全固态钠离子电池硫系化合物电解质

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009

物理化学学报 >> 2020, Vol. 36 >> Issue (5): 1905009.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009

所属专题：钠离子储能材料和器件

全固态钠离子电池硫系化合物电解质

陈光海,白莹,高永晟,吴锋,吴川*()

北京理工大学材料学院，环境科学与工程北京市重点实验室，北京 100081

收稿日期:2019-05-02 录用日期:2019-06-17 发布日期:2019-06-24
通讯作者: 吴川 E-mail:chuanwu@bit.edu.cn
作者简介:|吴川，1997年本科毕业于北京理工大学精细化工专业，2002年博士毕业于北京理工大学应用化学专业，2002-2004年中国科学院大连化学物理研究所博士后，2004年至今在北京理工大学任教。主要研究方向为能量存储与转化体系及其关键材料，包括锂离子电池、钠离子电池、铝离子电池以及其他高性能二次电池新体系
基金资助:
国家973计划项目(2015CB251100);北京市自然科学基金-海淀原始创新联合基金(L182056)

Chalcogenide Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Sodium Ion Batteries

Guanghai Chen,Ying Bai,Yongsheng Gao,Feng Wu,Chuan Wu*()

Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P. R. China

Received:2019-05-02 Accepted:2019-06-17 Published:2019-06-24
Contact: Chuan Wu E-mail:chuanwu@bit.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Basic Research Program of China(2015CB251100);the Beijing Natural Science Foundation-Haidian Original Innovation Collaborative Fund, China(L182056)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全固态钠离子电池具有资源丰富、安全性高等优势，作为未来大规模储能的重要选择而成为近年来先进二次电池前沿研究热点。钠离子硫系化合物电解质室温离子电导率高、弹性模量高、容易冷压成型，能增强电极/电解质界面接触、减小界面阻抗、缓冲电极材料在充放电过程中的应力/应变，是全固态钠离子电池的研究重点。本文对钠离子硫系化合物固态电解质的结构及性质进行了总结，讨论了硫系化合物电解质的本征特性、与电极的界面稳定性，并介绍了硫系化合物全固态钠离子电池的研究现状，最后分析了硫系化合物电解质面临的挑战及今后的发展方向。

关键词: 全固态钠离子电池, 硫系化合物电解质, 电导率, 化学稳定性, 界面

Abstract:

All-solid-state sodium ion batteries (ASIBs) are important for future large-scale energy storage applications. ASIBs have come to occupy an important position in research on advanced secondary batteries in recent years owing to their advantages of abundance in resources, low cost, long lifetime, and high safety. As the key to the success of ASIBs, solid-state electrolytes such as polymers, oxide ceramics, and sulfide glass-ceramics have always attracted immense interest. Chalcogenide electrolytes for ASIBs have high room-temperature conductivity, high elastic modulus, and can be easily pressed into a mold at room temperature; hence, they are the research focus in ASIBs. This paper summarized recent studies on the structure and properties of chalcogenide electrolytes for ASIBs. These studies demonstrate the relationship between the phase structure and ionic conductivity of sulfide-based electrolytes and selenide-based electrolytes. Besides, arguments that the sodium vacancy in the crystal structure dominates ionic conduction, and creating a sodium vacancy via cation substitution is the principal strategy to increasing ionic conduction, are discussed. Further, the intrinsic chemical stability and interface stability between the electrode and electrolyte are highlighted. Based on the soft and hard acid and base theory, some studies adopted various anion/cation ion substitution strategies to improve the chemical stability of chalcogenide electrolytes in humid air. Particularly, the inconsistency in the electrochemical stability window of a representative chalcogenide electrode, Na₃PS₄, as measured by a semi-blocking electrode and calculated by first-principles, is compared. Additionally, to develop all-solid-state Na-S and Na-O₂ batteries with high capacity, the nonnegligible interface instability of the sulfide electrode against the sodium metal anode and feasible solutions are summarized. Next, the research progress on ASIBs using chalcogenide electrolytes is reviewed. Chalcogenide electrolytes are restricted by the electrochemical stability window and chemical compatibility with electrode materials; hence, they are expected to only be applicable to ASIBs using sulfur, sulfide, and organic matter as the cathode and Na-Sn alloy as the anode. However, these ASIBs have long cycling life (> 500 cycles), illustrating their potential applications in large-scale energy storage power stations. Finally, we comprehensively evaluate the ionic conductivity, stability against humid air, stability of the interface, electrochemical stability window, and ease of preparation of typical chalcogenide electrolytes, including Na₃PS₄, Na₃PSe₄, Na₃SbS₄, Na₃SbSe₄, Na₁₀SnPS₁₂, and Na₁₁Sn₂PS₁₂. Moreover, we highlight the challenges and propose possible solutions toward the development of chalcogenide electrolytes in future. Advanced technologies in fine synthesis, in situ characterization, and surface/interface modification are essential to overcome existing challenges and promote the development of chalcogenide-electrolyte-based ASIBs.

