物理化学学报 >> 2023, Vol. 39 >> Issue (6): 2212016.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212016
所属专题： S型光催化剂
S-Scheme异质结光催化产氢研究进展
吴新鹤(
), 陈郭强, 王娟, 李金懋, 王国宏()
- 湖北师范大学化学化工学院, 污染物分析与资源化技术湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 黄石, 435002
-
收稿日期:2022-12-09录用日期:2023-01-02发布日期:2023-01-06 -
通讯作者:吴新鹤,王国宏 E-mail:wuxinhe@hbnu.edu.cn;wanggh2003@163.com
Review on S-Scheme Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
Xinhe Wu(), Guoqiang Chen, Juan Wang, Jinmao Li, Guohong Wang()
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Pollutant Analysis and Reuse Technology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, Hubei Province, China
-
Received:2022-12-09Accepted:2023-01-02Published:2023-01-06 -
Contact:Xinhe Wu, Guohong Wang E-mail:wuxinhe@hbnu.edu.cn;wanggh2003@163.com
摘要：
随着不可再生能源的大量消耗，能源短缺成为人类社会面临的重大挑战。在众多新能源制备技术中，光催化分解水制氢技术只需丰富的太阳能作为驱动力就可以实现分解水制氢，且制氢条件温和、绿色无污染，被认为是解决当前能源短缺危机的有效技术之一。光催化制氢技术的核心是光催化剂，因此发展高效稳定的光催化剂至关重要。然而，单组分光催化剂由于空穴-电子复合速度快、氧化还原能力有限、太阳能利用效率低等原因，通常只能呈现出有限的光催化分解水制氢活性。为此，科研人员做了大量改性研究，其中常见的改性策略有元素掺杂、助催化剂修饰、构建异质结等。通常，元素掺杂、助催化剂修饰等改性手段可以在一定程度上提高光催化剂的制氢活性，但并不能有效解决单相光催化剂的缺陷，导致其改性效果受到制约。然而，在两个或多个半导体之间构建异质结可以有效解决上述单组分光催化剂的缺陷。相较于当前流行的传统II型异质结和Z-型异质结，S-型异质结的电荷转移机制更为合理，受到科学家们的广泛关注与应用。因此，本文首先对S-型异质结光催化体系的发展背景进行介绍，包括传统II型异质结、全固态Z-型异质结和液相Z-型异质结光催化系统。随后对S-型异质结光催化机理进行具体阐述，并对其机理表征方法进行了概述，包括原位XPS光谱、开尔文探针力显微镜、电子顺磁共振、选择性沉积和密度泛函理论计算。此外，本文系统总结了当前报道的S-型异质结光催化剂在分解水制氢领域中的应用及其制氢性能增强机理分析，包括g-C3N4基、金属硫化物基、TiO2基、其他氧化物基等S型异质结光催化剂。总体而言，S型异质结光催化剂由于其有效的载流子分离和增强的光氧化还原能力，通常呈现出优异的光催化制氢性能。最后，指出了S型异质结光催化剂在分解水产氢中的发展瓶颈，并展望攻克该瓶颈以进一步提高S型异质结的光催化效率，从而达到工业应用标准。
引用本文
吴新鹤, 陈郭强, 王娟, 李金懋, 王国宏. S-Scheme异质结光催化产氢研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6), 2212016. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212016
Xinhe Wu, Guoqiang Chen, Juan Wang, Jinmao Li, Guohong Wang. Review on S-Scheme Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(6), 2212016. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212016
Fig 1
Schematic illustration for transfer route of photogenerated electron and hole: (A) type-Ⅱ heterojunction, (B) traditional (liquid) Z-scheme photocatalyst, (C) all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalyst and (D) S-scheme heterojunction."
Fig 1
Fig 2
Carrier-migration route in S-scheme heterojunction: (A) before contact; (B) after contact and (C) under light irradiation."
Fig 2
Fig 3
(a–e) High-resolution XPS spectra for orbitals of different elements; (f) electron transfer mechanism in TiO2@ZnIn2S4 S-scheme heterojunction. Adapted from Small journal, Wiley publisher 44."
Fig 3
Fig 4
(a) AFM image and (b, c) surface potential distribution images of CP composites; (d) surface potential from point A to B; (e) graphical illustration of KPFM. Adapted from Adv. Mater. journal, Wiley publisher 46."
Fig 4
Fig 5
(A) Photocurrent and (B) EIS plots of samples; (C) The structural configuration and the carrier-migration route of S-scheme heterojunction. Adapted from J. Mater. Sci. Technol. journal, Elsevier publisher 50."
Fig 5
Fig 6
(A) The formation graphical illustration of 2D/2D WO3/g-C3N4 heterojunctions; (B) Mott-Schottky plots and (C) band structures; (D, E) EPR spectra of different active substances. Adapted from Appl. Catal. B: Environ. journal, Elsevier publisher 36."
Fig 6
Fig 7
(A) The work functions according to the reported literatures; (B) Illustration of the photocatalytic degradation and hydrogen-evolution for g-C3N4/TiO2-CeO2 heterojunctions. Adapted from Chemosphere journal, Elsevier publisher 51."
Fig 7
Table 1
Recently reported H2-evolution of g-C3N4-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts."
