磷化钴封装在磷富集的三维多孔碳及其双功能氧电催化性能研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009051

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

能源和环境问题是制约人类延续和发展的首要问题，高效便宜的能源存储和转换装置吸引着广泛注意。基于便携式，功率密度高，无污染等，可充放电锌-空气电池(ZAB)被大量研究。然而，阴极的氧还原(ORR)和氧析出反应(OER)缓慢的动力学限制了ZAB的实际应用。开发电催化高效，便宜，高稳定性的双功能电催化剂至关重要，而其中将过渡金属和碳基材料复合是明智的决定。磷化钴(Co₂P)化合物已经广泛研究用作高效的OER催化剂，但是对于催化剂的ORR活性很少研究。在此，本论文通过简单热处理钴盐和植酸掺杂的k-卡拉胶复合物制备出磷化钴封装在磷掺杂的多孔碳(Co₂P-PCA-800)纳米催化剂。该催化剂具有3D分级多孔结构，表现出具有与商用Pt/C相当的半波电位(E_1/2) 0.84 V，从而满足了可充放电锌-空电池需求。同时，我们还制备了磷掺杂的多孔碳(PCA)和钴掺杂的多空碳(Co-CA)，对比了结构形貌对性能的影响。结果表明，具有完整的多孔结构，在每个位点的阻抗更一致，从而会有更多的有效活性位点。高效的ORR和OER活性主要归功于3D蜂窝分层多孔结构和正电荷磷化钴(Co₂P)纳米颗粒的协同作用。此外，蜂窝状3D孔结构不仅利于传质和加快电子传输也保护了磷化钴，让其更稳定。最后，我们组装了可充放电锌-空气电池用Co₂P-PCA-800作空气阴极催化剂。相比贵金属，该催化剂组装的ZAB具有接近的充放电性能和能量密度以及更高的比容量和更好的稳定性。这项工作也为解决能源和环境问题提供了新思路。

关键词: 磷化钴纳米颗粒, 三维多孔碳, 电催化, 氧还原反应, 锌空电池

Abstract:

The existing energy and environmental issues are the primary issues that restrict the continual development of the mankind. Cost-effective energy storage and conversion devices have attracted significant attention. Rechargeable zinc-air batteries (ZABs) are widely studied because they are portable, possess high power density, and are environmentally friendly. However, the slow kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) limit their practical application. It is crucial to develop dual-functional electrocatalysts with excellent electrocatalytic performance, low price, simple operation, and outstanding stability. Therefore, transition metals and carbon-based materials should be combined. Although Co₂P has been widely reported as an efficient OER catalyst, there are few studies based on the ORR activity. Herein, a facile pyrolysis of cobalt salt, phytic acid, and k-carrageenan aerogel was carried out on Co₂P nanoparticles within P-doped porous carbon (Co₂P-PCA-800), showing enhanced ORR activity. The resulting composite (Co₂P-PCA-800) with a three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical porous architecture exhibited outstanding ORR activity with a high half-wave potential (E_1/2) of approximately 0.84 V, which is comparable to that of Pt/C. Simultaneously, we fabricated phosphorus-doped porous carbon (PCA) and cobalt-doped porous carbon (Co-CA) to compare the effect of structural morphology on the catalytic performance. Studies have found that a regular interconnected porous structure can be beneficial for mass transfer and can ensure uniform distribution of ion current, thereby resulting in increased number of effective active sites. The outstanding ORR activity mainly results from the synergistic effect of the 3D honeycomb hierarchical porous structure and positively charged Co₂P nanoparticles encapsulated in P-doped carbon. In addition, the 3D honeycomb porous carbon structure not only facilitates mass transfer and accelerates electron transfer but also protects the cobalt phosphide. Finally, we assembled a rechargeable ZAB with Co₂P-PCA-800 as the air cathode catalyst. Compared with precious metal catalysts, the catalyst has considerable charge-discharge performance and energy density as well as higher specific capacity and better cycle stability. We believe that this study will provide a significant direction for solving energy and environmental issues.