Key words: All-solid-state sodium ion battery, Chalcogenide electrolyte, Conductivity, Chemical stability, Interface

陈光海,白莹,高永晟,吴锋,吴川. 全固态钠离子电池硫系化合物电解质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(5), 1905009. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009

Guanghai Chen,Ying Bai,Yongsheng Gao,Feng Wu,Chuan Wu. Chalcogenide Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Sodium Ion Batteries[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2020, 36(5), 1905009. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I5/1905009

图/表 19

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表1

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

图18

参考文献 106

1	Dunn B. ; Kamath H. ; Tarascon J. M. Science 2011, 334, 928. doi: 10.1126/science.1212741
2	Pan H. ; Hu Y. S. ; Chen L. Q. Energy Environ Sci. 2013, 6, 2338. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40847g
3	Yang Z. ; Zhang W. ; Shen Y. ; Yuan L. X. ; Huang Y. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32 (5), 1062. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603231
	杨泽; 张旺; 沈越; 袁利霞; 黄云辉. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32 (5), 1062. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603231
4	Zuo X. ; Cai F. ; Liu X. M. ; Yang H. ; Shen X. D. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29 (1), 64. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201211023
	左翔; 蔡烽; 刘晓敏; 杨晖; 沈晓冬. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29 (1), 64. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201211023
5	Ma Q. ; Hu Y. S. ; Li H. ; Chen L. Q. ; Huang X. J. ; Zhou Z. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34 (2), 213. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201707172
	马强; 胡勇胜; 李泓; 陈立泉; 黄学杰; 周志彬. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34 (2), 213. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201707172
6	Tel'nova G. B. ; Solntsev K. A. Inorg. Mater. 2015, 51, 305. doi: 10.1134/S0020168515030176
7	Noguchi Y. ; Kobayashi E. ; Plashnitsa L. S. ; Okada S. ; Yamaki J. I. Electrochim Acta 2013, 101, 59. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.038
8	Santhanagopalan D. ; Qian D. ; McGilvray T. ; Wang Z. ; Wang F. ; Camino F. ; Graetz J. ; Dudney N. ; Meng Y. S. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 298. doi: 10.1021/jz402467x
9	Wang Y. ; Zhong W. H. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 22. doi: 10.1002/celc.201402277
10	Nam Y. J. ; Cho S. J. ; Oh D. Y. ; Lim J. M. ; Kim S. Y. ; Song J. H. ; Lee Y. G. ; Lee S. Y. ; Jung Y. S. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3317. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00538
11	Park K. H. ; Oh D. Y. ; Choi Y. E. ; Nam Y. J. ; Han L. ; Kim J. Y. ; Xin H. ; Lin F. ; Oh S. M. ; Jung Y. S. Adv Mater. 2016, 28, 1874. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505008
12	Seino Y. ; Ota T. ; Takada K. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 627. doi: 10.1039/c3ee41655k
13	Kamaya N. ; Homma K. ; Yamakawa Y. ; Hirayama M. ; Kanno R. ; Yonemura M. ; Kamiyama T. ; Kato Y. ; Hama S. ; Kawamoto K. ; et al Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 682. doi: 10.1038/NMAT3066
14	Jansen M. ; Henseler U. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 99, 110. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(92)90295-7
15	Hayashi A. ; Noi K. ; Sakuda A. ; Tatsumisago M. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1843
16	Zhu Z.Y. ; Chu I. H. ; Deng Z. ; Ong S. P. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 8318. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03656
17	Chu I. H. ; Kompella C. S. ; Nguyen H. ; Zhu Z. ; Hy S. ; Deng Z. ; Meng Y. S. ; Ong S. P. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33733. doi: 10.1038/srep33733
18	de Klerk N. J. J. ; Wagemaker M. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3122. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00698
19	Noi K. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 260. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.158
20	Yu C. ; Ganapathy S. ; de Klerk N. J. J. ; van Eck E. R. H. ; Wagemaker M. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15095. doi: 10.1039/c6ta05896e
21	Hayashi A. ; Noi K. ; Tanibata N. ; Nagao M. ; Tatsumisago M. J. Power Sources 2014, 258, 420. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.054
22	Takeuchi S. ; Suzuki K. ; Hirayama M. ; Kanno R. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 265, 353. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2018.06.023
