; Lutz M. ; Spek A. L. ; Bouwman E. Science 2010, 327, 313. doi: 10.1126/science.1177981
16	Weng Z. ; Wu Y. ; Wang M. ; Jiang J. ; Yang K. ; Huo S. ; Wang X. -F. ; Ma Q. ; Brudvig G. W. ; Batista V. S. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02819-7
17	Ma T. ; Fan Q. ; Tao H. ; Han Z. ; Jia M. ; Gao Y. ; Ma W. ; Sun Z. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 472001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8f6f
18	Ma T. ; Fan Q. ; Li X. ; Qiu J. ; Wu T. ; Sun Z. J. CO₂ Util. 2019, 30, 168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.02.001
19	Sun Z. ; Ma T. ; Tao H. ; Fan Q. ; Han B. Chem 2017, 3, 560. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009
20	Bandi A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 2157. doi: 10.1149/1.2086903
21	Tayyebi E. ; Hussain J. ; Abghoui Y. ; Skúlason E. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 10078. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02224
22	Mistry H. ; Varela A. S. ; Bonifacio C. S. ; Zegkinoglou I. ; Sinev I. ; Choi Y. -W. ; Kisslinger K. ; Stach E. A. ; Yang J. C. ; Strasser P. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12123. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12123
23	Zhang R. ; Lv W. ; Lei L. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 24. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.006
24	Permyakova A. A. ; Herranz J. ; El Kazzi M. ; Diercks J. S. ; Povia M. ; Mangani L. R. ; Horisberger M. ; Pătru A. ; Schmidt T. J. ChemPhysChem 2019, 20, 3120. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201900468
25	Chu S. ; Yan X. ; Choi C. ; Hong S. ; Robertson A. ; Masa J. ; Han B. ; Jung Y. ; Sun Z. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 6540. doi: 10.1039/D0GC02279A
26	Kortlever R. ; Shen J. ; Schouten K. J. P. ; Calle-Vallejo F. ; Koper M. T. M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4073. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559
27	Kumar B. ; Atla V. ; Brian J. P. ; Kumari S. ; Nguyen T. Q. ; Sunkara M. ; Spurgeon J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3645. doi: 10.1002/anie.201612194
28	Peterson A. A. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Studt F. ; Rossmeisl J. ; Nørskov J. K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1311. doi: 10.1039/C0EE00071J
29	Cheng T. ; Xiao H. ; Goddard W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13802. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08534
30	Schouten K. J. P. ; Qin Z. ; Pérez Gallent E. ; Koper M. T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9864. doi: 10.1021/ja302668n
31	Gao D. ; Arán-Ais R. M. ; Jeon H. S. ; Roldan Cuenya B. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 198. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0235-5
32	Yang Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Hu J. S. ; Wan L. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1906085.
	杨艳; 张云; 胡劲松; 万立骏. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1906085. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906085
33	Mistry H. ; Reske R. ; Zeng Z. ; Zhao Z. -J. ; Greeley J. ; Strasser P. ; Cuenya B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16473. doi: 10.1021/ja508879j
34	Yang K. D. ; Ko W. R. ; Lee J. H. ; Kim S. J. ; Lee H. ; Lee M. H. ; Nam K. T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 796. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610432
35	Zhang Y. -J. ; Sethuraman V. ; Michalsky R. ; Peterson A. A. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3742. doi: 10.1021/cs5012298
36	Ma M. ; Djanashvili K. ; Smith W. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6680. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601282
37	Xiang H. ; Rasul S. ; Hou B. ; Portoles J. ; Cumpson P. ; Yu E. H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 601. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b16862
38	Wang H. ; Matios E. ; Wang C. ; Luo J. ; Lu X. ; Hu X. ; Li W. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3925. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01197
39	Li C. W. ; Kanan M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7231. doi: 10.1021/ja3010978