| S-scheme heterojunctions | Cocatalyst (wt%) | Light source (wavelength/nm) | H2-evolution rate (μmol∙h−1∙g−1) | Enhancement factor versus g-C3N4 | Apparent quantum yield (%) | Reference |
| WO3/g-C3N4 | Pt (2%) | 350 W Xe lamp | 982 | 1.7 | − | |
| S-g-C3N4/g-C3N4 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 5548.1 | 49 | 0.43 | |
| NMS/SCN | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 658.5 | 23 | − | |
| Ag/CNU-CNT | Pt (0.3%) | 400 W metal halide lamp | 10100 | 8 | 39 | |
| W18O49/g-C3N4 | Pt (X%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 1700 | 56 | − | |
| N-CDs/S-C3N4 | Pt (1%) | Xe lamp | 483.8 | 2.3 | 4.67 | |
| Pg-C3N4/CdS-EDTA | Pt (0.6%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 9378 | 11.8 | 10.17 | |
| HCCN/ACN | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp | 5534 | 6.6 | 3.62 | |
| Ni0.85Se/CN | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 8780.3 | 92.9 | − | |
| BiOBr/g-C3N4 | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 106.6 | 3.4 | − | |
| PCN/CS-D | Pt (0.6%) | Sodium lamp | 12547 | 15.6 | − | |
| SbVO4/g-C3N4 | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 752 | 4.1 | − | |
| CdS/g-C3N4/ GA | − | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 86.4 | 3.5 | − | |
| W18O49/HCN | − | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 892 | 3.4 | 6.21 | |
| MnWO4/g-C3N4 | Pt (0.5%) | 200 W Xe lamp | 2820.2 | 3.7 | 7.23 | |
| TiO2/g-C3N4-Ti3C2 | − | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 5540.2 | > 98 | 5.81 | |
| Bi2S3/g-C3N4 | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 3394.1 | 2.6 | ||
| TiO2/g-C3N4 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 2137.3 | 4.8 | 6.73 | |
| Ni2P-pg-C3N4/Cd0.5Zn0.5Se-D | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 12627 | > 100 | 37.7 | |
| NiTe2/g-C3N4 | − | 300 W Xe lamp | 2540.4 | 23.4 | − | |
| SNO/g-C3N4 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 1427.1 | 12.3 | 2.3 | |
| S-pCN/WO2.72 | − | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 786 | − | 7.5 | |
| g-C3N4/CdS | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp | 3370 | 3.5 | − | |
| Nano CdS/g-C3N4 | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 2582 | 9.7 | 3.41 | |
| Co3S4/g-C3N4 | − | 100 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 2120 | 176 | − | |
| Au/g-C3N4/Cu2O | − | 500 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 552.6 | 5.3 | − |
Table 1
Fig 8
Bandgap and positions of some metal sulfides semiconductor. Adapted from Sol. RRL journal, Wiley publisher 76."
Fig 8
Fig 9
(a) Comparison of the H2 evolution rates for various samples, (b) cycle testing of H2-production, (c) graphical illustration for carrier migration of CdS/PT S-scheme heterojunction. Adapted from Adv. Mater. journal, Wiley publisher 46"
Fig 9
Fig 10
Graphical explanation of (a) CdS/MnOx-BiVO4 photocatalysts for water-splitting H2/O2-evolution, (b) H2/O2-evolution rate and (c) proposed S-scheme heterojunction mechanism. Adapted from ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. journal, ACS publisher 80"
Fig 10
Fig 11
Various samples of (a) H2-evolution rates and (b) H2-evolution stability analysis. (c) before contact and (d) after the formation of CuO/CdS/CoWO4 S-scheme heterojunction. Adapted from Renew. Energ. journal, Elsevier publisher 81."
Fig 11
Table 2
Recently reported H2-evolution of Metal sulfide-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts."
| S-scheme heterojunction | Cocatalyst (wt%) | Light source (wavelength/nm) | H2 production rate (μmol∙h−1∙g−1) | Enhancement factor versus MS | Apparent quantum yield (%) | Reference |
| CdS/PT | Pt (1%) | 350 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 9280 | 8 | 24.3 | |
| CdS/g-C3N4-GA | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 86.38 | 2.37 | – | |
| CdS/MnOx-BiVO4 | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 350 nm) | 1010 | 1.87 | 11.3 | |
| CuO/CdS/CoWO4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 457.9 | 11.99 | – | |
| Cu-MOFs/Mn0.05Cd0.95S | – | 5 W LED | 10940 | 2.8 | 1.8 | |
| MX-ZIS-NiSe2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 23510 | 23.51 | 10.9 | |
| Cu2S/CdZnS | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 5904 | 3.19 | 2.13 | |
| Ti3C2-ZnIn2S4/CdS | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 8930 | 7.32 | 3.42 | |
| MX-CdS/WO3 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 2750 | 11 | 12.16 | |
| Co9S8-GDY-CuI | – | 5 W LED | 1411.8 | 1.85 | – | |
| MnO2@CdS | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 3940 | 2.8 | 16.9 | |
| COF/CdS | Pt | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 8670 | 2.1 | 8.9 | |
| ZIS/CDs/CN | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 17580 | 2 | 12.73 | |
| CdS/MoO3‒x | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 7440 | 10.3 | 14.3 | |
| CdS/W18O49 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 15400 | 5.1 | 15.4 | |
| SnO2/CdS | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 2540 | 5 | 29.3 | |
| Vs-ZCS/NixCo1−x(OH)2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 64600 | 11.1 | 17.32 | |
| BP/CIZS | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 2056 | 2 | 7.216 | |
| MoS2/CdIn2S4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 1868.19 | 2.26 | – | |
| CNMT/Zn0.5Cd0.5S | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 7825.20 | 6.38 | 18.9 | |
| In2S3/Nb2O5/Nb2C | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 68.8 | 7.5 | 1.07 | |
| ZnCdS/ NiCoP | – | 5W LED (λ > 420 nm) | 11659.6 | 4.16 | 7.93 | |
| Cd0.5Zn0.5S/Nb2O5 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 94 | 2.85 | – | |
| CuInS2@C3N4 | – | 350 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 373 | 31 | 4.32 | |
| Au-ZnIn2S4/NaTaO3 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 11404 | 10 | 10.1 | |
| ZnIn2S4/PDIIM | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 13040 | 2.64 | – |
Table 2
Fig 12
(a) Synthetic scheme for the TiO2−x/TpPa-1-COF heterojunctions, (b) photocatalytic hydrogen-generation rates of TiO2−x/TpPa-1-COF samples, (c) charge migration for TiO2−x/TpPa-1-COF samples. Adapted from Chem. Eng. J. journal, Elsevier publisher 107."
Fig 12
Fig 13
(a) Gas evolution rates of various photocatalysts, (b) five cycles of gas evolution over TO-MO-30; Schematic diagram of mechanism: (c) type-Ⅱ and (d) S-scheme heterojunctions. Adapted from New J. Chem. journal, RSC publisher 108."
Fig 13
Fig 14
(a) TEM and (b) HR-TEM images of rGO supported TiO2/In0.5WO3, hydrogen-generation activity of (c) TiO2 coupled with In0.5WO3 photocatalysts and (d) TiO2/2% (w) In0.5WO3 loaded with different contents of rGO, (e) Stability test of TWC0.5 photocatalyst, (f) S-scheme mechanism of rGO-TiO2/In0.5WO3 photocatalysts. Adapted from Sol. Energy journal, Elsevier publisher 109."
