物理化学学报 >> 2024, Vol. 40 >> Issue (7): 2307057.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307057
张新义1, 任楷1, 刘妍宁1, 谷振一2, 黄志雄2, 郑硕航2, 王晓彤2, 郭晋芝2, ZatovskyIgor V.3, 曹峻鸣2,*(
), 吴兴隆1,2,*(
)
收稿日期:2023-07-29
修回日期:2023-08-31
录用日期:2023-09-03
发布日期:2023-12-01
通讯作者:
Email: jmcao@nenu.edu.cn (曹峻鸣)xinglong@nenu.edu.cn (吴兴隆)
基金资助:
Xinyi Zhang1, Kai Ren1, Yanning Liu1, Zhenyi Gu2, Zhixiong Huang2, Shuohang Zheng2, Xiaotong Wang2, Jinzhi Guo2, Igor V. Zatovsky3, Junming Cao2,*(
), Xinglong Wu1,2,*(
)
Received:2023-07-29
Revised:2023-08-31
Accepted:2023-09-03
Published:2023-12-01
Contact:
Email: jmcao@nenu.edu.cn (Junming Cao)xinglong@nenu.edu.cn (Xinglong Wu)
Supported by:摘要:
目前对高性能与高稳定性的电催化剂进行精准合成仍然是亟待解决的问题。熵作为最重要的热力学参数之一,是描述体系无序程度的物理量,其数值主要由材料的结构、磁矩、原子和电子振动共同决定。根据体系的构型熵值,通常将材料分为低熵材料(ΔSmix < 1R)、中熵材料(1R ≤ ΔSmix ≥ 1.5R)和高熵材料(ΔSmix > 1.5R)。随着熵值的增加,材料本征的物理与化学性质也会发生相应的变化。高熵材料得益于不同金属元素的共存、界面处原子级的多组分排列,所产生的高熵、晶格畸变、迟滞扩散和“鸡尾酒”效应能够有效地提升电催化反应的活性,因此在电催化领域中得到了广泛的研究关注。本综述对高熵电催化剂的基本概念、合成路线(“自上而下”与“自下而上”)以及在不同电催化反应类型中,高熵材料结构与性能之间的构效关系进行了系统总结,主要包括析氢(HER)、析氧(OER)、氧还原(ORR)、醇氧化(AOR)、氮还原(NRR)和二氧化碳还原反应(CO2RR)等,从而阐明熵增工程对高性能电催化剂设计与应用的优势与潜力。同时,本文针对目前高熵催化剂研究所面临的主要问题与挑战,对未来基于熵增工程的高熵电催化剂的设计思路与合成方法进行展望。
张新义, 任楷, 刘妍宁, 谷振一, 黄志雄, 郑硕航, 王晓彤, 郭晋芝, ZatovskyIgor V., 曹峻鸣, 吴兴隆. 熵增工程在电催化反应中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7), 2307057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307057
Xinyi Zhang, Kai Ren, Yanning Liu, Zhenyi Gu, Zhixiong Huang, Shuohang Zheng, Xiaotong Wang, Jinzhi Guo, Igor V. Zatovsky, Junming Cao, Xinglong Wu. Progress on Entropy Production Engineering for Electrochemical Catalysis[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2024, 40(7), 2307057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307057
表1
"
| Synthesis routes | Synthesis | Characteristic | Example catalysts | Application | Refs. |
| Top-down routes | Melting and casting techniques | (CrFeCoNi)97O3 | OER | ||
| Plasma | Ultra small particles | FeCrCoNiCu)3O4 | HMF oxidation | ||
| Mechanochemistry | Solution-free, energy-saving, high-productivity, and low-temperature process | (NiMgCuZnCo)O | CO2RR | ||
| HE-ZIF-BM | CO2RR | ||||
| (FeMnNiCoCr)3S2 | Li-ion batteries | ||||
| Dealloying | Low cost, scalable fabrication, controllable structure | AlNiCoRuMoCrFeTi | ORR | ||
| Al-Ni-Co-Ru-X (X = Mo, Cu, V, Fe) | ORR | ||||
| PdPtCuNiP | HER | ||||
| FeCoNiAlTi | |||||
| Bottom-up routes | Carbothermal shock | Ultrafast, single phase, and various compositions | RuIrCeNiWCuCrCo | Li-O2 | |
| PdCuPtNiCo | ORR | ||||
| PdCuPtNiFe | |||||
| PdCuPtNiRh | |||||
| PdCuPtNiIr | |||||
| Laser | Colloids | CoCrFeNiAl | OER | ||
| Fast-moving bed | Ultrafast, single phase, and various compositions | FeCoPdPtIr | HER | ||
| Microwave | Uniform heating, fast heating, and cooling rate | FeCoNi MnVO/Ti3C2Tx−0.5 | OER | ||
| PtPdFeCoNi | |||||
| IrRuCoNiCu | Overall water splitting | ||||
| PtRhCoNiCu | |||||
| Wet chemistry | Small particle size, high dispersion, and single crystal | PtPdIrRuAg | ORR | ||
| IrPdPtRhRu | HER | ||||
| Pd@PdPtRhIrRu | |||||
| FeCoNiCuMn | ORR | ||||
| Electrostatically spun | Simplicity of installation, low cost, various compositions, synthetically controlled | FeCoNiIrRu | OER | ||
| FeCoNiCuMn | Overall water splitting | ||||
| Sol-gel | Low synthesis temperature, high dispersion | PdCuAuAgBiIn | CO2RR | ||
| NiCoFeMnCrP | HER & OER | ||||
| Co-precipitation | Simple process, low cost and synthetically controlled | NiCoCuZnFe-PBA | Li-S |
表2
"
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | Overpotential/mV | Tafel slope/(mV∙dec−1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
| HER | CuAlNiMoFe | nanoporous | 56 (100 mA∙cm−2) | 60 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | |
| 23 | 50 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 PBS | ||||
| Co0.6(VMnNiZn)0.4PS3 | nanosheets | 65.9 | 65.5 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| PtCoMoPdRh | nanoflowers | 16.5 | 26.8 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| PdMoGaInNi | nanosheets | 13 | 93.1 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 | ||