40	Eilert A. ; Cavalca F. ; Roberts F. S. ; Osterwalder J. ; Liu C. ; Favaro M. ; Crumlin E. J. ; Ogasawara H. ; Friebel D. ; Pettersson L. ; et al J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 285. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02273
41	Favaro M. ; Xiao H. ; Cheng T. ; Goddard W. A. ; Yano J. ; Crumlin E. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 6706. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701405114
42	Fields M. ; Hong X. ; Nørskov J. K. ; Chan K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 16209. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04983
43	Garza A. J. ; Bell A. T. ; Head-Gordon M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 601. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03180
44	Xiao H. ; Goddard W. A. ; Cheng T. ; Liu Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 6685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702405114
45	Chou T. -C. ; Chang C. -C. ; Yu H. -L. ; Yu W. -Y. ; Dong C. -L. ; Velasco-Vélez J. -J. ; Chuang C. -H. ; Chen L. -C. ; Lee J. -F. ; Chen J. -M. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2857. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11126
46	Velasco-Vélez J. -J. ; Jones T. ; Gao D. ; Carbonio E. ; Arrigo R. ; Hsu C. -J. ; Huang Y. -C. ; Dong C. -L. ; Chen J. -M. ; Lee J. -F. ; et al ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 1485. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05106
47	Yang P. -P. ; Zhang X. -L. ; Gao F. -Y. ; Zheng Y. -R. ; Niu Z. -Z. ; Yu X. ; Liu R. ; Wu Z. -Z. ; Qin S. ; Chi L. -P. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6400. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01699
48	Zhu Q. ; Sun X. ; Yang D. ; Ma J. ; Kang X. ; Zheng L. ; Zhang J. ; Wu Z. ; Han B. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3851. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11599-7
49	Zhang W. ; Huang C. ; Xiao Q. ; Yu L. ; Shuai L. ; An P. ; Zhang J. ; Qiu M. ; Ren Z. ; Yu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11417. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01562
50	Tan X. ; Yu C. ; Zhao C. ; Huang H. ; Yao X. ; Han X. ; Guo W. ; Cui S. ; Huang H. ; Qiu J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9904. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19111
51	Irfan Malik M. ; Malaibari Z. O. ; Atieh M. ; Abussaud B. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 152, 468. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.06.035
52	Gao D. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhou Z. ; Cai F. ; Zhao X. ; Huang W. ; Li Y. ; Zhu J. ; Liu P. ; Yang F. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5652. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00102
53	Lee C. W. ; Shin S. -J. ; Jung H. ; Nguyen D. L. T. ; Lee S. Y. ; Lee W. H. ; Won D. H. ; Kim M. G. ; Oh H. -S. ; Jang T. ; et al ACS Energy Letters 2019, 4, 2241. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01721
54	Chu S. L. ; Li X. ; Robertson A. W. ; Sun Z. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009023.
	楚森林; 李欣; Alex W. Robertson; 孙振宇. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009023
55	Lee S. ; Park G. ; Lee J. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8594. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02822
56	He J. ; Dettelbach K. E. ; Salvatore D. A. ; Li T. ; Berlinguette C. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6068. doi: 10.1002/anie.201612038
57	Li Y. ; Chu S. ; Shen H. ; Xia Q. ; Robertson A. W. ; Masa J. ; Siddiqui U. ; Sun Z. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 4948. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00800
58	Ren D. ; Ang B. S. -H. ; Yeo B. S. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8239. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02162
59	Chen K. ; Zhang X. ; Williams T. ; Bourgeois L. ; MacFarlane D. R. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 239, 84. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.019
60	An X. ; Li S. ; Yoshida A. ; Yu T. ; Wang Z. ; Hao X. ; Abudula A. ; Guan G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42114. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b13270
61	Larrazábal G. O. ; Martín A. J. ; Mitchell S. ; Hauert R. ; Pérez-Ramírez J. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 6265. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02067
