第三组份端基对有机太阳能电池性能的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804231

物理化学学报 >> 2019, Vol. 35 >> Issue (3): 275-283.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804231

所属专题：非富勒烯有机太阳能电池

第三组份端基对有机太阳能电池性能的影响

薛佩瑶¹,张俊祥²,辛景明³,RECHJeromy⁴,李腾飞¹,孟凯鑫¹,王嘉宇¹,马伟³,尤为⁴,MARDER Seth R.²,韩平畴^1,*(),占肖卫^1,*()

¹ 北京大学工学院材料科学与工程系，教育部高分子化学与物理重点实验室，北京 100871
² 美国佐治亚理工大学化学与生物化学学院，有机光电中心，亚特兰大，佐治亚州 30332-0400，美国
³ 西安交通大学金属材料强度国家重点实验室，西安 710049
⁴ 美国北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校化学系，教堂山，北卡罗来纳州27599-3290，美国

收稿日期:2018-03-29 发布日期:2018-08-28
通讯作者: 韩平畴,占肖卫 E-mail:ray-han@pku.edu.cn;xwzhan@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21734001);国家自然科学基金(51761165023);国家自然科学基金(21504066);国家自然科学基金(21534003);美国海军部(N00014-14-1-0580);美国海军部(N00014-16-1-2520);中国科学技术部(2016YFA0200700);美国自然科学基金(DMR-1507249);美国自然科学基金(CBET-1639429)

Effects of Terminal Groups in Third Components on Performance of Organic Solar Cells

Peiyao XUE¹,Junxiang ZHANG²,Jingming XIN³,Jeromy RECH⁴,Tengfei LI¹,Kaixin MENG¹,Jiayu WANG¹,Wei MA³,Wei YOU⁴,Seth R. MARDER²,Ray P. S. HAN^1,*(),Xiaowei ZHAN^1,*()

¹ Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Key Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Physics of Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
² Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0400, USA
³ State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, P. R. China
⁴ Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA

Received:2018-03-29 Published:2018-08-28
Contact: Ray P. S. HAN,Xiaowei ZHAN E-mail:ray-han@pku.edu.cn;xwzhan@pku.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21734001);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51761165023);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21504066);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21534003);the Department of the Navy, U.S.(N00014-14-1-0580);the Department of the Navy, U.S.(N00014-16-1-2520);the Ministry of Science and Technology, China(2016YFA0200700);the Natural Science Foundation, U.S.(DMR-1507249);the Natural Science Foundation, U.S.(CBET-1639429)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

我们用宽带隙聚合物FTAZ (苯并二噻吩-二氟苯并氮三唑共聚物)作为给体，窄带隙稠环电子受体FOIC (六噻吩稠环-氟代腈基茚酮类化合物)作为受体，中带隙稠环电子受体IDT-IC (引达醒-腈基茚酮类化合物)和IDT-NC (引达醒-腈基苯并茚酮类化合物)分别作为第三组分，制备了三元共混有机太阳能电池，研究了第三组分端基对器件性能的影响。IDT-IC和IDT-NC具有相似的化学结构，仅端基不同；IDT-IC端基是苯环，而IDT-NC端基是萘环。与IDT-IC相比，IDT-NC吸收光谱红移40 nm，LUMO能级下移0.11 eV，电子迁移率提高50%。基于FTAZ:FOIC，FTAZ:IDT-IC，FTAZ:IDT-NC二元共混体系的有机太阳能电池效率分别为9.73%，7.48%，7.68%。FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC和FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC三元共混器件的效率分别提升到11.2%和10.4%。对于FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC三元共混器件，由于IDT-IC比FOIC具有更高的LUMO能级，开路电压(V_OC)随着IDT-IC含量的增多而增加。由于IDT-IC与FOIC吸收光谱高度互补，短路电流(J_SC)也显著提高。第三组份IDT-IC的加入改善了薄膜形貌和载流子传输，填充因子(FF)有所提高。对于FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC三元共混器件，由于IDT-NC比FOIC具有更高的LUMO能级，V_OC随着IDT-NC含量的增多而增加；但由于IDT-NC的LUMO能级比IDT-IC的LUMO能级低，其V_OC比FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC体系低。由于FOIC和IDT-NC吸收光谱高度重叠，J_SC降低。第三组份IDT-NC的加入改善了薄膜形貌和载流子传输，FF提高，甚至比FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC体系有更好的载流子传输和FF。