Key words: Co₂P nanoparticles, 3D porous carbon, Electrocatalysis, Oxygen reduction reaction, Zn-air battery

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

肖瑶, 裴煜, 胡一帆, 马汝广, 王德义, 王家成. 磷化钴封装在磷富集的三维多孔碳及其双功能氧电催化性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7), 2009051. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009051

Yao Xiao, Yu Pei, Yifan Hu, Ruguang Ma, Deyi Wang, Jiacheng Wang. Co₂P@P-Doped 3D Porous Carbon for Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysis[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(7), 2009051. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009051

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009051

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I7/2009051

图/表 4

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

参考文献 47

1	Lv L. ; Yang Z. X. ; Chen K. ; Wang C. D. ; Xiong Y. J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, e1803358. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201803358
2	Wang H. F. ; Tang C. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, e1803329. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201803329
3	Shen H. ; Thomas T. ; Rasaki S. A. ; Saad A. ; Hu C. ; Wang J. ; Yang M. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2019, 2, 252. doi: 10.1007/s41918-019-00030-w
4	He W. T. ; Ma R. G. ; Zhu Y. F. ; Yang M. J. ; Wang J. C. J. Inorg. Mater. 2019, 34, 1115. doi: 10.15541/jim20190036
5	Ju Q. J. ; Ma R. G. ; Hu Y. F. ; Guo B. B. ; Liu Q. ; Thomas T. ; Zhang T. ; Yang M. H. ; Chen W. ; Wang J. C. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 9366. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00474
6	Wu G. ; Mack N. H. ; Gao W. ; Ma S. ; Zhong R. ; Han J. ; Baldwin J. K. ; Zelenay P. ACS Nano. 2012, 6, 9764. doi: 10.1021/nn303275d
7	Ma R. ; Lin G. ; Ju Q. ; Tang W. ; Chen G. ; Chen Z. ; Liu Q. ; Yang M. ; Lu Y. ; Wang J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 265, e118593. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118593
8	Pan J. ; Xu Y. Y. ; Yang H. ; Dong Z. ; Liu H. ; Xia B. Y. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700691. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700691
9	Zhu Y. -P. ; Liu Y. -P. ; Ren T. -Z. ; Yuan Z. -Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 7337. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503666
10	Guo B. B. ; Ju Q. J. ; Ma R. G. ; Li Z. C. ; Liu Q. ; Ai F. ; Yang M. H. ; Kaskel S. ; Luo J. ; Zhang T. ; Wang J. C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 19355. doi: 10.1039/c9ta06411g
11	Guo B. B. ; Ma R. G. ; Li Z. C. ; Guo S. K. ; Luo J. ; Yang M. H. ; Liu Q. ; Thomas T. ; Wang J. C. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 20. doi: 10.1007/s40820-019-0364-z
12	Zhong H. X. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang X. B. Chem 2018, 4, 196. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.01.015
13	Tao L. ; Wang Y. Q. ; Zou Y. Q. ; Zhang N. N. ; Zhang Y. Q. ; Wu Y. J. ; Wang Y. Y. ; Chen R. ; Wang S. Y. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 1901227. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201901227
14	Cai P. ; Li Y. ; Wang G. ; Wen Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3910. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712765
15	Zhong H. X. ; Li K. ; Zhang Q. ; Wang J. ; Meng F. L. ; Wu Z. J. ; Yan J. M. ; Zhang X. B. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e308. doi: 10.1038/am.2016.132
16	Wang Z. L. ; Xu D. ; Zhong H. X. ; Wang J. ; Meng F. L. ; Zhang X. B. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1400035. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400035
17	Hou J. G. ; Wu Y. Z. ; Zhang B. ; Cao S. Y. ; Li Z. W. ; Sun L. C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, e1808367. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808367
18	Gewirth A. A. ; Varnell J. A. ; DiAscro A. M. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2313. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00335
19	Dinh K. N. ; Liang Q. H. ; Du C. F. ; Zhao J. ; Tok A. L. Y. ; Mao H. ; Yan Q. Y. Nano. Today 2019, 25, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.008
20	Guo Y. Y. ; Yuan P. F. ; Zhang J. A. ; Xia H. C. ; Cheng F. Y. ; Zhou M. F. ; Li J. ; Qiao Y. Y. ; Mu S. C. ; Xu Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, e1805641. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201805641
21	Jiang D. ; Ma W. ; Zhou Y. ; Xing Y. ; Quan B. ; Li D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 550, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.080
