质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-Nx/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210036

物理化学学报 >> 2023, Vol. 39 >> Issue (8): 2210036.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210036

所属专题：能源电催化

质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展

兰畅¹^,², 楚宇逸¹^,², 王烁¹^,², 刘长鹏¹, 葛君杰¹^,*(), 邢巍¹^,*()

¹ 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所, 长春 130022
² 中国科学技术大学应用化学与工程学院, 合肥 230026

收稿日期:2022-10-26 录用日期:2022-12-05 发布日期:2022-12-09
通讯作者: 葛君杰,邢巍 E-mail:gejj@ciac.ac.cn;xingwei@ciac.ac.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2018YFB1502700);国家自然科学基金(21633008);国家自然科学基金(21875243);国家自然科学基金(U1601211);吉林省科技发展计划(20200201001JC);吉林省科技发展计划(20190201270JC);吉林省科技发展计划(20180101030JC)

Research Progress of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode Nonnoble Metal M-N_x/C-Type Oxygen Reduction Catalysts

Chang Lan¹^,², Yuyi Chu¹^,², Shuo Wang¹^,², Changpeng Liu¹, Junjie Ge¹^,*(), Wei Xing¹^,*()

¹ Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
² School of Applied Chemistry and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2022-10-26 Accepted:2022-12-05 Published:2022-12-09
Contact: Junjie Ge, Wei Xing E-mail:gejj@ciac.ac.cn;xingwei@ciac.ac.cn
Supported by:
the National Science and Technology Major Project(2018YFB1502700);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21633008);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21875243);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1601211);the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program(20200201001JC);the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program(20190201270JC);the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program(20180101030JC)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氧还原反应(ORR)是燃料电池能量转换的关键步骤，开发高性能低成本的催化剂以替代铂族贵金属是推动燃料电池商业化的重要途径。本文综述了质子交换膜燃料电池非贵金属M-N_x/C型催化剂的最新研究进展，概括了氧还原反应的基础理论，系统展示了先进表征技术对活性位点鉴定和反应机理研究的作用，总结了M-N_x/C型催化剂近年来的代表工作和活性突破，阐述了稳定性问题的根源及对应的方案策略，我们认为M-N_x/C型催化剂未来的发展方向是理性设计具高位点密度和高稳定性的催化剂。

关键词: 质子交换膜燃料电池, 氧还原反应, 非贵金属催化剂, 稳定性, 电催化

Abstract:

Proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are an efficient and clean energy conversion technology with the advantage of zero pollution for transportation applications. The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is the key step in the energy conversion at the cathode, but the slow kinetics requires a high content of expensive platinum-group-metal (PGM) catalysts. Therefore, research on high-performance and inexpensive catalysts to replace PGM-based catalysts are essential to promote the commercialization of fuel cells. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) with highly active sites that are atomically dispersed on substrates exhibit unique advantages, such as maximum atomic utilization, abundant chemical structures, and extraordinary catalytic performances for multiple important reactions. Inspired by macrocyclic compounds with MN₄ active centers, the application of pyrolyzed M-N_x/C type SACs (M = Fe, Co, Mn, Ru, Cr, Zn, etc.) in the ORR has significantly progressed within the last ten years. Particularly, single-atom Fe-N-C catalysts have been extensively investigated, demonstrating high ORR activity, which indicates that the initial electrochemistry and fuel cell performance are similar to that of conventional Pt/C catalysts. However, in the oxidizing and acidic PEMFC cathode, Fe-N-C catalysts are degraded rapidly, which hinders the application of these nonprecious metal M-N_x/C-type catalysts. Several degradation mechanisms have been proposed over the past few years, such as carbon oxidation, demetallation, and waterflooding. However, the degradation mechanisms remain unknown and require further investigation of the underlying causes of the mechanism, degradation process, and coping strategies. To achieve the future commercialization of high-performance M-N_x/C catalysts, several key challenges are summarized with potential research guidelines proposed to overcome bottlenecks. This review summarizes the development history and state-of-the-art research progress on nonprecious metal M-N_x/C-type catalysts in PEMFCs. First, we introduce the basic theory of the ORR and the methods of advanced characterization techniques for active site identification and reaction mechanism analysis to gain a comprehensive understanding of the structure–performance relationship. Subsequently, the representative studies and recent advancements in M-N_x/C-type catalysts by experimental and theoretical calculations are presented. Additionally, we analyze the root cause of the stability problems and propose the corresponding solution strategies to promote the intrinsic electrocatalytic ORR activity and durability, including regulating the electronic structure and coordination environment, as well as altering the central metal atoms and guest groups. Finally, we propose that the future direction of M-N_x/C-type catalysts is the rational design of catalysts with a high site density and high stability. Moreover, improving the lifetime of nonprecious metal catalysts remains essential for feasible applications in the future.

