锌-空气电池隔膜的关键作用及其最新研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307017

物理化学学报 >> 2024, Vol. 40 >> Issue (6): 2307017.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307017

综述上一篇

锌-空气电池隔膜的关键作用及其最新研究进展

王梦茵¹^,², 黄若贝²^,³, 熊剑峰¹^,², 田景华¹^,²^,*(), 李剑锋¹^,²^,*(), 田中群¹^,²

¹ 厦门大学化学化工学院, 福建厦门 361005
² 福建省能源材料科学与技术创新实验室(IKKEM), 福建厦门 361005
³ 厦门大学材料学院, 福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2023-07-11 修回日期:2023-08-18 录用日期:2023-08-22 发布日期:2023-11-29
通讯作者: Email: jhtian@xmu.edu.cn (田景华)Li@xmu.edu.cn (李剑锋)
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金(2021J06001); 国家重点研发计划(2020YFB1505800)

Critical Role and Recent Development of Separator in Zinc-Air Batteries

Meng-Yin Wang¹^,², Ruo-Bei Huang²^,³, Jian-Feng Xiong¹^,², Jing-Hua Tian¹^,²^,*(), Jian-Feng Li¹^,²^,*(), Zhong-Qun Tian¹^,²

¹ College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China
² Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China
³ College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China

Received:2023-07-11 Revised:2023-08-18 Accepted:2023-08-22 Published:2023-11-29
Contact: Email: jhtian@xmu.edu.cn (Jing-Hua Tian)Li@xmu.edu.cn (Jian-Feng Li)
Supported by:
the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China(2021J06001); the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFB1505800)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在化石能源日益短缺、资源消耗急剧增加的背景下，开发可再生的清洁能源，如太阳能和风能，变得尤为重要。然而，这些清洁能源供应不稳定，因此需要大规模能源转换和储存装置的发展。在这方面，锌-空气电池能量密度高、安全性好、成本低、易组装、对环境友好并且金属锌储量丰富，作为能源储存与转换器件有良好的发展前景，但在应用的过程中仍存在一些问题。其中，隔膜在锌-空气电池中起着隔离正负极，防止短路的重要作用，但关于锌-空气电池隔膜及其改性的研究较少。本文简要介绍了锌-空气电池的发展，以水系碱性锌-空气电池为例，阐述了其工作原理。文中通过理解电池各个组件可能导致电池失效的机制，重点分析了隔膜性能对整体电池性能的影响。其中包括隔膜的离子选择性、离子导电性、稳定性以及保水性等因素。这些因素在锌-空气电池中起到至关重要的作用，直接影响电池的效率、寿命和稳定性。此外，本文还对锌-空气电池隔膜未来发展方向进行了展望。随着科技的进步，锌-空气电池的隔膜材料可能会进行更多的改良和创新，以提高电池的性能和稳定性。对于清洁能源的推动，锌-空气电池在能源储存和转换领域有望发挥更大的作用。

关键词: 隔膜, 离子选择性, 离子导电性, 稳定性, 锌-空气电池

Abstract:

Amidst widespread consumption and the scarcity of non-renewable fossil fuels, the advancement of clean energy sources like solar and wind energy holds immense significance. Nevertheless, these clean energy sources grapple with unstable power supply, underscoring the pressing need for the enhancement of large-scale energy conversion and storage devices. Zinc-air batteries, boasting high energy density, safety, affordability, ease of assembly, eco-friendliness, and abundant zinc metal resources, exhibit promising potential as energy storage and conversion solutions. Nevertheless, various challenges persist in their application, including a limited cycle life and inadequate power density. Throughout the charge and discharge cycles, factors such as the dendritic growth of the zinc negative electrode, the formation of ZnO passivation layers, electrolyte evaporation, and side reactions involving the diffusion of zincate ions to the positive electrode collectively exert influence on the performance of zinc-air batteries. The separator plays a crucial role in zinc-air batteries by isolating the positive and negative electrodes to prevent short circuits, and these aforementioned issues can be resolved through optimization of the design. Until now, the commonly employed separators in zinc-air batteries can be categorized into various types: standard porous separators, anion exchange membranes, polymer gel electrolyte membranes, and composite membranes comprising diverse polymer compositions. Among these, within the context of separator research, porous separators of the polyolefin type are generally utilized in aqueous alkaline zinc-air batteries. Nevertheless, their pronounced hydrophobic nature results in markedly diminished ion conductivity. Conversely, gel-based solid-state or semi-solid-state electrolyte membranes are tailored for flexible electronic device applications. This adaptation ensures that zinc-air batteries uphold favorable electrochemical performance even under deformation conditions, simultaneously addressing the challenge of electrolyte volatilization to a certain degree. Fundamental attributes of the separator, such as pore size, hydrophilicity, and other properties, significantly impact the battery's lifespan and charge/discharge performance. Nevertheless, research on separators and their modifications to enhance zinc-air battery performance, along with the underlying principles, lags behind other aspects of zinc-air battery research, presenting ample room for advancement. This review offers a concise overview of zinc-air battery development, using aqueous alkaline zinc-air batteries as an example to elucidate their operational principles. The objective is to grasp the challenges leading to battery failure in different components and to particularly analyze how separator performance influences overall battery efficiency. This includes aspects such as ion selectivity, ion conductivity, stability, and water retention of the separator. The overview is divided into two main sections: (1) elucidating the fundamental structure and operational principles of the zinc-air battery, and (2) comprehensively exploring the fundamental attributes of the separator and its pivotal function within the zinc-air battery. The research progress and perspective for the development of zinc-air battery separators are also discussed and anticipated.

