生物柴油替代混合物化学动力学模型构建及路径分析

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201312102

物理化学学报 >> 2014, Vol. 30 >> Issue (2): 217-226.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201312102

生物柴油替代混合物化学动力学模型构建及路径分析

裴毅强¹, 郑朝蕾², 张博²

1 天津大学, 内燃机燃烧学国家重点实验室, 天津300072;
2 重庆大学, 低品位能源利用技术及系统教育部重点实验室, 重庆400044

收稿日期:2013-09-18 修回日期:2013-12-10 发布日期:2014-01-23
通讯作者: 郑朝蕾 E-mail:zhengzhaolei@cqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51006128)资助项目

Chemical Kinetic Model Development of Biodiesel Surrogate Fuel and Reaction Path Analysis

PEI Yi-Qiang¹, ZHENG Zhao-Lei², ZHANG Bo²

1 State Key Laboratory of Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P. R. China;
2 Key Laboratory of Low-Grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, P. R. China

Received:2013-09-18 Revised:2013-12-10 Published:2014-01-23
Contact: ZHENG Zhao-Lei E-mail:zhengzhaolei@cqu.edu.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51006128).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以癸酸甲酯(C₁₁H₂₂O₂)和正庚烷(nC₇H₁₆)作为生物柴油替代混合物，通过相对分子质量、低热值以及含氧量与实际生物柴油对比确定两种组分按摩尔比1：1混合，并在此基础上构建了一个由691种组分、3226个基元反应组成的生物柴油替代混合物的化学动力学机理. 在激波管条件下该机理计算的着火延迟与实验数据吻合很好；在发动机条件下该机理计算的缸内压力与实验值吻合很好，CO、未燃碳氢和NOx与实验结果趋势一致.此外，本文还对替代混合物的低温反应动力学过程进行了分析，结果表明癸酸甲酯脱氢产物主要为MD2J和MDMJ. MD2J在低温阶段的主要消耗途径除了加氧之外,还有与正庚烷基(C₇H₁₅-1)第一次加氧产物(C₇H₁₅O₂-3)进行交叉反应；发生分解反应生成MP2D及与氧发生脱氢反应生成MD2D. 另一种主要脱氢产物MDMJ在低温阶段的主要消耗途径为通过同分异构转化为MD2J和MD3J.

关键词: 生物柴油, 替代混合物, 动力学, 着火延迟, 低温反应

Abstract:

In the present study, methyl decanoate (C₁₁H₂₂O₂) and n-heptane (nC₇H₁₆) were selected as a surrogate of biodiesel fuel. The molar ratio of the two constituents was determined to be 1:1, based on a comparison of the relative molecular weights, low heat values, and oxygen contents of the surrogate fuel and real biodiesel fuel. Furthermore, a chemical kinetic model including 691 species and 3226 elementary reactions of this biodiesel surrogate fuel was developed. The ignition delay times from experiments and calculations, under shock tube conditions, were compared; the computational results agree well with the experimental results. Comparisons of the in-cylinder pressure and main emissions under the engine conditions showed that the in-cylinder pressure calculated using this model agrees very well with the experimental result, and the trends in variations in the amounts of CO, unburned hydrocarbons, and NO_x emissions calculated using this model are also close to the experimental results. In addition, the lowtemperature reaction kinetics was analyzed in this study. The results show that the main products of methyl decanoate H- abstraction are MD2J and MDMJ. Besides the oxygen addition reaction, the main consumption paths of MD2J include reaction with C₇H₁₅O₂-3 (the product of the first oxygen addition of C₇H₁₅-1), decomposition to MP2D, and H-abstraction by O₂ forming MD2D. The main consumption paths of MDMJ are conversion to its isomers, MD2J and MD3J.

