外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001004

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (10): 2001004.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001004

外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究

陈文琼¹, 关永吉¹, 张姣¹, 裴俊捷¹, 张晓萍¹^,*(), 邓友全²^,*()

¹ 兰州大学信息科学与工程学院光电子与电磁信息研究所，兰州 730000
² 中国科学院兰州化学物理研究所绿色化学与催化中心，兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-01-02 录用日期:2020-03-19 发布日期:2020-03-23
通讯作者: 张晓萍,邓友全 E-mail:zxp@lzu.edu.cn;ydeng@licp.cas.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目(2017YFA0403101);兰州大学国际师资博士后项目和兰州大学“中央高校基本科研业务费”优秀研究生创新项目(lzujbky-2018-it62)

Atomistic Insight into Changes in the Vibrational Spectrum of Ionic Liquids under External Electric Field

Wenqiong Chen¹, Yongji Guan¹, Jiao Zhang¹, Junjie Pei¹, Xiaoping Zhang¹^,*(), Youquan Deng²^,*()

¹ Institute of Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Information, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
² Centre for Green Chemistry and Catalysis, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2020-01-02 Accepted:2020-03-19 Published:2020-03-23
Contact: Xiaoping Zhang,Youquan Deng E-mail:zxp@lzu.edu.cn;ydeng@licp.cas.cn
About author:Email: ydeng@licp.cas.cn; Tel.: +86-931-4968116 (Y.D.)
Email: zxp@lzu.edu.cn (X.Z.)
Supported by:
the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFA0403101);the Lanzhou University International Teacher Postdoctoral Scholarship Fund and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China(lzujbky-2018-it62)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

振动光谱学是研究液体分子微观结构的强有力工具，利用振动光谱学探究外界条件作用下液体结构性质的变化是可行的。本文利用分子动力学模拟方法研究了从0到10 V·nm^-1变化的外加电场对1-乙基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐离子液体的振动光谱的影响，并且详细分析了位于50，183，3196，3396 cm^-1的振动峰的强度及位置随外加电场变化而变化的内在原因。随着外加电场从0增大到10 V·nm^-1，由于模拟体系中平均每对阴阳离子的总偶极矩增大(从4.34到5.46 Debye)和阳离子的取向更加一致，使得位于50、183 cm^-1的振动峰的强度相应地逐渐增强。位于3196 cm^-1的振动峰的强度明显减弱，因为外加电场的作用使甲基和乙基侧链上碳原子周围的氢原子不断增多，从而使烷基链上碳氢键的伸缩振动受限。外加电场作用下分子间⁺C-H···F^-氢键的减少使位于3396 cm^-1的振动峰的强度逐渐减弱。而位于50和3396 cm^-1的振动峰的红移现象分别归因于每对离子平均相互作用能的减小(从-378.7到-298.0 kJ·mol^-1)和有利于氢键结合的弛豫效应。

关键词: 外加电场, 振动光谱, 离子液体, 分子动力学模拟

Abstract:

Vibrational spectroscopy is a powerful tool for studying the microstructure of liquids, and anatomizing the nature of the vibrational spectrum (VS) is promising for investigating changes in the properties of liquid structures under external conditions. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed to explore changes in the VS of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([Emim][PF₆]) ionic liquid (IL) under an external electric field (EEF) ranging from 0 to 10 V·nm^-1 at 350 K. First, the vibrational spectra for [Emim][PF₆] IL as well as its cation and anion are separately obtained, and the peaks are strictly assigned. The results demonstrate that the VS calculated by MD simulation can well reproduce the main characteristic peaks in the experimentally measured spectrum. Then, the vibrational spectra of the IL under various EEFs from 0 to 10 V·nm^-1 are investigated, and the intrinsic origin of the changes in the vibrational bands (VBs) at 50, 183, 3196, and 3396 cm^-1 is analyzed. Our simulation results indicate that the intensities of the VBs at 50 and 183 cm^-1 are enhanced. In addition, the VB at 50 cm^-1 is redshifted by about 16 cm^-1 as the EEF is varied from 0 to 2 V·nm^-1, and the redshift wavenumber increases to 33 cm^-1 as the EEF is increased to 3 V·nm^-1 and beyond. However, the intensities of the VBs at 3196 and 3396 cm^-1 show an obvious decrease. Meanwhile, the VB at 3396 cm^-1 is redshifted by about 16 cm^-1 when the EEF increases to 3 V·nm^-1, and the redshift increases to 33 cm^-1 with an increase in the EEF beyond 4 V·nm^-1. The intensity of the VB at 50 cm^-1 increases because of the increase in the total dipole moment of each anion and cation (from 4.34 to 5.46 D), and the redshift is attributed to the decrease in the average interaction energy per ion pair (from -378.7 to -298.0 kJ·mol^-1) with increasing EEF. The intensity of the VB at 183 cm^-1 increases on account of the more consistent orientations for cations in the system with increasing EEF. The VB at 3196 cm^-1 weakens visibly because a greater number of hydrogen atoms appear around the carbon atoms on the methyl/ethyl side chains and the vibrations of the corresponding carbon-hydrogen bonds are suppressed under the action of the EEF. Furthermore, the intensity of the VB at 3396 cm^-1 decreases due to the decrease in the intermolecular ⁺C-H···F^- hydrogen bonds (HBs), while the relaxation effect that is beneficial for the formation of HBs simultaneously exists in the system under the varying EEF, thus causing a redshift of the VB at 3396 cm^-1.