Key words: Separator, Ion selectivity, Ion conductivity, Stability, Zinc-air battery

王梦茵, 黄若贝, 熊剑峰, 田景华, 李剑锋, 田中群. 锌-空气电池隔膜的关键作用及其最新研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(6), 2307017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307017

Meng-Yin Wang, Ruo-Bei Huang, Jian-Feng Xiong, Jing-Hua Tian, Jian-Feng Li, Zhong-Qun Tian. Critical Role and Recent Development of Separator in Zinc-Air Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2024, 40(6), 2307017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307017

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307017

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V40/I6/2307017

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 92

1	Liu J.-N. ; Zhao C.-X. ; Wang J. ; Ren D. ; Li B.-Q. ; Zhang Q. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 4542. doi: 10.1039/d2ee02440c
2	Harting K. ; Kunz U. ; Turek T. Z. Phys. Chem. 2012, 226, 151. doi: 10.1524/zpch.2012.0152
3	Fu J. ; Cano Z. P. ; Park M. G. ; Yu A. ; Fowler M. ; Chen Z. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604685. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604685
4	Zhu X. ; Hu C. ; Amal R. ; Dai L. ; Lu X. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4536. doi: 10.1039/d0ee02800b
5	Park J. E. ; Lim M. S. ; Kim J. K. ; Choi H. J. ; Sung Y.-E. ; Cho Y.-H. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 69, 161. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.023
6	Qaseem A. ; Chen F. ; Qiu C. ; Mahmoudi A. ; Wu X. ; Wang X. ; Johnston R. L. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2017, 34, 1700097. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201700097
7	Chakkaravarthy C. ; Waheed A. K. A. ; Udupa H. V. K. J. Power Sources 1981, 6, 203. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(81)80027-4
8	Zheng Q. ; Zhang Y. ; Su C. ; Zhao L. ; Guo Y. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 17, e2776. doi: 10.1002/apj.2776
9	Liu H. ; Liu Q. ; Wang Y. ; Wang Y. ; Chou S. ; Hu Z. ; Zhang Z. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 683. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.038
10	Niu Y. ; Gong S. ; Liu X. ; Xu C. ; Xu M. ; Sun S.-G. ; Chen Z. eScience 2022, 2, 546. doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2022.05.001
11	Dong F. ; Wu M. ; Chen Z. ; Liu X. ; Zhang G. ; Qiao J. ; Sun S. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 36. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00768-3
12	Zhang X. R. ; Xu Y. F. ; Shen S. Y. ; Chen Y. ; Huang L. ; Li J. T. ; Sun S. G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 2237.
	张晓茹; 许跃峰; 沈守宇; 陈媛; 黄令; 李君涛; 孙世刚. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 2237. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705231
13	Xiao Y. ; Pei Y. ; Hu Y. F. ; Ma R. G. ; Wang D. Y. ; Wang J. C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009051.
	肖瑶; 裴煜; 胡一帆; 马汝广; 王德义; 王家成. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009051. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009051
14	Prakoso B. ; Mahbub M. A. A. ; Yilmaz M. ; Khoiruddin ; Wenten I. G. ; Handoko A. D. ; Sumboja A. Chemnanomat 2021, 7, 354. doi: 10.1002/cnma.202000672
15	Zhao Z. ; Fan X. ; Ding J. ; Hu W. ; Zhong C. ; Lu J. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2259. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01541
16	Jeong B. J. ; Jo Y. N. Appl. Sci.-Basel 2021, 11, 11675. doi: 10.3390/app112411675
17	Chen C.-Y. ; Matsumoto K. ; Kubota K. ; Hagiwara R. ; Xu Q. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900196. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900196
18	Thomas S. ; Cole I. S. ; Sridhar M. ; Birbilis N. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 192. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.008
19	Lee S. H. ; Ryu K. S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2017, 38, 523. doi: 10.1002/bkcs.11149
20	Kim H. S. ; Jo Y. N. ; Lee W. J. ; Kim K. J. ; Lee C. W. Electroanalysis 2015, 27, 517. doi: 10.1002/elan.201400457
21	Clark S. ; Mainar A. R. ; Iruin E. ; Colmenares L. C. ; Blazquez J. A. ; Tolchard J. R. ; Jusys Z. ; Horstmann B. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903470. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903470