23	Rao R. P. ; Chen H. ; Wong L. L. ; Adams S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3377. doi: 10.1039/c6ta09809f
24	Ponrouch A. ; Marchante E. ; Courty M. ; Tarascon J. M. ; Palacín M. R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8572. doi: 10.1039/c2ee22258b
25	Yu Z. X. ; Shang S. L. ; Seo J. H. ; Wang D. ; Luo X. ; Huang Q. ; Chen S. ; Lu J. ; Li X. ; Liu Z. K. ; et al Adv Mater. 2017, 29, 16. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605561
26	Krebs B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1983, 22, 113. doi: 10.1002/anie.198301131\|
27	Kanno R. ; Murayama M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A742. doi: 10.1149/1.1379028
28	Tanibata N. ; Noi K. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 17120. doi: 10.1039/c4ra00996g
29	Tanibata N. ; Noi K. ; Hayashi A. ; Kitamura N. ; Idemoto Y. ; Tatsumisago M. ChemElectroChem 2014, 1, 1130. doi: 10.1002/celc.201402016
30	Zhang L. ; Zhang D. ; Yang K. ; Yan X. ; Wang L. ; Mi J. ; Xu B. ; Li Y. Adv. Sci. 2016, 1600089. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600089
31	Graf V. H. A. ; Schafer H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1976, 425, 67. doi: 10.1002/zaac.19764250109
32	Wang Y. ; Richards W. D. ; Ong S. P. ; Miara L. J. ; Kim J. C. ; Mo Y. F. ; Ceder G. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1026. doi: 10.1038/NMAT4369
33	Zhang D. ; Cao X. ; Xu D. ; Wang N. ; Yu C. ; Hu W. ; Yan X. ; Mi J. ; Wen B. ; Wang L. ; et al Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 100. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.173
34	Mikenda A. ; Preisinger. W. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Spectroscopy 1980, 36, 365. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(80)80145-0
35	Wang H. ; Chen Y. ; Hood Z. D. ; Sahu G. ; Pandian A. S. ; Keum J. K. ; An K. ; Liang C. D. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601546
36	Zhang D. C. ; Cao X. T. ; Xu D. ; Wang N. ; Yu C. ; Hu W. T. ; Yan X. L. ; Mi J. L. ; Wen B. ; Wang L. M. ; et al Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 100. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.173
37	Heo J. W. ; Banerjee A. ; Park K. H. ; Jung Y. S. ; Hong S. T. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702716. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702716
38	Maier J. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 805. doi: 10.1038/nmat1513
39	Jia H. H. ; Sun Y. L. ; Zhang Z. R. ; Peng L. F. ; An T. ; Xie J. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.04.011
40	Ong S. P. ; Mo Y. F. ; Richards W. D. ; Miara L. ; Lee H. S. ; Ceder G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 148. doi: 10.1039/c2ee23355j
41	Zhang L. ; Yang K. ; Mi J. ; Lu L. ; Zhao L. ; Wang L. ; Li Y. ; Zeng H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501294. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201501294
42	Bo S. H. ; Wang Y. ; Kim J. C. ; Richards W. D. ; Ceder G. Chem. Mat. 2016, 28, 252. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04013
43	Bo S. H. ; Wang Y. ; Ceder G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9044. doi: 10.1039/c6ta03027k
44	Wang N. ; Yang K. ; Zhang L. ; Yan X. ; Wang L. ; Xu B. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 53, 1987. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1618-0
45	Kato Y. ; Hori S. ; Saito T. ; Suzuki K. ; Hirayama M. ; Mitsui A. ; Yonemura M. ; Iba H. ; Kanno R. Nat. Energy, 2016, 1, 16030. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.30
46	Kandagal V. S. ; Bharadwaj M. D. ; Waghmare U. V. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 12992. doi: 10.1039/c5ta01616a
47	Richards W. D. ; Tsujimura T. ; Miara L. J. ; Wang Y. ; Kim J. C. ; Ong S. P. ; Uechi I. ; Suzuki N. ; Ceder G. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11009. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11009
48	Kandagal V. S. ; Bharadwaj M. D. ; Waghmare U. V. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 12992. doi: 10.1039/c5ta01616a
49	Tsuji F. ; Tanibata N. ; Sakuda A. ; Hayashi A. ; Tasumisago M. Chem. Lett. 2018, 47, 13. doi: 10.1246/cl.170836
50	Zhang Z. ; Ramos E. ; Lalère F. ; Assoud A. ; Kaup K. ; Hartman P. ; Nazar L. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 87. doi: 10.1039/c7ee03083e
51	Kuhn A. ; Kohler J. ; Lotsch B. V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 11620. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51985f
52	Kuhn A. ; Gerbig O. ; Zhu C. ; Falkenberg F. ; Maier J. ; Lotsch B. V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 14669. doi: 10.1039/c4cp02046d