22	Yao L. H. ; Zhang N. ; Wang Y. ; Ni Y. M. ; Yan D. P. ; Hu C. W. J. Power. Sources 2018, 374, 142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.028
23	Ahn S. H. ; Manthiram A. Small 2017, 13, e1702068. doi: 10.1002/smll.201702068
24	Gong K. ; Du F. ; Xia Z. ; Durstock M. ; Dai L. Science 2009, 323, 760. doi: 10.1126/science.1168049
25	Li H. ; Li Q. ; Wen P. ; Williams T. B. ; Adhikari S. ; Dun C. ; Lu C. ; Itanze D. ; Jiang L. ; Geyer S. M. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1705796. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705796
26	Han C. ; Bo X. ; Zhang Y. ; Li M. ; Wang A. ; Guo L. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15015. doi: 10.1039/c5cc05314e
27	Gao K. ; Wang B. ; Tao L. ; Cunning B. V. ; Zhang Z. ; Wang S. ; Ruoff R. S. ; Qu L. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1805121. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805121
28	Li J. S. ; Kong L. X. ; Wu Z. X. ; Zhang S. ; Yang X. Y. ; Sha J. Q. ; Liu G. D. Carbon 2019, 145, 694. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.032
29	Tian J. Q. ; Chen J. ; Liu J. Y. ; Tian Q. H. ; Chen P. Nano Energy 2018, 48, 284. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.063
30	Yuan K. ; Lutzenkirchen-Hecht D. ; Li L. ; Shuai L. ; Li Y. ; Cao R. ; Qiu M. ; Zhuang X. ; Leung M. K. H. ; Chen Y. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2404. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11852
31	Meng F. L. ; Liu K. H. ; Zhang Y. ; Shi M. M. ; Zhang X. B. ; Yan J. M. ; Jiang Q. Small 2018, 14, e1703843. doi: 10.1002/smll.201703843
32	Pan F. ; Li B. ; Sarnello E. ; Fei Y. ; Gang Y. ; Xiang X. ; Du Z. ; Zhang P. ; Wang G. ; Li Y. ; et al ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5506. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09658
33	Hua Y. P. ; Xu Q. C. ; Hu Y. J. ; Jiang H. ; Li C. Z. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 37, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.11.010
34	Zhang S. L. ; Guan B. Y. ; Lou X. W. D. Small 2019, 15, e1805324. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805324
35	Meng F. ; Zhong H. ; Bao D. ; Yan J. ; Zhang X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10226. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05046
36	Li D. ; Yang D. ; Yang X. ; Wang Y. ; Guo Z. ; Xia Y. ; Sun S. ; Guo S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15925. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610301
37	Shen R. ; Xie J. ; Zhang H. ; Zhang A. ; Chen X. ; Li X. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 6, 816. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03169
38	Gao J. ; Wang J. ; Zhou L. ; Cai X. ; Zhan D. ; Hou M. ; Lai L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 10364. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b20003
39	Liu M. ; Pang Y. ; Zhang B. ; De Luna P. ; Voznyy O. ; Xu J. ; Zheng X. ; Dinh C. T. ; Fan F. ; Sargent E. H. ; et al Nature 2016, 537, 382. doi: 10.1038/nature19060
40	Li Y. Z. ; Wang Z. ; Hu J. ; Li S. W. ; Du Y. C. ; Han X. J. ; Xu P. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, e1910498. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201910498
41	Li D. ; Sun Y. ; Chen S. ; Yao J. ; Zhang Y. ; Xia Y. ; Yang D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 17175. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b03059
42	Yan D. ; Li Y. ; Huo J. ; Chen R. ; Dai L. ; Wang S. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, e1606459. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606459
43	Lin Y. ; Yang L. ; Zhang Y. ; Jiang H. ; Xiao Z. ; Wu C. ; Zhang G. ; Jiang J. ; Song L. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, e1703623. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201703623
44	Yan X. ; Jia Y. ; Yao X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7628. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00690j
45	Martinez U. ; Komini Babu S. ; Holby E. F. ; Chung H. T. ; Yin X. ; Zelenay P. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1806545. doi: 10.1002/adma.201806545
46	Das D. ; Nanda K. K. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 303. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.024
47	Li X. ; Wang Y. ; Wang J. ; Da Y. ; Zhang J. ; Li L. ; Zhong C. ; Deng Y. ; Han X. ; Hu W. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2003414. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003414

