新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904025

物理化学学报 >> 2020, Vol. 36 >> Issue (2): 1904025.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904025

所属专题：超级电容器

新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器

陈尧^1,*(),陈政^1,^2,^3,*()

¹ 武汉科技大学材料与冶金学院，省部共建耐火材料与冶金国家重点实验室，武汉 430081
² 宁波诺丁汉大学科学与工程学院化学与环境工程系，浙江宁波 315100
³ 诺丁汉大学工程学院化学与环境工程系，诺丁汉NG2 7RD，英国

收稿日期:2019-04-03 录用日期:2019-06-07 发布日期:2019-06-17
通讯作者: 陈尧,陈政 E-mail:y.chen@wust.edu.cn;george.chen@nottingham.ac.uk
作者简介:Yao Chen (ORCID: 0000-0003-0147-8156) obtained his PhD degree from Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences under Prof. Yanwei Ma's supervision in 2012. He then completed his postdoc research in IFW Dresden, Germany, together with Prof. Oliver Schmidt and in AIST Kansai, Japan with Prof. Qiang Xu. Since 2015, as an instructor, he had joined Wuhan University of Science and Technology where he was mainly engaged in research on carbon based electrochemical energy storage devices and heterogeneous catalysis|George Z. Chen (ORCID: 0000-0002-5589-5767) graduated from Jiujiang Teachers Training College with a Diploma in 1981, Fujian Normal University with the MSc in 1985, and the University of London with the PhD and DIC in 1992. After contracted work in the Universities of Oxford, Leeds and Cambridge, he joined the University of Nottingham in 2003, and has been Professor since 2009. He is Li Dak Sam Chair Professor of the University of Nottingham Ningbo China, and Specially Invited Professor of Wuhan University of Science and Technology. His research aims at electrochemical and liquid salts innovations for materials, energy and environment
基金资助:
华中科技大学材料成形与模具技术国家重点实验室开放基金(P2019-014);宁波市政府(3315计划);宁波市政府(2014A35001-1)

New Precursors Derived Activated Carbon and Graphene for Aqueous Supercapacitors with Unequal Electrode Capacitances

Yao Chen^1,*(),George Zheng Chen^1,^2,^3,*()

¹ The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, College of Materials and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, P. R. China
² Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China
³ Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG2 7RD, UK

Received:2019-04-03 Accepted:2019-06-07 Published:2019-06-17
Contact: Yao Chen,George Zheng Chen E-mail:y.chen@wust.edu.cn;george.chen@nottingham.ac.uk
Supported by:
State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and the Die & Mould Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China(P2019-014);the Ningbo Municipal Government, China(3315计划);the Ningbo Municipal Government, China(2014A35001-1)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

碳材料具有不同的微米和纳米结构以及本体和表面的官能基团，因此成为最普遍采用的超级电容器电极材料。典型的例子是活性炭和石墨烯。最近的研究趋势是通过新方法，以传统和新碳源，例如生物质、聚合物、氧化石墨、碳氢以及二氧化碳气体，来制备成本低、电容性能高的活性炭和石墨烯。特别是，大多数新碳源衍生碳非常适用于水系电解液。电荷存储不仅发生在“碳|电解液”界面上(形成双电层)，也依靠本体和表面的官能化带来的氧化还原活性，包括有限离域价电子转移反应。此外，进一步理解电荷存储机制有助于设计出比传统对称电容器具有更高电压和比能量的非等电极电容水系超级电容器。本文综述了新碳源衍生碳材料和器件的最新进展，为超级电容器技术的持续发展助力。

关键词: 新碳源, 活性炭, 石墨烯, 水系电容器, 非等电极电容

Abstract:

Carbon materials can offer various micro- and nanostructures as well as bulk and surface functionalities; hence, they remain the most popular for manufacturing supercapacitors. This article critically reviews recent developments in the preparation of carbon materials from new precursors for supercapacitors. Typical examples are activated carbon (AC) and graphene, which can be prepared from various conventional and new precursors such as biomass, polymers, graphite oxide, CH₄, and even CO₂ via innovative processes to achieve low-cost and/or high specific capacitance. Specifically, when producing AC from natural biomasses or synthetic polymers, either new, spent, or waste, popular activation agents, such as KOH and ZnCl₂, are often used to process the ACs derived from these new precursors while the respective activation mechanisms always attract interest. The traditional two-step calcination process at high temperatures is widely employed to achieve high performance, with or without retaining the morphology of the precursors. The three-step calcination, including a post-vacuum treatment, is also the preferred choice in many cases, but it can increase the cost per capacity (kWh∙g⁻¹). More recently, one-step molecular activation promises a better and more economical approach to the commercial application of AC, although further increase of the yield is necessary. In addition to activation, graphitization, N doping, and template control can further improve ACs in terms of the charging and discharging rates, or pseudocapacitance, or both. Considerations are also given to material structure design, and carbon regeneration during activation. Metal-organic frameworks, which were initially used as templates, have been found to be good direct carbon precursors. Various graphene structures, including powders, films, aerogels, foams, and fibers, can be produced from graphite oxide, CO₂, and CH₄. Similar to AC, graphene can possess micropores by activation. Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis and molten salt processing are newly-reported methods for fabrication of mesoporous graphene. Macroporous graphene hydrogels can be produced by hydrothermal treatment of graphite oxide suspension, which can also be transferred into films. Hierarchically porous structures can be achieved by H₂O₂ etching or ZnCl₂ activation of the macroporous graphene precursor. Sponges as templates combined with KOH activation are applied to create both micro- and macropores in graphene foams. Graphene can grow on fibers and textiles by electrodeposition, dip-coating, or filtration, which can be woven into clothes with a large area or thick loading, illuminating the potential application in flexible and wearable supercapacitors. The key obstacles in AC and graphene production are high cost, low yield, low packing density, and low working potential range. Most Carbon materials derived from new precursors work very well with aqueous electrolytes. Charge storage occurs not only in the electric double layer (i.e., the "carbon | electrolyte" interface), but also via redox activity in association with the bulk and surface functionalities, and the resulting partial delocalization of valence electrons. The analysis of the capacitive electrode has shown a design defect that prevents the working voltage of a symmetrical supercapacitor from reaching the full potential window of the carbon material. This defect can be avoided in AC-based supercapacitors with unequal electrode capacitances, leading to higher cell voltages and hence higher specific energy than their symmetrical counterparts. There are also emerging ways to raise the energy capacity of AC supercapacitors, such as the use of redox electrolytes to enable the Nernstian charge storage mechanism, and of the three dimensional printing method for a desirable electrode structure. All these developments are promising carbon materials from various precursors of new and waste sources for a more affordable and sustainable supercapacitor technology.

Key words: New precursor, Activated carbon, Graphene, Aqueous supercapacitor, Unequal electrode capacitance

陈尧,陈政. 新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2), 1904025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904025

Yao Chen,George Zheng Chen. New Precursors Derived Activated Carbon and Graphene for Aqueous Supercapacitors with Unequal Electrode Capacitances[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2020, 36(2), 1904025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904025