22	Ingale P. ; Sakthivel M. ; Drillet J. F. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, H5224. doi: 10.1149/2.0351708jes
23	Dai G. ; Lu L. ; Shim J. ; Lee H. T. Korean Hydrogen New Energ. Soc. 2021, 32, 401. doi: 10.7316/KHNES.2021.32.5.401
24	Sumboja A. ; Ge X. ; Zheng G. ; Goh F. W. T. ; Hor T. S. A. ; Zong Y. ; Liu Z. J. Power Sources 2016, 332, 330. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.142
25	Goh F. W. T. ; Liu Z. ; Hor T. S. A. ; Zhang J. ; Ge X. ; Zong Y. ; Yu A. ; Khoo W. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161, A2080. doi: 10.1149/2.0311414jes
26	Han J. W. ; Jo Y. N. Kor. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 29, 798. doi: 10.3740/mrsk.2019.29.12.798
27	Mainar A. R. ; Iruin E. ; Colmenares L. C. ; Blazquez J. A. ; Grande H.-J. Energy Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 174. doi: 10.1002/ese3.191
28	Mainar A. R. ; Leonet O. ; Bengoechea M. ; Boyano I. ; deMeatza I. ; Kvasha A. ; Guerfi A. ; Alberto Blazquez J. Int. J. Energy Res. 2016, 40, 1032. doi: 10.1002/er.3499
29	Yang D. ; Chen D. ; Jiang Y. ; Ang E. H. ; Feng Y. ; Rui X. ; Yu Y. Carbon Energy 2021, 3, 50. doi: 10.1002/cey2.88
30	Tan P. ; Chen B. ; Xu H. ; Zhang H. ; Cai W. ; Ni M. ; Liu M. ; Shao Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2056. doi: 10.1039/c7ee01913k
31	Liu Q. ; Liu R. ; He C. ; Xia C. ; Guo W. ; Xu Z.-L. ; Xia B. Y. eScience 2022, 2, 453. doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2022.08.004
32	Tsehaye M. T. ; Alloin F. ; Iojoiu C. ; Tufa R. A. ; Aili D. ; Fischer P. ; Velizarov S. J. Power Sources 2020, 475, 228689. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228689
33	Zhu A. L. ; Wilkinson D. P. ; Zhang X. ; Xing Y. ; Rozhin A. G. ; Kulinich S. A. J. Energy Storage 2016, 8, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2016.09.007
34	Hwang H. J. ; Chi W. S. ; Kwon O. ; Lee J. G. ; Kim J. H. ; Shul Y.-G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26298. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b07841
35	Zhao C.-X. ; Yu L. ; Liu J.-N. ; Wang J. ; Yao N. ; Li X.-Y. ; Chen X. ; Li B.-Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed 2022, 61, e202208042. doi: 10.1002/anie.202208042
36	Zhao C.-X. ; Liu J.-N. ; Yao N. ; Wang J. ; Ren D. ; Chen X. ; Li B.-Q. ; Zhang Q. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed 2021, 60, 15281. doi: 10.1002/anie.202104171
37	Sangeetha T. ; Chen P.-T. ; Yan W.-M. ; Huang K. D. Energy 2020, 197, 117181. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117181
38	Zhong Y. ; Liu B. ; Zhao Z. ; Shen Y. ; Liu X. ; Zhong C. Energies 2021, 14, 2607. doi: 10.3390/en14092607
39	Lu C.-T. ; Zhu Z.-Y. ; Chen S.-W. ; Chang Y.-L. ; Hsueh K.-L. Batteries-Basel 2022, 8, 92. doi: 10.3390/batteries8080092
40	Mainar A. R. ; Iruin E. ; Colmenares L. C. ; Kvasha A. ; de Meatza I. ; Bengoechea M. ; Leonet O. ; Boyano I. ; Zhang Z. ; Alberto Blazquez J. J. Energy Storage 2018, 15, 304. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2017.12.004
41	Zhu Y. ; Yue K. ; Xia C. ; Zaman S. ; Yang H. ; Wang X. ; Yan Y. ; Xia B. Y. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 137. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00669-5
42	Yao Z.-C. ; Tang T. ; Hu J.-S. ; Wan L.-J. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 6380. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00275
43	Abbasi A. ; Xu Y. ; Khezri R. ; Etesami M. ; Lin C. ; Kheawhom S. ; Lu Y. Mater. Today Sustain. 2022, 18, 100126. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100126
44	Leong K. W. ; Wang Y. ; Ni M. ; Pan W. ; Luo S. ; Leung D. Y. C. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2022, 154, 111771. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111771
45	Chen X. ; Zhou Z. ; Karahan H. E. ; Shao Q. ; Wei L. ; Chen Y. Small 2018, 14, 1801929. doi: 10.1002/smll.201801929
46	Marcus K. ; Liang K. ; Niu W. ; Yang Y. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 2746. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00925
47	Kim H.-W. ; Lim J.-M. ; Lee H.-J. ; Eom S.-W. ; Hong Y. T. ; Lee S.-Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3711. doi: 10.1039/c5ta09576j