Key words: Proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Oxygen reduction reaction, Non-precious metal catalyst, Stability, Electrocatalysis

兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8), 2210036. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210036

Chang Lan, Yuyi Chu, Shuo Wang, Changpeng Liu, Junjie Ge, Wei Xing. Research Progress of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode Nonnoble Metal M-N_x/C-Type Oxygen Reduction Catalysts[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(8), 2210036. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210036

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210036

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V39/I8/2210036

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

参考文献 102

1	Chatterjee S. ; Dutta I. ; Lum Y. ; Lai Z. ; Huang K.-W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1194. doi: 10.1039/d0ee03011b
2	Cullen D. A. ; Neyerlin K. C. ; Ahluwalia R. K. ; Mukundan R. ; More K. L. ; Borup R. L. ; Weber A. Z. ; Myers D. J. ; Kusoglu A. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 462. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z
3	Steele B. C. ; Heinzel A. Nature 2001, 414, 345. doi: 10.1038/35104620
4	Staffell I. ; Scamman D. ; Abad A. V. ; Balcombe P. ; Dodds P. E. ; Ekins P. ; Shah N. ; Ward K. R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 463. doi: 10.1039/c8ee01157e
5	Shih C. F. ; Zhang T. ; Li J. H. ; Bai C. L. Joule 2018, 2, 1925. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.016
6	Debe M. K. Nature 2012, 486, 43. doi: 10.1038/nature11115
7	Li Q. ; Wang T. ; Havas D. ; Zhang H. ; Xu P. ; Han J. ; Cho J. ; Wu G. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1600140. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600140
8	Xu X. ; Xia Z. ; Zhang X. ; Sun R. ; Sun X. ; Li H. ; Wu C. ; Wang J. ; Wang S. ; Sun G. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 259, 118042. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118042
9	Wroblowa H. S. ; Yen Chi P. ; Razumney G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1976, 69, 195. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0728(76)80250-1
10	Muthukrishnan A. ; Nabae Y. ; Chang C. W. ; Okajima T. ; Ohsaka T. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 1764. doi: 10.1039/c4cy01429d
11	Luo E. ; Chu Y. ; Liu J. ; Shi Z. ; Zhu S. ; Gong L. ; Ge J. ; Choi C. H. ; Liu C. ; Xing W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2158. doi: 10.1039/d1ee00142f
12	Wang X. ; Li Z. ; Qu Y. ; Yuan T. ; Wang W. ; Wu Y. ; Li Y. Chem 2019, 5, 1486. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.002
13	Keith J. A. ; Jerkiewicz G. ; Jacob T. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 2779. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000286
14	Singh H. ; Zhuang S. ; Ingis B. ; Nunna B. B. ; Lee E. S. Carbon 2019, 151, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.075
15	Duan Z. ; Wang G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 20178. doi: 10.1039/c1cp21687b
16	Tao X. ; Lu R. ; Ni L. ; Gridin V. ; Al-Hilfi S. H. ; Qiu Z. ; Zhao Y. ; Kramm U. I. ; Zhou Y. ; Mullen K. Mater. Horizons 2021, 9, 417. doi: 10.1039/d1mh01307f
17	Li X. ; Xiang Z. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 57. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27735-1
18	Chung H. T. ; Cullen D. A. ; Higgins D. ; Sneed B. T. ; Holby E. F. ; More K. L. ; Zelenay P. Science 2017, 357, 479. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2255
19	Wang J. ; Huang Z. ; Liu W. ; Chang C. ; Tang H. ; Li Z. ; Chen W. ; Jia C. ; Yao T. ; Wei S. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17281. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10385
20	Yang G. ; Zhu J. ; Yuan P. ; Hu Y. ; Qu G. ; Lu B.-A. ; Xue X. ; Yin H. ; Cheng W. ; Cheng J. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1734. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21919-5
21	Zhang X. ; Xue D. ; Jiang S. ; Xia H. ; Yang Y. ; Yan W. ; Hu J. ; Zhang J. InfoMat 2022, 4, 12257. doi: 10.1002/inf2.12257
22	Luo E. ; Zhang H. ; Wang X. ; Gao L. ; Gong L. ; Zhao T. ; Jin Z. ; Ge J. ; Jiang Z. ; Liu C. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12469. doi: 10.1002/anie.201906289
23	Xiao M. ; Gao L. ; Wang Y. ; Wang X. ; Zhu J. ; Jin Z. ; Liu C. ; Chen H. ; Li G. ; Ge J. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19800. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09234
24	Xiao M. ; Chen Y. ; Zhu J. ; Zhang H. ; Zhao X. ; Gao L. ; Wang X. ; Zhao J. ; Ge J. ; Jiang Z. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17763. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08362