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904025

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I2/1904025

图/表 14

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 1

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Table 2

Fig 12

参考文献 123

1	Chen G. Z. Int. Mater. Rev 2017, 62, 173. doi: 10.1080/09506608.2016.1240914
2	Zhang X. ; Zhang H. ; Li C. ; Wang K. ; Sun X. ; Ma Y. RSC Adv 2014, 4, 45862. doi: 10.1039/c4ra07869a
3	Chen, Y.; Chen, G. Z. Building Porous Graphene Architectures for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices, In: Innovations in Engineered Porous Materials for Energy Generation and Storage applications; Rajagopalan, R.; Balakrishnan, A. Eds.; CRC press, Boca Raton, 2018, pp. 86–108.
4	Inagaki M. ; Konno H. ; Tanaike O. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 7880. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.036
5	Hibino T. ; Kobayashi K. ; Nagao M. ; Kawasaki S. Sci. Rep 2015, 5, 7903. doi: 10.1038/srep07903
6	Sevilla M. ; Mokaya R. Energy Environ. Sci 2014, 7, 1250. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43525c
7	Harris P. J. F. ; Liu Z. ; Suenaga K. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 362201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/36/362201
8	Peigney A. ; Laurent C. ; Flahaut E. ; Bacsa R. R. ; Rousset A. Carbon 2001, 39, 507. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6223(00)00155-x
9	Zhang Y. ; Tan Y. W. ; Stormer H. L. ; Kim P. Nature 2005, 438, 201. doi: 10.1038/nature04235
10	Liu F. ; Ming P. ; Li J. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 064120. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.064120
11	Stankovich S. ; Dikin D. A. ; Piner R. D. ; Kohlhaas K. A. ; Kleinhammes A. ; Jia Y. ; Wu Y. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034
12	Stoller M. D. ; Park S. ; Zhu Y. ; An J. ; Ruoff R. S. Nano Lett 2008, 8, 3498. doi: 10.1021/nl802558y
13	Li D. ; Muller M. B. ; Gilje S. ; Kaner R. B. ; Wallace G. G. Nat. Nanotechnol 2008, 3, 101. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.451
14	Li J. ; O'Shea J. ; Hou X. ; Chen G. Z. Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 10414. doi: 10.1039/c7cc04344a
15	Rouquerol J. ; Avnir D. ; Fairbridge C. W. ; Everett D. H. ; Haynes J. H. ; Pernicone N. ; Ramsay J. D. F. ; Sing K. S. W. ; Unger K. K. Pure Appl. Chem 1994, 66, 1739. doi: 10.1351/pac199466081739
16	Ibarra J. ; Moliner R. ; Palacios J. Fuel 1991, 70, 727. doi: 10.1016/0016-2361(91)90069-M
17	Ahmadpour A. ; Do D. D. Carbon 1996, 34, 471. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9
18	Hayashi J. i. ; Kazehaya A. ; Muroyama K. ; Watkinson A. P. Carbon 2000, 38, 1873. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00027-0
19	Saha D. ; Li Y. ; Bi Z. ; Chen J. ; Keum J. K. ; Hensley D. K. ; Grappe H. A. ; Meyer H. M. ; Dai S. ; Paranthaman M. P. ; Naskar A. K. Langmuir 2014, 30, 900. doi: 10.1021/la404112m
20	Hao P. ; Zhao Z. ; Tian J. ; Li H. ; Sang Y. ; Yu G. ; Cai H. ; Liu H. ; Wong C. P. ; Umar A. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12120. doi: 10.1039/c4nr03574g
21	Su X. L. ; Chen J. R. ; Zheng G. P. ; Yang J. H. ; Guan X. X. ; Liu P. ; Zheng X. C. Appl. Surf. Sci 2018, 436, 327. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.249
22	Xie L. ; Sun G. ; Su F. ; Guo X. ; Kong Q. ; Li X. ; Huang X. ; Wan L. ; Song W. ; Li K. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1637. doi: 10.1039/c5ta09043a
23	Li Y. ; Wang G. ; Wei T. ; Fan Z. ; Yan P. Nano Energy 2016, 19, 165. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.038
24	Wang H. ; Xu Z. ; Li Z. ; Cui K. ; Ding J. ; Kohandehghan A. ; Tan X. ; Zahiri B. ; Olsen B. C. ; Holt C. M. B. ; et al Nano Lett 2014, 14, 1987. doi: 10.1021/nl500011d
25	Tian W. ; Gao Q. ; Tan Y. ; Yang K. ; Zhu L. ; Yang C. ; Zhang H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 5656. doi: 10.1039/c4ta06620k
26	Li D. ; Zhang J. ; Wang Z. ; Jin X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin 2017, 33, 2245. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705241
	李道琰; 张基琛; 王志勇; 金先波. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 2245. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705241
27	Zhang L. ; Gu H. ; Sun H. ; Cao F. ; Chen Y. ; Chen G. Z. Carbon 2018, 132, 573. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.100
28	Mao N. ; Wang H. ; Sui Y. ; Cui Y. ; Pokrzywinski J. ; Shi J. ; Liu W. ; Chen S. ; Wang X. ; Mitlin D. Nano Research 2017, 10, 1767. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1486-6
29	Yan J. ; Wei T. ; Qiao W. ; Fan Z. ; Zhang L. ; Li T. ; Zhao Q. Electrochem. Commun 2010, 12, 1279. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.06.037
30	Zhang H. ; Zhang X. ; Ma Y. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 184, 347. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.089