48	Thuy Nguyen Thanh T. ; Chung H.-J. ; Ivey D. G. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 327, 135021. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135021
49	Bonnick P. ; Dahn J. R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A981. doi: 10.1149/2.023207jes
50	Saputra H. ; Othman R. ; Sutjipto A. G. E. ; Muhida R. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367, 152. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.061
51	Xu N. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang M. ; Fan X. ; Zhang T. ; Peng L. ; Zhou X.-D. ; Qiao J. Nano Energy 2019, 65, 104021. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104021
52	Wang Q. ; Feng Q. ; Lei Y. ; Tang S. ; Xu L. ; Xiong Y. ; Fang G. ; Wang Y. ; Yang P. ; Liu J. ; Liu W. ; Xiong X. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3689. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31383-4
53	Sankaralingam, R. K.; Seshadri, S.; Sunarso, J.; Bhatt, A. I.; Kapoor, A. In PVA-Based KOH Polymer Gel Electrolyte as a Membrane Separator for Zinc-Air Flow Battery, 1st International Conference on Energy Materials (ICEM), Xiamen Univ, Electr Network, Nov 05–08, 2022; Wee-Jun Ong, Ka Lun Wong, Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2021; pp. 1649–1654.
54	Yang C. C. ; Lin S. J. J. Power Sources 2002, 112, 497. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7753(02)00438-x
55	Xu M. ; Dou H. ; Zhang Z. ; Zheng Y. ; Ren B. ; Ma Q. ; Wen G. ; Luo D. ; Yu A. ; Zhang L. ; et al Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed 2022, 61, e202117703. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117703
56	Arora P. ; Zhang Z. J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4419. doi: 10.1021/cr020738u
57	Pleha, D.; Dvorak, P.; Kunovjanek, M.; Musil, M.; Cech, O. In Battery Separators, International Meeting on Advanced Batteries, Accumulators and Fuel Cells-12 (ABAF-12), Brno Univ Technol, Brno, Czech Republic, Sep. 11–14, 2012; Vondrak, J (Vondrak, J); Sedlarikova, M (Sedlarikova, M); Vanysek, P (Vanysek, P), Eds.; The Electrochemical Society: Pennington, 2011; pp. 153–158.
58	Ma L. ; Chen S. ; Wang D. ; Yang Q. ; Mo F. ; Liang G. ; Li N. ; Zhang H. ; Zapien J. A. ; Zhi C. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803046. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201803046
59	Kwon O. ; Hwang H. J. ; Ji Y. ; Jeon O. S. ; Kim J. P. ; Lee C. ; Shul Y. G. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38552-4
60	Plaimer M. ; Breitfuss C. ; Sinz W. ; Heindl S. F. ; Ellersdorfer C. ; Steffan H. ; Wilkening M. ; Hennige V. ; Tatschl R. ; Geier A. ; et al J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 702. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.047
61	Abbasi A. ; Hosseini S. ; Somwangthanaroj A. ; Mohamad A. A. ; Kheawhom S. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2019, 20, 3678. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153678
62	Lee H.-J. ; Lim J.-M. ; Kim H.-W. ; Jeong S.-H. ; Eom S.-W. ; Hong Y. T. ; Lee S.-Y. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 499, 526. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.038
63	Tsehaye M. T. ; Gebreslassie G. T. ; Choi N. H. ; Milian D. ; Martin V. ; Fischer P. ; Tubke J. ; El Kissi N. ; Donten M.L. ; Alloin F. ; et al Molecules 2021, 26, 4062. doi: 10.3390/molecules26134062
64	Tsehaye M. T. ; Choi N. H. ; Fischer P. ; Tubke J. ; Planes E. ; Alloin F. ; Iojoiu C. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2022, 5, 7069. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00697
65	Dewi E. L. ; Oyaizu K. ; Nishide H. ; Tsuchida E. J. Power Sources 2003, 115, 149. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7753(02)00650-x
66	Nanthapong S. ; Kheawhom S. ; Klaysom C. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2020, 21, 7052. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197052
67	Zuo Y. ; Wang K. ; Zhao S. ; Wei M. ; Liu X. ; Zhang P. ; Xiao Y. ; Xiong J. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132996. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132996
68	Fu J. ; Zhang J. ; Song X. ; Zarrin H. ; Tian X. ; Qiao J. ; Rasen L. ; Li K. ; Chen Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 663. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03404c