25	Zelenay, P.; Myers, D. Electrocatalysis Consortium 2.0. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review21/fc160_myers_zelenay_2021_o.pdf.
26	Xiao M. ; Zhu J. ; Ma L. ; Jin Z. ; Ge J. ; Deng X. ; Hou Y. ; He Q. ; Li J. ; Jia Q. ; et al ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2824. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00138
27	Fei H. ; Dong J. ; Chen D. ; Hu T. ; Duan X. ; Shakir I. ; Huang Y. ; Duan X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 5207. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00422j
28	van Oversteeg C. H. ; Doan H. Q. ; de Groot F. M. ; Cuk T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 102. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00230g
29	Luo E. ; Wang C. ; Li Y. ; Wang X. ; Gong L. ; Zhao T. ; Jin Z. ; Ge J. ; Liu C. ; Xing W. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2420. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2868-8
30	Yu L. ; Li Y. ; Ruan Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 25296. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111761
31	Tamenori Y. ; Morita M. ; Nakamura T. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2011, 18, 747. doi: 10.1107/S0909049511027531
32	Toyoshima R. ; Kondoh H. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 083003. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/8/083003
33	Kramm U. I. ; Herrmann-Geppert I. ; Behrends J. ; Lips K. ; Fiechter S. ; Bogdanoff P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 635. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b11015
34	Li J. ; Sougrati M. T. ; Zitolo A. ; Ablett J. M. ; Oğuz I. C. ; Mineva T. ; Matanovic I. ; Atanassov P. ; Huang Y. ; Zenyuk I. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2020, 4, 10. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00545-2
35	Jia Q. ; Liu E. ; Jiao L. ; Pann S. ; Mukerjee S. Adv Mater 2019, 31, e1805157. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805157
36	Saveleva V. A. ; Ebner K. ; Ni L. ; Smolentsev G. ; Klose D. ; Zitolo A. ; Marelli E. ; Li J. ; Medarde M. ; Safonova O. V. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11707. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016951
37	Bandyopadhyay D. Int. Mater. Rev. 2006, 51, 171. doi: 10.1179/174328006x79490
38	Malko D. ; Kucernak A. ; Lopes T. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13285. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13285
39	Xu X. ; Zhang X. ; Kuang Z. ; Xia Z. ; Rykov A. I. ; Yu S. ; Wang J. ; Wang S. ; Sun G. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 309, 121290. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121290
40	Bae G. ; Kim H. ; Choi H. ; Jeong P. ; Kim D. H. ; Kwon H. C. ; Lee K. S. ; Choi M. ; Oh H. S. ; Jaouen F. ; et al JACS Au 2021, 1, 586. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00074
41	Primbs M. ; Sun Y. ; Roy A. ; Malko D. ; Mehmood A. ; Sougrati M.-T. ; Blanchard P.-Y. ; Granozzi G. ; Kosmala T. ; Daniel G. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 2480. doi: 10.1039/d0ee01013h
42	Edgecomb J. ; Xie X. ; Shao Y. ; El-Khoury P. Z. ; Johnson G. E. ; Prabhakaran V. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 572563. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.572563
43	Jiao L. ; Li J. ; Richard L. L. ; Sun Q. ; Stracensky T. ; Liu E. ; Sougrati M. T. ; Zhao Z. ; Yang F. ; Zhong S. ; et al Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1385. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01030-2
44	Jin Z. ; Li P. ; Meng Y. ; Fang Z. ; Xiao D. ; Yu G. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 615. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00650-w
45	Deng Y. ; Luo J. ; Chi B. ; Tang H. ; Li J. ; Qiao X. ; Shen Y. ; Yang Y. ; Jia C. ; Rao P. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101222. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101222
46	Dong F. ; Wu M. ; Chen Z. ; Liu X. ; Zhang G. ; Qiao J. ; Sun S. Nanomicro Lett. 2022, 14, 36. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00768-3
47	Jasinski R. Nature 1964, 201, 1212. doi: 10.1038/2011212a0
48	Jahnke H. ; Schonborn M. ; Zimmermann G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1976, 61, 133. doi: 10.1007/BFb0046059
49	Lefevre M. ; Proietti E. ; Jaouen F. ; Dodelet J. P. Science 2009, 324, 71. doi: 10.1126/science.1170051
50	Wu G. ; More K. L. ; Johnston C. M. ; Zelenay P. Science 2011, 332, 443. doi: 10.1126/science.1200832
51	Zhang H. ; Chung H. T. ; Cullen D. A. ; Wagner S. ; Kramm U. I. ; More K. L. ; Zelenay P. ; Wu G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2548. doi: 10.1039/c9ee00877b
52	He Y. ; Liu S. ; Priest C. ; Shi Q. ; Wu G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3484. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00903e