53	Duchardt M. ; Ruschewitz U. ; Adams S. ; Dehnen S. ; Roling B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1351. doi: 10.1002/ange.201712769
54	Ramos E. P. ; Zhang Z. Z. ; Assoud A. ; Kaup K. ; Lalere F. ; Nazar L. F. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 7413. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02077
55	Yu Z. ; Shang S. L. ; Gao Y. ; Wang D. ; Li X. ; Liu Z. K. ; Wang D. H. Nano Energy 2018, 47, 325. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.046
56	Yu Z. X. ; Shang S. L. ; Wang D. W. ; Li Y. C. ; Yennawar H. P. ; Li G. X. ; Huang H. ; Gao Y. ; Mallouk T. E. ; Liu Z. K. ; et al Energy Storage Mater 2019, 17, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.027
57	Wang Y. ; Richards W. D. ; Bo S. H. ; Miara L. J. ; Ceder G. Chem. Mat. 2017, 29, 7475. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02476
58	Han F. D. ; Westover A. S. ; Yue J. ; Fan X. L. ; Wang F. ; Chi M. F. ; Leonard D. N. ; Dudney N. J. ; Wang H. ; Wang C. S. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 187. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z
59	Banerjee A. ; Park K. H. ; Heo J. W. ; Nam Y. J. ; Moon C. K. ; Oh S. M. ; Hong S. T. ; Jung Y. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9634. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604158
60	Kim T. W. ; Park K. H. ; Choi Y. E. ; Lee J. Y. ; Jung Y. S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 840. doi: 10.1039/C7TA09242C
61	Moon C. K. ; Lee H. J. ; Park K. H. ; Kwak H. ; Heo J. W. ; Choi K. ; Yang H. ; Kim M. S. ; Hong S. T. ; Lee J. H. ; et al ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2504. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01479
62	Hibi Y. ; Tanibata N. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Solid State Ion. 2015, 270, 6. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.11.024
63	Takada K. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 759. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.034
64	Sahu G. ; Lin Z. ; Li J. ; Liu Z. ; Dudney N. ; Liang C. D. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1053. doi: 10.1039/c3ee43357a
65	Shang S. L. ; Yu Z. ; Wang Y. ; Wang D. ; Liu Z. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 16261. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03606
66	Han F. ; Gao T. ; Zhu Y. ; Gaskell K. J. ; Wang C.S. Adv Mater. 2015, 27, 3473. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500180
67	Tian Y. S. ; Shi T. ; Richards W. D. ; Li J. ; Kim J. C. ; Bo S. H. ; Ceder G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1150. doi: 10.1039/c7ee00534b
68	Han F. ; Zhu Y. ; He X. ; Mo Y. F. ; Wang C. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501590. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201501590
69	Takada K. ; Ohta N. ; Zhang L. ; Xu X. ; Hang B. T. ; Ohnishi T. ; Osada M. ; Sasaki T. Solid State Ion. 2012, 225, 594. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.01.009
70	Hartmann P. ; Bender C. L. ; Vracar M. ; Durr A. K. ; Garsuch A. ; Janek J. ; Adelhelm P. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 228. doi: 10.1038/NMAT3486
71	Das S. K. ; Lau S. ; Archer L. A. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 12623. doi: 10.1039/c4ta02176b
72	Manthiram A. ; Yu X. W. Small 2015, 11, 2108. doi: 10.1002/smll.201403257
73	Yu X. W. ; Manthiram A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500350. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201500350
74	Wei S. ; Xu S. ; Agrawral A. ; Choudhury S. ; Lu Y. ; Tu Z. ; Ma L. ; Archer L. A. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11722. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11722
75	Wu F. ; Liu L. ; Yuan Y. F. ; Li Y. ; Bai Y. ; Lu J. ; Wu C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 32. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b08380
76	Li Y. ; Yuan Y. F. ; Bai Y. ; Liu Y. C. ; Wang Z. H. ; Li L. M. ; Wu F. ; Khalil A. ; Wu C. ; Lu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 25, 1702781. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702781
77	Chen G. H. ; Bai Y. ; Li H. ; Li Y. ; Wang Z. H. ; Ni Q. ; Liu L. ; Wu F. ; Yao Y. G. ; Wu C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 8. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16186
78	Luo W. ; Hu L. B. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 420. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00357
79	Seh Z. W. ; Sun J. ; Sun Y. ; Cui Y. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 449. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00328
