温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

升高温度可以提高反应速率和增加物质的输运，因此通过不同温度下反应机理的研究可以深入理解电催化过程，对催化剂的设计具有指导意义。本工作初步建立了变温原位红外测定方法。采用温控电极，用电势测温法进行温度的校准，实验得出控温仪器加热温度T_h与电极表面温度T_S的关系为T_S = 0.57T_h + 7.71 (30 ℃ < T_h≤ 50 ℃)；T_S = 0.62T_h + 5.12 (50 ℃ < T_h ≤ 80 ℃)，误差分析最大温差为1 ℃。利用该方法我们研究了商业Pt/C催化剂在不同温度下乙醇的电氧化过程。从循环伏安图可以明显看到随着温度的升高整体氧化电流增大，起始电位、峰电位均负移，说明热活化使得氧化反应更容易进行；第一个峰电流与第二个峰电流的比值用于定性评估CO₂的选择性，对比25 ℃，商业Pt/C催化剂在65 ℃下第一峰提高30%，说明高温有利于C―C键的断裂。对比25 ℃的原位红外谱图，我们发现35 ℃及50 ℃下商业Pt/C催化剂上CO₂产物的起始电位负移200 mV，说明高温下，Pt/C催化剂能在更低的电位提供含氧物种；而CH₃CHO、CH₃COOH起始电位不随温度变化。用CO₂与CH₃COOH的积分面积比来评估CO₂选择性，发现高温低电位其选择性最高，说明高温低电位有利于乙醇完全氧化生成CO₂，而高温高电位下表面吸附含氧物种占据了活性位，阻碍C―C键断裂。

关键词: 温控电极, 电势测温法, 原位红外光谱, 乙醇, 电催化

Abstract:

The electrocatalytic activity of commercial Pt/C for ethanol oxidation is relatively low, and the C―C bond is difficult to break. Thus, the complete oxidation process is not easy, and the fuel utilization efficiency becomes considerably reduced. Increasing the temperature can increase the reaction rate and enhance the mass transport; therefore, a temperature-controlled electrode was used during our in situ FTIRS (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) investigation. The temperature sensor was placed at a certain distance from the surface of the electrode; thus, the surface temperature needed to be corrected. The temperature was calibrated using the "potentiometric" measurement method, which was because the potential-temperature coefficient of the redox couple is constant under certain conditions, and the electrode surface temperature was obtained by potential conversion at different temperatures during the experiment. The experimental results showed that the relationship between the heating temperature, T_h, and the surface temperature, T_S, was T_S = 0.57T_h + 7.71 (30 ℃ < T_h ≤ 50 ℃) and T_S = 0.62T_h + 5.12 (50 ℃ < T_h ≤ 80 ℃), and according to error analysis, the maximum error was 1 ℃. The temperature-controlled electrode was applied to investigate the electrooxidation of ethanol using both in situ FTIRS and cyclic voltammetry using a commercial Pt/C catalyst at different temperatures. Clearly, based on the CV curve for the oxidation of ethanol, with increasing temperature, the overall oxidation current increased, and the onset potential and peak potential both negatively shifted, indicating that thermal activation allows the oxidation reaction to proceed easier. Electrooxidation of ethanol showed two positive oxidation peaks, and the ratio of the first peak current to the second peak current was used to qualitatively evaluate the selectivity of CO₂. Compared with at 25 ℃, the first peak current increased by 30% at 65 ℃, indicating that the high temperature was conducive to C―C bond cleavage. Comparing the in situ FTIRS recorded at 50 ℃, 35 ℃, and 25 ℃, we found that the onset potential of CO₂ on the commercial Pt/C catalyst was lower by 200 mV, indicating that Pt/C can provide oxygen-containing species at lower potentials at high temperature; however, the onset potentials of CH₃CHO and CH₃COOH did not change with temperature. The CO₂ selectivity was semi-quantitatively calculated by the area of CO₂ compared with the area of CH₃COOH from the FTIRS data. It was found that CO₂ had the highest selectivity at high temperature and low potential, indicating that high temperature is conducive to complete ethanol oxidation during CO₂ formation, possibly because both the ethanol bridge adsorption pattern and adsorbed OH (OH_ad) increased with temperature, enhancing subsequent CO_ad and OH_ad oxidation reactions. The low selectivity of CO₂ at the high potential was due to the adsorption of oxygen-containing species that occupied the surface-active site, blocking the adsorption of ethanol.