Key words: External electric field, Vibrational spectrum, Ionic liquids, Molecular dynamics simulation

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

陈文琼, 关永吉, 张姣, 裴俊捷, 张晓萍, 邓友全. 外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10), 2001004. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001004

Wenqiong Chen, Yongji Guan, Jiao Zhang, Junjie Pei, Xiaoping Zhang, Youquan Deng. Atomistic Insight into Changes in the Vibrational Spectrum of Ionic Liquids under External Electric Field[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(10), 2001004. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001004

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001004

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I10/2001004

图/表 10

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

参考文献 50

1	Hallett J. P. ; Welton T. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3508. doi: 10.1021/cr1003248
2	Chiappe C. ; Pieraccini D. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 275. doi: 10.1002/poc.863
3	Earle M. J. ; Seddon K. R. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1391. doi: 10.1351/pac200072071391
4	Welton T. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2459. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.04.015
5	Plechkova N. V. ; Seddon K. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 123. doi: 10.1039/b006677j
6	Thomas M. ; Brehm M. ; Holloczki O. ; Kelemen Z. ; Nyulaszi L. ; Pasinszki T. ; Kirchner B. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 024510. doi: 10.1063/1.4887082
7	Heyden M. ; Sun J. ; Forbert H. ; Mathias G. ; Havenith M. ; Marx D. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2135. doi: 10.1021/jz300748s
8	Ishiyama T. ; Takahashi H. ; Morita A. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2012, 24, 124107. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/12/124107
9	Kiefer J. ; Fries J. ; Leipertz A. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007, 61, 1306. doi: 10.1366/000370207783292000
10	Bhargava B. L. ; Balasubramanian S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 417, 486. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.050
11	Katsyuba S. A. ; Zvereva E. E. ; Vidis A. ; Dyson P. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 352. doi: 10.1021/jp064610i
12	Jeon Y. ; Sung J. ; Seo C. ; Lim H. ; Cheong H. ; Kang M. ; Moon B. ; Ouchi Y. ; Kim D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 4735. doi: 10.1021/jp7120752
13	Heimer N. E. ; Del Sesto R. E. ; Meng Z. Z. ; Wilkes J. S. ; Carper W. R. J. Mol. Liq. 2006, 124, 84. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2005.08.004
14	Zhou G. B. ; Li Y. Z. ; Yang Z. ; Fu F. J. ; Huang Y. P. ; Wan Z. ; Li L. ; Chen X. S. ; Hu N. ; Huang L. L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 5033. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00307
15	Xuan X. ; Guo M. ; Pei Y. ; Zheng Y. Spectrochim. Acta A, Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 78, 1492. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.01.039
16	Fumino K. ; Wulf A. ; Ludwig R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3830. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705736
17	Fumino K. ; Peppel T. ; Geppert-Rybczynska M. ; Zaitsau D. H. ; Lehmann J. K. ; Verevkin S. P. ; Kockerling M. ; Ludwig R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 14064. doi: 10.1039/c1cp20732f
18	Brela M. Z. ; Kubisiak P. ; Eilmes A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 9527. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b05839
19	Dhumal N. R. ; Singh M. P. ; Anderson J. A. ; Kiefer J. ; Kim H. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 3295. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10123
20	Liu T. ; Danten Y. ; Grondin J. ; Vilar R. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2016, 47, 449. doi: 10.1002/jrs.4835
21	Liu J. ; Kim H. ; Dhumal N. R. ; Kim H. J. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 292, 111282. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111282
22	Paschoal V. H. ; Faria L. F. O. ; Ribeiro M. C. C. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7053. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00461
23	Wang Y. ; Voth G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12192. doi: 10.1021/ja053796g
24	Daily J. W. ; Micci M. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 094501. doi: 10.1063/1.3197850
25	Shi R. ; Wang Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 5102. doi: 10.1021/jp311017r
26	Ricks-Laskoski H. L. ; Snow A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12402. doi: 10.1021/ja064264i
27	Wang Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 11058. doi: 10.1021/jp906228d
28	English N. J. ; Mooney D. A. ; O'Brien S. Mol. Phys. 2011, 109, 625. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2010.544263
29	Chen W. Q. ; Guan Y. J. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 912.
	陈文琼; 关永吉; 张晓萍; 邓友全. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 912. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091
30	Martinez L. ; Andrade R. ; Birgin E. G. ; Martinez J. M. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2157. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21224
31	Humphrey W. ; Dalke A. ; Schulten K. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
32	Todorov I. T. ; Smith W. ; Trachenko K. ; Dove M. T. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 1911. doi: 10.1039/b517931a
33	Lopes J. N. C. ; Padua A. A. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 16893. doi: 10.1021/jp0476545
34	Jorgensen W. L. ; Maxwell D. S. ; TiradoRives J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225. doi: 10.1021/ja9621760
35	Kaminski G. ; Jorgensen W. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18010. doi: 10.1021/jp9624257
36	Essmann U. ; Perera L. ; Berkowitz M. L. ; Darden T. ; Lee H. ; Pedersen L. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577. doi: 10.1063/1.470117
37	Nose S. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 511. doi: 10.1063/1.447334
38	Hoover W. G. Phys. Rev. A Gen. Phys. 1985, 31, 1695. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
39	Kowsari M. H. ; Alavi S. ; Ashrafizaadeh M. ; Najafi B. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 224508. doi: 10.1063/1.3035978
40	Praprotnik M. ; Janezic D. ; Mavri J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 11056. doi: 10.1021/jp046158d
41	Koddermann T. ; Fumino K. ; Ludwig R. ; Canongia Lopes J. N. ; Padua A. A. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 1181. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900144
42	Talaty E. R. ; Raja S. ; Storhaug V. J. ; Dölle A. ; Carper W. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13177. doi: 10.1021/jp040199s
43	Avena M. ; Marracino P. ; Liberti M. ; Apollonio F. ; English N. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 141101. doi: 10.1063/1.4917024
44	Marracino P. ; Liberti M. ; d'Inzeo G. ; Apollonio F. Bioelectromagnetics 2015, 36, 377. doi: 10.1002/bem.21916
45	Chatzipapadopoulos S. ; Zentel T. ; Ludwig R. ; Lutgens M. ; Lochbrunner S. ; Kuhn O. ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 2519. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201500433
46	Luzar A. ; Chandler D. Nature 1996, 379, 55. doi: 10.1038/379055a0
47	Zhou G. ; Yang Z. ; Fu F. ; Huang Y. ; Chen X. ; Lu Z. ; Hu N. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 8166. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01624
48	Roth C. ; Chatzipapadopoulos S. ; Kerlé D. ; Friedriszik F. ; Lütgens M. ; Lochbrunner S. ; Kühn O. ; Ludwig R. New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 105026. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/105026
49	Atkins P. ; de Paula J. Atkins' Physical Chemistry 7th ed Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002.
50	Zhao Y. ; Dong K. ; Liu X. ; Zhang S. ; Zhu J. ; Wang J. Mol. Simulat. 2012, 38, 172. doi: 10.1080/08927022.2011.61089