62	Yang H. -P. ; Yue Y. -N. ; Qin S. ; Wang H. ; Lu J. -X. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3216. doi: 10.1039/C6GC00091F
63	Rasul S. ; Anjum D. H. ; Jedidi A. ; Minenkov Y. ; Cavallo L. ; Takanabe K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2146. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410233
64	Yang D. ; Zhu Q. ; Sun X. ; Chen C. ; Lu L. ; Guo W. ; Liu Z. ; Han B. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 3705. doi: 10.1039/C8GC01552J
65	Peña M. A. ; Fierro J. L. G. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1981. doi: 10.1021/cr980129f
66	Lu J. ; Zhu C. ; Pan C. ; Lin W. ; Lemmon J. P. ; Chen F. ; Li C. ; Xie K. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar5100. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5100
67	Chen S. ; Su Y. ; Deng P. ; Qi R. ; Zhu J. ; Chen J. ; Wang Z. ; Zhou L. ; Guo X. ; Xia B. Y. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4640. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00847
68	Nur Hossain M. ; Chen S. ; Chen A. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 259, 118096. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118096
69	Pang Y. ; Burdyny T. ; Dinh C. -T. ; Kibria M. G. ; Fan J. Z. ; Liu M. ; Sargent E. H. ; Sinton D. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4023. doi: 10.1039/C7GC01677H
70	Wu M. ; Zhu C. ; Wang K. ; Li G. ; Dong X. ; Song Y. ; Xue J. ; Chen W. ; Wei W. ; Sun Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 11562. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b21153
71	Kim J. ; Choi W. ; Park J. W. ; Kim C. ; Kim M. ; Song H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6986. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00911
72	Jitaru M. ; Lowy D. A. ; Toma M. ; Toma B. C. ; Oniciu L. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1997, 27, 875. doi: 10.1023/A:1018441316386
73	Chen Y. ; Kanan M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1986. doi: 10.1021/ja2108799
74	Wu J. ; Risalvato F. G. ; Ma S. ; Zhou X. -D. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1647. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13544F
75	An X. ; Li S. ; Yoshida A. ; Wang Z. ; Hao X. ; Abudula A. ; Guan G. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 9360. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00515
76	Zhang Q. ; Zhang Y. ; Mao J. ; Liu J. ; Zhou Y. ; Guay D. ; Qiao J. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1443. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802725
77	Cui C. ; Han J. ; Zhu X. ; Liu X. ; Wang H. ; Mei D. ; Ge Q. J. Catal. 2016, 343, 257. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.12.001
78	Deng W. ; Zhang L. ; Li L. ; Chen S. ; Hu C. ; Zhao Z. -J. ; Wang T. ; Gong J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2911. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13786
79	Zhang W. ; Qin Q. ; Dai L. ; Qin R. ; Zhao X. ; Chen X. ; Ou D. ; Chen J. ; Chuong T. T. ; Wu B. ; Zheng N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 9475. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804142
80	Lee S. ; Ju H. ; Machunda R. ; Uhm S. ; Lee J. K. ; Lee H. J. ; Lee J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 3029. doi: 10.1039/C4TA03893B
81	Gao D. ; Zhou H. ; Wang J. ; Miao S. ; Yang F. ; Wang G. ; Wang J. ; Bao X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4288. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00046
82	Zhu W. ; Zhang Y. -J. ; Zhang H. ; Lv H. ; Li Q. ; Michalsky R. ; Peterson A. A. ; Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16132. doi: 10.1021/ja5095099
83	Li Q. ; Fu J. ; Zhu W. ; Chen Z. ; Shen B. ; Wu L. ; Xi Z. ; Wang T. ; Lu G. ; Zhu J. -J. ; Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4290. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00261
84	Huo S. ; Weng Z. ; Wu Z. ; Zhong Y. ; Wu Y. ; Fang J. ; Wang H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28519. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07707
85	Cheng Y. ; Hou P. ; Pan H. ; Shi H. ; Kang P. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 272, 118954. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118954
