Ni, Co基硒化物修饰g-C3N4光催化产氢研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912033

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (10): 1912033.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912033

Ni, Co基硒化物修饰g-C₃N₄光催化产氢研究

靳治良, 李彦兵(), 郝旭强()

北方民族大学化学与化学工程学院，宁夏太阳能化学转化技术重点实验室，国家民委化工技术基础重点实验室，银川 750021

收稿日期:2019-12-11 发布日期:2020-02-03
通讯作者: 李彦兵,郝旭强 E-mail:1757039358@qq.com;haoxuqiang@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21862002);国家自然科学基金(41663012);北方民族大学重大科研项目“清洁能源催化生产中的新技术、新体系”(ZDZX201803);北方民族大学宁夏低品位资源高价值利用与环境化学一体化技术创新团队项目资助

Ni, Co-Based Selenide Anchored g-C₃N₄ for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Zhiliang Jin, Yanbing Li(), Xuqiang Hao()

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Chemical Engineering and Technology, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Ningxia Key Laboratory of Solar Chemical Conversion Technology, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China

Received:2019-12-11 Published:2020-02-03
Contact: Yanbing Li,Xuqiang Hao E-mail:1757039358@qq.com;haoxuqiang@126.com
About author:Emails: haoxuqiang@126.com (X.H.); +86-18095117159 (X.H.)
Emails: 1757039358@qq.com (Y.L.); +86-15709611341 (Y.L.)
Supported by:
the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation(21862002);the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation(41663012);the New Technology and System for Clean Energy Catalytic Production, Major Scientific Project of North Minzu University(ZDZX201803);the Ningxia Low-Grade Resource High Value Utilization and Environmental Chemical Integration Technology Innovation Team Project of North Minzu University

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

新型高效的催化剂是突破单体光催化材料载流子低分离和转移效率的重要途径。本文将Ni₃Se₄和CoSe₂纳米粒子锚定在具有良好分散性的g-C₃N₄纳米片表面，合成了两种新的g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄和g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂光催化剂并实现了原位光催化析氢。相当严重的载流子的重组导致g-C₃N₄单体展现了大约只有1.9 μmol·h^-1的极差的光催化析氢活性。Ni₃Se₄和CoSe₂纳米颗粒对于加速载流子快速分离和转移的独特作用使得在g-C₃N₄表面负载Ni₃Se₄和CoSe₂纳米粒子极大地提高了其产氢活性。G-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄展示了一个大约16.4 μmol·h^-1的光催化产氢活性并且g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂展现了一个大约25.6 μmol·h^-1的光催化产氢活性，这分别是g-C₃N₄单体的8倍和13倍。其中，将Ni₃Se₄和CoSe₂与g-C₃N₄耦合可以显著提高光吸收密度以及扩展光响应范围。激发态EY在g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄和g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂存在时比在g-C₃N₄存在时展现了更低的荧光强度，并且在g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄和g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂体系中可观察到最大的电子转移速率。相比g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄@FTO和g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂@FTO电极，g-C₃N₄@@FTO显现了最小的光电流响应密度和最大的电化学，这表明在g-C₃N₄纳米片表面引入Ni₃Se₄和CoSe₂纳米颗粒增强了光生载流子的分离和转移效率，即基于g-C₃N₄的金属硒化的合成有效地抑制了光生载流子的复合以及促进了光催化水裂解制氢反应。同时，吸收带边的红移有效地降低了光激电子从价带到导带跃迁的阈值。此外，g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄和g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂复合催化剂的zeta电位比g-C₃N₄的更负，说明样品表面对质子增强的吸附。并且密度泛函理论结果表明：g-C₃N₄中N位点对H的吸附能为-0.22 eV，还发现氢原子更倾向于吸附在两个硒原子的桥位点上形成Se―H―Se键，并且吸附能为1.53 eV。所有对样品进行的透射电子显微镜(TEM)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、X射线衍射(XRD)、紫外可见漫反射光谱(UV-Vis-DRS)、瞬态光电流、傅立叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)等相关表征都展示了彼此匹配的结果。