Key words: Biodiesel, Surrogate fuel, Kinetics, Ignition delay, Lowtemperature reaction

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

裴毅强, 郑朝蕾, 张博. 生物柴油替代混合物化学动力学模型构建及路径分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(2), 217-226. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201312102

PEI Yi-Qiang, ZHENG Zhao-Lei, ZHANG Bo. Chemical Kinetic Model Development of Biodiesel Surrogate Fuel and Reaction Path Analysis[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30(2), 217-226. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201312102

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201312102

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2014/V30/I2/217

参考文献

(1) Yao, G. X.; Wang, J. M. Sino-Global Energy 2010, 15 (9), 23.[姚国欣,王建明.中外能源, 2010, 15 (9), 23.]
(2) Zhang, S. W. Chemical Industry 2007, 25 (9), 5. [张泗文. 化学工业, 2007, 25 (9), 5.]
(3) Szybist, J. P.; Song, J. H.; Alam, M. Fuel Process. Technol.2007, 88 (7), 679. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.12.008
(4) Lee, C. S.; Park, S. W.; Kwon, S. L. Energy Fuels 2005, 19 (5),2201. doi: 10.1021/ef050026h
(5) Gaurav, K.; Srivastava, R.; Singh, R. Int. J. Green Energy 2013,10 (8), 775. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2012.726673
(6) Lü, X. C.; Ma, J. J.; Ji, L. B.; Huang, Z. Combust. Sci. Technol.2009, 15 (3), 203. [吕兴才,马骏骏, 吉丽斌,黄震.燃烧科学与技术, 2009, 15 (3), 203.]
(7) Komninos, N. P.; Rakopoulos, C. D. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.2012, 16 (3), 1588. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.026
(8) Mancaruso, E.; Vaglieco, B. M. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2010, 34 (3), 346. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.010
(9) Zhang, Q. F.; Zheng, Z. L.; He, Z. W.; Wang, Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (3), 530. [张庆峰, 郑朝蕾, 何祖威,王迎.物理化学学报, 2011, 27 (3), 530.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110334
(10) Szybist, J. P.; McFarlane, J.; Bunting, B. G. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser.2007, 2007-01-4010.
(11) Valeri, I. G.; Yang, J. F. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27 (5), 641. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.024
(12) Fisher, E. M.; Pitz, W. J.; Curran, H. J.; Westbrook, C. K. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2000, 2 (28), 1579.
(13) Herbinet, O.; William, J. P.; Charles, K. W. Combust. Flame2008, 154 (3), 507. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.03.003
(14) Diévart, P.; Won, S. H.; Dooley, S.; Dryer, F. L.; Ju, Y. G.Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 1793. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.01.002
(15) Hakka, M. H.; Glaude, P. A.; Herbinet, O.; Battin-Leclerc, F.Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 2129. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.003
(16) Brakora, J. L.; Ra, Y.; Reitz, R. D.; McFarlane, J.; Daw, C. S.SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 2008, 2008-01-1378.
(17) Herbinet, O.; Pitz, W. J.; Westbrook, C. K. Combust. Flame2010, 157, 893. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.10.013
(18) Sarathy, S. M.; Thomson, M. J.; Pitz, W. J.; Lu, T. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 399. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.058
(19) Patel, A.; Kong, S. C.; Reitz, R. D. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 2004,2004-01-0558.
(20) Hori, M.; Matsunaga, N.; Marinov, N. M.; Pitz, W.; Westbrook,C. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1998, 27, 389.
(21) Kee, R. J.; Rupley, F. M.; Miller, J. A.; Coltrin, M. E.; Grcar, J.F.; Meeks, E.; Moffat, H. K.; Lutz, A. E.; Dixon-Lewis, G.;Smooke, M. D.; Warnatz, J.; Evans, G. H.; Larson, R. S.;Mitchell, R. E.; Petzold, L. R.; Reynolds, W. C.; Caracotsios,M.; Stewart, W. E.; Glarborg, P.; Wang, C.; McLellan, C. L.;Adigun, O.; Houf, W. G.; Chou, C. P.; Miller, S. F.; Ho, P.;Young, P. D.; Young, D. J.; Hodgson, D. W.; Petrova, M. V.;Puduppakkam, K. V. CHEMKIN Release 4.1; Reaction Design:San Diego, CA. 2006
(22) Hernandez, J. J.; Serrano, C.; Perez, J. Energ Fuel 2006, 20,532. doi: 10.1021/ef058025c
(23) Nicolas, G. J. The Rate-controlled Constrained-EquilibriumModeling of C1-C2/O2/diluent Mixtures. Ph. D. Dissertation,Northeastern University, Boston, 2012.
(24) Hernandez, J. J.; Sanz-Argent, J.; Carot, J. M.; Jabaloyes, J. M.Int. J. Engine Res. 2010, 11, 199. doi: 10.1243/14680874JER06209
(25) Andrae, J. C. G.; Brinck, T.; Kalghatgi, G. T. Combust. Flame2008, 155, 696. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.05.010
(26) Andrae, J. C. G. Fuel 2013, 107, 740. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.070
(27) Gustavsson, J.; Golovitchev, V. I. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 2003,2003-01-1848.
(28) Ciezki, H. K.; Adomeit, G. Combust. Flame 1993, 93 (4), 421.doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(93)90142-P
(29) Wang, W. J.; Oehlschlaeger, M. A. Combust. Flame 2012, 159,476. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.07.019
(30) Cheng, X. B.; Chen, D. L.; Ju, H. L. Automobile Technology2008, No. 1, 46. [成晓北,陈德良, 鞠洪玲.汽车技术, 2008,No. 1, 46.]
(31) Zheng, Z. L.; Yao, M. F. Fuel 2006, 85 (17-18), 2605. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.05.005