86	Wang K. ; Liu D. ; Deng P. ; Liu L. ; Lu S. ; Sun Z. ; Ma Y. ; Wang Y. ; Li M. ; Xia B. Y. ; et al Nano Energy 2019, 64, 103954. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103954
87	Fan L. ; Xia Z. ; Xu M. ; Lu Y. ; Li Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706289. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201706289
88	Liu S. ; Xiao J. ; Lu X. F. ; Wang J. ; Wang X. ; Lou X. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8499. doi: 10.1002/anie.201903613
89	Li F. ; Chen L. ; Knowles G. P. ; MacFarlane D. R. ; Zhang J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 505. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608279
90	Xie X. ; Li Y. ; Liu Z. -Q. ; Haruta M. ; Shen W. Nature 2009, 458, 746. doi: 10.1038/nature07877
91	Roy S. C. ; Varghese O. K. ; Paulose M. ; Grimes C. A. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1259. doi: 10.1021/nn9015423
92	Sun Y. ; Gao S. ; Lei F. ; Liu J. ; Liang L. ; Xie Y. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3976. doi: 10.1039/C4SC00565A
93	Huang X. ; Cao T. ; Liu M. ; Zhao G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 26432. doi: 10.1021/jp408630s
94	Gao S. ; Lin Y. ; Jiao X. ; Sun Y. ; Luo Q. ; Zhang W. ; Li D. ; Yang J. ; Xie Y. Nature 2016, 529, 68. doi: 10.1038/nature16455
95	Gao S. ; Jiao X. ; Sun Z. ; Zhang W. ; Sun Y. ; Wang C. ; Hu Q. ; Zu X. ; Yang F. ; Yang S. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 698. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509800
96	Yang H. ; Han N. ; Deng J. ; Wu J. ; Wang Y. ; Hu Y. ; Ding P. ; Li Y. ; Li Y. ; Lu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801536. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801536
97	Han N. ; Wang Y. ; Yang H. ; Deng J. ; Wu J. ; Li Y. ; Li Y. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03712-z
98	Lee C. W. ; Hong J. S. ; Yang K. D. ; Jin K. ; Lee J. H. ; Ahn H. -Y. ; Seo H. ; Sung N. -E. ; Nam K. T. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 931. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03242
99	Koh J. H. ; Won D. H. ; Eom T. ; Kim N. -K. ; Jung K. D. ; Kim H. ; Hwang Y. J. ; Min B. K. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 5071. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00707
100	Kim S. ; Dong W. J. ; Gim S. ; Sohn W. ; Park J. Y. ; Yoo C. J. ; Jang H. W. ; Lee J. -L. Nano Energy 2017, 39, 44. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.065
101	Gong Q. ; Ding P. ; Xu M. ; Zhu X. ; Wang M. ; Deng J. ; Ma Q. ; Han N. ; Zhu Y. ; Lu J. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10819-4
102	Deng P. ; Wang H. ; Qi R. ; Zhu J. ; Chen S. ; Yang F. ; Zhou L. ; Qi K. ; Liu H. ; Xia B. Y. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 743. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04043
103	Deng P. ; Yang F. ; Wang Z. ; Chen S. ; Zhou Y. ; Zaman S. ; Xia B. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10807. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000657
104	Chen Z. ; Mou K. ; Wang X. ; Liu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12790. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807643
105	Li T. ; Wei H. ; Liu T. ; Zheng G. ; Liu S. ; Luo J. -L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 22346. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b04580
106	Rabiee A. ; Nematollahi D. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 193, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.02.016
107	Xia Z. ; Freeman M. ; Zhang D. ; Yang B. ; Lei L. ; Li Z. ; Hou Y. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 253. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700935
108	Sun X. ; Lu L. ; Zhu Q. ; Wu C. ; Yang D. ; Chen C. ; Han B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2427. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712221
109	Chu S. ; Hong S. ; Masa J. ; Li X. ; Sun Z. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12380. doi: 10.1039/C9CC05435A
110	White J. L. ; Bocarsly A. B. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, H410. doi: 10.1149/2.0681606jes
111	Mou K. ; Chen Z. ; Yao S. ; Liu L. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 289, 65. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.026
112	Won D. H. ; Shin H. ; Koh J. ; Chung J. ; Lee H. S. ; Kim H. ; Woo S. I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9297. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602888