80	Luo W. ; Lin C. F. ; Zhao O. ; Noked M. ; Zhang Y. ; Rubloff G. W. ; Hu L. B. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601526. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601526
81	Bertheville B. ; Low H. ; Bill D.F. ; Kubel F. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1997, 58, 1569. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3697(97)00101-7
82	Yu X. F. ; Giorgi G. ; Ushiyama H. ; Yamashita K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 612, 129. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.010
83	Wenzel S. ; Leichtweiss T. ; Krüger D. ; Sann J. ; Janek J. Solid State Ion. 2015, 278, 98. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.06.001
84	Wu E. A. ; Kompella C. S. ; Zhu Z. ; Lee J. Z. ; Lee S. C. ; Chu I. H. ; Nguyen H. ; Ong S. P. ; Banerjee A. ; Meng Y. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 12. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b19037
85	Hartmann P. ; Leichtweiss T. ; Busche M. R. ; Schneider M. ; Reich M. ; Sann J. ; Adelhelm P. ; Janek J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 21064. doi: 10.1021/jp4051275
86	Hu P. ; Zhang Y. ; Chi X. ; Kumar Rao K. ; Hao F. ; Dong H. ; Guo F. ; Ren Y. ; Grabow L. C. ; Yao Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9672. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19984
87	Tian Y. ; Sun Y. ; Hannah D. C. ; Xiao Y. ; Liu H. ; Chapman K. W. ; Bo S. H. ; Ceder G. Joule 2019, 3, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.019
88	Kim J. K. ; Lim Y. J. ; Kim H. J. ; Cho G. B. ; Kim Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3589. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.019
89	Li H. ; Bai Y. ; Wu F. ; Li Y. ; Wu C. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 784. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.153
90	Li H. ; Yu X. ; Bai Y. ; Wu F. ; Wu C. ; Liu L. Y. ; Yang X. Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 9578. doi: 10.1039/c5ta00277j
91	Li H. ; Wu C. ; Bai Y. ; Wu F. ; Wang M. Z. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.096
92	Zhang Z. ; Zhang Q. ; Shi J. ; Chu Y. S. ; Yu X. ; Xu K. ; Ge M. ; Yan H. ; Li W. ; Gu L. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601196. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601196
93	Ni Q. ; Bai Y. ; Li Y. ; Ling L. M. ; Li L. ; Chen G. H. ; Wang Z. H. ; Ren H. X. ; Wu F. ; Wu C. Small 2018, 14, 1702864. doi: 10.1002/smll.201702864
94	Ni'mah Y. L. ; Cheng M. Y. ; Cheng J. H. ; Rick J. ; Hwang B. J. J. Power Sources. 2015, 278, 375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.047
95	Tatsumisago M. ; Hayashi A. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2014, 5, 226. doi: 10.1111/ijag.12084
96	Wan H. ; Mwizerwa J. P. ; Qi X. ; Liu X. ; Xu X. ; Li H. ; Hu Y. S. ; Yao X. Y. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2809. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00073
97	Tanibata N. ; Deguchi M. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Chem. Mat. 2017, 29, 5232. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01116
98	Tanibata N. ; Tsukasaki H. ; Deguchi M. ; Mori S. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Solid State Ion. 2017, 311, 6. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.08.022
99	Yue J. ; Han F. D. ; Fan X. L. ; Zhu X. Y. ; Ma Z. H. ; Yang J. ; Wang C. S. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4885. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01445
100	Chi X. W. ; Liang Y. L. ; Hao F. ; Zhang Y. ; Whiteley J. ; Dong H. ; Hu P. ; Lee S. ; Yao Y. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2630. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712895
101	Sakuda A. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2261. doi: 10.1038/srep02261
102	Minami T. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Solid State Ion. 2006, 177, 2715. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.07.017
103	Nagao M. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 56, 6055. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.084
104	Noi K. ; Nagata Y. ; Hakari T. ; Suzuki K. ; Yubuchi S. ; Ito Y. ; Sakuda A. ; Hayashi A. ; Tatsumisago M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19605. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b02427
105	Yue J. ; Zhu X. Y. ; Han F. D. ; Fan X. L. ; Wang L. N. ; Yang J. ; Wang C. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39645. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12610
106	Wu F. ; Fitzhugh W. ; Ye L. H. ; Ning J. X. ; Li X. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4037. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06123-2