关键词: 稠环电子受体, 非富勒烯受体, 有机太阳能电池, 端基效应, 三元共混

Abstract:

Ternary blends have been considered as an effective approach to improve power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells (OSCs). Among them, the fullerene-containing ternary OSCs have been studied extensively, and their PCEs are as high as over 14%. However, all non-fullerene acceptor ternary OSCs are still limited by their relatively lower PCEs. In this work, we used wide-bandgap benzodithiophene-difluorobenzotriazole copolymer FTAZ as the donor, low-bandgap fused-ring electron acceptor (FREA), fused tris(thieno- thiophene) end-capped by fluorinated 1, 1-dicyanomethylene-3-indanone (FOIC) as acceptor, and two medium-bandgap FREAs, indaceno-dithiophene end- capped by 1, 1-dicyanomethylene-3-indanone (IDT-IC) and indacenodithiophene end-capped by 1, 1-dicyanomethylene-3-benzoindanone (IDT-NC), as the third components to fabricate the ternary blends FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC and FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC, and investigated the effects of the third components on the performance of ternary OSCs. Both IDT-IC and IDT-NC are based on the same indacenodithiophene core but contain different terminal groups (phenyl and naphthyl). Relative to IDT-IC with phenyl terminal groups, IDT-NC with naphthyl terminal groups has extended π-conjugation, down-shifted lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), red-shifted absorption and higher electron mobility. The binary devices based on the FTAZ:FOIC, FTAZ:IDT-IC and FTAZ:IDT-NC blends exhibit PCEs of 9.73%, 7.48% and 7.68%, respectively. Compared with corresponding binary devices, both ternary devices based on FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC and FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC exhibit better photovoltaic performances. When the IDT-IC weight ratio in acceptors is 50%, the FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC ternary devices exhibit the best PCE of 11.2%. The ternary-blend OSCs yield simultaneously improved open-circuit voltage (V_OC), short-circuit current density (J_SC) and fill factor (FF) compared with the binary devices based on FTAZ:FOIC. The higher V_OC is attributed to the higher LUMO energy level of IDT-IC compared with FOIC. The improved J_SC is attributed to the complementary absorption of FOIC and IDT-IC. The introduction of IDT-IC improves blend morphology and charge transport, leading to higher FF. The FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC system yields a higher PCE of 10.4% relative to the binary devices based on FTAZ:FOIC as the active layer. However, the PCE of the FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC-based ternary devices is lower than that of the FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC-based ternary devices. Compared with the binary devices based on FTAZ:FOIC, in FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC-based ternary devices, as the ratio of the third component increases, the V_OC increases due to the higher LUMO energy level of IDT-NC, the FF increases due to optimized morphology and improved charge transport, while the J_SC decreases due to the overlapped absorption of FOIC and IDT-NC. The terminal groups in the third components affect the performance of the ternary OSCs. The lower LUMO. energy level of IDT-NC is responsible for the lower V_OC of the FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC devices. The red-shifted absorption of IDT-NC leads to the overlapping of the absorption spectra of IDT-NC and FOIC and lower J_SC. On the other hand, replacing the phenyl terminal groups by the naphthyl terminal groups influences the π-π packing and charge transport. The FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-NC blend exhibits higher electron mobility and more balanced charge transport than FTAZ:FOIC:IDT-IC, leading to a higher FF.