69	Teng H.-T. ; Wang W.-T. ; Han X.-F. ; Hao X. ; Yang R. ; Tian J.-H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39, 2107017.
	滕浩天; 王文涛; 韩晓峰; 郝翔; 杨瑞枝; 田景华. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39, 2107017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202107017
70	Wu G. M. ; Lin S. J. ; Yang C. C. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280, 802. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.037
71	Zhang G. ; Cai X. ; Li C. ; Yao J. ; Tian Z. ; Zhang F. ; Liu Y. ; Liu W. ; Zhang X. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 221, 446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.005
72	Miao H. ; Chen B. ; Li S. ; Wu X. ; Wang Q. ; Zhang C. ; Sun Z. ; Li H. J. Power Sources 2020, 450, 227653. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227653
73	Wu G. M. ; Lin S. J. ; You J. H. ; Yang C. C. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 112, 798. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.06.058
74	Zhang Y. ; Li C. ; Cai X. ; Yao J. ; Li M. ; Zhang X. ; Liu Q. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 220, 635. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.103
75	Wang M. ; Xu N. ; Fu J. ; Liu Y. ; Qiao J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 11257. doi: 10.1039/c9ta02314c
76	Cai X. ; Zhang Y. ; Li C. ; Zhang G. ; Wang X. ; Zhang X. ; Wang Q. ; Wang F. Membranes. 2021, 11, 224. doi: 10.3390/membranes11030224
77	Liu X. ; Fan X. ; Liu B. ; Ding J. ; Deng Y. ; Han X. ; Zhong C. ; Hu W. Adv. Mater.. 2021, 33, 2006461. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006461
78	Singh G. ; Kumar M. ; Thomas T. S. ; Nagaiah T. C. ; Mandal D. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2021, 4, 14689. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03318
79	Sapkota P. ; Kim H. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2010, 16, 39. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.01.024
80	You X. ; Qiao C. ; Peng D. ; Liu W. ; Li C. ; Zhao H. ; Qi H. ; Cai X. ; Shao Y. ; Shi X. Polymers 2021, 13, 9. doi: 10.3390/polym13010009
81	Zhao N. ; Wu F. ; Xing Y. ; Qu W. ; Chen N. ; Shang Y. ; Yan M. ; Li Y. ; Li L. ; Chen R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 15537. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b00758
82	Song Z. ; Liu X. ; Ding J. ; Liu J. ; Han X. ; Deng Y. ; Zhong C. ; Hu W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 49801. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c14470
83	Yang C. C. ; Lin S. J. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2003, 33, 777. doi: 10.1023/a:1025514620869
84	Fan X. ; Liu J. ; Song Z. ; Han X. ; Deng Y. ; Zhong C. ; Hu W. Nano Energy 2019, 56, 454. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.057
85	Zuo Y. ; Zhang W. ; Wei M. ; Zhang P. ; Zhao S. ; Pei P. ; Qiu L. ; Wang H. ; Meng Z. ; Wang K. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 53, 136. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.047
86	Song Z. ; Ding J. ; Liu B. ; Liu X. ; Han X. ; Deng Y. ; Hu W. ; Zhong C. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908127. doi: 10.1002/adma.201908127
87	Zhang P. ; Wang K. ; Zuo Y. ; Wei M. ; Wang H. ; Chen Z. ; Shang N. ; Pei P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 49109. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c13625
88	Li M. ; Liu B. ; Fan X. ; Liu X. ; Liu J. ; Ding J. ; Han X. ; Deng Y. ; Hu W. ; Zhong C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 28909. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b09086
89	Liu Q. ; Xia C. ; He C. ; Guo W. ; Wu Z. P. ; Li Z. ; Zhao Q. ; Xia B. Y. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202210567. doi: 10.1002/anie.202210567
90	Park J. ; Park M. ; Nam G. ; Lee J.-S. ; Cho J. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1396. doi: 10.1002/adma.201404639
91	Gu C. ; Xie X.-Q. ; Liang Y. ; Li J. ; Wang H. ; Wang K. ; Liu J. ; Wang M. ; Zhang Y. ; Li M. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 4451. doi: 10.1039/d1ee01134k
92	Sun N. ; Lu F. ; Yu Y. ; Su L. ; Gao X. ; Zheng L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 11778. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00325