Types	Electrolyte	Structure	Conductivity @RT/(mS·cm^?1)	Activation Energy/eV	Ref.
Na₃MS₄ (M = P, Sb)	Na₃PS₄	Cubic	0.2	0.281	15
	Na₃PS₄	Cubic	0.46	0.198	21
	Na_2.94PS₄ ^[D]	Cubic	170	-	18
	Na₃PS₄	Tetragonal	3.39	0.173	22
	Na₃SbS₄	Cubic	1.05	0.22	35
	Na₃SbS₄	Cubic	2.8	0.061	33
	Na₃SbS₄	Tetragonal	3	0.25	30
	Na₃SbS₄	Tetragonal	1.1	0.2	59
	Na₃SbS₄	Tetragonal	0.1-0.2	0.27-0.35	60
	Na₃SbS₄	Tetragonal	1.77	0.254	33
Doped-Na₃MS₄ (M = P, Sb)	Na_3.125Si_0.125P_0.875S₄ ^[D]	Cubic	2.99	0.241	16
	Na_3.0625Si_0.0625P_0.9375S₄ ^[D]	Cubic	1.66	0.242	16
	Na_3.0625Ge_0.0625P_0.9375S₄^[D]	Cubic	0.54	0.28	16
	Na_3.0625Sn_0.0625P_0.9375S₄^[D]	Cubic	10.7	0.171	16
	Na_2.9375PS_3.9375Cl_0.0625	Tetragonal	1.14	0.249	17
	Na_3.1Ge_0.1P_0.9S₄	Cubic	0.212	0.21	23
	Na_3.1Ti_0.1P_0.9S₄	Cubic	0.23	0.20	23
	Na_3.1Sn_0.1P_0.9S₄	Cubic	0.25	0.18	23
	Na₃P_0.62As_0.38S₄	Tetragonal	1.46	0.256	25
	Na_2.730Ca_0.135PS₄	Cubic	1.4	0.346	61
	Na_4?xSn_1?xSb_xS₄	Tetragonal	0.2-0.5	-	37
	Na₄Sn_0.67Si_0.33S₄	-	0.012	0.56	39
	Na₄[Sn_0.67Si_0.33]_0.75P_0.25S₄	-	1.61	0.26	39
	94Na₃PS₄·6Na₄SiS₄	Cubic	0.74	0.260	28
	71Na₃PS₄?29NaI	Cubic	0.014	-	62
Na₃MSe₄ (M = P, Sb)	Na₃PSe₄	Cubic	1.16	0.21	41
	Na₃PSe₄	Cubic	0.11	0.281	39
	Na₃SbSe₄	Cubic	3.7	0.19	44
Na₇P₃X₁₁ (X = S, Se)	Na₇P₃S₁₁ ^[D]	Triclinic	10.97	0.217	57
Na₇P₃X₁₁ (X = S, Se)	Na₇P₃Se₁₁ ^[D]	Triclinic	12.56	0.213	57
Na₁₀MP₂S₁₂ (M = Si, Ge, Sn)	Na₁₀SiP₂S₁₂ ^[D]	Tetragonal	10.28	0.229	47
	Na₁₀GeP₂S₁₂ ^[D]	Tetragonal	3.5	0.27	47
	Na₁₀SnP₂S₁₂	Tetragonal	0.4	0.356	47
Na₁₁M₂PS₁₂ (M = Si, Ge, Sn)	Na₁₁Sn₂PS₁₂	Tetragonal	3.7	0.383	53
Na₁₁M₂PS₁₂ (M = Si, Ge, Sn)	Na₁₁Sn₂PS₁₂	Tetragonal	1.4	0.25	50
Na₁₁M₂SbS₁₂	Na₁₁Sn₂SbS₁₂	Tetragonal	0.56	0.34	54
Na₁₁M₂PSe₁₂	Na₁₁Sn₂PSe₁₂	Tetragonal	3.04	0.28	56
Others	Na_10.8Sn_1.9PS_11.8	Tetragonal	0.67	0.307	55