Key words: Fused-ring electron acceptor, Non-fullerene acceptor, Organic solar cell, Terminal-group effect, Ternary blend

薛佩瑶,张俊祥,辛景明,RECHJeromy,李腾飞,孟凯鑫,王嘉宇,马伟,尤为,MARDER Seth R.,韩平畴,占肖卫. 第三组份端基对有机太阳能电池性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3), 275-283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804231

Peiyao XUE,Junxiang ZHANG,Jingming XIN,Jeromy RECH,Tengfei LI,Kaixin MENG,Jiayu WANG,Wei MA,Wei YOU,Seth R. MARDER,Ray P. S. HAN,Xiaowei ZHAN. Effects of Terminal Groups in Third Components on Performance of Organic Solar Cells[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35(3), 275-283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804231

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201804231

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V35/I3/275

参考文献

1	Cheng Y. J. ; Yang S. H. ; Hsu C. S Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 5868.
2	Li G. ; Zhu R. ; Yang Y Nat. Photon 2012, 6, 153.
3	Lin Y. Z. ; Li Y. F. ; Zhan X. W Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 4245.
4	Lu L. Y. ; Zheng T. Y. ; Wu Q. H. ; Alexander M. S. ; Zhao D. L. ; Yu L. P Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 12666.
5	Li Y. W. ; Xu G. Y. ; Cui C. H. ; Li Y. F Adv. Mater 2017, 8, 1701791.
6	Yu G. ; Gao J. ; Hummelen J. C. ; Wudl F. ; Heeger A. J Science 1995, 270, 1789.
7	Halls J. J. M. ; Walsh C. A. ; Greenham N. C. ; Marseglia E. A. ; Friend R. H. ; Moratti S. C. ; Holmes A. B Nature 1995, 376, 498.
8	Zhao J. B. ; Li Y. K. ; Yang G. F. ; Jiang K. ; Lin H. R. ; Ade H. ; Ma W. ; Yan H Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15027.
9	Ye L. ; Hu H. W. ; Ghasemi M. ; Wang T. H. ; Collins B. A. ; Kim J. H. ; Jiang K. ; Carpenter J. H. ; Li H. ; Li Z.K. ; et al Nat. Mater 2018, 17, 253.
10	Yan C. Q. ; Barlow S. ; Wang Z. H. ; Yan H. ; Jen A. K. Y. ; Marder S. R. ; Zhan X. W Nat. Rev. Mater 2018, 3, 18003.
11	Cheng P. ; Li G. ; Zhan X. W. ; Yang Y Nat. Photon 2018, 12, 131.
12	Zhan X. W. ; Tan Z. A. ; Domercq B. ; An Z. S. ; Zhang X. ; Barlow S. ; Li Y. F. ; Zhu D. B. ; Kippelen B. ; Marder S. R. J Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 7246.
13	Zhong Y. ; Trinh M. T. ; Chen R. S. ; Purdum G. E. ; Khlyabich P. P. ; Sezen M. ; Oh S. ; Zhu H. M. ; Fowler B. ; Zhang B. Y. ; et al Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 8242.
14	Zhang J. Q. ; Li Y. K. ; Huang J. C. ; Hu H. W. ; Zhang G. Y. ; Ma T. X. ; Chow P. C. Y. ; Ade H. ; Pan D. ; Yan H. J Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 16092.
15	Meng D. ; Sun D. ; Zhong C. M. ; Liu T. ; Fan B. B. ; Huo L. J. ; Li Y. ; Jiang W. ; Choi H. ; Kim T. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 375.
16	Meng D. ; Fu H. T. ; Xiao C. Y. ; Meng X. Y. ; Winands T. ; Ma W. ; Wei W. ; Fan B. B. ; Huo L. J. ; Doltsinis N. L. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 10184.
17	Hartnett P. E. ; Timalsina A. ; Matte H. S. S. R. ; Zhou N. J. ; Guo X. G. ; Zhao W. ; Facchetti A. ; Chang R. P. H. ; Hersam M. C. ; Wasielewski M. R. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 16345.
18	Wu Q. H. ; Zhao D. L. ; Schneider A. M. ; Chen W. ; Yu L. P. J Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 7248.