31	Su H. ; Zhang H. ; Liu F. ; Chun F. ; Zhang B. ; Chu X. ; Huang H. ; Deng W. ; Gu B. ; Zhang H. ; et al Chem. Eng. J 2017, 322, 73. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.012
32	Tang K. ; Chang J. ; Cao H. ; Su C. ; Li Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhang Y. ACS Sus. Chem. Eng 2017, 5, 11324. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02307
33	Feng L. ; Wang K. ; Zhang X. ; Sun X. ; Li C. ; Ge X. ; Ma Y. Adv. Funct. Mater 2018, 28, 1704463. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201704463
34	Alabadi A. ; Yang X. ; Dong Z. ; Li Z. ; Tan B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 11697. doi: 10.1039/c4ta01215a
35	Kim M. ; Puthiaraj P. ; Qian Y. ; Kim Y. ; Jang S. ; Hwang S. ; Na E. ; Ahn W. S. ; Shim S. E. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 284, 98. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.096
36	Wei X. ; Wan S. ; Jiang X. ; Wang Z. ; Gao S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22238. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b05022
37	Sun L. ; Tian C. ; Li M. ; Meng X. ; Wang L. ; Wang R. ; Yin J. ; Fu H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 6462. doi: 10.1039/c3ta10897j
38	Graf D. ; Molitor F. ; Ensslin K. ; Stampfer C. ; Jungen A. ; Hierold C. ; Wirtz L. Nano Lett 2007, 7, 238. doi: 10.1021/nl061702a
39	Tian W. ; Gao Q. ; Tan Y. ; Li Z. Carbon 2017, 119, 287. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.050
40	Li B. ; Dai F. ; Xiao Q. ; Yang L. ; Shen J. ; Zhang C. ; Cai M. Energy Environ. Sci 2016, 9, 102. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03149d
41	Ma C. ; Chen X. ; Long D. ; Wang J. ; Qiao W. ; Ling L. Carbon 2017, 118, 699. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.075
42	Song Z. ; Zhu D. ; Li L. ; Chen T. ; Duan H. ; Wang Z. ; Lv Y. ; Xiong W. ; Liu M. ; Gan L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 1177. doi: 10.1039/c8ta10158b
43	Li Z. ; Xu Z. ; Wang H. ; Ding J. ; Zahiri B. ; Holt C. M. B. ; Tan X. ; Mitlin D. Energy Environ. Sci 2014, 7, 1708. doi: 10.1039/C3EE43979H
44	Xia X. ; Zhang Y. ; Fan Z. ; Chao D. ; Xiong Q. ; Tu J. ; Zhang H. ; Fan H. J. Adv. Energy Mater 2015, 5, 1401709. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401709
45	Wang Q. ; Yan J. ; Wang Y. ; Wei T. ; Zhang M. ; Jing X. ; Fan Z. Carbon 2014, 67, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.070
46	Li C. ; Zhang X. ; Wang K. ; Sun X. ; Ma Y. J. Power Sources 2018, 400, 468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.013
47	Li C. ; Zhang X. ; Wang K. ; Sun X. ; Ma Y. Carbon 2018, 140, 237. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.044
48	Ning G. ; Fan Z. ; Wang G. ; Gao J. ; Qian W. ; Wei F. Chem. Commun 2011, 47, 5976. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11159k
49	Fan Z. ; Liu Y. ; Yan J. ; Ning G. ; Wang Q. ; Wei T. ; Zhi L. ; Wei F. Adv. Energy Mater 2012, 2, 419. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100654
50	Liu B. ; Shioyama H. ; Akita T. ; Xu Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 5390. doi: 10.1021/ja7106146
51	Jiang H. L. ; Liu B. ; Lan Y. Q. ; Kuratani K. ; Akita T. ; Shioyama H. ; Zong F. ; Xu Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 11854. doi: 10.1021/ja203184k
52	Chaikittisilp W. ; Hu M. ; Wang H. ; Huang H. S. ; Fujita T. ; Wu K. C. W. ; Chen L. C. ; Yamauchi Y. ; Ariga K. Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 7259. doi: 10.1039/c2cc33433j
53	Amali A. J. ; Sun J. K. ; Xu Q. Chem. Commun 2014, 50, 1519. doi: 10.1039/c3cc48112c
54	Sun H. ; Gu H. ; Zhang L. ; Chen Y. Mater. Lett 2018, 216, 123. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.009
55	Salunkhe R. R. ; Young C. ; Tang J. ; Takei T. ; Ide Y. ; Kobayashi N. ; Yamauchi Y. Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 4764. doi: 10.1039/c6cc00413j
56	Pachfule P. ; Shinde D. ; Majumder M. ; Xu Q. Nat. Chem 2016, 8, 718. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2515
57	Kosynkin D. V. ; Higginbotham A. L. ; Sinitskii A. ; Lomeda J. R. ; Dimiev A. ; Price B. K. ; Tour J. M. Nature 2009, 458, 872. doi: 10.1038/nature07872
58	Yang X. ; Cheng C. ; Wang Y. ; Qiu L. ; Li D. Science 2013, 341, 534. doi: 10.1126/science.1239089
59	Xu Y. ; Sheng K. ; Li C. ; Shi G. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324. doi: 10.1021/nn101187z
60	Chen Z. ; Ren W. ; Gao L. ; Liu B. ; Pei S. ; Cheng H. M. Nat. Mater 2011, 10, 424. doi: 10.1038/nmat3001
61	Xu Z. ; Gao C. Nat. Commun 2011, 2, 571. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1583
62	Dong Z. ; Jiang C. ; Cheng H. ; Zhao Y. ; Shi G. ; Jiang L. ; Qu L. Adv. Mater 2012, 24, 1856. doi: 10.1002/adma.201200170