Key words: Temperature controlled electrode, "Potentiometric" measurement, In situ FTIRS, Ethanol, Electrocatalysis

涂昆芳, 李广, 姜艳霞. 温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8), 1906026. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

Kunfang Tu, Guang Li, Yanxia Jiang. Effect of Temperature on the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Ethanol[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36(8), 1906026. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I8/1906026

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

表2

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 25

1	Chen X. B. ; Li C. ; Gratzel M. ; Kostecki R. ; Mao S. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7909. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35230C
2	Antolini E. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.009
3	An L. ; Zhao T. S. ; Li Y. S. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev 2015, 50, 1462. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.074
4	Yajima T. ; Uchida H. ; Watanabe M. J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (8), 2654. doi: 10.1021/jp037215q
5	Ye J. Y. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Sheng T. ; Sun S. G. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 414. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.023
6	Watanabe M. ; Sato T. ; Kunimatsu K. ; Uchida H. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53 (23), 6928. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.023
7	Wang J. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 396, 33. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00355-4
8	Zhou Z. Y. ; Wang Q. ; Lin J. L. ; Tian N. ; Sun S. G. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55 (27), 7995. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.071
9	Jenkins D. M. ; Song C. Y. ; Fares S. ; Cheng H. ; Barrettino D. Sens Actu B: Chem. 2009, 137, 222. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.09.046
10	Compton R. G. ; Coles B. A. ; Marken F. Chem. Commun 1998, 2595, 2595. doi: 10.1039/A806511J
11	Yuan Q. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Zhuang J. ; Wang X. Chem. Mater 2010, 22, 2395. doi: 10.1021/cm903844t
12	Hitmi H. ; Belgsir E. M. ; Léger J. M. ; Lamy C. ; Lezna R. O. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 407. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80080-4
13	Rao L. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Zhang B. W. ; Cai Y. R. ; Sun S. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 13662. doi: 10.1039/C3CP55059A
14	Iwasita T. ; Pastor E. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 531. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80097-9
15	Rasch B. ; Iwasita T. Electrochim. Acta 1990, 35, 989. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(90)90032-U
16	Colmati F. ; Tremiliosi-Filho G. ; Gonzalez E. R. ; Berná A. ; Herrero E. ; Feliu ; J M. Faraday Discuss 2008, 140, 379. doi: 10.1039/B802160K
17	Liu H. X. ; Tian N. ; Brandon M. P. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Lin J. L. ; Hardacre C. ; Lin W. F. ; Sun S. G. ACS Catal 2012, 2, 708. doi: 10.1021/cs200686a
18	Lu G. Q. ; Sun S. G. ; Cai L. R. ; Chen S. P. ; Tian Z. W. Langmuir 2000, 16, 778. doi: 10.1021/la990282k
19	Tian N. ; Xiao J. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Liu H. X. ; Xu B. B. ; Sun S. G. Faraday Discuss. 2013, 162, 77. doi: 10.1039/C3FD20146E
20	Ghumman A. ; Pickup P. G. J. Power Sources 2008, 179, 280. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.071
21	Rao V. ; Cremers C. ; Stimming U. J. Eletrochem. Soc 2007, 154, 1138. doi: 10.1149/1.2777108
22	Camara G.A. ; Iwasita T. J. Eletrochem. Soc. 2005, 578, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.01.013
23	Severson M. W. ; Stuhlmann C. ; Villegas I. ; Weaver M. J. J. Chem Phys. 1995, 103, 9832. doi: 10.1063/1.469950
24	Zhang B. W. ; Sheng T. ; Wang Y. X. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (1), 892. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03021
25	Wang H. F ; Liu Z. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (33), 10996. doi: 10.1021/ja801648h

T/℃	j₁/(A?mg^?1)	j₂/(A?mg^?1)	j₁/j₂
25	0.372	0.444	0.838
35	0.626	0.628	0.997
45	0.985	0.866	1.137
55	1.328	1.082	1.227
65	1.666	1.286	1.295

Wavenumber/cm^?1	Assignment
2341–2345	O―C―O asymmetric stretching
2040–2060	linearly adsorbed CO_L
1713–1723	C―O stretching of acetaldehyde and acetic acid in solution
1640–1650 1274–1284	H―O―H bending coupling C―O stretching and OH deformation of acetic acid

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[3]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[4]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[5]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[6]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[7]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[8]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[9]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[10]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[11]	雷永刚, 赵天宇, 黄锦鸿, 张颖贞, 臧雪瑞, 李晓, 蔡伟龙, 黄剑莹, 胡军, 赖跃坤. 金属碳化钨与液相染料光敏剂协同促进光催化制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2206006 -0 .
[12]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[13]	尉瑞芳, 李东峰, 尹恒, 王秀丽, 李灿. 微秒时间分辨的工况电化学紫外可见吸收光谱测量系统[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207035 -0 .
[14]	韦天然, 张书胜, 刘倩, 邱园, 罗俊, 刘熙俊. 富氧空位的非晶氧化铜高选择性电催化还原CO₂制乙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207026 -0 .
[15]	刘真, 孟祥福, 古万苗, 查珺, 闫楠, 尤青, 夏楠, 王辉, 伍志鲲. 组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2212064 - .