19	Lin Y. Z. ; Wang J. Y. ; Zhang Z. G. ; Bai H. T. ; Li Y. F. ; Zhu D. B. ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2015, 27, 1170.
20	Lin Y. Z. ; Li T. F. ; Zhao F. W. ; Han L. ; Wang Z. Y. ; Wu Y. ; He Q. ; Wang J. Y. ; Huo L. J. ; Sun Y.M. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater 2016, 6, 1600854.
21	Dai S. X. ; Zhao F. W. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Lau T. K. ; Li T. F. ; Liu K. ; Ling Q. D. ; Wang C. R. ; Lu X. H. ; You W. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 1336.
22	Li T. F. ; Dai S. X. ; Ke Z. F. ; Yang L. X. ; Wang J. Y. ; Yan C. Q. ; Ma W. ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1705969.
23	Li S. X. ; Zhan L. L. ; Liu F. ; Ren J. ; Shi M. M. ; Li C. Z. ; Russell T. P. ; Chen H. Z Adv. Mater 2017, 30, 1705208.
24	Feng S. Y. ; Zhang C. E ; Liu Y. H. ; Bi Z. Z. ; Zhang Z. ; Xu X. J. ; Ma W. ; Bo Z. S Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1703527.
25	Lin Y. Z. ; Zhao F. W. ; He Q. ; Huo L. J. ; Wu Y. ; Parker T. C. ; Ma W. ; Sun Y. M. ; Wang C. R. ; Zhu D. B. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 4955.
26	Wang W. ; Yan C. Q. ; Lau T. K. ; Wang J. Y. ; Liu K. ; Fan Y. ; Lu X. H. ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1701308.
27	Wang J. Y. ; Wang W. ; Wang X. H. ; Wu Y. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Yan C. Q. ; Ma W. ; You W. ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1702125.
28	Jia B. Y. ; Dai S. X. ; Ke Z. F. ; Yan C. Q. ; Ma W. ; Zhan X. W Chem. Mater 2017, 30, 239.
29	Xu S. J. ; Zhou Z. C. ; Liu W. Y. ; Zhang Z. B. ; Liu F. ; Yan H. P. ; Zhu X. Z Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1704510.
30	Zhao F. W. ; Dai S. X. ; Wu Y. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Wang J. Y. ; Li J. ; Ling Q. ; Wei Z. X. ; Ma W. ; You W. ; et al Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1700144.
31	Zhu J. S. ; Ke Z. F. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Wang J. Y. ; Dai S. X. ; Wu Y. ; Xu Y. ; Lin Y. Z. ; Ma W. ; You W. ; et al Adv. Mater 2017, 30, 1704713.
32	Lin Y. Z. ; Zhao F. W. ; Prasad S. K. K. ; Chen J. D. ; Cai W. Z. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Chen K. ; Wu Y. ; Ma W. ; Gao F. ; et al Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1706363.
33	Luo Z. H. ; Bin H. J. ; Liu T. ; Zhang Z. G. ; Yang Y. K. ; Zhong C. ; Qiu B. B. ; Li G. H. ; Gao W. ; Xie D. J. ; et al Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1706124.
34	Zhao W. C. ; Li S. S. ; Yao H. F. ; Zhang S. Q. ; Zhang Y. ; Yang B. ; Hou J. H. J Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 7148.
35	Fei Z. P. ; Eisner F. D. ; Jiao X. C. ; Azzouzi M. ; R?hr J. A. ; Han Y. ; Shahid M. ; Chesman A. S. R. ; Easton C. D. ; McNeill C. R. ; et al Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1705209.
36	Zhang Z. G. ; Yang Y. K. ; Yao J. ; Xue L. W. ; Chen S. S. ; Li X. J. ; Morrison W. ; Yang C. ; Li Y. F Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 13503.
37	Bin H. J. ; Yang Y. K. ; Zhang Z. G. ; Ye L. ; Ghasemi M. ; Chen S. S. ; Zhang Y. D. ; Zhang C. F. ; Sun C. K. ; Xue L. M. ; et al Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5085.