[1]	邱江源, 于涛, 陈均鑫, 李文轩, 张晓萱, 李金生, 郭瑞, 黄在银, 刘宣文. FeOOH调节Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂@FeOOH异质结中Bi₁₂O₁₇Cl₂的表面势阱深度以增强压电电荷转移和压电自芬顿催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100157 - .
[2]	梁英, 邓羽恒, 余士律, 程家豪, 宋嘉伟, 姚俊, 杨亦辰, 张万雷, 周文靖, 张欣, 沈文剑, 梁桂杰, 李彬, 彭勇, 胡润, 李望南. 机器学习辅助减反膜结构设计与界面修饰协同优化的高效稳定钙钛矿太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100098 - .
[3]	祝鑫彤, 曹斌, 闫崇, 唐城, 陈爱兵, 张强. 锂离子电池石墨负极包覆研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100096 - .
[4]	洪佳楠, 许辰宇, 刘烟, 黎昌棋, 王梦琳, 张彦威. 通过边缘活性位点调控解析光热催化中析氢与二氧化碳还原的界面竞争[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100099 - .
[5]	吴琦, 王长华, 李莹莹, 张昕彤. 增强g-C₃N₄@BN范德华异质结界面上的三重态电子转移增强光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100107 - .
[6]	彭羽, 陈嘉威, 殷悦, 曹永杰, 廖莫愁, 王丛笑, 董晓丽, 夏永姚. 无碳酸乙烯酯电解液定向构筑正极电解质界面相实现高电压钴酸锂的宽温域稳定运行[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100087 - .
[7]	曹雪婷, 察爽爽, 龚鸣. 电催化反应中的界面双电层：理论、表征与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100041 - .
[8]	黄奥羽, 许君, 黄玉, 储圭, 王卯, 王黎丽, 孙永奇, 蒋臻, 朱晓波. 通过简单的浆料添加剂调整电极-电解液界面以实现稳定的高电压锂离子电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100037 - .
[9]	王毅锴, 蒋晓林, 宋浩鸣, 魏楠, 王逸凡, 徐新军, 李翠红, 路皓, 刘亚辉, 薄志山. 氰基修饰的苝二酰亚胺衍生物作为膜厚不敏感型阴极界面材料用于高效有机太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100027 - .
[10]	刘建东, 张志佳, Mikhail Kamenskii, Filipp Volkov, Svetlana Eliseeva, 马建民. 高压锂电池正极电解质界面研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100011 - .
[11]	刘崇静, 夏雨健, 张鹏军, 魏世强, 曹登丰, 圣蓓蓓, 褚勇衡, 陈双明, 宋礼, 刘啸嵩. 近常压X射线光电子能谱研究固-气和固-液界面[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100013 - .
[12]	马浩桐, 衡明宇, 许杨, 毕炜, 缪应纯, 肖舒宁. 微波合成铜负载的碳掺杂氮化硼光催化材料及其大气浓度下CO₂还原性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(11): 100132 - .
[13]	陈晓睿, 罗轩, 苏通明, 谢新玲, 陈柳云, 宾月景, 秦祖赠, 纪红兵. Ga掺杂Cu/γ-Al₂O₃双功能界面位点促进CO₂加氢直接合成二甲醚[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(10): 100126 - .
[14]	韩卓, 张丹丰, 王海先, 郑国瑞, 柳明, 贺艳兵. 长寿命高镍锂电池界面重构电解液添加剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2307034 - .
[15]	蔡宇珊, 肖方兴. MXenes基光催化剂的进展、挑战和展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2306048 - .

全固态钠离子电池硫系化合物电解质

Chalcogenide Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Sodium Ion Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 19

参考文献 106

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0