关键词: Ni₃Se₄, CoSe₂, g-C₃N₄, 析氢

Abstract:

Developing novel and efficient catalysts is a significant way to break the bottleneck of low separation and transfer efficiency of charge carriers in pristine photocatalysts. Here, two fresh photocatalysts, g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄ and g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂ hybrids, are first synthesized by anchoring Ni₃Se₄ and CoSe₂ nanoparticles on the surface of well-dispersed g-C₃N₄ nanosheets. The resulting materials show excellent performance for photocatalytic in situ hydrogen generation. Pristine g-C₃N₄ has poor photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity (about 1.9 μmol·h^-1) because of the rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs. However, the hydrogen generation activity is well improved after growing Ni₃Se₄ and CoSe₂ on the surface of g-C₃N₄, owing to the unique effect of these selenides in accelerating the separation and migration of charge carriers. The hydrogen production activities of G-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄ and g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂ are about 16.4 μmol·h^-1 and 25.6 μmol·h^-1, which are 8-fold and 13-fold that of pristine g-C₃N₄, respectively. In detail, coupling Ni₃Se₄ and CoSe₂ with g-C₃N₄ greatly improves the light absorbance density and extends the light response region. The photoluminescence intensity of the photoexcited Eosin Y dye in the presence of g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄ and g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂ is weaker than that in the presence of pure g-C₃N₄. On the other hand, the upper limit of the electron-transfer rate constants in the presence of g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄ and g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂ is greater than that in the presence of pure g-C₃N₄. Among the g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄@FTO, g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂@FTO, and g-C₃N₄@FTO electrodes, the g-C₃N₄@FTO electrode has the lowest photocurrent density and the highest electrochemical impedance, implying that the introduction of CoSe₂ and Ni₃Se₄ onto the surface of g-C₃N₄ enhances the separation and transfer efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers. In other words, the formation of two star metals selenide based on g-C₃N₄ can efficiently inhibit the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers and accelerate photocatalytic water splitting to generate H₂. Meanwhile, the right shift of the absorption band edge effectively reduces the transition threshold of the photoexcited electrons from the valence band to the conduction band. In addition, the more negative zeta potential for the g-C₃N₄@Ni₃Se₄ and g-C₃N₄@CoSe₂ catalysts as compared with that for pure g-C₃N₄ leads to a notable enhancement in the adsorption of protons by the sample surface. Moreover, the results of density functional theory calculations indicate that the hydrogen adsorption energy of the N sites in g-C₃N₄ is -0.22 eV; further, the hydrogen atoms are preferentially adsorbed at the bridge site of two selenium atoms to form a Se―H―Se bond, and the adsorption energy is 1.53 eV. In-depth characterization has been carried out by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, transient photocurrent measurements, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; the results of these experiments are in good agreement with one another.

Key words: Ni₃Se₄, CoSe₂, g-C₃N₄, Hydrogen evolution

靳治良, 李彦兵, 郝旭强. Ni, Co基硒化物修饰g-C₃N₄光催化产氢研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10), 1912033. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912033

Zhiliang Jin, Yanbing Li, Xuqiang Hao. Ni, Co-Based Selenide Anchored g-C₃N₄ for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(10), 1912033. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912033