38	Deng D. ; Zhou E. J. ; Wei Z. X Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin 2018, 34, 1239.
38	邓丹; 周二军; 魏志祥. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 1239.
39	Lu L. Y. ; Kelly M. A. ; You W. ; Yu L. P Nat. Photon 2015, 9, 491.
40	Huang W. C. ; Cheng P. ; Yang Y. ; Li G. ; Yang Y Adv. Mater 2018, 9, 190.
41	Xu W. D. ; Gao F Mater. Horiz 2018, 5, 206.
42	Liu Y. H. ; Zhao J. B. ; Li Z. K. ; Mu C. ; Ma W. ; Hu H. W. ; Jiang K. ; Lin H. R. ; Ade H. ; Yan H Nat. Commun 2014, 5, 5293.
43	Li W. ; Yan Y. ; Gong Y. Y. ; Cai J. L. ; Cai F. L. ; Gurney R. S. ; Liu D. ; Pearson A. J. ; Lidzey D. G. ; Wang T Adv. Funct. Mater 2017, 28, 1704212.
44	Zhong W. K. ; Cui J. ; Fan B. B. ; Ying L. ; Wang Y. ; Wang X. ; Zhang G. C. ; Jiang X. F. ; Huang F. ; Cao Y Chem. Mater 2017, 29, 8177.
45	Cheng P. ; Zhang M. Y. ; Lau T. K. ; Wu Y. ; Jia B. Y. ; Wang J. Y. ; Yan C. Q. ; Qin M. ; Lu X. H. ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1605219.
46	Cheng P. ; Zhan X. W Mater. Horiz 2015, 2, 447.
47	Khlyabich P. P. ; Burkhart B. ; Thompson B. C. J Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 14534.
48	Street R. A. ; Davies D. ; Khlyabich P. P. ; Burkhartart B. ; Thompson B. C. J Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 986.
49	Dai S. X. ; Li T. F. ; Wang W. ; Xiao Y. Q. ; Lau T. K. ; Li Z. Y. ; Liu K. ; Lu X. H ; Zhan X. W Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1706571.
50	Liu T. ; Guo Y. ; Yi Y. P. ; Huo L. J. ; Xue X. N. ; Sun X. B. ; Fu H. T. ; Xiong W. T. ; Meng D. ; Wang Z. H. ; et al Adv. Mater 2016, 28, 10008.
51	Baran D. ; Ashraf R. S. ; Hanifi D. A. ; Abdelsamie M. ; Gasparini N. ; R?hr J. A. ; Holliday S. ; Wadsworth A. ; Lockett S. ; Neophytou M. ; et al Nat. Mater 2016, 16, 363.
52	Zhang T. ; Zhao X. L. ; Yang D. L. ; Tian Y. M. ; Yang X. N Adv. Energy Mater 2017, 7, 1701691.
53	Cheng P. ; Yan C. Q. ; Wu Y. ; Wang J. Y. ; Qin M. ; An Q. S. ; Cao J. M. ; Huo L. J. ; Zhang F. J. ; Ding L. M. ; et al Adv. Mater 2016, 28, 8021.
54	Xiao Z. ; Jia X. ; Ding L. M Chin. Sci. Bull 2017, 62, 1562.
55	Zhang J. Q. ; Zhang Y. J. ; Fang J. ; Lu K. ; Wang Z. Y. ; Ma W. ; Wei Z. X. J Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 137, 8176.
56	Zhang J. X. ; Yan C. Q. ; Wang W. ; Xiao Y. Q. ; Lu X. H. ; Barlow S. ; Parker T. C. ; Zhan X. W. ; Marder S. R Chem. Mater 2018, 30, 309.
57	Li S. S. ; Ye L. ; Zhao W. C. ; Liu X. Y. ; Zhu J. ; Ade H. ; Hou J. H Adv. Mater 2017, 29, 1704501.
58	Price S. C. ; Stuart A. C. ; Yang L. Q. ; Zhou H. X. ; You W. J Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 4625.
59	Schilinsky P. ; Waldauf C. ; Brabec C. J Appl. Phys. Lett 2002, 81, 3885.
60	Hexemer A. ; Bras W. ; Glossinger J. ; Schaible E. ; Gann E. ; Kirian R. ; MacDowell A. ; Church M. ; Rude B. ; Padmore H. J Phys. Conf. Ser 2010, 247, 012007.
61	Gann E. ; Young A. T. ; Collins B. A. ; Yan H. ; Nasiatka J. ; Padmore H. A. ; Ade H. ; Hexemer A. ; Wang C Rev. Sci. Instrum 2012, 83, 045110.
62	Wu Y. ; Wang Z. Y. ; Meng X. Y. ; Ma W Prog. Chem 2017, 2, 93.
63	Zhang L. ; Ma W. ; Chin J Polym. Sci 2017, 35, 184.

