Pt 含量对Co@Pt/C核壳结构催化剂性能的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305101

物理化学学报 >> 2013, Vol. 29 >> Issue (08): 1745-1752.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305101

Pt 含量对Co@Pt/C核壳结构催化剂性能的影响

赵天天^1,2, 林瑞^1,2, 张路^1,2, 曹春晖^1,2, 马建新^1,2

1 同济大学新能源汽车工程中心, 上海 201804;
2 同济大学汽车学院, 上海 201804

收稿日期:2013-04-06 修回日期:2013-05-09 发布日期:2013-07-09
通讯作者: 林瑞, 马建新 E-mail:ruilin@tongji.edu.cn;jxma@tongji.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21276199)和111 创新引智基地(B08019)资助项目

Effects of Pt Content on the Catalytic Performance of Co@Pt/C Core-Shell Structured Electrocatalysts

ZHAO Tian-Tian^1,2, LIN Rui^1,2, ZHANG Lu^1,2, CAO Chui-Hui^1,2, MA Jian-Xin^1,2

1 Clean Energy Automotive Engineering Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804;
2 School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804

Received:2013-04-06 Revised:2013-05-09 Published:2013-07-09
Contact: LIN Rui, MA Jian-Xin E-mail:ruilin@tongji.edu.cn;jxma@tongji.edu.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21276199) and 111 Project, China (B08019).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用两步还原法制得Co@Pt/C核壳结构催化剂, 其中Co与Pt 的总质量分数为20%. 通过改变金属前驱体的用量, 制备了不同Co:Pt 原子比的Co@Pt/C 催化剂, 以20% (w) Co@Pt(1:1)/C 与20% (w) Co@Pt(1:3)/C 表示. 采用透射电镜(TEM)、光电子射线能谱分析(XPS)、循环伏安(CV)、线性扫描伏安(LSV)等方法考察了其结构与性能, 并与实验室早先制备的40% (w) Co@Pt/C 催化剂进行了比较. 自制20% Co@Pt(1:1)/C 与20% Co@Pt(1:3)/C 催化剂的金属颗粒直径约为2.2-2.3 nm, 在碳载体上分散均匀, 粒径分布范围较窄, 电化学活性比表面积(ECSA)分别为56 和60 m²·g^-1, 均超过商用催化剂20% Pt/C(E-tek) (ECSA=54 m²·g^-1). 20%Co@Pt(1:1)/C 与20% Co@Pt(1:3)/C 的半波电位相较于40% Co@Pt(1:1)/C 和40% Co@Pt(1:3)/C 均向正向移动, 表现出更好的氧还原(ORR)催化活性, 并有望降低催化剂的成本, 在质子交换膜燃料电池领域表现出良好的应用前景.

关键词: 质子交换膜燃料电池, 核壳结构催化剂, 电化学性能, 氧还原反应, 半波电位

Abstract:

Core-shell structured Co@Pt/C electrocatalysts containing different mass fractions of Co to Pt, which are represented as 20% (w) Co@Pt(1:1)/C and 20% (w) Co@Pt(1:3)/C, were prepared by changing the ratio of metallic precursors using a successive reduction method. The structure and electrochemical performance of the as-prepared catalysts were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The performance of the as-prepared catalysts was compared with that of 40% (w) Co@Pt/C catalyst we synthesized previously. The sizes of Co@Pt(1:1) and Co@Pt(1:3) particles ranged from 2.2 to 2.3 nm, and the metal particles were well dispersed on the carbon support. The electrochemical specific area (ECSA) of 20% Co@Pt(1:1)/C (56 m²·g^-1) and 20% Co@Pt(1:3)/C (60 m²·g^-1) were higher than that of commercial 20% Pt/C (E-tek) (54 m²·g^-1). Compared with those of 40% Co@Pt(1:1)/C and 40% Co@Pt(1:3)/C, the half-wave potentials of 20% Co@Pt(1:1)/C and 20% Co@Pt(1:3)/C shifted to the positive direction, and they correspondingly showed improved catalytic performance. The low cost and high performance of the 20% Co@Pt/C catalyst make it a promising low-Pt catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells.