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912033

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I10/1912033

图/表 17

Table 1

Table 2

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Table 3

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Table 4

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

参考文献 50

1	Fang Y. X. ; Xu Y. T. ; Li X. C. ; Ma Y. W. ; Wang X. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 9749. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804530
2	Cui Y. ; Pan Y. X. ; Qin H. L. ; Cong H. P. ; Yu S. H. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800029. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800029
3	Batmunkh M. ; Shrestha A. ; Bat-Erdene M. ; Nine M. J. ; Shearer C. J. ; Gibson C. T. ; Slattery A. D. ; Tawfik S. A. ; Ford M. J. ; Dai S. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 2644. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712280
4	Zhang F. ; Zhuang H. Q. ; Song J. ; Men Y. L. ; Pan Y. X. ; Yu S. H. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 226, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.046
5	Fu J. W. ; Xu Q. L. ; Low J. X. ; Jiang C. J. ; Yu J. G. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 243, 556. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.011
6	Zheng M. ; Cao X. H. ; Ding Y. ; Tian T. ; Lin J. Q. J. Catal. 2018, 363, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.04.022
7	Nocera D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 616. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00615
8	Zheng M. ; Ding Y. ; Yu L. ; Du X. Q. ; Zhao Y. K. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605846. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201605846
9	Zhao Y. F. ; Zhao Y. X. ; Waterhouse G. I. N. ; Zheng L. R. ; Cao X. Z. ; Teng F. ; Wu L. Z. ; Tung C. H. ; Hare D. O. ; Zhang T. R. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703828. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703828
10	Li H. ; Sun Y. ; Yuan Z. G. ; Zhu Y. P. ; Ma T. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 3222. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712925
11	Zhu M. S. ; Kim S. Y. ; Mao L. ; Fujitsuka M. ; Zhang J. Y. ; Wang X. C. ; Majima T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13234. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b08416
12	Li Y. X. ; Li H. ; Li Y. F. ; Peng S. Q. ; Hu Y. H. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 506. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.117
13	Ye P. ; Liu X. L. ; Iocozzia J. ; Yuan Y. P. ; Gu L. ; Xu G. S. ; Lin Z. Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8493. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01031A
14	She X. J. ; Wu J. J. ; Zhong J. ; Xu H. ; Yang Y. C. ; Vajtai R. ; Lou J. ; Liu Y. ; Du D. L. ; Li H. M. ; Ajayan P. M. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 138. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.042
15	Cao S W. ; Low J. X. ; Yu J. G. ; Jaroniec M. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2150. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500033
16	Hao X. Q. ; Wang Y. C. ; Zhou J. ; Cui Z. W. ; Wang Y. ; Zou Z. G. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 221, 302. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.006
17	Chen J. ; Shen S. H. ; Guo P. H. ; Wang M. ; Wu P. ; Wang X. X. ; Guo L. J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2014, 152-153, 335. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.047
18	Feng C. C. ; Wang Z. H. ; Ma Y. ; Zhang Y. J. ; Wang L. ; Bi Y. P. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 205, 19. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.014
19	Chen J. ; Shen S. H. ; Wu P. ; Guo L. J. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 509. doi: 10.1039/C4GC01683A
20	Wang Q. Z. ; Shi Y. B. ; Du Z. Y. ; He J. J. ; Zhong J. B. ; Zhao L. C. ; She H. D. ; Liu G. ; Su B. T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 24, 4108. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201500552
21	Zhai C. Y. ; Sun M. J. ; Zeng L. X. ; Xue M. Q. ; Pan J. G. ; Du Y. K. ; Zhu M. S. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 243, 283. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.047
22	Yang H. ; Jin Z. L. ; Hu H. Y. ; Bi Y. P. ; Lu G. X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 587. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.021
23	Ding C. M. ; Shi J. Y. ; Wang Z. L. ; Li C. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 675. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03107