| PtPdRhIrRu | nanocrystals | 36.3 | 33.0 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| NiCoFePtRh | nanoparticles | 27 | 30.1 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 | ||
| FeCoNiCuMn | nanoparticles | 281 (100 mA∙cm–2]) | 53 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| PtPdRhRuCu | mesoporous nanospheres | 10 | 87 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| 13 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 | |||||
| 28 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 PBS | |||||
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | Overpotential/mV | Tafel slope/(mV∙dec−1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
| OER | Ag@CoCuFeAgMoOOH | 281 (100 mA∙cm–2]) | 35.3 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| CoCuFeMoOOH@Cu | nanosheets | 199 | 48.8 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| FeNiCoCrMnV | nanoparticles | 220 | 45 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| FeCoNiCrMo | plate | 281 (100 mA∙cm–2]) | 38.5 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| FeNiCoCrMnS2 | spherical | 199 | 39.1 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| IrFeCoNiCu | nanoparticles | 302 | 58 | 0.1 mol∙L−1 HClO4 | ||
| FeCoNiIrRu | nanoparticles | 241 | 153 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 | ||
| CoFeNiMoWTe | nanospheres | 373 | 40.6 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 | ||
| K0.8Na0.2(MgMnFeCoNi)F3 | cubic | 314 | 55 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | E1/2 (vs RHE)/V | Mass activity | Electrolyte | Ref. |
| ORR | PtFeCoNiCuZn | nanocrystals | 0.898 | 0.48 A mg–1] | 0.1 mol∙L−1 HClO4 | |
| FeCoNiCuPd | nanoparticles | 0.90 | 2.04 A mg–1] | 0.1 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| PtPdIrRuAg | ribbons | 0.93 | 3.642.04 A mg–1] | 0.1 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| AlNiCoRuMo | 0.875 | 0.81 A mg–1] | 0.1 mol∙L−1 KOH | |||
| AlNiCoRuMoCrFeTi | 0.87 | 0.1 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||||
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | Mass activity | Electrolyte | Ref. | |
| AOR | FeCoNiSn@Pd | nanoparticles | 7.34 A∙mg−1 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH + 1.0 mol∙L−1 C2H5OH | ||
| PtPdRuIrOs | nanoparticles | 1.65A∙mg−1 | 0.1 mol∙L−1 HClO4 + 1.0 mol∙L−1 C2H5OH | |||
| np-AlPdNiCuMo | nanoporous | 7.34 A∙mg−1 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 + 0.5 mol∙L−1 C2H5OH | |||
| PtRhBiSnSb | nanoplates | 19.529 A∙mg−1 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH + 1.0 mol∙L−1 CH3OH | |||
| 15.558 A∙mg−1 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH + 1.0 mol∙L−1 C2H5OH | |||||
| 7.535 A∙mg−1 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH + 1.0 mol∙L−1 C3H8O3 | |||||
| PtBiPbNiCo | nanoplates | 7.1 A∙mg−1 | 0.5 mol∙L−1 H2SO4 +0.5 mol∙L−1 CH2O2 | |||
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | NH3 yield | Faraday efficiency (FE) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
| NRR | ((NiFeCoMnV)3O4 | nanospheres | 47.58 µg∙h−1∙mg−1 | 10.74% | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | |
| RuFeCoNiCu | nanoparticles | 57.1 µg∙h−1∙mg−1 | 38.5 | 1.0 mol∙L−1 KOH | ||
| 52.6 µg∙h−1∙mg−1 | 27.6% | 0.1 mol∙L−1 Li2SO4 | ||||
| 47.2 µg∙h−1∙mg−1 | 21.2% | 0.1 mol∙L−1 Na2SO4 | ||||
| 37.1 µg∙h−1∙mg−1 | 7.7% | 0.1 mol∙L−1 HCl | ||||
| Reaction | Composition | Structural feature | products | Faraday efficiency (FE) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
| CO2RR | PdCuAuAgBiIn | aerogels | HCOOH | 98.1% | 0.1 mol∙L−1 KHCO3 | |
| (MoWVNbTa)S2 | nanoflowers | CO | 91% | 1 mol∙L−1 KOH+1 mol∙L−1 choline chloride | ||
| 1 |
doi: 10.1002/idm2.12041 |
| 2 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002 |
| 3 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202205814 |