[1]	邱江源, 于涛, 陈均鑫, 李文轩, 张晓萱, 李金生, 郭瑞, 黄在银, 刘宣文. FeOOH调节Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂@FeOOH异质结中Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂的表面势阱深度以增强压电电荷转移和压电自芬顿催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100157 - .
[2]	段睿智, 王小梅, 周潘旺, 刘扬, 李灿. 羟基物种在过渡金属表面碱性析氢反应中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100111 - .
[3]	DristySumiya Akter, HabibMd Ahasan, LinShusen, JoniMehedi Hasan, MandavkarRutuja, ChungYoung-Uk, NajibullahMd, LeeJihoon. 利用Zn掺杂制备高效稳定工业级电解水的NiBP微球催化剂研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100079 - .
[4]	曹雪婷, 察爽爽, 龚鸣. 电催化反应中的界面双电层：理论、表征与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100041 - .
[5]	李坚, 张毓, 闫融融, 孙开媛, 刘晓晴, 梁子尚, 焦忆楠, 卜晖, 陈欣, 赵晋津, 施剑林. 高效靶向示踪钙钛矿纳米系统光电增效抗肿瘤[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100042 - .
[6]	陈润华, 吴琼, 罗婧宸, 祖小龙, 朱姗, 孙永福. 缺陷态二维超薄材料用于光/电催化CO₂还原的基础与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100019 - .
[7]	董雪, 孙晓甫, 贾帅强, 韩世涛, 周达伟, 姚婷, 王敏, 方明慧, 吴海虹, 韩布兴. 碳修饰的铜催化剂实现安培级电流电化学还原CO₂制C₂₊产物[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100024 - .
[8]	王琪, 刘宇庆, 王洁菲, 马媛媛, 都京, 韩占刚. 电催化氯代芳香烃脱氯催化剂的合成策略、应用与挑战[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(10): 100120 - .
[9]	李清, 张光勋, 徐玉霞, 孙洋洋, 庞欢. 磷化调控构筑分层结构的Ni₂P催化剂用于高效电氧化尿素[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2308045 - .
[10]	李美然, 宋英杰, 万鑫, 李洋, 罗毅奇, 贺业亨, 夏博文, 周华, 邵明飞. 镍钒水滑石电极用于可放大电催化5-羟甲基糠醛氧化耦合产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2306007 - .
[11]	孔燕, 危伟, 徐乐凯, 陈晨. 电催化氮集成二氧化碳还原反应合成有机氮化合物[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2307049 - .
[12]	许文涛, 莫栩妍, 周洋, 翁祖贤, 莫坤玲, 吴炎桦, 蒋欣霖, 李丹, 蓝汤淇, 文欢, 郑伏琴, 樊友军, 陈卫. 双金属浸出诱导催化剂重构用于高活性和高稳定性电化学水氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2308003 - .
[13]	赵路甜, 郭杨格, 罗柳轩, 闫晓晖, 沈水云, 章俊良. 金属纳米晶体电催化剂的电化学合成：原理、应用与挑战[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7): 2306029 - .
[14]	王烨, 葛瑞翔, 刘翔, 李敬, 段昊泓. 一种阴离子浸出策略合成金属羟基氧化物用于电催化甘油氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7): 2307019 - .
[15]	张新义, 任楷, 刘妍宁, 谷振一, 黄志雄, 郑硕航, 王晓彤, 郭晋芝, ZatovskyIgor V., 曹峻鸣, 吴兴隆. 熵增工程在电催化反应中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7): 2307057 - .