63	Shin H. J. ; Kim K. K. ; Benayad A. ; Yoon S. M. ; Park H. K. ; Jung I. S. ; Jin M. H. ; Jeong H. K. ; Kim J. M. ; Choi J. Y. ; et al Adv. Funct. Mater 2009, 19, 1987. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200900167
64	Fan X. ; Peng W. ; Li Y. ; Li X. ; Wang S. ; Zhang G. ; Zhang F. Adv. Mater 2008, 20, 4490. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801306
65	Wang G. ; Yang J. ; Park J. ; Gou X. ; Wang B. ; Liu H. ; Yao J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 8192. doi: 10.1021/jp710931h
66	Chen Y. ; Zhang X. ; Yu P. ; Ma Y. Chem. Commun 2009, 4527 doi: 10.1039/B907723E
67	Zhang J. ; Yang H. ; Shen G. ; Cheng P. ; Zhang J. ; Guo S. Chem. Commun 2010, 46, 1112. doi: 10.1039/B917705A
68	Chen Y. ; Zhang X. ; Zhang D. ; Yu P. ; Ma Y. Carbon 2011, 49, 573. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.060
69	Pei S. ; Zhao J. ; Du J. ; Ren W. ; Cheng H. M. Carbon 2010, 48, 4466. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.006
70	Schniepp H. C. ; Li J. L. ; McAllister M. J. ; Sai H. ; Herrera-Alonso M. ; Adamson D. H. ; Prud'homme R. K. ; Car R. ; Saville D. A. ; Aksay I. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 8535. doi: 10.1021/jp060936f
71	Yan J. ; Wang Q. ; Wei T. ; Jiang L. ; Zhang M. ; Jing X. ; Fan Z. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4720. doi: 10.1021/nn500497k
72	Zhu Y. ; Murali S. ; Stoller M. D. ; Ganesh K. J. ; Cai W. ; Ferreira P. J. ; Pirkle A. ; Wallace R. M. ; Cychosz K. A. ; Thommes M. ; et al Science 2011, 332, 1537. doi: 10.1126/science.1200770
73	Chen Y. ; Zhang X. ; Zhang H. ; Sun X. ; Zhang D. ; Ma Y. RSC Adv 2012, 2, 7747. doi: 10.1039/C2RA20667F
74	Kim H. K. ; Bak S. M. ; Lee S. W. ; Kim M. S. ; Park B. ; Lee S. C. ; Choi Y. J. ; Jun S. C. ; Han J. T. ; Nam K. W. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci 2016, 9, 1270. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03580e
75	Li C. ; Zhang X. ; Wang K. ; Sun X. ; Liu G. ; Li J. ; Tian H. ; Li J. ; Ma Y. Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1604690. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604690
76	Chakrabarti A. ; Lu J. ; Skrabutenas J. C. ; Xu T. ; Xiao Z. ; Maguire J. A. ; Hosmane N. S. J. Mater. Chem 2011, 21, 9491. doi: 10.1039/c1jm11227a
77	Zhang H. ; Zhang X. ; Sun X. ; Zhang D. ; Lin H. ; Wang C. ; Wang H. ; Ma Y. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1084. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200904
78	Strauss V. ; Marsh K. ; Kowal M. D. ; El-Kady M. ; Kaner R. B. Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1704449. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704449
79	Lin S. ; Zhang C. ; Wang Z. ; Dai S. ; Jin X. Adv. Energy Mater 2017, 7, 1700766. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700766
80	Liu Y. ; Cai X. ; Luo B. ; Yan M. ; Jiang J. ; Shi W. Carbon 2016, 107, 426. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.025
81	Xu Y. ; Lin Z. ; Zhong X. ; Huang X. ; Weiss N. O. ; Huang Y. ; Duan X. Nat. Commun 2014, 5, 4554. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5554
82	Bai H. ; Li C. ; Wang X. ; Shi G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5545. doi: 10.1021/jp1120299
83	Xiong Z. ; Liao C. ; Han W. ; Wang X. Adv. Mater 2015, 27, 4469. doi: 10.1002/adma.201501983
84	Li H. ; Tao Y. ; Zheng X. ; Luo J. ; Kang F. ; Cheng H. M. ; Yang Q. H. Energy Environ. Sci 2016, 9, 3135. doi: 10.1039/c6ee00941g
85	Chen Y. ; Zhang X. ; Yu P. ; Ma Y. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 3031. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.057
86	Kulkarni S. B. ; Patil U. M. ; Shackery I. ; Sohn J. S. ; Lee S. ; Park B. ; Jun S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4989. doi: 10.1039/c3ta14959e
87	Yang Z. Y. ; Jin L. J. ; Lu G. Q. ; Xiao Q. Q. ; Zhang Y. X. ; Jing L. ; Zhang X. X. ; Yan Y. M. ; Sun K. N. Adv. Funct. Mater 2014, 24, 3917. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201304091
88	Xu J. ; Tan Z. ; Zeng W. ; Chen G. ; Wu S. ; Zhao Y. ; Ni K. ; Tao Z. ; Ikram M. ; Ji H. ; Zhu Y. Adv. Mater 2016, 28, 5222. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600586
89	Jang E. Y. ; Carretero-González J. ; Choi A. ; Kim W. J. ; Kozlov M. , E.; Kim T., Kang T. J., Baek S. J., Kim D. W., Park Y. W., et al. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 235601. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/23/235601
90	Zhao Y. ; Jiang C. ; Hu C. ; Dong Z. ; Xue J. ; Meng Y. ; Zheng N. ; Chen P. ; Qu L. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2406. doi: 10.1021/nn305674a
91	Meng Y. ; Zhao Y. ; Hu C. ; Cheng H. ; Hu Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Shi G. ; Qu L. Adv. Mater 2013, 25, 2326. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300132
92	Qu G. ; Cheng J. ; Li X. ; Yuan D. ; Chen P. ; Chen X. ; Wang B. ; Peng H. Adv. Mater 2016, 28, 3646. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600689