24	Wang G. R. ; Jin Z. L. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 467-468, 1239. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.239
25	Wang H. Y. ; Wang G. R. ; Liu Z. W. ; Jin Z. L. Mol. Catal. 2018, 453, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2018.04.028
26	Chao Y. G. ; Zhou P. ; Li N. ; Lai J. P. ; Yang Y. ; Zhang Y. L. ; Tang Y. H. ; Yang W. X. ; Du Y. P. ; Su D. ; et al J. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, 1807226. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807226
27	Yang Y. ; Kang Y. K. ; Zhao H. H. ; Dai X. P. ; Cui M. L. ; Luan X. B. ; Zhang X. ; Nie F. ; Ren Z. T. ; Song W. Y. Small 2019, 16, 1905083. doi: 10.1002/smll.201905083
28	Wang P. W. ; Pu Z. H. ; Li W. Q. ; Zhu J. W. ; Zhang C. T. ; Zhao Y. F. ; Mu S. C. J. Catal. 2019, 377, 600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.08.005
29	Sun Y. Q. ; Xu K. ; Wei Z. X. ; Li H. L. ; Zhang T. ; Li X. Y. ; Cai W. P. ; Ma J. M. ; Fan H. J. ; Li Y. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802121. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802121
30	Tang C. ; Cheng N. Y. ; Pu Z. H. ; Xing W. ; Sun X. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 9351. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503407
31	Che Y. P. ; Lu B. X. ; Qi Q. ; Chang H. Q. ; Zhai J. ; Wang K. F. ; Liu Z. Y. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34287-w
32	Liu Y. N. ; Shen C. C. ; Jiang N. ; Zhao Z. W. ; Zhou X. ; Zhao S. J. ; Xu A. W. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8228. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03266
33	Wu X. H. ; Chen F. Y. ; Wang X. F. ; Yu H. G. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 645. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.050
34	Akple M. S. ; Low J. X. ; Wageh S. ; Ghamdi A. A. A. ; Yu J. G. ; Zhang J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 196. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.250
35	Li Y. B. ; Jin Z. L. ; Zhang L. J. ; Fan K. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 390. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63173-0
36	Xu M. ; Han L. ; Dong S. J. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2013, 5, 12533. doi: 10.1021/am4038307
37	Meng J. ; Lan Z. Y. ; Chen T. ; Lin Q. Y. ; Liu H. ; Wei X. ; Lu Y. H. ; Li J. X. ; Zhang Z. J. Phys. Chem. 2018, 122, 24725. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07014
38	Kang Y. Y. ; Yang Y. Q. ; Yin L. C. ; Kang X. D. ; Liu G. ; Cheng H M. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4572. doi: 10.1002/adma.201501939
39	Han Q. ; Zhao F. ; Hu C. G. ; Lv L. X. ; Zhang Z. P. ; Chen N. ; Qu L. T. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 1718. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0675-9
40	Liang Q. H. ; Li Z. ; Huang Z. H. ; Kang F. Y. ; Yang Q. H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6885. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503221
41	Zhang G.G. ; Zhang M. W. ; Ye X. X. ; Qiu X. Q. ; Lin S. ; Wang X. C. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 805. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303611
42	Wang H. Y. ; Jin Z. L. ; Hao X. Q. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 4015. doi: 10.1039/C9DT00586B
43	Xing Z. C. ; Liu Q. ; Asiri A. M. ; Sun X. P. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5702. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401692
44	Li H. Y. ; Gao D. ; Cheng X. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 138, 232. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.065
45	Zhang H. X. ; Yang B. ; Wu X. L. ; Li Z. J. ; Lei L. C. ; Zhang X. W. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2015, 7, 1772. doi: 10.1021/am507373g
46	Elbanna O. ; Fujitsuka M. ; Majima T. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 34844. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b08548
47	Lin Z. Y. ; Du C. ; Yan B. ; Wang C. X. ; Yang G. W. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06456-y
48	Liang Q. H. ; Li Z. ; Huang Z. H. ; Kang F. Y. ; Yang Q. H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6885. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503221
49	Tong Z. W. ; Yang D. ; Li Z. ; Nan Y. H. ; Ding F. ; Shen Y. C. ; Jiang Z. Y. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 1103. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08251
50	Yan J. M. ; Yi S. S. ; Wulan B. R. ; Li S. J. ; Liu K. H. ; Jiang Q. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 200, 477. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.046