Fig 14
Table 3
Recently reported H2-evolution of TiO2-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts."
| S-scheme heterojunction | Cocatalyst (wt%) | Light source (wavelength/nm) | H2 production rate (μmol∙h−1∙g−1) | Enhancement factor versus TiO2 | Apparent quantum yield (%) | Reference |
| TiO2−x/TpPa-1-COF | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 15330 | 10.5 | 6.7 | |
| TiO2-MoO3 | – | Xe lamp | 151 | – | 1.38 | |
| TiO2/In0.5WO3/rGO | – | Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 304.98 | 12 | 15.6 | |
| Co2P/PC-b-TiO2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 1530 | 4.37 | 12.5 | |
| Ti3C2 MXene@TiO2/CuInS2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 356.27 | 69.5 | – | |
| TiO2/CdS | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 2320 | 35 | 10.14 | |
| ZnIn2S4/TiO2 | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp | 8774 | 2.7 | 39 | |
| TiO2/ZnIn2S4 | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp | 6030 | 3.7 | 10.49 | |
| TiO2/g-C3N4 | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 4900 | 11 | – | |
| Co3Se4/TiO2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (350–780 nm) | 6065 | 12.5 | 1.8 | |
| BP/(Ti3C2Tx@TiO2) | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 325 nm) | 564.8 | 48.11 | 2.7 | |
| CuBi2O4/Na-P25 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 2695.73 | 37.5 | – | |
| TiO2−x MS/BiOI NS | Pt (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (300–800 nm) | 749.28 | 3 | 4.46 | |
| TiO2/Bi2O3 | – | LED (λ = 365 nm) | 12080 | 43 | – | |
| WO3/TiO2/rGO | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 245.8 | 3.5 | 1.4 | |
| TiO2/ZnCo2S4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 5580 | 88.3 | 11.5 | |
| PDI-TiO2 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp | 9766 | 2.56 | – |
Table 3
Fig 15
(a) Schematic diagram for the preparation of WO3@ZnIn2S4 heterostructures, FESEM image of (b) pure WO3 nanofibers and (c) WO3@ZnIn2S4, (d) hydrogen-generation activity and (e) S-scheme mechanism of WO3@ZnIn2S4 photocatalysts. Adapted from J. Mater. Chem. A journal, RSC publisher 20."
Fig 15
Fig 16
(a) TEM images of 2Cu2O/1ZnO heterojunction particles, (b) H2-evolution performance of different samples, (c) S-scheme charge-transfer mechanism of the xCu2O/yZnO heterojunctions. Adapted from Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. journal, Elsevier publisher 124."
Fig 16
Fig 17
(a) Schematic representation of the synthetic process of HT-In2O3/MⅡIn2S4 (MⅡ = Ca, Mn, and Zn) heterostructure photocatalysts, (b) hydrogen-production rate and (c) plausible S-scheme charge-migration mechanism. Adapted from ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. journal, ACS publisher 125."
Fig 17
Table 4
Recently reported H2-evolution of other oxide-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts."
| S-scheme heterojunction | Cocatalyst (wt%) | Light source (wavelength/nm) | H2 production rate (μmol∙h−1∙g−1) | Enhancement factor versus oxide | Apparent quantum yield (%) | Reference |
| WO3@ZnIn2S4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 8500 | 10.62 | 3.61 | |
| W18O49/g‐C3N4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 892 | 3.4 | 6.21 | |
| CuO/CdS/CoWO4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 457.9 | 102.9 | – | |
| Cd0.5Zn0.5S/Nb2O5 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 94 | – | – | |
| WO3/TiO2/rGO | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 245.8 | 2.3 | 1.4 | |
| Cu2O/ZnO | – | 150 W Xe lamp | 208.95 | 31.77 | 8.85 | |
| In2O3/MⅡIn2S4 | – | 250 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 5331 | 88.8 | – | |
| Fe3O4/Co3O4-TiO2 | – | 150 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 578 | – | – | |
| Co3O4/ZnO | Pt (0.5%) | 500 W Xe lamp (420-700m) | 2241 | 1834 | – | |
| WO3/TpPa-1-COF | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 19890 | 4.8 | 12.4 | |
| ZnO@ZnS | – | 350 W Xe lamp | 15700 | 3.2 | 27.4 | |
| W18O49/Cd0.5Zn0.5S | – | 300 W Xe lamp (200-2500 nm) | 147700 | 2.03 | 45.3 | |
| CeO2/CdWO4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 2590 | 14.97 | – | |
| α-Fe2O3/TiO2-Pd | – | 250 W UV lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 3490.54 | 87 | – | |
| p-CNQDs/VO-ZnO | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 481.3 | 117 | 15.4 | |
| ZnBi2O4/ZnO | – | 570 W Xe lamp | 3440 | 12.7 | – | |
| WO3/RP | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 6 | 6 | 2.5 | |
| WO3/CoP | – | 5 W white light | 4417.2 | 5.06 | 2.02 | |
| MoP@MoO3 | – | 5 W LED | 10000.3 | – | 7.78 | |
| In2O3/CdS | – | 150 W Xe lamp | 14.98 | 8.66 | 9.5 | |
| Mn0.5Cd0.5S/WO3/Au | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 25856 | 2.74 | – | |
| CeO2/CdSe-DETA | Pt (0.6%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 3710 | 46.38 | 29.7 | |
| Cu2O/g-C3N4 | – | 500 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 480.6 | 12 | – | |
| ZnO/SrTiO3 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 16006.12 | 31.89 | 11.52 |
Table 4
Fig 18
(a) TEM images and elemental mapping of CdSe-DF/Cu3P heterojunction, (b) bar diagram for H2-evolution rate of various photocatalysts and (c) charge-transfer path via the S-scheme mechanism. Adapted from ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. journal, ACS publisher 143."
Fig 18
Fig 19
(a) Graphical illustrating for the synthesis of ZnIn2S4/BiOBr (ZIS/BOB) heterojunctions, (b) average H2 evolution rates and (c) charge-transfer mechanism in ZnIn2S4/BiOBr S-scheme heterojunction. Adapted from ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. journal, ACS publisher 144."
Fig 19
Fig 20
(a) TEM and (b) HR-TEM images of polypyrrole-supported ZnFe2O4@WO3−X (PZFW15) photocatalyst, (c) H2-evolution rates of various photocatalysts and (d) S-scheme charge-transfer mechanism in PZFW15 photocatalyst. Adapted from ACS Omega journal, ACS publisher 145."