93	Liu L. ; Yu Y. ; Yan C. ; Li K. ; Zheng Z. Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 7260. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8260
94	Sun H. ; Xie S. ; Li Y. ; Jiang Y. ; Sun X. ; Wang B. ; Peng H. Adv. Mater 2016, 28, 8431. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602987
95	Yang Y. ; Huang Q. ; Niu L. ; Wang D. ; Yan C. ; She Y. ; Zheng Z. Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1606679. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606679
96	Hong M. S. ; Lee S. H. ; Kim S. W. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett 2002, 5, A227. doi: 10.1149/1.1506463
97	Sun X. ; Zhang X. ; Zhang H. ; Zhang D. ; Ma Y. J. Solid State Electrochem 2012, 16, 2597. doi: 10.1007/s10008-012-1678-7
98	Khomenko V. ; Raymundo-Piñero E. ; Béguin F. J. Power Sources 2006, 153, 183. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.210
99	Peng C. ; Zhang S. ; Zhou X. ; Chen G. Z. Energy Environ. Sci 2010, 3, 1499. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00228c
100	Dai Z. ; Peng C. ; Chae J. H. ; Ng K. C. ; Chen G. Z. Sci. Rep 2015, 5, 9854. doi: 10.1038/srep09854
101	Demarconnay L. ; Raymundo-Pi ero E. ; Béguin F. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 580. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.013
102	Chae J. H. ; Chen G. Z. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 86, 248. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.033
103	Weng Z. ; Li F. ; Wang D. W. ; Wen L. ; Cheng H. M. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed 2013, 52, 3722. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209259
104	Wu Z. S. ; Ren W. ; Wang D. W. ; Li F. ; Liu B. ; Cheng H. M. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5835. doi: 10.1021/nn101754k
105	Fan Z. ; Yan J. ; Wei T. ; Zhi L. ; Ning G. ; Li T. ; Wei F. Adv. Funct. Mater 2011, 21, 2366. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201100058
106	Zhang X. ; Sun X. ; Chen Y. ; Zhang D. ; Ma Y. Mater. Lett 2012, 68, 336. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.092
107	Jabeen N. ; Hussain A. ; Xia Q. ; Sun S. ; Zhu J. ; Xia H. Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1700804. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700804
108	Xiong T. ; Tan T. L. ; Lu L. ; Lee W. S. V. ; Xue J. Adv. Energy Mater 2018, 8, 1702630. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702630
109	Zuo W. ; Xie C. ; Xu P. ; Li Y. ; Liu J. Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1703463. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703463
110	Kong D. ; Ren W. ; Cheng C. ; Wang Y. ; Huang Z. ; Yang H. Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21334. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b05908
111	Zhu Y. ; Wu Z. ; Jing M. ; Hou H. ; Yang Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Yang X. ; Song W. ; Jia X. ; Ji X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 866. doi: 10.1039/C4TA05507A
112	Guan C. ; Liu X. ; Ren W. ; Li X. ; Cheng C. ; Wang J. Adv. Energy Mater 2017, 7, 1602391. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602391
113	Gao S. ; Sun Y. ; Lei F. ; Liang L. ; Liu J. ; Bi W. ; Pan B. ; Xie Y. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed 2014, 53, 12789. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407836
114	Dong X. ; Guo Z. ; Song Y. ; Hou M. ; Wang J. ; Wang Y. ; Xia Y. Adv. Funct. Mater 2014, 24, 3405. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201304001
115	Lai F. ; Miao Y. E. ; Zuo L. ; Lu H. ; Huang Y. ; Liu T. Small 2016, 12, 3235. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600412
116	Liu S. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhang B. ; Xia H. ; Zhou J. ; Xie W. ; Li H. J. Power Sources 2018, 381, 116. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.014
117	Wang D. ; Nai J. ; Li H. ; Xu L. ; Wang Y. Carbon 2019, 141, 40. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.055
118	Roldán S. ; Blanco C. ; Granda M. ; Menéndez R. ; Santamaría R. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed 2011, 123, 1737. doi: 10.1002/ange.201006811
119	Sheng L. ; Jiang L. ; Wei T. ; Liu Z. ; Fan Z. Adv. Energy Mater 2017, 7, 1700668. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700668
120	Sheng L. ; Jiang L. ; Wei T. ; Zhou Q. ; Jiang Y. ; Jiang Z. ; Liu Z. ; Fan Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 7649. doi: 10.1039/C8TA01375F
121	Akinwolemiwa B. ; Peng C. ; Chen G. Z. J. Electrochem. Soc 2015, 162, A5054. doi: 10.1149/2.0111505jes
122	Akinwolemiwa B. ; Wei C. H. ; Yang Q. H. ; Yu L. P. ; Xia L. ; Hu D. ; Peng C. ; Chen G. Z. J. Electrochem. Soc 2018, 165, A4067. doi: 10.1149/2.0031902jes
123	Shen K. ; Ding J. ; Yang S. Adv. Energy Mater 2018, 8, 1800408. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800408