| 4 |
doi: 10.1039/d2cs00843b |
| 5 |
doi: 10.1039/d1cs00135c |
| 6 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202108133 |
| 7 |
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101105 |
| 8 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202107488 |
| 9 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02973 |
| 10 |
doi: 10.1039/D0EE01617A |
| 11 |
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.03.020 |
| 12 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00655 |
| 13 |
doi: 10.1039/D0EE03915B |
| 14 |
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63407-8 |
| 15 |
doi: 10.1039/D1EE00509J |
| 16 |
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106216 |
| 17 |
doi: 10.1007/s12598-022-02168-x |
| 18 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10303-z |
| 19 |
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10602 |
| 20 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.036 |
| 21 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.026 |
| 22 |
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10143 |
| 23 |
doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 |
| 24 |
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8748 |
| 25 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.041 |
| 26 |
doi: 10.1002/adem.200300567 |
| 27 |
doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 |
| 28 |
doi: 10.1080/21663831.2014.912690 |
| 29 |
doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.12.021 |
| 30 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117140 |
| 31 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202209616 |
| 32 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.12.026 |
| 33 |
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0510 |
| 34 |
doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.01.003 |
| 35 |
doi: 10.1039/D0TA02125C |
| 36 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.058 |
| 37 |
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.5895 |
| 38 |
doi: 10.1007/s40843-017-9195-8 |
| 39 |
doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00064 |
| 40 |
doi: 10.1126/science.aan5412 |
| 41 |
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 |
| 42 |
doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.05.022 |
| 43 |
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.001 |
| 44 |
doi: 10.2475/ajs.s3-16.96.441 |
| 45 |
doi: 10.1007/s12613-020-2000-9 |
| 46 |
doi: 10.1038/nature02146 |
| 47 |
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129428 |
| 48 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202101845 |
| 49 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202107390 |
| 50 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.201900787 |
| 51 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118431 |
| 52 |
doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00434 |
| 53 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202101586 |
| 54 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01523 |
| 55 |
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c07787 |
| 56 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15934-1 |
| 57 |
doi: 10.1002/smll.202207820 |
| 58 |
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c05113 |
| 59 |
doi: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2022-0125 |
| 60 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03544 |
| 61 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02755 |
| 62 |
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf9931 |
| 63 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32850-8 |
| 64 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133251 |
| 65 |
doi: 10.1039/d2ee03185j |
| 66 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202209242 |
| 67 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202209350 |
| 68 |
doi: 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02792-0 |
| 69 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.201005547 |
| 70 |
doi: 10.1039/c2cs15332g |
| 71 |
doi: 10.1039/c1cs15171a |
| 72 |
doi: 10.1039/c7gc00693d |
| 73 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103090 |
| 74 |
doi: 10.1002/smll.202107207 |
| 75 |
doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac041 |
| 76 |
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04259 |
| 77 |
doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3804-2 |
| 78 |
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06082-9 |
| 79 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202010561 |
| 80 |
|
|
马明军; 冯志超; 张小委; 孙超越; 王海青; 周伟家; 刘宏. 物理化学学报,, 2022, 38, 2106003.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202106003 |
|
| 81 |
doi: 10.1007/s12598-022-02061-7 |
| 82 |
|
|
崔柏桦; 施毅; 李根; 陈亚楠; 陈伟; 邓意达; 胡文彬. 物理化学学报,, 2022, 38, 2106010.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202106010 |
|
| 83 |
doi: 10.1039/D0CS00013B |
| 84 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108571 |
| 85 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.049 |
| 86 |
doi: 10.1002/cnl2.9 |
| 87 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108046 |
| 88 |
doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.06.022 |
| 89 |
doi: 10.1039/d0cs00575d |
| 90 |
doi: 10.1002/admi.202102154 |
| 91 |
doi: 10.1002/cnl2.77 |
| 92 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135375 |
| 93 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202009613 |
| 94 |
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c01064 |
| 95 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122814 |
| 96 |
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c02778 |
| 97 |
doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.08.022 |
| 98 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c07643 |
| 99 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39157-2 |
| 100 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202110511 |
| 101 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202100745 |
| 102 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202200742 |
| 103 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144015 |
| 104 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202106229 |
| 105 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01831 |
| 106 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30379-4 |
| 107 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202301420 |
| 108 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12377 |
| 109 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202204110 |
| 110 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202110128 |
| 111 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202204643 |
| 112 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04807 |
| 113 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202206276 |
| 114 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202213783 |
| 115 |
doi: 10.1002/smll.202106358 |
| 116 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202006939 |
| 117 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202100347 |
| 118 |
doi: 10.1002/idm2.12059 |
| 119 |
doi: 10.1007/s40843-021-1919-5 |
| 120 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300765 |
| 121 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300239 |
| 122 |
doi: 10.1039/D2EE03930C |
| 123 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c12431 |
| 124 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202203913 |
| 125 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202100347 |
| 126 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36380-9 |
| 127 |
doi: 10.1039/D3EE00747B |
| 128 |
doi: 10.1039/D2TA09626A |
| 129 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202218269 |
| 130 |
doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00546-1 |
| 131 |
doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w |
| 132 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37268-4 |
| 133 |
