层间共价增强石墨烯材料的构筑、性能与应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202011059

Abstract

Abstract:

The development of large-scale and controlled graphene production lays the foundation for macroscopic assembly. Among the diverse assembly strategies, modulating the interlayer interaction of graphene nanosheets is of vital importance because it determines the mechanical, electrical, thermal, and permeation properties of the macroscopic objects. Depending on the nature and strength of the interlayer interaction, covalent and noncovalent bondings, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interaction, π-π interaction, and van der Waals force, are classified as two main types of interlayer connection methods, which solely or synergistically link the individual graphene nanosheets for practical macroscopic materials. Among them, the covalent bonding within the interlayer space renders graphene assembly adjusted interlayer distance, strong interlayer interaction, a rich diversity of functionalities, and potential atomic configuration reconstruction, which has attracted considerable research attention. Compared with other noncovalent assembly methods, covalent connections are stronger and thus more stable; however, there are some issues that remain. First, the covalent modification of the graphene surface depends on the defects and/or functional groups, which becomes difficult for graphene films free of surface imperfections. Second, the covalent connection partly alters the sp² hybrid carbon atoms to sp³, resulting in a deteriorated electrical conductivity. Thus, the electrical properties of the macroscopic assembly are far inferior to those of the constituent nanosheets, thereby restricting their applications. Lastly, covalent bonding is naturally rigid, rendering high modulus and strength to the graphene assembly while impairing the toughness. As in certain applications, both high strength and toughness are required; thus, a balanced covalent and noncovalent interaction is required. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in the construction method, properties, and applications of the interlayer covalently connected graphene materials. In the construction method, graphene is classified according to the synthesis method as oxidation-reduction and chemical vapor deposition method, wherein the latter represents graphene without abundant surface bonding sites and is hard to be covalently connected. For the former graphene produced by the oxidation-reduction method, the paper and fiber assembly forms are discussed. Then, the influence of covalent bonding on the mechanical and electrical properties is studied. Note that both the enhancement and potential impairments caused by covalent bonding are addressed. Finally, the applications in electrical devices, energy storage, and ion separation are summarized. The interlayer covalently connected macroscopic graphene material unifies the exceptional properties of graphene and the advantages of assembly strategy and will find applications in related fields. Moreover, it will also inspire the assembly of other graphene-like two-dimensional materials for a richer diversity of applications.

Key words: Graphene, Covalent bond, Diamane, Assembly, Mechanical property

Tao Liang, Bin Wang. Interlayer Covalently Enhanced Graphene Materials: Construction, Properties, and Applications[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(1): 2011059.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 1