113	Rosen J. ; Hutchings G. S. ; Lu Q. ; Forest R. V. ; Moore A. ; Jiao F. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4586. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00922
114	Quan F. ; Zhong D. ; Song H. ; Jia F. ; Zhang L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 16409. doi: 10.1039/C5TA04102C
115	Nguyen D. L. T. ; Jee M. S. ; Won D. H. ; Jung H. ; Oh H. -S. ; Min B. K. ; Hwang Y. J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 11377. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02460
116	Jeon H. S. ; Sinev I. ; Scholten F. ; Divins N. J. ; Zegkinoglou I. ; Pielsticker L. ; Cuenya B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 9383. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05258
117	Geng Z. ; Kong X. ; Chen W. ; Su H. ; Liu Y. ; Cai F. ; Wang G. ; Zeng J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6054. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711255
118	Bachiller-Baeza B. ; Rodriguez-Ramos I. ; Guerrero-Ruiz A. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3556. doi: 10.1021/la970856q
119	Miao Z. ; Hu P. ; Nie C. ; Xie H. ; Fu W. ; Li Q. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 38, 114. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.010
120	Sekimoto T. ; Deguchi M. ; Yotsuhashi S. ; Yamada Y. ; Masui T. ; Kuramata A. ; Yamakoshi S. Electrochem. Commun. 2014, 43, 95. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.03.023
121	Tsuneoka H. ; Teramura K. ; Shishido T. ; Tanaka T. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8892. doi: 10.1021/jp910835k
122	Yuliati L. ; Itoh H. ; Yoshida H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 452, 178. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.12.051
123	Spataru N. ; Tokuhiro K. ; Terashima C. ; Rao T. N. ; Fujishima A. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2003, 33, 1205. doi: 10.1023/B:JACH.0000003866.85015.b6
124	Karamad M. ; Hansen H. A. ; Rossmeisl J. ; Nørskov J. K. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4075. doi: 10.1021/cs501542n
125	Lum Y. ; Ager J. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 551. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710590

[1]	高凤雨, 刘恒恒, 姚小龙, Sani Zaharaddeen, 唐晓龙, 罗宁, 易红宏, 赵顺征, 于庆君, 周远松. 球形表面富锰Mn_xCo_3−xO_4−ƞ尖晶石型催化剂选择性催化还原NO_x研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212003 -0 .
[2]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[3]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[4]	袁干印, 奚政, 王楚, 孙晓环, 韩杰, 郭荣. 超分子手性聚苯胺-金复合纳米酶的构建及其对映选择性催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212061 -0 .
[5]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[6]	崔柏桦, 施毅, 李根, 陈亚楠, 陈伟, 邓意达, 胡文彬. 海水电解面临的挑战与机遇：含氯电化学中先进材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106010 - .
[7]	孙轲, 赵永青, 殷杰, 靳晶, 刘翰文, 席聘贤. 有机配体表面改性NiCo₂O₄纳米线用于水全分解[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2107005 - .
[8]	刘弘禹, 孟钢, 邓赞红, 李蒙, 常鋆青, 代甜甜, 方晓东. VOCs分子的半导体型传感器识别检测研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2008018 - .
[9]	林飞宇, 杨英, 朱从潭, 陈甜, 马书鹏, 罗媛, 朱刘, 郭学益. 湿空气下制备稳定的CsPbI₂Br钙钛矿太阳电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2005007 - .
[10]	陈志洋, 唐雅婷, 吕泽, 孟霄汉, 梁前伟, 冯建国. 香茅油纳米乳剂的构建、表征、抗菌性能和细胞毒性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2205053 - .
[11]	李少鹏, 杜靖, 张彬, 刘艳贞, 梅清清, 孟庆磊, 董明华, 杜鹃, 赵志娟, 郑黎荣, 韩布兴, 赵美廷, 刘会贞. 利用空间位阻和氢溢流协同作用促进5-羟甲基糠醛选择性加氢制备5-甲基糠醛[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10): 2206019 - .
[12]	刘苗苗, 杨茅茂, 舒欣欣, 张进涛. 燃料电池碳基氧还原催化剂的设计与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007072 - .
[13]	包玉菲, 冯立纲. PdNi/石墨烯气凝胶电催化甲酸氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2008031 - .
[14]	黄磊, Zaman Shahid, 王志同, 牛慧婷, 游波, 夏宝玉. 铂基空心纳米框架的合成及其在直接醇燃料电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009035 - .
[15]	田立亮, 张玮琦, 解政, 彭凯, 马强, 徐谦, Pasupathi Sivakumar, 苏华能. 催化层掺杂共价有机框架材料提升高温聚电解质膜燃料电池性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009049 - .

基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原

Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 125

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原

Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 125

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction