石墨烯作为硫载体在锂硫电池中的研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101001

Abstract

Abstract:

Lithium-sulfur batteries are considered to be one of the most promising new-generation energy storage devices, owing to their ultra-high theoretical energy density and the merits of sulfur cathodes, which include natural abundance, low cost, and no toxicity. However, the commercial application of lithium-sulfur batteries is still subject to various intractable challenges. First, the insulation of sulfur and its solid discharge products (Li₂S₂/Li₂S) leads to low utilization of the active materials. Second, the cathode suffers from an 80% volume expansion after the discharge process, which adversely affects its structural stability. Finally, intermediary lithium polysulfides can easily dissolve into the electrolyte, which can trigger the "shuttle effect." This results in the loss of active materials, fast capacity fading, and low Coulombic efficiency. Graphene has garnered significant interest as a host material to accommodate sulfur for high-performance lithium-sulfur battery. A graphene host featuring a high specific surface area, excellent conductivity, and excellent mechanical stability can ensure a good electrical contact between the sulfur species and the current collector and withstand the volumetric strain of the electrode during cycling. Unfortunately, lithium polysulfides are still prone to escape from cathodes owing to the open two-dimensional (2D) plane structure of graphene sheets. To address this issue, various graphene-based materials with unique structures and chemical compositions have been trialed as sulfur hosts. In this review, we summarize research progress regarding three-dimensional (3D) graphene, graphene with modified surface chemistry, graphene-based composites, and graphene-based flexible materials as sulfur hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Furthermore, we analyze the challenges of applying graphene host materials in high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. This review is mainly divided into four parts: (1) 3D graphene materials as sulfur hosts: the interconnected 3D porous network structure assembled from 2D graphene sheets provides a half-enclosed cavity to accommodate sulfur and its discharge products, which can inhibit the diffusion of lithium polysulfides to a certain extent. (2) Graphene materials with modified surface chemistry as sulfur hosts: hydrophilic surface functional groups and doped non-metal or metal heteroatoms on graphene can chemically adsorb polar lithium polysulfides. (3) Graphene-based composites as sulfur hosts: in various graphene-based composites, graphene usually functions as a conductive and flexible substrate. Other components, such as other types of carbon or metal compounds, can play an important role in restricting lithium polysulfides and propelling their reaction kinetics. (4) Flexible graphene-sulfur electrodes: the excellent flexibility and conductivity of graphene endowed it and its composites with a broad range of prospective applications regarding flexible lithium-sulfur batteries.

Key words: Lithium-sulfur battery, Sulfur host, Graphene, Graphene-based composite, Flexible cathode

Mengdi Zhang, Bei Chen, Mingbo Wu. Research Progress in Graphene as Sulfur Hosts in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(2), 2101001. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101001

Figures/Tables 10

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Table 1

Electrochemical performance of sulfur-loading graphene materials."

Materials	Sulfur Content (w/%)	Current Density	Specific Capacity/(mAh·g^-1)	Cycle Numbers	Ref.
Porous graphene	66	1C	824	80	33
Unstacked double-layer templated graphene (DTG)	64	10C	628	200	34
Hierarchical porous graphene (HPG)	68	5C	656	Initial	35
Hydroxylated graphene	50	2C	647	200	36
Functionalized holey graphene	49	0.2C	429	300	37
Amino-functionalized reduced graphene oxide (EFG)	60	0.5C	650	350	38
N-doped graphene	65.2	2C	492	1000	39
3D B-doped graphene aerogel (BGA)	59	2C	600	200	40
N/S co-doped graphene (A-NSG)	72.4	0.2C	780	600	41
Co single atoms embedded in N-doped graphene (Co-N/G)	90	1C	681	500	50
Holey Fe, N co-doped graphene（HFeNG）	86.5	0.1C	1290	Initial	51
V single atoms on N-doped graphene (SAV@NG)	80	0.5C	645	Initial	52
N-doped carbon channels implanted on graphene (NTPC-G)	60	6C	563	Initial	61
N doped aligned CNT/graphene (N-ACNT/G)	52.6	1C	880	80	62
Coaxial graphene wrapping over sulfur-coated carbon nanofibers (G-S-CNFs)	33	1C	273	1500	63
Graphene-supported N and B rich carbon layer (G-NBCL)	70	2C	301	1500	64
TiO₂ modified N-doped graphene /sulfur composite (NG/S-TiO₂)	59	1C	918	500	65
VS₂-attached reduced graphene oxide sheets (VS₂-rGO)	89	0.1C	1013	Initial	66
VN nanoribbon/graphene composite (VN/G)	–	1C	917	200	67
CoSe₂ hollow nanospheres decorated rGO (RGO-CoSe₂)	74.7	1C	741	400	68
Graphene/PDMS Foam	–	1.5 A·g^?1	448	1000	70
Nano-sulfur/graphene paper (S-rGO)	63	0.3 A·g^?1	800	200	71
rGO-S composite films (rGO-S)	56	0.1C	1187	Initial	72
Graphene/CNT aerogels	50	2C	445	500	74
Graphene wrapped N-doped hollow carbon spheres-sulfur hybrid paper (G-NDHCS-S)	62	2C	600	Initial	53
Sulfur-graphene-conducting polymer hybrid film (SGP)	56.4	1C	806	500	75
Graphene/1T MoS₂ composite film	–	0.1C	1181	Initial	76
Porous rGO/sulfur nanoparticles/Mn₃O₄ nanoparticles with sodium alginate/polyaniline binder (PRGO/S/Mn₃O₄@PANI-SA)	56.2	5 A·g^?1	722	500	77

Table 1

References 77

1	Larcher D. ; Tarascon J. M. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 19. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2085
2	Fotouhi A. ; Auger D. J. ; Propp K. ; Longo S. ; Wild M. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2016, 56, 1008. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.009
3	Zhang L. ; Wang Y. ; Niu Z. ; Chen J. Carbon 2019, 141, 400. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.067
4	Liu Y.-T. ; Liu S. ; Li G.-R. ; Gao X.-P. Adv. Mater. 2020, 33, 2003955. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003955
5	Bruce P. G. ; Freunberger S. A. ; Hardwick L. J. ; Tarascon J.-M. Nat. Mater. 2011, 11, 19. doi: 10.1038/nmat3191
6	Yang Y. ; Zheng G. ; Cui Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3018. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35256g
7	Zhang M. ; Yu C. ; Zhao C. ; Song X. ; Han X. ; Liu S. ; Hao C. ; Qiu J. Energy Storage Mater. 2016, 5, 223. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.04.002
8	Cheon S. E. ; Ko K. S. ; Cho J. H. ; Kim S. W. ; Chin E. Y. ; Kim H. T. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, A796. doi: 10.1149/1.1571532
9	Liu S. ; Yao L. ; Zhang Q. ; Li L.-L. ; Hu N.-T. ; Wei L.-M. ; Wei H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 2339.
	刘帅; 姚路; 章琴; 李路路; 胡南滔; 魏良明; 魏浩. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 2339. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201706021
10	He Y. ; Chang Z. ; Wu S. ; Zhou H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 6155. doi: 10.1039/C8TA01115J
11	Zheng D. ; Wang G. W. ; Liu D. ; Si J. Y. ; Ding T. Y. ; Qu D. Y. ; Yang X. Q. ; Qu D. Y. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3 doi: 10.1002/admt.201700233
12	Deng S. ; Yan Y. ; Wei L. ; Li T. ; Su X. ; Yang X. ; Li Z. ; Wu M. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 1266. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01815
13	Xu Z. L. ; Kim J. K. ; Kang K. Nano Today 2018, 19, 84. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.02.006
14	Guan L. ; Hu H. ; Li L. ; Pan Y. ; Zhu Y. ; Li Q. ; Guo H. ; Wang K. ; Huang Y. ; Zhang M. ; et al ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6222. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02294
15	Yan Y. ; Chen Z. ; Yang J. ; Guan L. ; Hu H. ; Zhao Q. ; Ren H. ; Lin Y. ; Li Z. ; Wu M. Small 2020, 16, 2004631. doi: 10.1002/smll.202004631
16	Chen Z. L. ; Gao P. ; Liu Z. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1907004.
	陈召龙; 高鹏; 刘忠范. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1907004. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907004
17	Wang B. ; Ruan T. ; Chen Y. ; Jin F. ; Peng L. ; Zhou Y. ; Wang D. ; Dou S. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 22. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.004
18	Chen K. ; Sun Z. H. ; Fang R. P. ; Li F. ; Cheng H. M. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 377.
	陈克; 孙振华; 方若翩; 李峰; 成会明. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 377. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201709001
19	Zhang Y. ; Gao Z. ; Song N. ; He J. ; Li X. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 9, 319. doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.06.001
20	Sun C. ; Liu Y. ; Sheng J. ; Huang Q. ; Lv W. ; Zhou G. ; Cheng H.-M. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 2487. doi: 10.1039/d0mh00815j
21	Wang H. ; Yang Y. ; Liang Y. ; Robinson J. T. ; Li Y. ; Jackson A. ; Cui Y. ; Dai H. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2644. doi: 10.1021/nl200658a
22	Ji L. ; Rao M. ; Zheng H. ; Zhang L. ; Li Y. ; Duan W. ; Guo J. ; Cairns E. J. ; Zhang Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18522. doi: 10.1021/ja206955k
23	Yang X. ; Zhang L. ; Zhang F. ; Huang Y. ; Chen Y. S. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5208. doi: 10.1021/nn501284q
24	Ning H. ; Mao Q. ; Wang W. ; Yang Z. ; Wang X. ; Zhao Q. ; Song Y. ; Wu M. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 785, 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.142
25	Zhao Q. ; Liu J. ; Li X. ; Xia Z. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhou M. ; Tian W. ; Wang M. ; Hu H. ; Li Z. ; et al Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 215. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.076
26	Wang Y. ; Huo. W. ; Yuan X. ; Zhang Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1904007.
	王易; 霍旺晨; 袁小亚; 张育新. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1904007. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904007
27	Zhang T. ; Li C. ; Wang W. ; Guo Z. ; Pang A. ; Ma H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905048.
	张婷; 李翠翠; 王伟; 郭兆琦; 庞爱民; 马海霞. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905048. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905048
28	Li Y. ; Cai Q. ; Wang L. ; Li Q. ; Peng X. ; Gao B. ; Huo K. ; Chu P. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23784. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09479
29	Li Z. ; Xu R. ; Deng S. ; Su X. ; Wu W. ; Liu S. ; Wu M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.050
30	Liu D. ; Zhang C. ; Zhou G. ; Lv W. ; Ling G. ; Zhi L. ; Yang Q.-H. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5 doi: 10.1002/advs.201700270
31	Guo X. ; Zheng S. ; Zhang G. ; Xiao X. ; Li X. ; Xu Y. ; Xue H. ; Pang H. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 9, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.07.006
32	Wang Z. ; Xu X. ; Ji S. ; Liu Z. ; Zhang D. ; Shen J. ; Liu J. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.09.037
33	Huang J.-Q. ; Liu X.-F. ; Zhang Q. ; Chen C.-M. ; Zhao M.-Q. ; Zhang S.-M. ; Zhu W. ; Qian W.-Z. ; Wei F. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 314. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.10.003
34	Zhao M.-Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Huang J.-Q. ; Tian G.-L. ; Nie J.-Q. ; Peng H.-J. ; Wei F. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3410. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4410
35	Tang C. ; Li B.-Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhu L. ; Wang H.-F. ; Shi J.-L. ; Wei F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 577. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503726
36	Zu C. ; Manthiram A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 1008. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201201080
37	Chang N. ; Zhou C. G. ; Fu H. ; Zhao Y. ; Shui J. L. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 9. doi: 10.1002/admi.201700783
38	Wang Z. ; Dong Y. ; Li H. ; Zhao Z. ; Wu H. B. ; Hao C. ; Liu S. ; Qiu J. ; Lou X. W. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5002. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6002
39	Qiu Y. ; Li W. ; Zhao W. ; Li G. ; Hou Y. ; Liu M. ; Zhou L. ; Ye F. ; Li H. ; Wei Z. ; et al Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 4821. doi: 10.1021/nl5020475
40	Xie Y. ; Meng Z. ; Cai T. ; Han W. -Q. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25202. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08129
41	Xu J. ; Su D. ; Zhang W. ; Bao W. ; Wang G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17381. doi: 10.1039/c6ta05878g
42	Hou T. Z. ; Chen X. ; Peng H. J. ; Huang J. Q. ; Li B. Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Li B. Small 2016, 12, 3283. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600809
43	Zhang K. ; Chen Z. ; Ning R. ; Xi S. ; Tang W. ; Du Y. ; Liu C. ; Ren Z. ; Chi X. ; Bai M. ; et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 25147. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b05628
44	Zhang L. ; Liu D. ; Muhammad Z. ; Wan F. ; Xie W. ; Wang Y. ; Song L. ; Niu Z. ; Chen J. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 19063955. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903955
45	Li Y. ; Lin S. ; Wang D. ; Gao T. ; Song J. ; Zhou P. ; Xu Z. ; Yang Z. ; Xiao N. ; Guo S. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906722. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906722
46	Li Y. ; Wu J. ; Zhang B. ; Wang W. ; Zhang G. ; Seh Z. W. ; Zhang N. ; Sun J. ; Huang L. ; Jiang J. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 30, 250. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.022
47	Lu C. ; Chen Y. ; Yang Y. ; Chen X. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5522. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02167
48	Lu C. ; Fang R. ; Chen X. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906548. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906548
49	Zhang Q. ; Zhang X. ; Wang J. ; Wang C. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 032001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abbd70
50	Du Z. ; Chen X. ; Hu W. ; Chuang C. ; Xie S. ; Hu A. ; Yan W. ; Kong X. ; Wu X. ; Ji H. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3977. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12973
51	Wang Y. ; Adekoya D. ; Sun J. ; Tang T. ; Qiu H. ; Xu L. ; Zhang S. ; Hou Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807485. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807485
52	Zhou G. ; Wang S. ; Wang T. ; Yang S.-Z. ; Johannessen B. ; Chen H. ; Liu C. ; Ye Y. ; Wu Y. ; Peng Y. ; et al Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 1252. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04719
53	Zhou G. M. ; Zhao Y. B. ; Manthiram A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1402263. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201402263
54	Chen K. ; Sun Z. ; Fang R. ; Shi Y. ; Cheng H.-M. ; Li F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1707592. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201707592
55	Chen X. ; Xiao Z. ; Ning X. ; Liu Z. ; Yang Z. ; Zou C. ; Wang S. ; Chen X. ; Chen Y. ; Huang S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1301988. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201301988
56	Peng H.-J. ; Huang J.-Q. ; Zhao M.-Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Cheng X.-B. ; Liu X.-Y. ; Qian W.-Z. ; Wei F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2772. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303296
57	Chen R. ; Zhao T. ; Lu J. ; Wu F. ; Li L. ; Chen J. ; Tan G. ; Ye Y. ; Amine K. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4642. doi: 10.1021/nl4016683
58	Zhao C. ; Yu C. ; Zhang M. ; Yang J. ; Liu S. ; Li M. ; Han X. ; Dong Y. ; Qiu J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 21842. doi: 10.1039/c5ta05146k
59	Huang J.-Q. ; Xu Z.-L. ; Abouali S. ; Garakani M. A. ; Kim J.-K. Carbon 2016, 99, 624. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.081
60	Zhang Z. ; Kong L.-L. ; Liu S. ; Li G.-R. ; Gao X.-P. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602543. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602543
61	Zhang M. ; Yu C. ; Yang J. ; Zhao C. ; Ling Z. ; Qiu J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10380. doi: 10.1039/c7ta01512g
62	Tang C. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhao M.-Q. ; Huang J.-Q. ; Cheng X.-B. ; Tian G.-L. ; Peng H.-J. ; Wei F. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6100. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401243
63	Lu S. ; Cheng Y. ; Wu X. ; Liu J. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2485. doi: 10.1021/nl400543y
64	Yuan S. ; Bao J. L. ; Wang L. ; Xia Y. ; Truhlar D. G. ; Wang Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501733. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201501733
65	Yu M. ; Ma J. ; Song H. ; Wang A. ; Tian F. ; Wang Y. ; Qiu H. ; Wang R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1495. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03902a
66	Cheng Z. ; Xiao Z. ; Pan H. ; Wang S. ; Wang R. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702337. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702337
67	Sun Z. ; Zhang J. ; Yin L. ; Hu G. ; Fang R. ; Cheng H.-M. ; Li F. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14627. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14627
68	Chen L. ; Yang W. ; Liu J. ; Zhou Y. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 2743. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2508-3
69	Jin J. ; Wen Z. ; Ma G. ; Lu Y. ; Cui Y. ; Wu M. ; Liang X. ; Wu X. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2558. doi: 10.1039/C2RA22808D
70	Zhou G. M. ; Li L. ; Ma C. Q. ; Wang S. G. ; Shi Y. ; Koratkar N. ; Ren W. C. ; Li F. ; Cheng H. M. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 356. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.025
71	Wang C. ; Wang X. S. ; Wang Y. J. ; Chen J. T. ; Zhou H. H. ; Huang Y. H. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 678. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.060
72	Cao J. ; Chen C. ; Zhao Q. ; Zhang N. ; Lu Q. Q. ; Wang X. Y. ; Niu Z. Q. ; Chen J. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9629. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602262
73	Sun L. ; Kong W. B. ; Jiang Y. ; Wu H. C. ; Jiang K. L. ; Wang J. P. ; Fan S. S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 5305. doi: 10.1039/c4ta06255h
74	Shi H. D. ; Zhao X. J. ; Wu Z. S. ; Dong Y. F. ; Lu P. F. ; Chen J. ; Ren W. C. ; Cheng H. M. ; Bao X. H. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 743. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.006
75	Xiao P. ; Bu F. ; Yang G. ; Zhang Y. ; Xu Y. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703324. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703324
76	He J. ; Hartmann G. ; Lee M. ; Hwang G. S. ; Chen Y. ; Manthiram A. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 344. doi: 10.1039/C8EE03252A
77	Ghosh A. ; Manjunatha R. ; Kumar R. ; Mitra S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 33775. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11180

[1]	Hanyu Xu, Xuedan Song, Qing Zhang, Chang Yu, Jieshan Qiu. Mechanistic Insights into Water-Mediated CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction Reactions on Cu@C₂N Catalysts: A Theoretical Study [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(1): 2303040-.
[2]	Qu Zhuoyan, Zhang Xiaoyin, Xiao Ru, Sun Zhenhua, Li Feng. Application of Organosulfur Compounds in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(8): 2301019-0.
[3]	Haoliang Lv, Xuejie Wang, Yu Yang, Tao Liu, Liuyang Zhang. RGO-Coated MOF-Derived In₂Se₃ as a High-Performance Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(3): 2210014-0.
[4]	Zheng-Min Wang, Qing-Ling Hong, Xiao-Hui Wang, Hao Huang, Yu Chen, Shu-Ni Li. RuP Nanoparticles Anchored on N-doped Graphene Aerogels for Hydrazine Oxidation-Boosted Hydrogen Production [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(12): 2303028-.
[5]	Junhao Liao, Yixuan Zhao, Zhaoning Hu, Saiyu Bu, Qi Lu, Mingpeng Shang, Kaicheng Jia, Xiaohui Qiu, Qin Xie, Li Lin, Zhongfan Liu. Crack-Free Transfer of Graphene Wafers via Photoresist as Transfer Medium [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(10): 2306038-.
[6]	Yue Qi, Luzhao Sun, Zhongfan Liu. Super Graphene-Skinned Material: A New Member of Graphene Materials Family [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(10): 2307028-.
[7]	Jiawei Yang, Chunyang Zheng, Yahui Pang, Zhongyang Ji, Yurui Li, Jiayi Hu, Jiangrui Zhu, Qi Lu, Li Lin, Zhongfan Liu, Qingmei Hu, Baolu Guan, Jianbo Yin. Graphene Based Room-Temperature Terahertz Detector with Integrated Bow-Tie Antenna [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(10): 2307012-.
[8]	Zhenfei Gao, Qingquan Song, Zhihua Xiao, Zhaolong Li, Tao Li, Jiajun Luo, Shanshan Wang, Wanli Zhou, Lanying Li, Junrong Yu, Jin Zhang. Submicron-Sized, High Crystalline Graphene-Reinforced Meta-Aramid Fibers with Enhanced Tensile Strength [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(10): 2307046-.
[9]	Ruojuan Liu, Bingzhi Liu, Jingyu Sun, Zhongfan Liu. Gaseous-Promotor-Assisted Direct Growth of Graphene on Insulating Substrates: Progress and Prospects [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(1): 2111011-0.
[10]	Wenya He, Huhu Cheng, Liangti Qu. Progress on Carbonene Fibers for Energy Devices [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2203004-.
[11]	Hanqing Liu, Feng Zhou, Xiaoyu Shi, Quan Shi, Zhong-Shuai Wu. Recent Advances and Prospects of Graphene-Based Fibers for Application in Energy Storage Devices [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2204017-.
[12]	Wenqian He, Ya Di, Nan Jiang, Zunfeng Liu, Yongsheng Chen. Graphene-Oxide Seeds Nucleate Strong and Tough Hydrogel-Based Artificial Spider Silk [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2204059-.
[13]	Zhou Xia, Yuanlong Shao. Wet Spinning Assembled Graphene Fiber: Processing, Structure, Property, and Smart Applications [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2103046-.
[14]	Jingsong Peng, Qunfeng Cheng. Nacre-Inspired Graphene-based Multifunctional Nanocomposites [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(5): 2005006-.
[15]	Henan Mao, Xiaogong Wang. Key Factors Affecting Rheological Behavior of High-Concentration Graphene Oxide Dispersions and Population Balance Equation Model Analysis [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(4): 2004025-.

Research Progress in Graphene as Sulfur Hosts in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 77

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0