[1]	曹冲, 张裴, 曹立冬, 刘铭鑫, 宋玉莹, 陈鹏, 黄啟良, 韩布兴. 液滴在超疏水植物叶面的沉积：实验和分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2207006 - .
[2]	王欢, 吴云雁, 赵燕飞, 刘志敏. 离子液体介导CO₂化学转化研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2010022 - .
[3]	吴智伟, 丁伟璐, 张雅琴, 王艳磊, 何宏艳. 咪唑类离子液体与酪氨酸相互作用及机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2002021 - .
[4]	刘璐, 徐玉萍, 陈霞, 洪梅, 佟静. 1-烷基-3-甲基咪唑氯化物焓变的热重分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 2004014 - .
[5]	惠淑荣, 赵丽薇, 刘青山, 宋大勇. [C₃mim][NTf₂]/DEC/[Li][NTf₂]体系的基础性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 1910067 - .
[6]	胡益民, 韩杰, 郭荣. 非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C₁₆imC₈Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1909049 - .
[7]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840 -849 .
[8]	杨康,帅骁睿,杨化超,严建华,岑可法. 基于室温离子液体的活化石墨烯粉末超级电容储能性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 755 -765 .
[9]	许谢君,肖兴庆,徐首红,刘洪来. 亮氨酸拉链型脂肽对脂质体温敏性调节的分子模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 598 -606 .
[10]	潘明光,赵永升,曾小勤,邹建新. 偶氮苯基型离子液体溶液对空气中湿度的变色响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 624 -629 .
[11]	吕康杰,彭燕秋,肖丽,陆君涛,庄林. 醇/水混合溶剂中碱性聚合物电解质独特的溶解行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 378 -384 .
[12]	杨化超,薄拯,帅骁睿,严建华,岑可法. 润湿特性对超级电容器储能动力学的影响机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 200 -207 .
[13]	龚燕燕,刘海春,张朵,佟静. 醚基功能化离子液体[MOEMIm]Cl和[EOEMIm]Cl热力学性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(11): 1224 -1231 .
[14]	陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 912 -919 .
[15]	胡之楠,左剑涛,夏美晨,房大维,臧树良. Pitzer方程应用于离子液体[C_nmim][H₂PO₄](n= 3, 4, 5, 6)溶解焓研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 933 -937 .

外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究

Atomistic Insight into Changes in the Vibrational Spectrum of Ionic Liquids under External Electric Field

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0