53	Li, X.; Li, J.; Wu, G.; Litster, S. Stationary Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Using Pure Methanol. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review21/fc317_Li_2021_o.pdf
54	Wan X. ; Liu X. ; Li Y. ; Yu R. ; Zheng L. ; Yan W. ; Wang H. ; Xu M. ; Shui J. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 259. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0237-3
55	Xiao M. ; Zhu J. ; Li G. ; Li N. ; Li S. ; Cano Z. P. ; Ma L. ; Cui P. ; Xu P. ; Jiang G. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 9640. doi: 10.1002/anie.201905241
56	Gong L. ; Zhang H. ; Wang Y. ; Luo E. ; Li K. ; Gao L. ; Wang Y. ; Wu Z. ; Jin Z. ; Ge J. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 13923. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004534
57	Xu, H. Electrocat: Durable Mn-Based Pgm-Free Catalysts for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review21/fc170_xu_2021_o.pdf.
58	Wang Q. ; Yang Y. ; Sun F. ; Chen G. ; Wang J. ; Peng L. ; Chen W. T. ; Shang L. ; Zhao J. ; Sun-Waterhouse D. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100219. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202100219
59	Qu Y. ; Li Z. ; Chen W. ; Lin Y. ; Yuan T. ; Yang Z. ; Zhao C. ; Wang J. ; Zhao C. ; Wang X. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 781. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0146-x
60	Zhu M. ; Zhao C. ; Liu X. ; Wang X. ; Zhou F. ; Wang J. ; Hu Y. ; Zhao Y. ; Yao T. ; Yang L.-M.; ; et al ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 3923. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c05503
61	Li J. ; Chen S. ; Yang N. ; Deng M. ; Ibraheem S. ; Deng J. ; Li J. ; Li L. ; Wei Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7035. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902109
62	Xie X. ; He C. ; Li B. ; He Y. ; Cullen D. A. ; Wegener E. C. ; Kropf A. J. ; Martinez U. ; Cheng Y. ; Engelhard M. H. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 1044. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00546-1
63	Yin S. ; Yang S. ; Li G. ; Li G. ; Zhang B. ; Wang C. ; Chen M. ; Liao H.-G. ; Yang J. ; Jiang Y. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 3033. doi: 10.1039/d2ee00061j
64	Mehmood A. ; Gong M. ; Jaouen F. ; Roy A. ; Zitolo A. ; Khan A. ; Sougrati M.-T. ; Primbs M. ; Bonastres A. M. ; Fongalland D. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 311. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00772-9
65	Wei X. ; Song S. ; Cai W. ; Luo X. ; Jiao L. ; Fang Q. ; Wang X. ; Wu N. ; Luo Z. ; Wang H. ; et al Chem 2022, 9, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.10.001
66	Xie H. ; Xie X. ; Hu G. ; Prabhakaran V. ; Saha S. ; Gonzalez-Lopez L. ; Phakatkar A. H. ; Hong M. ; Wu M. ; Shahbazian-Yassar R. ; et al Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 281. doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-00988-w
67	Ramaswamy N. ; Mukerjee S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 18015. doi: 10.1021/jp204680p
68	Ramaswamy N. ; Mukerjee S. Adv. Phys 2012, 2012, 1. doi: 10.1155/2012/491604
69	Liu Q. T. ; Liu X. F. ; Zheng L. R. ; Shui J. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1204. doi: 10.1002/anie.201709597
70	Shao Y. ; Dodelet J.-P. ; Wu G. ; Zelenay P. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807615. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807615
71	Miao Z. ; Li S. ; Priest C. ; Wang T. ; Wu G. ; Li Q. Adv. Mater. 2022, 2200595 doi: 10.1002/adma.202200595
72	Miao Z. ; Wang X. ; Zhao Z. ; Zuo W. ; Chen S. ; Li Z. ; He Y. ; Liang J. ; Ma F. ; Wang H.-L. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006613. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006613
73	Li L. ; Wen Y. ; Han G. ; Liu Y. ; Song Y. ; Zhang W. ; Sun J. ; Du L. ; Kong F. ; Ma Y. ; et al Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135320. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135320
74	Wan X. ; Shui J. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1696. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00473
75	Ahluwalia R. K. ; Wang X. ; Osmieri L. ; Peng J. K. ; Cetinbas C. F. ; Park J. ; Myers D. J. ; Chung H. T. ; Neyerlin K. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 024513. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/abe34c
76	Du L. ; Prabhakaran V. ; Xie X. ; Park S. ; Wang Y. ; Shao Y. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 1908232. doi: 10.1002/adma.201908232
77	Xia D. ; Yang X. ; Xie L. ; Wei Y. ; Jiang W. ; Dou M. ; Li X. ; Li J. ; Gan L. ; Kang F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1906174. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201906174