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

References 77

1	Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. ; Morozov S. V. ; Jiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Dubonos S. V. ; Grigorieva I. V. ; Firsov A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896
2	Lee C. ; Wei X. ; Kysar J. W. ; Hone J. Science 2008, 321, 382. doi: 10.1126/science.1156211
3	Stoller M. D. ; Park S. ; Zhu Y. ; An J. ; Ruoff R. S. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498. doi: 10.1021/nl802558y
4	Balandin A. A. ; Ghosh S. ; Bao W. ; Calizo I. ; Teweldebrhan D. ; Miao F. ; Lau C. N. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902. doi: 10.1021/nl0731872
5	Hummers W. S. ; Offeman R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. doi: 10.1021/ja01539a017
6	Paton K. R. ; Varrla E. ; Backes C. ; Smith R. J. ; Khan U. ; O'Neill A. ; Boland C. ; Lotya M. ; Istrate O. M. ; King P. ; et al Nature Mater. 2014, 13, 624. doi: 10.1038/nmat3944
7	Li X. ; Cai W. ; An J. ; Kim S. ; Nah J. ; Yang D. ; Piner R. ; Velamakanni A. ; Jung I. ; Tutuc E. ; et al Science 2009, 324, 1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1171245
8	Liang T. ; Kong Y. ; Chen H. ; Xu M. Chin. J. Chem. 2016, 34, 32. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201500429
9	Lin Y.-M. ; Dimitrakopoulos C. ; Jenkins K. A. ; Farmer D. B. ; Chiu H.-Y. ; Grill A. ; Avouris P. Science 2010, 327, 662. doi: 10.1126/science.1184289
10	Zhang Y. ; Gong S. ; Zhang Q. ; Ming P. ; Wan S. ; Peng J. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2378. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00258C
11	Pan L. ; Liu Y. ; Zhong M. ; Xie X. Small 2020, 16, 1902779. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902779
12	Rao C. N. R. ; Pramoda K. ; Kumar R. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 10093. doi: 10.1039/C7CC05390H
13	Shehzad K. ; Xu Y. ; Gao C. ; Duan X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5541. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00218H
14	Cong H.-P. ; Chen J.-F. ; Yu S.-H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7295. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00181H
15	Georgakilas V. ; Tiwari J. N. ; Kemp K. C. ; Perman J. A. ; Bourlinos A. B. ; Kim K. S. ; Zboril R. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5464. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00620
16	Dikin D. A. ; Stankovich S. ; Zimney E. J. ; Piner R. D. ; Dommett G. H. B. ; Evmenenko G. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. Nature 2007, 448, 457. doi: 10.1038/nature06016
17	Gao Y. ; Liu L.-Q. ; Zu S.-Z. ; Peng K. ; Zhou D. ; Han B.-H. ; Zhang Z. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2134. doi: 10.1021/nn103331x
18	Cao C. ; Daly M. ; Chen B. ; Howe J. Y. ; Singh C. V. ; Filleter T. ; Sun Y. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6528. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02173
19	Park S. ; Dikin D. A. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 15801. doi: 10.1021/jp907613s
20	An Z. ; Compton O. C. ; Putz K. W. ; Brinson L. C. ; Nguyen S. T. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3842. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101544
21	Tian Y. ; Cao Y. ; Wang Y. ; Yang W. ; Feng J. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2980. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300118
22	Compton O. C. ; Dikin D. A. ; Putz K. W. ; Brinson L. C. ; Nguyen S. T. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 892. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902069
23	Bourlinos A. B. ; Gournis D. ; Petridis D. ; Szabó T. ; Szeri A. ; Dékány I. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6050. doi: 10.1021/la026525h
24	Matsuo Y. ; Watanabe K. ; Fukutsuka T. ; Sugie Y. Carbon 2003, 41, 1545. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00079-4
25	Matsuo Y. ; Miyabe T. ; Fukutsuka T. ; Sugie Y. Carbon 2007, 45, 1005. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.023
26	Chen H. ; Müller M. B. ; Gilmore K. J. ; Wallace G. G. ; Li D. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3557. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800757