Precursors ^Ref.	Activation reagents	Step number ^a	Surface area/(m²·g^-1)	Electrolyte	Current load	Capacitance/(F·g^-1)
Coconut shell ³⁷	ZnCl₂+FeCl₃	1	1874	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	1 A·g^-1	276 ^b
Agar ²⁷	KOH	1	1672	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	0.25 A·g^-1	228 ^b
C₉H₇N₃ ²⁸	KOH	1	2980	1 mol·L^-1 Na₂SO₄	0.5 A·g^-1	221 ^b
PDB ⁴²	KOH	1	2660	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	0.2 A·g^-1	290 ^b
Gelatin ²⁶	KOH	2	3692	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	0.5 A·g^-1	305 ^b
Sonicated ZIF-8 ⁵³	KOH	2	2972	1 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	10 mV·s^-1	211 ^b
MOF-74 ⁵⁶	KOH	2	1492	1 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	1 A·g^-1	168 ^b
Resin+Melamine ⁴¹	KOH	3	2234	3 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	0.1 A·g^-1	309 ^b
ZIF-8 ⁵²	–	1	1075	0.5 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	50 mV·s^-1	128
PPEA ³⁶	KOH	1	3103	1 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	1 A·g^-1	356
Willow catkin ²²	KOH	2	1776	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	1 A·g^-1	292
Pitch ⁴⁵	KOH	2	762	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	2 mV·s^-1	294
Egg white ⁴³	KOH	2	1217	1 mol·L^-1 KOH	0.25 A·g^-1	525
Bamboo ²⁵	KOH	3	1472	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	0.1 A·g^-1	301