System		EY	g-C₃N₄	CN@NS-3	CN@CS-3
Lifetime, τ (ns)	τ₁	0.35	0.02	3.07	3.7
	τ₂			0.05	0.31
Rel (%)	A₁	100	100	1.87	1.41
	A₂			98.13	98.59
K_et				3.0 × 10¹⁰	4.7 × 10¹⁰
Average Lifetime (ns)		0.35	0.02	0.05	0.32
χ²		1.4	1.8	1.1	1.7

[1]	黄火帅, 韦之栋, 严嘉玮, 池家晟, 苏千翔, 陈铭夏, 江治, 孙洋洲, 上官文峰. 揭示Zn_xCd_1−xS固溶体光催化析氢中的直接-间接带隙跃迁机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100141 - .
[2]	赵呈孝, 李昭霖, 吴东方, 杨小飞. SBA-15模板化共价三嗪框架增强光催化产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100149 - .
[3]	洪佳楠, 许辰宇, 刘烟, 黎昌棋, 王梦琳, 张彦威. 通过边缘活性位点调控解析光热催化中析氢与二氧化碳还原的界面竞争[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100099 - .
[4]	王慧, LabidiAbdelkader, 任梦涵, ShaikFeroz, 王传义. 微观结构调控的g-C₃N₄在光催化NO转化中的最新进展：吸附/活化位点的关键作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100039 - .
[5]	李钦, 张慧慧, 顾华军, 崔园园, 高瑞华, 戴维林. Ti₃C₂ MXene纳米片上原位生长的Cd_0.5Zn_0.5S纳米棒实现高效可见光催化析氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100031 - .
[6]	赵鑫婉, 曹越, 雷敏军, 靳治良, Tsubaki Noritatsu. 构建S型异质结：通过将共价有机框架与过渡金属硫化物结合实现高效无贵金属光催化制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(12): 100152 - .
[7]	柳如艳, 倪振瑞, RuzimuradovOlim, TurayevKhayit, 刘涛, 余罗, 邝攀勇. Ni诱导的Pt 5d-H 1s反键轨道调控以增强析氢和尿素氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(12): 100159 - .
[8]	王佳瑶, 潘桂旭, 王宁, 王诗涵, 朱耀麟, 李云锋. 基于分子水平调控的供体-π-受体型石墨相氮化碳光催化体系的制备及其高效生产H₂O₂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(12): 100168 - .
[9]	秦春玲, 陈爽, GomaaHassanien, ShenashenMohamed A., El-SaftySherif A., 刘倩, 安翠华, 刘熙俊, 邓齐波, 胡宁. 外加物理场调控二维材料的HER和OER性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2307059 - .
[10]	孙巍, 王永靖, 项坤, 白赛帅, 王海涛, 邹菁, Arramel, 江吉周. CoP修饰Ti₃C₂T_x MXene纳米复合材料作为高效析氢反应电催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2308015 - .
[11]	肖林锋, 任婉璐, 沈诗诗, 陈梦姗, 廖润华, 周英棠, 李喜宝. 调控ZnIn₂S₄/Bi₂O₃ S型异质结的电子结构和润湿性增强光催化析氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2308036 - .
[12]	王海涛, 余良浪, 江吉周, Arramel, 邹菁. 硫取代氮增强g-C₃N₄光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(5): 2305047 - .
[13]	卢华森, 宋世旭, 贾萁森, 刘光波, 姜鲁华. 用于光电催化水分解的氧化亚铜基光电阴极研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(2): 2304035 - .
[14]	秦建宇, 安月皎, 张艳峰. 原位合成S型氮缺陷ZnWO₄/g-C₃N₄异质结及CO₂光还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(12): 2408002 - .
[15]	王雪娇, 董隋颖, 戚克振, PopkovVadim, 项祥林. 利用改性g-C₃N₄光催化还原CO₂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(12): 2408005 - .

Ni, Co基硒化物修饰g-C₃N₄光催化产氢研究

Ni, Co-Based Selenide Anchored g-C₃N₄ for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

Ni(CH₃COO)₂?4H₂O	Se	NaBH₄	g-C₃N₄	Sample
25	10	80	300	CN@NS-1
75	30	110	300	CN@NS-3
125	50	130	300	CN@NS-5
175	70	150	300	CN@NS-7

Sample	S_BET/(m²?g^-1)	Pore volume/(cm³?g^-1)	Average pore size/nm
Pure g-C₃N₄	44	0.10	15
CN@CS-3	25	0.12	19
CN@NS-3	23	0.10	16