27	Wan S. ; Li Y. ; Mu J. ; Aliev A. E. ; Fang S. ; Kotov N. A. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. ; Baughman R. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018, 115, 5359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719111115
28	Xu Z. ; Gao C. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 571. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1583
29	Xu Z. ; Sun H. ; Zhao X. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 188. doi: 10.1002/adma.201203448
30	Xu Z. ; Gao C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1267. doi: 10.1021/ar4002813
31	Xu Z. ; Liu Y. ; Zhao X. ; Peng L. ; Sun H. ; Xu Y. ; Ren X. ; Jin C. ; Xu P. ; Wang M. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6449. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506426
32	Huang G. ; Hou C. ; Shao Y. ; Wang H. ; Zhang Q. ; Li Y. ; Zhu M. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 4248. doi: 10.1038/srep04248
33	Xu Z. ; Liu Z. ; Sun H. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3249. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300774
34	Kou L. ; Gao C. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4370. doi: 10.1039/c3nr00455d
35	Liu Z. ; Xu Z. ; Hu X. ; Gao C. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6931. doi: 10.1021/ma400681v
36	Zhao X. ; Xu Z. ; Zheng B. ; Gao C. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3164. doi: 10.1038/srep03164
37	Li M. ; Zhang X. ; Wang X. ; Ru Y. ; Qiao J. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 6511. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03108
38	Zhang Y. ; Li Y. ; Ming P. ; Zhang Q. ; Liu T. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2834. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506074
39	Liang T. ; Luan C. ; Chen H. ; Xu M. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3719. doi: 10.1039/C7NR00188F
40	Habib M. R. ; Liang T. ; Yu X. ; Pi X. ; Liu Y. ; Xu M. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018, 81, 036501. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa9bbf
41	Liang T. ; Habib M. R. ; Kong Y. ; Cai Y. ; Chen H. ; Fujita D. ; Lin C.-T. ; Liu Y. ; Yu C. ; Su H. ; et al Carbon 2019, 147, 120. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.075
42	Odkhuu D. ; Shin D. ; Ruoff R. S. ; Park N. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3276. doi: 10.1038/srep03276
43	Barboza A. P. M. ; Guimaraes M. H. D. ; Massote D. V. P. ; Campos L. C. ; Barbosa Neto N. M. ; Cancado L. G. ; Lacerda R. G. ; Chacham H. ; Mazzoni M. S. C. ; Neves B. R. A. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3014. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101061
44	Martins L. G. P. ; Matos M. J. S. ; Paschoal A. R. ; Freire P. T. C. ; Andrade N. F. ; Aguiar A. L. ; Kong J. ; Neves B. R. A. ; de Oliveira A. B. ; Mazzoni M. S. C. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 96. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00149-8
45	Chernozatonskii L. A. ; Sorokin P. B. ; Kvashnin A. G. ; Kvashnin D. G. JEPT Lett. 2009, 90, 134. doi: 10.1134/S0021364009140112
46	Kvashnin A. G. ; Chernozatonskii L. A. ; Yakobson B. I. ; Sorokin P. B. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 676. doi: 10.1021/nl403938g
47	Luo Z. ; Yu T. ; Kim K. ; Ni Z. ; You Y. ; Lim S. ; Shen Z. ; Wang S. ; Lin J. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1781. doi: 10.1021/nn900371t
48	Ke F. ; Zhang L. ; Chen Y. ; Yin K. ; Wang C. ; Tzeng Y.-K. ; Lin Y. ; Dong H. ; Liu Z. ; Tse J. S. ; et al Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5916. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01872
49	Tao Z. ; Du J. ; Qi Z. ; Ni K. ; Jiang S. ; Zhu Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 133101. doi: 10.1063/1.5135027
50	Gao Y. ; Cao T. ; Cellini F. ; Berger C. ; de Heer W. A. ; Tosatti E. ; Riedo E. ; Bongiorno A. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 133. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0023-9
51	Rajasekaran S. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Ogasawara H. ; Nilsson A. ; Kaya S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 085503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.085503