Fig 20
Table 5
Recently reported H2-evolution of other S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts."
| S-scheme heterojunction | Cocatalyst (wt%) | Light source (wavelength/nm) | H2 production rate (μmol∙h−1∙g−1) | Enhancement factor | Apparent quantum yield (%) | Reference |
| Ni2P/pg-C3N4/Cd0.5Zn0.5Se-D | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 12627 | 3.65 | 37.7 | |
| COF/CdS | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 8670 | 2.1 | 8.9 | |
| ZnBi2O4/ZnO | – | 570 W Xe lamp | 3440 | 12.7 | – | |
| CdSe/Cu3P | – | 500 W Xe-Hg lamp | 92100 | 2 | – | |
| BiOBr/ZnIn2S4 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (320-780 nm) | 17000 | 4 | 11.7 | |
| ZnFe2O4@WO3−X/polypyrrole | – | 150 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 43800 | 2.2 | – | |
| curcumin/ZnO | – | 300 W sun simulator | 5100 | 6.46 | – | |
| BiVO3/SnO2 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 8200 | 8 | – | |
| ZnWO4-ZnIn2S4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 4925.3 | 304 | – | |
| BiVO4/Bi0.6Y0.4VO4 | Rh (1%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 300 nm) | 910 | 3 | – | |
| Polyaniline/g-C3N4 | – | 300 W sun simulator | 4430 | 11 | – | |
| ZnCoMOF@CoP-5 | – | 5 W LED | 16958 | 14.8 | 7.6 | |
| Cs2AgBiBr6/Ag3PO4 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 819.23 | 3.3 | – | |
| CoAlP/Ni2P | – | 5 W LED | 8240 | 10.3 | – | |
| Ni2P-SnNb2O6/CdS-D | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 11992 | 199.87 | 35.8 | |
| Zn0.7Cd0.3S/0.5Ti3C2/2Fe2O3 | – | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 27240 | 100.89 | 20.92 | |
| Ni-MOF–74/BiVO4/P | – | 5 W LED | 4908 | 23 | – | |
| SnNb2O6/Ni-ZnIn2S4 | Pt (3%) | 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 2807 | 4.49 | 7.8 | |
| Pt/BP-Bi2WO6 | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 16.8 | 4.5 | – | |
| Bi2O2CO3/HRP | – | 300 W Xe lamp | 3144 | 3 | – | |
| Ni-MOF/P | – | 5 W LED | 6337 | 14.18 | – |
Table 5
| 1 |
Hasija V. ; Kumar A. ; Sudhaik A. ; Raizada P. ; Singh P. ; Van Le Q. ; Le T. T. ; Nguyen V. H. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2941.
doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01231-w |
| 2 |
Sayed M. ; Yu J. ; Liu G. ; Jaroniec M. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 10484.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00473 |
| 3 |
Kumar A. ; Khosla A. ; Kumar Sharma S. ; Dhiman P. ; Sharma G. ; Gnanasekaran L. ; Naushad M. ; Stadler F. J. Fuel 2023, 333, 126267.
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126267 |
| 4 |
Abutaleb A. Polymer 2021, 13, 2290.
doi: 10.3390/polym13142290 |
| 5 |
Dhakshinamoorthy A. ; Asiri A. M. ; García H. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2016, 55, 5414.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201505581 |
| 6 | Han G. ; Xu F. ; Cheng B. ; Li Y. ; Yu J. ; Zhang L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2112037. |
|
韩高伟; 徐飞燕; 程蓓; 李佑稷; 余家国; 张留洋; 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2112037.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202112037 |
|
| 7 |
Kudo A. ; Miseki Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253.
doi: 10.1039/B800489G |
| 8 |
Wazir M. B. ; Daud M. ; Safeer S. ; Almarzooqi F. ; Qurashi A. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 16856.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00330 |
| 9 |
Bie C. ; Cheng B. ; Fan J. ; Ho W. ; Yu J. EnergyChem 2021, 3, 100051.
doi: 10.1016/j.enchem.2021.100051 |
| 10 |
Purohit S. ; Yadav K. L. ; Satapathi S. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2200058.
doi: 10.1002/admi.202200058 |
| 11 |
Bie C. ; Cheng B. ; Ho W. ; Li Y. ; Macyk W. ; Ghasemi J. B. ; Yu J. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 5739.
doi: 10.1039/D2GC01684B |
| 12 |
Wang X. ; Sayed M. ; Ruzimuradov O. ; Zhang J. ; Fan Y. ; Li X. ; Bai X. ; Low J. Appl. Mater. Today 2022, 29, 101609.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101609 |
| 13 |
Xiang X. ; Wang L. ; Zhang J. ; Cheng B. ; Yu J. ; Macyk W. Adv. Photonics Res. 2022, 3, 2200065.
doi: 10.1002/adpr.202200065 |
| 14 |
Bie C. ; Wang L. ; Yu J. Chem 2022, 8, 1567.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.04.013 |
| 15 |
Gao D. ; Xu J. ; Wang L. ; Zhu B. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2108475.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202108475 |
| 16 |
Bie C. ; Zhu B. ; Wang L. ; Yu H. ; Jiang C. ; Chen T. ; Yu J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, 202212045.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202212045 |
| 17 |
Gao D. ; Xu J. ; Chen F. ; Wang P. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2022, 305, 121053.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.121053 |
| 18 |
Wu X. ; Ma H. ; Zhong W. ; Fan J. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 271, 118899.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118899 |
| 19 |
Yu W. ; Zhang S. ; Chen J. ; Xia P. ; Richter M. H. ; Chen L. ; Xu W. ; Jin J. ; Chen S. ; Peng T. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15668.
doi: 10.1039/C8TA02922A |
| 20 |
Cao S. ; Yu J. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Mousavi M. ; Ghasemi J. B. ; Xu F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 17174.
doi: 10.1039/D2TA05181H |
| 21 |
Wu X. ; Gao D. ; Wang P. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. Carbon 2019, 153, 757.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.083 |
| 22 | Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Xu Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2202001. |
|
WagehS.; Al-GhamdiAhmed A.; 徐全龙; 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2202001.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202202001 |
|
| 23 |
Wu X. ; Gao D. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 9608.
doi: 10.1039/C9NR00887J |
| 24 |
Xu J. ; Zhong W. ; Gao D. ; Wang X. ; Wang P. ; Yu H. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 439, 135758.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135758 |
| 25 |
Zhong W. ; Wu X. ; Liu Y. ; Wang X. ; Fan J. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021, 280, 119455.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119455 |
| 26 |
Wu X. ; Chen F. ; Wang X. ; Yu H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 645.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.050 |
| 27 |
Yu H. ; Ma H. ; Wu X. ; Wang X. ; Fan J. ; Yu J. Sol. RRL 2020, 5, 2000372.
doi: 10.1002/solr.202000372 |
| 28 |
Wang L. ; Bie C. ; Yu J. Trends Chem. 2022, 4, 973.
doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2022.08.008 |
| 29 |
Xia Y. ; Sayed M. ; Zhang L. ; Cheng B. ; Yu J. Chem. Catal. 2021, 1, 1173.
doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2021.08.009 |
| 30 |
Xu Q. ; Zhang L. ; Cheng B. ; Fan J. ; Yu J. Chem 2020, 6, 1543.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010 |
| 31 |
Serpone N. ; Borgarello E. ; Grätzel M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 6, 342.
doi: 10.1039/C39840000342 |
| 32 |
Bard A. J. J. Photochem. 1979, 10, 59.
doi: 10.1016/0047-2670(79)80037-4 |
| 33 |
Sayama K. ; Mukasa K. ; Abe R. ; Abe Y. ; Arakawa H. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2002, 148, 71.
doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00070-9 |
| 34 |
Abe R. ; Shinmei K. ; Koumura N. ; Hara K. ; Ohtani B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16872.
doi: 10.1021/ja4048637 |
| 35 |
Tada H. ; Mitsui T. ; Kiyonaga T. ; Akita T. ; Tanaka K. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 782.
doi: 10.1038/nmat1734 |
| 36 |
Fu J. ; Xu Q. ; Low J. ; Jiang C. ; Yu J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 243, 556.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.011 |
| 37 |
Zhang L. ; Zhang J. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2107668.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202107668 |
| 38 |
Zhang J. ; Wang L. ; Mousavi M. ; Ghasemi J. B. ; Yu J. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2022, 41, 2206003.
doi: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2022-0150 |
| 39 |
Wang Z. ; Cheng B. ; Zhang L. ; Yu J. ; Li Y. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. Chin. J Catal. 2022, 43, 1657.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)64010-X |
| 40 |
Jiang Z. ; Cheng B. ; Zhang Y. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Yu J. ; Wang L. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 124, 193.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.01.029 |
| 41 |
Wang L. ; Zhang J. ; Yu H. ; Patir I. H. ; Li Y. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Yu J. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 4695.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01332 |
| 42 |
Xu Q. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Li X. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 124, 171.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.02.016 |
| 43 |
Zhang J. ; Zhang L. ; Wang W. ; Yu J. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 8462.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02125 |
| 44 |
Wang L. ; Cheng B. ; Zhang L. ; Yu J. Small 2021, 17, 2103447.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202103447 |
| 45 |
Yu W. ; Fu H. J. ; Mueller T. ; Brunschwig B. S. ; Lewis N. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 020902.
doi: 10.1063/5.0009858 |
| 46 |
Cheng C. ; He B. ; Fan J. ; Cheng B. ; Cao S. ; Yu J. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2100317.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202100317 |
| 47 |
Yang J. ; Wu X. ; Mei Z. ; Zhou S. ; Su Y. ; Wang G. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 8, 2200056.
doi: 10.1002/adsu.202200056 |
| 48 |
Liu B. ; Bie C. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang L. ; Li Y. ; Yu J. Langmuir 2021, 37, 14114.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02360 |
| 49 |
Wu X. ; Ma H. ; Wang K. ; Wang J. ; Wang G. ; Yu H. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 633, 817.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.11.143 |
| 50 |
Jiang J. ; Xiong Z. ; Wang H. ; Liao G. ; Bai S. ; Zou J. ; Wu P. ; Zhang P. ; Li X. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 118, 15.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.018 |
| 51 |
Vignesh S. ; Chandrasekaran S. ; Srinivasan M. ; Anbarasan R. ; Perumalsamy R. ; Arumugam E. ; Shkir M. ; Algarni H. ; AlFaify S. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132611.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132611 |
| 52 |
Chen Y. ; Su F. ; Xie H. ; Wang R. ; Ding C. ; Huang J. ; Xu Y. ; Ye L. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126498.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126498 |
| 53 |
Gogoi D. ; Shah A. K. ; Qureshi M. ; Golder A. K. ; Peela N. R. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 558, 149900.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149900 |
| 54 | Huang Y. ; Mei F. ; Zhang J. ; Dai K. ; Dawson G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2108028. |
|
黄悦; 梅飞飞; 张金锋; 代凯; DawsonG.; 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2108028.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202108028 |
|
| 55 |
Li X. ; Luo Q. ; Han L. ; Deng F. ; Yang Y. ; Dong F. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 114, 222.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.030 |
| 56 |
Chen X. ; Hu T. ; Zhang J. ; Yang C. ; Dai K. ; Pan C. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 863, 158068.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158068 |
| 57 |
Sun H. ; Shi Y. ; Shi W. ; Guo F. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 593, 153281.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153281 |
| 58 |
Feng K. ; Tian J. ; Hu X. ; Fan J. ; Liu E. Int. J. Hydrog. Energ. 2022, 47, 4601.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.095 |
| 59 |
Zhang B. ; Hu X. ; Liu E. ; Fan J. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 1519.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63765-2 |
| 60 |
Chen D. ; Li X. ; Dai K. ; Zhang J. ; Dawson G. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 244001.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac58d0 |
| 61 |
Li C. ; Zhao Y. ; Fan J. ; Hu X. ; Liu E. ; Yu Q. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 919, 165752.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165752 |
| 62 |
Liu J. ; Wei X. ; Sun W. ; Guan X. ; Zheng X. ; Li J. Environ. Res. 2021, 197, 111136.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111136 |
| 63 |
Liu Q. ; He X. ; Peng J. ; Yu X. ; Tang H. ; Zhang J. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 1478.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63753-6 |
| 64 |
Zhou H. ; Ke J. ; Wu H. ; Liu J. ; Xu D. ; Zou X. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 23, 100918.
doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100918 |
| 65 |
Dong G. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang Y. ; Deng Q. ; Qin C. ; Hu Y. ; Zhou Y. ; Tian G. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 14342.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03019 |
| 66 |
Zhang B. ; Shi H. ; Yan Y. ; Liu C. ; Hu X. ; Liu E. ; Fan J. Colloid. Surface. A 2021, 608, 125598.
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125598 |
| 67 |
Li B. ; Zhang B. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang M. ; Huang W. ; Yu C. ; Sun J. ; Feng J. ; Dong S. ; Sun J. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 32413.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.090 |
| 68 |
Chen X. ; Ke X. ; Zhang J. ; Yang C. ; Dai K. ; Liang C. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 13488.
doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.207 |
| 69 |
Zhang Q. ; Bai X. ; Hu X. ; Fan J. ; Liu E. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 579, 152224.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152224 |
| 70 |
Wang H. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhan X. ; Yu J. ; Chen L. ; Sun Y. ; Shi H. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 899, 163250.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163250 |
| 71 |
Li X. ; Kang B. ; Dong F. ; Zhang Z. ; Luo X. ; Han L. ; Huang J. ; Feng Z. ; Chen Z. ; Xu J. ; et al Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105671.
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105671 |
| 72 |
Ran Y. ; Cui Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Fang Y. ; Zhang W. ; Yu X. ; Lan H. ; An X. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133348.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133348 |
| 73 |
Chen L. ; Xu Y. ; Chen B. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 256, 117848.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117848 |
| 74 |
Wang Y. ; Hao X. ; Zhang L. ; Jin Z. ; Zhao T. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 943.
doi: 10.1039/D0CY02009E |
| 75 |
Mu F. ; Miao X. ; Cao J. ; Zhao W. ; Yang G. ; Zeng H. ; Li S. ; Sun C. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 360, 131948.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131948 |
| 76 |
Zhang G. ; Guan Z. ; Yang J. ; Li Q. ; Zhou Y. ; Zou Z. Sol. RRL 2022, 6, 2200587.
doi: 10.1002/solr.202200587 |
| 77 |
Gao L. ; Liu J. ; Long H. ; Wang P. ; Yu H. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 7307.
doi: 10.1039/D1CY01581H |
| 78 |
Chandrasekaran S. ; Yao L. ; Deng L. ; Bowen C. ; Zhang Y. ; Chen S. ; Lin Z. ; Peng F. ; Zhang P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4178.
doi: 10.1039/C8CS00664D |
| 79 |
Kulkarni P. ; Nataraj S. K. ; Balakrishna R. G. ; Nagaraju D. H. ; Reddy M. V. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 22040.
doi: 10.1039/C7TA07329A |
| 80 |
Gogoi D. ; Shah A. K. ; Rambabu P. ; Qureshi M. ; Golder A. K. ; Peela N. R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 45475.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c11740 |
| 81 |
Güy N. ; Atacan K. ; Özacar M. Renew. Energy 2022, 195, 107.
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.171 |
| 82 |
Cao Y. ; Wang G. ; Liu H. ; Li Y. ; Jin Z. ; Ma Q. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 7230.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.214 |
| 83 |
Bai J. ; Chen W. ; Hao L. ; Shen R. ; Zhang P. ; Li N. ; Li X. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 447, 137488.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137488 |
| 84 |
Wang G. ; Quan Y. ; Yang K. ; Jin Z. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 121, 28.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.073 |
| 85 |
Bai J. ; Chen W. ; Shen R. ; Jiang Z. ; Zhang P. ; Liu W. ; Li X. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 112, 85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.003 |
| 86 |
Bai J. ; Shen R. ; Jiang Z. ; Zhang P. ; Li Y. ; Li X. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 359.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63883-4 |
| 87 |
Jin Z. ; Li H. ; Li J. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 303.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63818-4 |
| 88 |
Zulfiqar S. ; Liu S. ; Rahman N. ; Tang H. ; Shah S. ; Yu X. ; Liu Q. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 2381.
doi: 10.1007/s12598-020-01616-w |
| 89 |
Sun L. ; Li L. ; Yang J. ; Fan J. ; Xu Q. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 350.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63869-X |
| 90 |
Xu Z. ; Shi W. ; Shi Y. ; Sun H. ; Li L. ; Guo F. ; Wen H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 595, 153482.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153482 |
| 91 |
Peng J. ; Shen J. ; Yu X. ; Tang H. ; Zulfiqar ; Liu Q. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 87.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63595-1 |
| 92 |
Xiong Y. ; Liu T. ; Wang X. ; Liu W. ; Xue Y. ; Zhang X. ; Xiong C. ; Tian J. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 918, 165652.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165652 |
| 93 |
Liu Y. ; Sun J. ; Zhou X. ; Lv C. ; Zhou Y. ; Cong B. ; Chen G. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135280.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135280 |
| 94 |
Yang H. ; Meng A. L. ; Yang L. ; - N. ; Li Z.-J. J. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134371.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134371 |
| 95 |
Wang L. ; Zhang Z. ; Xu X. ; Yu L. ; Yang T. ; Zhang X. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhu H. ; Li J. ; Zhang J. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 926, 166981.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166981 |
| 96 |
Zhang B. ; Shi H. ; Hu X. ; Wang Y. ; Liu E. ; Fan J. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 205101.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab7563 |
| 97 |
Li C. ; Liu X. ; Huo P. ; Yan Y. ; Liao G. ; Ding G. ; Liu C. Small 2021, 17, 2102539.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202102539 |
| 98 |
Tayyab M. ; Liu Y. ; Liu Z. ; Pan L. ; Xu Z. ; Yue W. ; Zhou L. ; Lei J. ; Zhang J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 500.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.071 |
| 99 |
Wang K. ; Xie H. ; Li Y. ; Wang G. ; Jin Z. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.001 |
| 100 |
Shao X. ; Wang K. ; Peng L. ; Li K. ; Wen H. ; Le X. ; Wu X. ; Wang G. Colloid. Surfaces A 2022, 652, 129846.
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129846 |
| 101 |
Luo J. ; Lin Z. ; Zhao Y. ; Jiang S. ; Song S. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 122.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63490-X |
| 102 |
Zhang J. ; Gu H. ; Wang X. ; Zhang H. ; Chang S. ; Li Q. ; Dai W. L. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 625, 785.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.074 |
| 103 |
Liu L. ; Wu Y. ; Song R. ; Zhang Y. ; Ma Y. ; Wan J. ; Zhang M. ; Cui H. ; Yang H. ; Chen X. ; et al J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 701.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.109 |
| 104 |
He B. ; Wang Z. ; Xiao P. ; Chen T. ; Yu J. ; Zhang L. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2203225.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202203225 |
| 105 |
Wang L. ; Fei X. ; Zhang L. ; Yu J. ; Cheng B. ; Ma Y. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 112, 1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.016 |
| 106 |
Peiris S. ; de Silva H. B. ; Ranasinghe K. N. ; Bandara S. V. ; Perera I. R. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2021, 68, 738.
doi: 10.1002/jccs.202000465 |
| 107 |
Zhang Y. -P. ; Han W. ; Yang Y. ; Zhang H. -Y. ; Wang Y. ; Wang L. ; Sun X. J. ; Zhang F. M. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137213.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137213 |
| 108 |
Alnaggar G. ; Alkanad K. ; Chandrashekar S. S. G. ; Bajiri M. A. ; Drmosh Q. A. ; Krishnappagowda L. N. ; Ananda S. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 9629.
doi: 10.1039/D2NJ00173J |
| 109 |
Shaheer A. R. M. ; Vinesh V. ; Lakhera S. K. ; Neppolian B. Sol. Energy 2021, 213, 260.
doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.030 |
| 110 |
Chen L. ; Song X. ; Ren J. ; Yuan Z. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2022, 315, 121546.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121546 |
| 111 |
Yang W. ; Ma G. ; Fu Y. ; Peng K. ; Yang H. ; Zhan X. ; Yang W. ; Wang L. ; Hou H. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132381.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132381 |
| 112 |
Ge H. ; Xu F. ; Cheng B. ; Yu J. ; Ho W. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 6301.
doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901486 |
| 113 | Mei Z. ; Wang G. ; Yan S. ; Wang J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009097. |
|
梅子慧; 王国宏; 严素定; 王娟; 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009097.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009097 |
|
| 114 |
Li J. ; Wu C. ; Li J. ; Dong B. ; Zhao L. ; Wang S. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 339.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63875-5 |
| 115 |
Alsalme A. ; Galal A. H. ; El-Sherbeny E. F. ; Soltan A. ; Abdel-Messih M. F. ; Ahmed M. A. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 122, 108819.
doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.108819 |
| 116 |
Huang W. ; Xue W. ; Hu X. ; Fan J. ; Tang C. ; Liu E. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 599, 153900.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153900 |
| 117 |
Ai Z. ; Zhang K. ; Xu L. ; Huang M. ; Shi D. ; Shao Y. ; Shen J. ; Wu Y. ; Hao X. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 610, 13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.053 |
| 118 |
Mao J. X. ; Wang J. C. ; Gao H. ; Shi W. ; Jiang H. P. ; Hou Y. ; Li R. ; Zhang W. ; Liu L. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 8214.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.133 |
| 119 |
Zhang B. ; Wang D. ; Jiao S. ; Xu Z. ; Liu Y. ; Zhao C. ; Pan J. ; Liu D. ; Liu G. ; Jiang B. ; et al Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137138.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137138 |
| 120 |
Gao J. ; Rao S. ; Yu X. ; Wang L. ; Xu J. ; Yang J. ; Liu Q. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 166.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.112 |
| 121 |
He F. ; Meng A. ; Cheng B. ; Ho W. ; Yu J. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 9.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63382-6 |
| 122 |
Dai X. ; Feng S. ; Wu W. ; Zhou Y. ; Ye Z. ; Cao X. ; Wang Y. ; Yang C. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 25104.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.269 |
| 123 |
Liu L. ; Liu J. ; Zong S. ; Huang Z. ; Feng X. ; Zheng J. ; Fang Y. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 39486.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.122 |
| 124 |
Park B. H. ; Park H. ; Kim T. ; Yoon S. J. ; Kim Y. ; Son N. ; Kang M. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 38319.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.087 |
| 125 |
Bariki R. ; Das K. ; Pradhan S. K. ; Prusti B. ; Mishra B. G. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2022, 5, 11002.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.2c01670 |
| 126 |
Abutalib M. M. ; Alghamdi H. M. ; Rajeh A. ; Nur O. ; Hezma A. M. ; Mannaa M. A. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 1043.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.078 |
| 127 |
Mohamed R. M. ; Shawky A. Opt. Mater. 2022, 124, 112012.
doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112012 |
| 128 |
Sun L. ; Li L. ; Fan J. ; Xu Q. ; Ma D. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 41.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.065 |
| 129 |
Jiang J. ; Wang G. ; Shao Y. ; Wang J. ; Zhou S. ; Su Y. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 329.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63889-5 |
| 130 |
Xue W. ; Sun H. ; Hu X. ; Bai X. ; Fan J. ; Liu E. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 234.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63783-4 |
| 131 |
Bahadoran A. ; Ramakrishna S. ; Masudy-Panah S. ; De Lile J. R. ; Gu J. ; Liu Q. ; Mishra Y. K. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 10931.
doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01224 |
| 132 |
Bootluck W. ; Chittrakarn T. ; Techato K. ; Jutaporn P. ; Khongnakorn W. Catal. Lett. 2022, 152, 2590.
doi: 10.1007/s10562-021-03873-5 |
| 133 |
Wang Y. ; Yu H. ; Wang D. ; Xing M. ; Zhang Y. ; Song C. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135321.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135321 |
| 134 |
Bahadoran A. ; Masudy-Panah S. ; De Lile J. R. ; Li J. ; Gu J. ; Sadeghi B. ; Ramakrishna S. ; Liu Q. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 24094.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.208 |
| 135 |
Jiang S. ; Cao J. ; Guo M. ; Cao D. ; Jia X. ; Lin H. ; Chen S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 558, 149882.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149882 |
| 136 |
Li T. ; Guo X. ; Zhang L. ; Yan T. ; Jin Z. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 20560.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.169 |
| 137 |
Zhang L. ; Jin Z. ; Tsubaki N. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 18507.
doi: 10.1039/D1NR05452J |
| 138 |
Chava R. K. ; Son N. ; Kang M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 627, 247.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.031 |
| 139 |
Liu Y. ; Gong Z. ; Lv H. ; Ren H. ; Xing X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 526, 146734.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146734 |
| 140 |
Li Z. ; Jin D. ; Wang Z. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 6358.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.122 |
| 141 |
Dai B. ; Li Y. ; Xu J. ; Sun C. ; Li S. ; Zhao W. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 592, 153309.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153309 |
| 142 |
Zhao Y. ; Guo Y. ; Li J. ; Li P. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 18922.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.051 |
| 143 |
Ravi P. ; Kumaravel D. K. ; Subramanian D. ; Thoondyaiah D. ; Rao V. N. ; Venkatakrishnan S. M. ; Sathish M. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2021, 4, 13983.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02790 |
| 144 |
Xi Y. ; Chen W. ; Dong W. ; Fan Z. ; Wang K. ; Shen Y. ; Tu G. ; Zhong S. ; Bai S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 39491.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c11233 |
| 145 |
Kumar Das K. ; Sahoo D. P. ; Mansingh S. ; Parida K. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 30401.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03705 |
| 146 |
AlFawaz A. ; Alsalme A. ; Alswieleh A. M. ; Abdel-Messih M. F. ; Galal A. H. ; Shaker M. H. ; Ahmed M. A. ; Soltan A. Opt. Mater. 2022, 128, 112331.
doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112331 |
| 147 |
Abd-Rabboh H. S. M. ; Galal A. H. ; Aziz R. A. ; Ahmed M. A. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 29507.
doi: 10.1039/D1RA04717E |
| 148 |
Dai M. ; He Z. ; Zhang P. ; Li X. ; Wang S. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 122, 231.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.02.014 |
| 149 |
Guo W. ; Luo H. ; Jiang Z. ; Shangguan W. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 316.