Key words: Proton exchange membrane fuel cell, Core-shell structured catalyst, Electrochemical performance, Oxygen reduction reaction, Half wave potential

赵天天, 林瑞, 张路, 曹春晖, 马建新. Pt 含量对Co@Pt/C核壳结构催化剂性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(08), 1745-1752. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305101

ZHAO Tian-Tian, LIN Rui, ZHANG Lu, CAO Chui-Hui, MA Jian-Xin. Effects of Pt Content on the Catalytic Performance of Co@Pt/C Core-Shell Structured Electrocatalysts[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29(08), 1745-1752. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305101

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305101

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V29/I08/1745

参考文献

(1) Mazumder, V.; Lee, Y. M.; Sun, S. H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010,20, 1224. doi: 10.1002/adfm.v20:8
(2) Yang, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2011, 50, 2674. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005868
(3) Fu, R.; Zheng, J. S.;Wang, X. Z.; Ma, J. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (9), 2141. [符蓉, 郑俊生, 王喜照, 马建新.物理化学学报, 2011, 27 (9), 2141.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110809
(4) Mukerjee, S.; Srinivasan, S.; Soriaga, M. P. J. Phys. Chem.1995, 99, 4577. doi: 10.1021/j100013a032
(5) Zong, J.; Huang, C. D.;Wang, Y. X. Battery Bimonthly 2011, 41 (2), 104. [宗军, 黄成德, 王宇新. 电池, 2011, 41 (2), 104.]
(6) Lim, B.; Jiang, M. J.; Camargo, H. C. P.; Cho, E. C.; Tao, J.; Lu,X. M.; Zhu, Y. M.; Xia, Y. M. Science 2009, 324, 1302. doi: 10.1126/science.1170377
(7) Stamenkovic, V. R.; Fowler, B.; Mun, B. S.;Wang, G. F.; Ross,N. P.; Christopher, A. L.; Nenad, M. M. Science 2007, 315, 493.doi: 10.1126/science.1135941
(8) Wang, C.; Chi, M. F.; Li, D. G.; Strmcnik, D.; Vliet, D.;Wang,G. F.; Komanicky, V.; Chang, K. C.; Paulikas, A. P.; Tripkovic,D.; Pearson, J.; More, K. L.; Markovic, N. M.; Sramenkovic, V.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14396. doi: 10.1021/ja2047655
(9) Chen, Y. M.; Liang, Z. X.; Yang, F.; Liu, Y.W.; Chen, S. L.J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 24073. doi: 10.1021/jp207828n
(10) Zhang, J.; Yang, H. Z.; Fang, J. Y.; Zou, S. Z. Nano Lett. 2010,10, 638. doi: 10.1021/nl903717z
(11) Lin, R.; Zhang, H. Y.; Zhao, T. T.; Cao, C. H.; Yang, D. J.; Ma,J. X. Electrochimica Acta 2012, 62, 263. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.018
(12) Zhang, H. Y.; Cao, C. H.; Zhao, J.; Lin, R.; Ma, J. X. Chinese Journal of Catalysis 2012, 33 (2), 222. [张海艳, 曹春晖,赵健, 林瑞, 马建新. 催化学报, 2012, 33 (2), 222.]
(13) Zhu, H.; Li, X.W.;Wang, F. H. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 9151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.224
(14) Mani, P.; Srivastava, R.; Strasser, P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112,2770. doi: 10.1021/jp0776412
(15) Dang, D.; Gao, H. L.; Peng, L. J.; Su, Y. L.; Liao, S. J.;Wang, Y.Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (10), 2379. [党岱, 高海丽,彭良进, 苏允兰, 廖世军, 王晔. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27 (10), 2379.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110922
(16) Liu, B.; Liao, S. J.; Liang, Z. X. Progress in Chenmistry 2011,23 (5), 852. [刘宾, 廖世军, 梁振兴. 化学进展, 2011, 23 (5), 852.]
(17) Adzic, R. R.; Zhang, J.; Sasaki, K.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Shao,M.;Wang, J. X.; Nilekar, A. U.; Marvrikakis, M.; Valerio, J. A.;Uribe, F. Top Catal. 2007, 46, 249. doi: 10.1007/s11244-007-9003-x
(18) Kristian, N.; Yu, Y. L.; Lee, J. M.; Liu, X.W.;Wang, X.Electrochimica Acta 2010, 56, 1000. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.073
(19) Wu, H. M.;Wexler, D.;Wang, G. X.; Lin, H. K. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012, 16, 1105.
(20) Brushett, F. R.; Duong, H. T.; Ng, J.W.; Behrens, R. L.;Wieckowski, A.; Kenis, P. J. A. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2010, 157 (6), B837.
(21) Wang, R. F.;Wang, H.;Wei, B. X.;Wang,W.; Lei, Z. Q.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 10081. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.008
(22) Lin, R.; Cao, C. H.; Zhao, T. T.; Huang, Z.; Li, B.;Wieckowski,A.; Ma, J. X. Journal of Power Sources 2013, 223, 190. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.073
(23) Yang, X. J.; Cheng, F. Y.; Tao, Z. L.; Chen, J. Journal of Power Sources 2011, 196, 2785. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.079
(24) Lee, M. H.; Do, J. S. Journal of Power Sources 2009, 188, 353.doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.051
(25) Gasteiger, H. A.; Kocha, S. S.; Sompalli, B.;Wagner, F. T.Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2005, 56, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021
(26) Cao, C. H.; Lin, R.; Zhao, T. T.; Huang, Z.; Ma, J. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29 (1), 95. [曹春晖, 林瑞, 赵天天,黄真, 马建新. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29 (1), 95.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201209272