52	Bakharev P. V. ; Huang M. ; Saxena M. ; Lee S. W. ; Joo S. H. ; Park S. O. ; Dong J. ; Camacho-Mojica D. C. ; Jin S. ; Kwon Y. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 59. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0582-z
53	Cheng T. ; Liu Z. ; Liu Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13819. doi: 10.1039/D0TC03253K
54	Suk J. W. ; Piner R. D. ; An J. ; Ruoff R. S. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6557. doi: 10.1021/nn101781v
55	Cao C. ; Daly M. ; Singh C. V. ; Sun Y. ; Filleter T. Carbon 2015, 81, 497. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.082
56	Papageorgiou D. G. ; Kinloch I. A. ; Young R. J. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 75. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004
57	Márquez-Lamas U. ; Martínez-Guerra E. ; Toxqui-Terán A. ; Aguirre-Tostado F. S. ; Lara-Ceniceros T. E. ; Bonilla-Cruz J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 852. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09961
58	Lee W. ; Lee J. U. ; Jung B. M. ; Byun J.-H. ; Yi J.-W. ; Lee S.-B. ; Kim B.-S. Carbon 2013, 65, 296. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.029
59	Ma T. ; Gao H.-L. ; Cong H.-P. ; Yao H.-B. ; Wu L. ; Yu Z.-Y. ; Chen S.-M. ; Yu S.-H. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706435. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706435
60	Jia Z. ; Wang Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4405. doi: 10.1039/C4TA06193D
61	Nam Y. T. ; Choi J. ; Kang K. M. ; Kim D. W. ; Jung H.-T. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 27376. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09912
62	Lim M.-Y. ; Choi Y.-S. ; Kim J. ; Kim K. ; Shin H. ; Kim J.-J. ; Shin D. M. ; Lee J.-C. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 521, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.067
63	Yoon S. S. ; Lee K. E. ; Cha H.-J. ; Seong D. G. ; Um M.-K. ; Byun J.-H. ; Oh Y. ; Oh J. H. ; Lee W. ; Lee J. U. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16366. doi: 10.1038/srep16366
64	Gao H. ; Xiao F. ; Ching C. B. ; Duan H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 7020. doi: 10.1021/am302280b
65	Ma Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Zhu Y. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 9. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-9462-9
66	Zhu Y. ; Ji H. ; Cheng H.-M. ; Ruoff R. S. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 90. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx055
67	Shen B. ; Zhai W. ; Zheng W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4542. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201400079
68	Wang N. ; Samani M. K. ; Li H. ; Dong L. ; Zhang Z. ; Su P. ; Chen S. ; Chen J. ; Huang S. ; Yuan G. ; et al Small 2018, 14, 1801346. doi: 10.1002/smll.201801346
69	Han H. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang N. ; Samani M. K. ; Ni Y. ; Mijbil Z. Y. ; Edwards M. ; Xiong S. ; Sääskilahti K. ; Murugesan M. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11281. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11281
70	Jia Z. ; Wang Y. ; Shi W. ; Wang J. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 520, 139. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.042
71	Cao M.-S. ; Wang X.-X. ; Cao W.-Q. ; Yuan J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 6589. doi: 10.1039/C5TC01354B
72	Song W.-L. ; Fan L.-Z. ; Cao M.-S. ; Lu M.-M. ; Wang C.-Y. ; Wang J. ; Chen T.-T. ; Li Y. ; Hou Z.-L. ; Liu J. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 5057. doi: 10.1039/C4TC00517A
73	Liu Y. ; Liang H. ; Xu Z. ; Xi J. ; Chen G. ; Gao W. ; Xue M. ; Gao C. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4301. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01491
74	Zhang M. ; Huang L. ; Chen J. ; Li C. ; Shi G. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7588. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403322
75	Lin X. ; Shen X. ; Zheng Q. ; Yousefi N. ; Ye L. ; Mai Y.-W. ; Kim J.-K. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 10708. doi: 10.1021/nn303904z
76	Cheng Q. ; Wu M. ; Li M. ; Jiang L. ; Tang Z. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 3838. doi: 10.1002/ange.201210166
77	Cui W. ; Li M. ; Liu J. ; Wang B. ; Zhang C. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9511. doi: 10.1021/nn503755c