78	Ma Q. ; Jin H. ; Zhu J. ; Li Z. ; Xu H. ; Liu B. ; Zhang Z. ; Ma J. ; Mu S. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102209. doi: 10.1002/advs.202102209
79	Li J. ; Zhang H. ; Samarakoon W. ; Shan W. ; Cullen D. A. ; Karakalos S. ; Chen M. ; Gu D. ; More K. L. ; Wang G. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 18971. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909312
80	Wei H. ; Su X. ; Liu J. ; Tian J. ; Wang Z. ; Sun K. ; Rui Z. ; Yang W. ; Zou Z. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 88, 19. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2018.01.011
81	Wang Z. ; Tang H. ; Zhang H. ; Lei M. ; Chen R. ; Xiao P. ; Pan M. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 421, 201. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.014
82	Yoon K. R. ; Lee K. A. ; Jo S. ; Yook S. H. ; Lee K. Y. ; Kim I.-D. ; Kim J. Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806929. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201806929
83	Wang Y. ; Wan X. ; Liu J. ; Li W. ; Li Y. ; Guo X. ; Liu X. ; Shang J. ; Shui J. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 3082. doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3966-y
84	Liu S. ; Li C. ; Zachman M. J. ; Zeng Y. ; Yu H. ; Li B. ; Wang M. ; Braaten J. ; Liu J. ; Meyer H. M. ; et al Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 652. doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01062-1
85	Yang N. ; Peng L. ; Li L. ; Li J. ; Liao Q. ; Shao M. ; Wei Z. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 12476. doi: 10.1039/d1sc02901k
86	Herranz J. ; Jaouen F. ; Lefevre M. ; Kramm U. I. ; Proietti E. ; Dodelet J. P. ; Bogdanoff P. ; Fiechter S. ; Abs-Wurmbach I. ; Bertrand P. ; et al J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 16087. doi: 10.1021/jp2042526
87	Li H. ; Tang Y. ; Wang Z. ; Shi Z. ; Wu S. ; Song D. ; Zhang J. ; Fatih K. ; Zhang J. ; Wang H. ; et al J. Power Sources 2008, 178, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.068
88	Fu X. ; Zamani P. ; Choi J.-Y. ; Hassan F. M. ; Jiang G. ; Higgins D. C. ; Zhang Y. ; Hoque M. A. ; Chen Z. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604456. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604456
89	Chenitz R. ; Kramm U. I. ; Lefèvre M. ; Glibin V. ; Zhang G. ; Sun S. ; Dodelet J.-P. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 365. doi: 10.1039/c7ee02302b
90	Zhang X. ; Xia Z. ; Li H. ; Yu S. ; Wang S. ; Sun G. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 7086. doi: 10.1039/c9ra00167k
91	Choi J.-Y. ; Yang L. ; Kishimoto T. ; Fu X. ; Ye S. ; Chen Z. ; Banham D. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 296. doi: 10.1039/c6ee03005j
92	Wang Y.-C. ; Zhu P.-F. ; Yang H. ; Huang L. ; Wu Q.-H. ; Rauf M. ; Zhang J.-Y. ; Dong J. ; Wang K. ; Zhou Z.-Y. ; et al ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 1914. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700939
93	Hao Y.-C. ; Guo Y. ; Chen L.-W. ; Shu M. ; Wang X.-Y. ; Bu T.-A. ; Gao W.-Y. ; Zhang N. ; Su X. ; Feng X. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 467. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0267-x
94	Mun Y. ; Kim M. J. ; Park S.-A. ; Lee E. ; Ye Y. ; Lee S. ; Kim Y.-T. ; Kim S. ; Kim O.-H. ; Cho Y.-H. ; et al Appl. Catal. B 2018, 222, 191. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.015
95	Cheng Q. ; Han S. ; Mao K. ; Chen C. ; Yang L. ; Zou Z. ; Gu M. ; Hu Z. ; Yang H. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 485. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.005
96	Slack J. ; Halevi B. ; McCool G. ; Li J. ; Paylicek R. ; Wycisk R. ; Mukerjee S. ; Pintauro P. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 1537. doi: 10.1002/celc.201800283
97	Yin H. ; Yuan P. ; Lu B.-A. ; Xia H. ; Guo K. ; Yang G. ; Qu G. ; Xue D. ; Hu Y. ; Cheng J. ; et al ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 12754. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02259
98	Wan X. ; Liu Q. ; Liu J. ; Liu S. ; Liu X. ; Zheng L. ; Shang J. ; Yu R. ; Shui J. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30702-z
99	Ye W. ; Chen S. ; Lin Y. ; Yang L. ; Chen S. ; Zheng X. ; Qi Z. ; Wang C. ; Long R. ; Chen M. ; et al Chem 2019, 5, 2865. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.020
100	Peng L. ; Yang J. ; Yang Y. ; Qian F. ; Wang Q. ; Sun-Waterhouse D. ; Shang L. ; Zhang T. ; Waterhouse G. I. N. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202544. doi: 10.1002/adma.202202544
101	Xu M.-J. ; Liu J. ; Ge J.-J. ; Liu C.-P. ; Xing W. J. Electrochem. 2020, 26, 464. doi: 10.13208/j.electrochem.200444
102	Wang X. ; Zhang L. ; Liu C.-P. ; Ge J.-J. ; Zhu J.-B. ; Xing W. J. Electrochem. 2022, 28, 2108501. doi: 10.13208/j.electrochem.210850