[1]	王晶晶, 曹贵强, 段瑞贤, 李向阳, 李喜飞. 金属单原子催化剂增强硫正极动力学的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212005 -0 .
[2]	吕娜, 荆雪东, 许瑶, 鲁巍, 刘奎朝, 张振翼. 多组分纳米纤维体系中载流子动力学的有效级联调制及其高效光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2207045 -0 .
[3]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[4]	马骋, 窦翔宇, 刘泽宇, 廖培龙, 朱志扬, 刘卡尔顿, 黄建滨. 一种新型CO₂/原油助混剂CAA8-X的应用与助混机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2012019 - .
[5]	俞宏伟, 李实, 李金龙, 朱韶华, 孙成珍. 气驱油油气混相过程的界面传质特性及其分子机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006061 - .
[6]	卢浩然, 魏雅清, 龙闰. 纳米孔缺陷导致单层黑磷电荷局域极大抑制非辐射电子-空穴复合的时域模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006064 - .
[7]	毛赫南, 王晓工. 影响高浓度氧化石墨烯分散液流变行为的重要因素及群体平衡动力学分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2004025 - .
[8]	曹冲, 张裴, 曹立冬, 刘铭鑫, 宋玉莹, 陈鹏, 黄啟良, 韩布兴. 液滴在超疏水植物叶面的沉积：实验和分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2207006 - .
[9]	李孟婷, 郑星群, 李莉, 魏子栋. 碱性介质中氢氧化和析氢反应机理研究现状[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007054 - .
[10]	王云飞, 刘建华, 于美, 钟锦岩, 周琪森, 邱俊明, 张晓亮. SnO₂表面卤化提高钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2006030 - .
[11]	陈文琼, 关永吉, 张姣, 裴俊捷, 张晓萍, 邓友全. 外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2001004 - .
[12]	任宁,王昉,张建军,郑新芳. 热分析动力学研究方法的新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905062 - .
[13]	张婷,李翠翠,王伟,郭兆琦,庞爱民,马海霞. 三维氧化铁/石墨烯的构建及其对CL-20的热分解性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905048 - .
[14]	苗静,郭睿凤,刘志宏. BaO∙4B₂O₃∙5H₂O纳米材料的制备及其对聚丙烯阻燃性能的热分解动力学方法评价[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905052 - .
[15]	谢文,周莲娇,徐娟,郭清莲,蒋风雷,刘义. 生物热化学和热动力学研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905051 - .

生物柴油替代混合物化学动力学模型构建及路径分析

Chemical Kinetic Model Development of Biodiesel Surrogate Fuel and Reaction Path Analysis

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0