Materials	Young’s Modulus/GPa	Tensile Strength /MPa	Strain/%	Reference
Monolayer Graphene	1000	130000	–	²
GO Paper	32	100	0.6	¹⁶
Glutaraldehyde-GO Paper	30.4	101	0.4	¹⁷
Polyallylamine-GO Paper	33.3 ± 2.7	91.9 ± 22.4	0.32 ± 0.08	¹⁹
Boron-GO Paper	127 ± 4	185 ± 30	–	²⁰
PEI Crosslinked GO Paper	103.4	209.9	–	²¹
GO Fiber	5.4	102	6.8–10.1	²⁸
Phenolic Resin-GO Fiber	120	1450	1.8	³⁷
Monolayer GO	207.6 ± 23.4	–	–	⁵⁴
Monolayer rGO	250	–	–	⁵⁶

[1]	Youwen Rong, Jiaqi Sang, Li Che, Dunfeng Gao, Guoxiong Wang. Designing Electrolytes for Aqueous Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(5): 2212027-0.
[2]	Haoliang Lv, Xuejie Wang, Yu Yang, Tao Liu, Liuyang Zhang. RGO-Coated MOF-Derived In₂Se₃ as a High-Performance Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(3): 2210014-0.
[3]	Jingwen Zhang, Hualong Ma, Jun Ma, Meixue Hu, Qihao Li, Sheng Chen, Tianshu Ning, Chuangxin Ge, Xi Liu, Li Xiao, Lin Zhuang, Yixiao Zhang, Liwei Chen. Cone Shaped Surface Array Structure on an Alkaline Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Improves Fuel Cell Performance [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(2): 2111037-0.
[4]	Ruojuan Liu, Bingzhi Liu, Jingyu Sun, Zhongfan Liu. Gaseous-Promotor-Assisted Direct Growth of Graphene on Insulating Substrates: Progress and Prospects [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(1): 2111011-0.
[5]	Zhou Xia, Yuanlong Shao. Wet Spinning Assembled Graphene Fiber: Processing, Structure, Property, and Smart Applications [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2103046-.
[6]	Kunjie Wu, Yongyi Zhang, Zhenzhong Yong, Qingwen Li. Continuous Preparation and Performance Enhancement Techniques of Carbon Nanotube Fibers [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2106034-.
[7]	Wenya He, Huhu Cheng, Liangti Qu. Progress on Carbonene Fibers for Energy Devices [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2203004-.
[8]	Hanqing Liu, Feng Zhou, Xiaoyu Shi, Quan Shi, Zhong-Shuai Wu. Recent Advances and Prospects of Graphene-Based Fibers for Application in Energy Storage Devices [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2204017-.
[9]	Wenqian He, Ya Di, Nan Jiang, Zunfeng Liu, Yongsheng Chen. Graphene-Oxide Seeds Nucleate Strong and Tough Hydrogel-Based Artificial Spider Silk [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(9): 2204059-.
[10]	Jingsong Peng, Qunfeng Cheng. Nacre-Inspired Graphene-based Multifunctional Nanocomposites [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(5): 2005006-.
[11]	Henan Mao, Xiaogong Wang. Key Factors Affecting Rheological Behavior of High-Concentration Graphene Oxide Dispersions and Population Balance Equation Model Analysis [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(4): 2004025-.
[12]	Yishun Yang, Min Zhou, Yanxia Xing. Symmetry-Dependent Transport Properties of γ-Graphyne-based Molecular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(4): 2003004-.
[13]	Zheng Bo, Jing Kong, Huachao Yang, Zhouwei Zheng, Pengpeng Chen, Jianhua Yan, Kefa Cen. Ultra-Low-Temperature Supercapacitor Based on Holey Graphene and Mixed-Solvent Organic Electrolyte [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(4): 2005054-.
[14]	Shiyi Tang, Gaotian Lu, Yi Su, Guang Wang, Xuanzhang Li, Guangqi Zhang, Yang Wei, Yuegang Zhang. Raman Mapping of Lithiation Process on Graphene [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(3): 2001007-.
[15]	Ye Fan, Chongmei Cao, Yun Fang, Yongmei Xia. Fabrication of Fluorescent Nanodots by Self-Crosslinking Ufasomes of Conjugated Linoleic Acid and Their Unique Fluorescence Properties [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(3): 2002032-.

Interlayer Covalently Enhanced Graphene Materials: Construction, Properties, and Applications

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 77

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0