[1]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[2]	陈帅, 余创, 罗启悦, 魏超超, 李莉萍, 李广社, 程时杰, 谢佳. 卤化物固态电解质研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210032 -0 .
[3]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[4]	彭林峰, 余创, 魏超超, 廖聪, 陈帅, 张隆, 程时杰, 谢佳. 锂硫银锗矿固态电解质研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2211034 -0 .
[5]	齐亚娥, 夏永姚. 电解液调控策略提升水系锌离子电池正极材料电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2205045 -0 .
[6]	李景学, 于跃, 徐斯然, 闫文付, 木士春, 张佳楠. 电子自旋效应在电催化剂中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2302049 - .
[7]	莫英, 肖逵逵, 吴剑芳, 刘辉, 胡爱平, 高鹏, 刘继磊. 锂离子电池隔膜的功能化改性及表征技术[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2107030 - .
[8]	薄拯, 孔竞, 杨化超, 郑周威, 陈鹏鹏, 严建华, 岑可法. 基于混合溶剂有机电解液的超低温孔洞石墨烯超级电容[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2005054 - .
[9]	韩爱娣, 闫晓晖, 陈俊任, 程晓静, 章俊良. 分散溶剂对PEMFC催化层中超薄Nafion离聚物质子传导的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 1912052 - .
[10]	梁嘉顺, 刘轩, 李箐. 提升燃料电池铂基催化剂稳定性的原理、策略与方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2010072 - .
[11]	李峥嵘, 申涛, 胡冶州, 陈科, 陆贇, 王得丽. 有序金属间化合物电催化剂在燃料电池中的应用进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2010029 - .
[12]	刘苗苗, 杨茅茂, 舒欣欣, 张进涛. 燃料电池碳基氧还原催化剂的设计与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007072 - .
[13]	韩洪仨, 王彦青, 张云龙, 丛媛媛, 秦嘉琪, 高蕊, 柴春晓, 宋玉江. 金属卟啉修饰的多孔聚苯胺基氧还原电催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2008017 - .
[14]	罗芳, 潘书媛, 杨泽惠. 中高温质子交换膜燃料电池催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009087 - .
[15]	王健, 丁炜, 魏子栋. 超低铂用量质子交换膜燃料电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009094 - .

Pt 含量对Co@Pt/C核壳结构催化剂性能的影响

Effects of Pt Content on the Catalytic Performance of Co@Pt/C Core-Shell Structured Electrocatalysts

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0