[1]	梁秋菊, 常银霞, 梁朝伟, 祝浩雷, 郭子宾, 刘剑刚. 结晶动力学策略在非富勒烯体系太阳能电池形貌调控领域的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212006 -0 .
[2]	徐小云, 吴宏波, 梁世洁, 唐正, 李梦阳, 王静, 王翔, 闻瑾, 周二军, 李韦伟, 马在飞. 聚3-己基噻吩：非富勒烯太阳能电池中的量子效率损失和电压损失[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2201039 - .
[3]	刘柏侨, 许韵华, 夏冬冬, 肖承义, 杨兆凡, 李韦伟. 基于非富勒烯电子受体的半透明有机太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2009056 - .
[4]	张美琪, 马云龙, 郑庆东. 含萘并二噻吩小分子受体材料的带隙调控及其在非富勒烯太阳能电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 503 -508 .
[5]	邓祎华, 彭爱东, 吴筱曦, 陈华杰, 黄辉. 有机太阳能电池中基于苝二酰亚胺结构小分子受体进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 461 -471 .
[6]	冯诗语, 路皓, 刘泽坤, 刘亚辉, 李翠红, 薄志山. 通过非共价构象锁定和端基工程策略设计高效率的A-D-A型稠环电子受体[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 355 -360 .
[7]	章中强, 张书华, 刘志玺, 张志国, 李永舫, 李昌治, 陈红征. 骨架非稠合的电子受体在聚合物太阳能电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 394 -400 .
[8]	刘方彬,刘俊,王利祥. 带有噻吩侧基的有机硼小分子电子受体光伏材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 251 -256 .
[9]	杨阳,蒋秀,占肖卫,陈兴国. 以绕丹宁和噻唑烷-2, 4-二酮为端基的不对称结构有机受体分子的设计合成与构性关系探讨[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 257 -267 .
[10]	许青青,常春梅,李万宾,郭冰,国霞,张茂杰. 基于一种新型聚噻吩衍生物为给体的非富勒烯聚合物太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 268 -274 .
[11]	吴仪, 孔静宜, 秦云朋, 姚惠峰, 张少青, 侯剑辉. 通过调节共轭聚合物侧链实现可绿色溶剂加工的非富勒烯太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(12): 1391 -1398 .
[12]	贾国骁,张少青,杨丽燕,何畅,范慧俐,侯剑辉. A-D-A型小分子电子给体光伏材料的端基修饰及其光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 76 -83 .
[13]	何畅,侯剑辉. 基于非富勒烯受体的溶液加工型全小分子太阳能电池研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(11): 1202 -1210 .
[14]	张少青,侯剑辉. 面向非富勒烯型有机光伏电池的聚合物给体材料设计[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(12): 2327 -2338 .
[15]	刘继翀,唐峰,叶枫叶,陈琪,陈立桅. 利用扫描开尔文探针显微镜观察薄膜光电器件能级排布[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(10): 1934 -1943 .

第三组份端基对有机太阳能电池性能的影响

Effects of Terminal Groups in Third Components on Performance of Organic Solar Cells

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0