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c06118 |
| 134 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162508 |
| 135 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37011-z |
| 136 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202211099 |
| 137 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202005767 |
| 138 |
doi: 10.1002/advs.202103722 |
| 139 |
doi: 10.1002/smll.202004500 |
| 140 |
doi: 10.1002/inf2.12306 |
| 141 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01908 |
| 142 |
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.047 |
| 143 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202007129 |
| 144 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202004892 |
| 145 |
doi: 10.1039/c9cs00280d |
| 146 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.201805367 |
| 147 |
doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2021-y |
| 148 |
doi: 10.1126/science.aar6611 |
| 149 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119325 |
| 150 |
doi: 10.1039/c4cs00085d |
| 151 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.201800191 |
| 152 |
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100232 |
| 153 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002131 |
| 154 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00626 |
| 155 |
doi: 10.1002/inf2.12311 |
| 156 |
doi: 10.1039/D0EE02747B |
| 157 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37360-9 |
| 158 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202005821 |
| 159 |
doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0607-8 |
| 160 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38524-3 |
| 161 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13190-6 |
| 162 |
|
|
陈瑶; 陈存; 曹雪松; 王震宇; 张楠; 刘天西. 物理化学学报,, 2023, 39, 2210053.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212053 |
|
| 163 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24228-z |
| [1] | 张慧, 赵子健, 王雅静, 倪凯, 王彦飞, 朱亮, 刘建允, 赵晓昱. 通过热压法构建具有高效离子传输路径的无溶剂LiFePO4卤水提锂电极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(2): 100130 - . |
| [2] | 吕宪伟, 丁信元, 龚家兴, 闫旭焕, 黄大勇, 耿建新, 袁忠勇. 轨道杂化在光催化与电催化中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(2): 100151 - . |
| [3] | 邱江源, 于涛, 陈均鑫, 李文轩, 张晓萱, 李金生, 郭瑞, 黄在银, 刘宣文. FeOOH调节Bi12O17Cl2@FeOOH异质结中Bi12O17Cl2的表面势阱深度以增强压电电荷转移和压电自芬顿催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100157 - . |
| [4] | 赵呈孝, 李昭霖, 吴东方, 杨小飞. SBA-15模板化共价三嗪框架增强光催化产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100149 - . |
| [5] | 陈芸, 邓代洁, 徐丽, 朱兴旺, 李赫楠, 孙成明. 共价键调控电荷转移以实现自供能电化学传感平台对重金属离子的灵敏分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100144 - . |
| [6] | 王雷, 张盼盼, 郭志远, 汪婧, 马杰, 纪志永. 电化学提锂中的法拉第材料:进展、挑战与性能强化方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100127 - . |
| [7] | 孙明磊, 袁忠勇. 电化学降解污水中含氮废弃物的升值策略[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100108 - . |
| [8] | 段睿智, 王小梅, 周潘旺, 刘扬, 李灿. 羟基物种在过渡金属表面碱性析氢反应中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100111 - . |
| [9] | 吴琦, 王长华, 李莹莹, 张昕彤. 增强g-C3N4@BN范德华异质结界面上的三重态电子转移增强光催化合成H2O2[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100107 - . |
| [10] | 宋亮亮, 梁颢严, 李顺清, 邱报, 刘兆平. 超高比能电池高锰富锂层状氧化物正极材料面临的挑战与解决策略[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100085 - . |
| [11] | 王伟康, 吴亚栋, 张建军, 孟凯, 李金河, 王乐乐, 刘芹芹. 三聚氰胺泡沫支撑的S型硫铟锌镉/硫掺杂氮化碳异质结的绿色H2O2合成:协同界面电荷转移调控与局域光热效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100093 - . |
| [12] | 陈泽秋, 蔡黎淼, 关杰, 李瞻洋, 王昊, 郭耀广, 徐兴涛, 潘丽坤. 电容去离子提锂技术中电极材料的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100089 - . |
| [13] | 刘方璇, 刘子妍, 周国伟, 高婷婷, 刘文宇, 孙彬. 中空结构光催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100071 - . |
| [14] | DristySumiya Akter, HabibMd Ahasan, LinShusen, JoniMehedi Hasan, MandavkarRutuja, ChungYoung-Uk, NajibullahMd, LeeJihoon. 利用Zn掺杂制备高效稳定工业级电解水的NiBP微球催化剂研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100079 - . |
| [15] | 曹雪婷, 察爽爽, 龚鸣. 电催化反应中的界面双电层:理论、表征与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100041 - . |
|
||