Catalyst	Active site	Electrolyte	Halfwave potential/V (vs. RHE)	Maximum Power
TPI@Z8(SiO₂)-650-Z ⁵⁴	FeN₄	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	0.823	H₂/2.5 bar O₂: 1.18 W∙cm⁻²
Cr/N/C-950 ²²	CrN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.773	–
Ru-SSC ²³	RuN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.824	H₂/1.5 bar O₂: 0.64 W∙cm⁻²
Ir-SAC ⁵⁵	IrN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.864	H₂/O₂: 0.932 W∙cm⁻²
FeCoN_x/C ²⁴	FeCoN₅-OH	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.860	H₂/O₂: 0.819 W∙cm⁻²
Fe-N-C-YZ ⁵³	FeN₄	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	0.916	H₂/air 300/1000 sccm: 0.558 W∙cm^–2
Mn(acac)₃@ZIF-NC ⁵⁷	MnN₄	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	0.872	50%RH H₂/air 250 kPa: 0.674 W∙cm⁻²
Fe/NC-NaCl ⁵⁸	FeN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.832	H₂/O₂: 0.89 W∙cm⁻²
Cu-SAs/N-C ⁵⁹	CuN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄ 0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	0.730 0.895	–
Ce-SAS/HPNC ⁶⁰	Ce-N₄/O₆	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄	0.862	H₂/2 bar O₂: 0.525 W∙cm^–2
Zn-N-C ⁶¹	ZnN₄	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ HClO₄ 0.1 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	0.746 0.873	–
Co-N-C ⁶²	CoN₄	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	0.820	H₂/O₂: 0.64 W∙cm^–2