Materials ^Ref.	SSA/(m²·g^-1)	Electrolyte	Capacitance/(F·g^-1)
Molten salt G ⁷⁹	187	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	435 (522 F·cm^-3)
Holey G film ⁸¹	810	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	310 ^a
Sponge-template G ⁸⁸	2582	6 mol·L^-1 KOH	188 ^a
G-CNT textile ⁹⁵	160	5 mol·L^-1 LiCl	250 ^a
		PVA/LiCl	107 F·cm^-3 ^a

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	吕浩亮, 王雪杰, 杨宇, 刘涛, 张留洋. 还原氧化石墨烯包覆MOF衍生In₂Se₃用于钠离子电池负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2210014 -0 .
[3]	王正慜, 洪庆玲, 王晓慧, 黄昊, 陈煜, 李淑妮. 氮掺杂石墨烯气凝胶锚定RuP纳米粒子用于水合肼氧化辅助产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2303028 - .
[4]	廖珺豪, 赵一萱, 胡兆宁, 补赛玉, 陆琪, 尚明鹏, 贾开诚, 裘晓辉, 谢芹, 林立, 刘忠范. 光刻胶辅助的石墨烯晶圆无损转移[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2306038 - .
[5]	亓月, 孙禄钊, 刘忠范. 超级蒙烯材料：石墨烯家族的新成员[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307028 - .
[6]	杨嘉炜, 郑春阳, 庞亚会, 纪仲阳, 李雨芮, 胡嘉仪, 朱江瑞, 陆琪, 林立, 刘忠范, 胡清梅, 关宝璐, 尹建波. 耦合蝶形天线的石墨烯室温太赫兹探测器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307012 - .
[7]	高振飞, 宋清泉, 肖志华, 李兆龙, 李涛, 罗家俊, 王珊珊, 周万立, 李兰英, 于俊荣, 张锦. 亚微米尺寸、高结晶度石墨烯增强间位芳纶纤维力学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307046 - .
[8]	刘若娟, 刘冰之, 孙靖宇, 刘忠范. 气相助剂辅助绝缘衬底上石墨烯生长：现状与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2111011 -0 .
[9]	贺文娅, 程虎虎, 曲良体. 烯碳纤维基能源器件的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2203004 - .
[10]	刘汉卿, 周锋, 师晓宇, 史全, 吴忠帅. 石墨烯基纤维储能器件的研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204017 - .
[11]	何文倩, 邸亚, 姜南, 刘遵峰, 陈永胜. 石墨烯诱导水凝胶成核的高强韧人造蛛丝[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204059 - .
[12]	夏洲, 邵元龙. 湿法纺制石墨烯纤维：工艺、结构、性能与智能应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2103046 - .
[13]	彭景淞, 程群峰. 仿鲍鱼壳石墨烯多功能纳米复合材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2005006 - .
[14]	毛赫南, 王晓工. 影响高浓度氧化石墨烯分散液流变行为的重要因素及群体平衡动力学分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2004025 - .
[15]	杨贻顺, 周敏, 邢燕霞. 基于γ-石墨炔分子磁隧道结对称性依赖的输运性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2003004 - .

新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器

New Precursors Derived Activated Carbon and Graphene for Aqueous Supercapacitors with Unequal Electrode Capacitances

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 123

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0