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63846-9 |
| 150 |
AlFawaz A. ; Alsalme A. ; Soltan A. ; Elmahgary M. G. ; Ahmed M. A. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 168, 110773.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110773 |
| 151 |
Quan Y. ; Wang G. ; Wang X. ; Guo X. ; Hao X. ; Wang K. ; Jin Z. Langmuir 2022, 38, 12617.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02091 |
| 152 |
Chen Z. ; Li X. ; Wu Y. ; Zheng J. ; Peng P. ; Zhang X. ; Duan A. ; Wang D. ; Yang Q. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 295, 121250.
doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121250 |
| 153 |
Wang K. ; Li S. ; Li Y. ; Li Y. ; Wang G. ; Jin Z. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 23618.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.200 |
| 154 |
Hu T. ; Dai K. ; Zhang J. ; Chen S. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 269, 118844.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118844 |
| 155 |
Bai J. ; Shen R. ; Chen W. ; Xie J. ; Zhang P. ; Jiang Z. ; Li X. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132587.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132587 |
| 156 |
Li H. ; Gong H. ; Jin Z. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2022, 307, 121166.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121166 |
| 157 |
Li C. ; Liu X. ; Ding G. ; Huo P. ; Yan Y. ; Yan Y. ; Liao G. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 4681.
doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03936 |
| 158 |
Chen C. ; Hu J. ; Yang X. ; Yang T. ; Qu J. ; Guo C. ; Li C. M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 20162.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c03482 |
| 159 |
Wang Z. ; Bai Y. ; Li Y. ; Tao K. ; Simayi M. ; Li Y. ; Chen Z. ; Sun Y. ; Chen X. ; Pang X. ; et al J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 609, 320.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.136 |
| 160 |
Gong H. ; Li Y. ; Li H. ; Jin Z. Langmuir 2022, 38, 2117.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c03198 |
| 161 |
Xia Z. ; Chen C. ; Qi X. ; Xu Q. ; Tang H. ; Liu G. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 2200134.
doi: 10.1002/adsu.202200134 |
| 162 |
Lei W. ; Pang X. ; Ge G. ; Liu G. Nano Today 2021, 39, 101183.
doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101183 |
| 163 |
Lei W. ; Zhou T. ; Pang X. ; Xue S. ; Xu Q. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 114, 143.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.029 |
| 164 |
Chen Y. ; Li L. ; Xu Q. ; Chen W. ; Dong Y. ; Fan J. ; Ma D. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2000541.
doi: 10.1002/solr.202000541 |
| 165 |
Pang X. ; Xue S. ; Zhou T. ; Qiao M. ; Li H. ; Liu X. ; Xu Q. ; Liu G. ; Lei W. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 2100507.
doi: 10.1002/adsu.202100507 |
| 166 |
Xu Q. ; Ma D. ; Yang S. ; Tian Z. ; Cheng B. ; Fan J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 495, 143555.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143555 |
| 167 |
Deng J. ; Lei W. ; Fu J. ; Jin H. ; Xu Q. ; Wang S. Sol. RRL 2022, 6, 2200279.
doi: 10.1002/solr.202200279 |
| 168 |
Xu Q. ; Xia Z. ; Zhang J. ; Wei Z. ; Guo Q. ; Jin H. ; Tang H. ; Li S. ; Pan X. ; Su Z. ; et al Carbon Energy 2022, 1.
doi: 10.1002/cey2.205 |
| [1] | 曹玥晗, 郭瑞, 马敏智, 黄泽皑, 周莹. 活性位点电子密度变化对光催化CO2活化和选择转化的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303029 - . |
| [2] | 张珹博, 陶晓萍, 蒋文超, 郭俊雪, 张鹏飞, 李灿, 李仁贵. 微波辅助合成促进铬酸铋晶体的光生电荷分离[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303034 - . |
| [3] | 冀连连, 王现鹏, 张莹莹, 申学礼, 薛娣, 王璐, 王滋, 王文冲, 黄丽珍, 迟力峰. 有机-有机界面效应的原位及非原位研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2304002 - . |
| [4] | 赖可溱, 李丰彦, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 金属-有机骨架衍生的Ni-CNT/ZnIn2S4异质结用于光催化产氢及其电荷转移途径的确定[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2304018 - . |
| [5] | 宋千伟, 何观朝, 费慧龙. 基于单原子催化剂的光热催化转化：原理和应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212038 -0 . |
| [6] | 张怡宁, 高明, 陈松涛, 王会琴, 霍鹏伟. Ag/CN/ZnIn2S4 S型异质结等离子体光催化剂的制备及其增强光还原CO2研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2211051 - . |
| [7] | 罗铖, 龙庆, 程蓓, 朱必成, 王临曦. Pt-C3N4/BiOCl S型异质结应用于光催化CO2还原的理论计算研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2212026 - . |
| [8] | 张珂瑜, 李云锋, 袁仕丹, 张洛红, 王倩. S型异质结H2O2光催化剂的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2212010 - . |
| [9] | 孙涛, 李晨曦, 鲍钰鹏, 樊君, 刘恩周. S-型MnCo2S4/g-C3N4异质结光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2212009 - . |
| [10] | 陈茹瑶, 夏加增, 陈义钢, 史海峰. CuWO4−x/Bi12O17Cl2梯型异质结增强PMS活化性能用于高效抗生素去除[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2209012 - . |
| [11] | 王中辽, 汪静, 张金锋, 代凯. 光激发电荷在光催化氧化还原反应中的全利用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2209037 - . |
| [12] | 王吉超, 乔秀, 史维娜, 贺景, 陈军, 张万庆. 多面体状Cu2O修饰片状BiOI的S型异质结构筑及光催化水蒸气中CO2转化性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2210003 - . |
| [13] | 昝忠奇, 李喜宝, 高晓明, 黄军同, 罗一丹, 韩露. 0D/2D碳氮量子点(CNQDs)/BiOBr复合的S型异质结高效光催化降解和产H2O2[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2209016 - . |
| [14] | 周文杰, 景启航, 李家馨, 陈颖芝, 郝国栋, 王鲁宁. 有机光催化剂用于太阳能水分解：分子水平和聚集体水平改性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211010 -0 . |
| [15] | 雷永刚, 赵天宇, 黄锦鸿, 张颖贞, 臧雪瑞, 李晓, 蔡伟龙, 黄剑莹, 胡军, 赖跃坤. 金属碳化钨与液相染料光敏剂协同促进光催化制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2206006 -0 . |
|
||