Parameter	Description, target value	Property
Thickness	Separator thickness < 25 μm	Mechanical
Tensile strength	≈ 95 MPa
Puncture strength	> 300 g/25.4 μm
Gurley	Air permeability ≈ 25 s·mL⁻¹	Electrochemical
MacMullin number	Resistance ratio, ≤ 11
Wettability	Fast and complete wetting in electrolytes
Chemical stability	Long term stability in batteries, ≈ 10 years
Pore size	Small pores that direct electrode contact is avoided, < 1 μm
Porosity	Volumetric separator ratio with and without pores, ≈ 40%
Dimensional stability	Shrinkage at 200 ℃, < 5%	Thermal
Shut down temperature	130 ℃	Thermal

Separator	Diffusion coefficient of [Zn(OH)₄]²⁻ (cm²·min⁻¹)	σ(OH⁻) (S·cm⁻¹)	Stability	Mechanical property	Performance	Ref.
PPO–TMA	1.13 × 10⁻⁸	1.737 × 10⁻²	chemical: soaked in KOH, 7 mol·L⁻¹ solution for 150 h at 30 ℃ thermal: ~180–250 ℃ electrochemical: stability window was measured to be 4 V	–	803 mAh·g_Zn⁻¹ 932 mWh·g_Zn⁻¹ (15 mA·cm⁻² at 0.9 V cut-off voltage)	61
PBE(Nafion-PVA/PAA)	4.1 × 10⁻⁷	6.6 × 10⁻³	Good electrochemical stability	tensile modulus 973.1 MPa	~41.6 h (20 mA·cm⁻², 10 min each cycle)	47
PVA/PAA	–	0.301	Stable in Al\|PVA/PAA\|Al cell with cyclic sweeping range from −1.5 to +1.5 V	–	50 mW·cm⁻²	70
RDC/N-PAA/KOH	–	0.430	−0.8 – +0.8 V	tensile strength 381.43 kPa	round-trip efficiency (69.36%) and longer cycle times (11 h). 40.25 mW∙cm⁻² and 731.5 mAh∙g⁻¹ (2 mA∙cm⁻²)	71
PAM-based AGEs	–	0.2156	–	repeatable mechanical bending and pounding	105 mW∙cm⁻² 140 cycles (~23.3 h) (5 mA∙cm⁻², 10 min each cycle)	72
CCNF-PDIL SSEs	–	0.2865	–	maximum stress of 105 MPa by virtue of the reinforced concrete architecture	720 cycles (240 h) (2 mA·cm⁻², 10 min each cycle) 135 mW∙cm⁻² (current density of 220 mA·cm⁻²)	55
BC/PVA	–	8.08 × 10⁻²	high thermal/chemical stability	tensile strength 0.951 MPa	650 cycles (> 440 h) (0.5 mA·cm⁻², 40 min per cycle)	81
TEAOH-PVA	–	3.0 × 10⁻²	better thermal stability than the KOH-PVA electrolyte	good mechanical flexibility	74.1 mW∙cm⁻² Over 30 h (20 min, 5 mA⋅cm⁻³) Shelf Life: 15 days	88
Celgard®3501 (reference)	2.324 × 10⁻⁵	1.28 × 10⁻²	Non stable in −0.9 – 0.9 V (vs. Pt/Pt²⁺)	Tensile Modulus 751.4 MPa	15 h (20 mA·cm⁻², each cycle 10 min)	47