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[3]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[4]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[5]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[6]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[7]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[8]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[9]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[10]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[11]	尉瑞芳, 李东峰, 尹恒, 王秀丽, 李灿. 微秒时间分辨的工况电化学紫外可见吸收光谱测量系统[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207035 -0 .
[12]	韦天然, 张书胜, 刘倩, 邱园, 罗俊, 刘熙俊. 富氧空位的非晶氧化铜高选择性电催化还原CO₂制乙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207026 -0 .
[13]	刘真, 孟祥福, 古万苗, 查珺, 闫楠, 尤青, 夏楠, 王辉, 伍志鲲. 组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2212064 - .
[14]	李景学, 于跃, 徐斯然, 闫文付, 木士春, 张佳楠. 电子自旋效应在电催化剂中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2302049 - .
[15]	彭芦苇, 张杨, 何瑞楠, 徐能能, 乔锦丽. 电催化二氧化碳还原催化剂、电解液、反应器和隔膜研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2302037 - .

质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展

Research Progress of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode Nonnoble Metal M-N_x/C-Type Oxygen Reduction Catalysts

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-Nx/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展

Research Progress of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode Nonnoble Metal M-Nx/C-Type Oxygen Reduction Catalysts

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 102

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展

Research Progress of Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode Nonnoble Metal M-N_x/C-Type Oxygen Reduction Catalysts