[1]	戚洺瑄, 金斓煜, 姚宏鹤, 徐子鹏, 成腾, 陈棋, 朱城, 白阳. 钙钛矿太阳能电池在反向偏压下的电学失效及稳定性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100088 - .
[2]	薛夷菡, 韩雪, 张洁, 温晓茹. NCQDs修饰FeOOH基复合材料的制备及其电容脱盐性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100072 - .
[3]	石英彤, 徐国桐, 梁贵增, 兰笛, 张思远, 王彦儒, 李道浩, 吴广磊. PEG-VN改性PP隔膜用于高稳定性高效率锂硫电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(7): 100082 - .
[4]	周昱晨, 刘焕敏, 李红星, 宋欣妤, 唐永华, 周鹏. 设计热力学稳定的贵金属单原子光催化剂用于乙醇的高效非氧化转化形成高纯氢和增值产物乙醛[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(6): 100067 - .
[5]	唐海莲, 陈思远, 刘巧云, 白国义, 乔波涛, 刘菲. 用于糠醇加氢的稳定型Rh/羟基磷灰石催化剂：氧化型金属-载体强相互作用在还原条件下的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100036 - .
[6]	周欣, 霍怡廷, 杨松瑀, 何博文, 王晓晶, 吴珍, 张建军. 利用飞秒瞬态吸收光谱研究pH值对质子化COF光催化H₂O₂生成的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(12): 100160 - .
[7]	李芷阳, 邓晖, 蔡芯琪, 陈卓. 磁性核壳胶囊局域中和胃酸用于活性益生菌的高效递送[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7): 2306051 - .
[8]	郭雅雯, 李大伟, 高杨, 李翠红. 非富勒烯受体有机太阳能电池稳定性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(6): 2306050 - .
[9]	AhmedYameen, 封想想, 高远基, 丁洋, 龙操玉, HaiderMustafa, 李恒月, 李专, 黄誓成, SaidaminovMakhsud I., 阳军亮. 离子液体界面修饰的高效稳定FAPbI₃钙钛矿太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(6): 2303057 - .
[10]	田晓靖, 黄至纯, 张青松, 王旭, 杨宁, 邓南平. PNIPAm温敏纳米纤维膜：交联作用下的形貌稳定性和响应行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(4): 2304037 - .
[11]	李亚捷, 陈斌, 王依平, 邢辉, 赵伟, 张更, 施思齐. 定制电解液或隔膜实现锂离子各向异性输运从而抑制枝晶生长：相场模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(3): 2305053 - .
[12]	李莹, 赵钰燊, 陈凯, 刘旭, 伊廷锋, 陈立锋. 高性能锂离子电池用N掺杂C-Sn交联纳米纤维自支撑电极的理性设计[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(3): 2305007 - .
[13]	裘科, 王凤梅, 廖莫愁, 朱科润, 陈嘉威, 张威, 夏永姚, 董晓丽, 王飞. 气相SiO₂复合水凝胶聚合物电解质用于近中性锌-空气电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(3): 2304036 - .
[14]	王往, 刘宇澄, 陈胜利. 基于镍铁层状双氢氧化物的氧析出催化剂：催化机制、电极设计和稳定性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(2): 2303059 - .
[15]	胡雪晨, 夏求应, 岳钒, 何欣怡, 梅正浩, 王金石, 夏晖, 黄晓东. LiNbO₃负极薄膜电化学性能及全固态薄膜锂离子电池应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(2): 2309046 - .

锌-空气电池隔膜的关键作用及其最新研究进展

Critical Role and Recent Development of Separator in Zinc-Air Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 92

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0