物理化学学报 >> 2024, Vol. 40 >> Issue (4): 2305048.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305048
收稿日期:2023-05-26
修回日期:2023-07-12
录用日期:2023-07-12
发布日期:2023-07-19
通讯作者:
Email: hanqiaofeng@njust.edu.cn (韩巧凤)
作者简介:†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
Huiwei Ding, Bo Peng, Zhihao Wang, Qiaofeng Han*(
)
Received:2023-05-26
Revised:2023-07-12
Accepted:2023-07-12
Published:2023-07-19
Contact:
Email: hanqiaofeng@njust.edu.cn (Qiaofeng Han)
Supported by:摘要:
随着经济的快速增长,环境和能源问题日益突出。太阳能作为一种可再生、环保的能源,受到了许多研究人员的关注,最大限度地利用太阳能资源成为未来的研究热点。众所周知,光催化技术可以将太阳能转化为化学能或电能,为环境污染提供解决方案。因此,半导体光催化技术被认为是解决能源危机和环境问题的最环保的技术之一。铋基半导体材料由于合适的能带结构、丰富的种类、无毒性和低成本,在光催化领域受到欢迎。然而,纯Bi基光催化剂存在光激发电子-空穴对复合效率高、量子产率低和光吸收能力有限的问题,导致光催化性能低。为了克服这些限制,人们设计了各种策略,比如金属或非金属掺杂、金属沉积、异质结构建和诱导缺陷生成来提高它们的光催化活性。在这些策略中,元素掺杂或金属沉积被认为是调整铋基材料能带结构和物化性质的有效方法。这个方法拓宽了光响应范围和提高了光催化性能。这篇综述总结了金属掺杂、非金属掺杂、金属和非金属共掺杂以及金属沉积改性铋基材料的最新研究进展。它也探索了它们在光催化降解污染物和重金属离子、氮气还原、二氧化碳还原、光催化抗菌等各个领域的应用。关于金属掺杂,我们将其分为三类:碱金属或碱土金属掺杂、过渡金属掺杂和稀土金属掺杂,并详细介绍了每种掺杂的优缺点。非金属掺杂则被分为卤素掺杂和非卤素掺杂,并重点研究非金属掺杂对铋基材料的影响。此外,我们还纵向比较了每个元素的优点。结合最近的研究进展,简要介绍了结合金属和非金属元素优点的共掺杂。对于金属沉积,我们主要从肖特基势垒和局域表面等离子体共振(LSPR)效应两个方面介绍了对Bi基材料的影响。最后,我们也呈现了金属或非金属改性Bi基光催化剂目前面临的挑战和前景。
丁慧伟, 彭博, 王志豪, 韩巧凤. 铋基光催化剂的金属或非金属改性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(4), 2305048. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305048
Huiwei Ding, Bo Peng, Zhihao Wang, Qiaofeng Han. Advances in Metal or Nonmetal Modification of Bismuth-Based Photocatalysts[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2024, 40(4), 2305048. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305048
表1
"
| Types of metal doping | Dopants | Ionic radius Bi (1.03 Å) | Pristine materials | Light source | Application | Enhanced photocatalytic Activity/pristine | Ref. |
| Alkali metals | Na | 1.02 Å | α-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 0.0245 min−1/0.0081 min−1 | |
| Cs | 1.74 Å | α-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | MB degradation | 0.0765 min−1/0.0125 min−1 | ||
| Sr | 1.12 Å | BiOI | λ > 420 nm | Indomethacin degradation | 0.0574 min−1/0.0053 min−1 | ||
| Ba | 1.35 Å | BiOBr | λ ≥ 420 nm | NO oxidation | 53%/10% (5 min) | ||
| Ba | BiFeO3 | Natural sunlight | RhB degradation | 86%/57% (6 h) | |||
| Transition metals | Ti | 0.6 Å | β-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | Pentachlorophenol reduction | 99.6% within 60 min | |
| Ti | BiOI | λ ≥ 400 nm | Diclofenac sodium salt degradation | 0.0483 min−1/0.004 min−1 | |||
| Mn | 0.83 Å | BiOCl | Visible light | Nile blue degradation | 0.36 min−1/0.02 min−1 | ||
| Fe | 0.64 Å | Bi2MoO6 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 92.4%/66.3% (90 min) | ||
| Fe | δ-Bi2O3 | UV light | Paracetamol degradation | − | |||
| Fe | BiOCl | λ ≥ 400 nm | Cr reduction RhB degradation | 0.061 min−1/0.012 min−1 0.077 min−1/0.019 min−1 | |||
| Co | 0.65 Å | BiOBr | λ > 400 nm | RhB degradation MB degradation | 99.5%/34% (120 min) 98.9%/50.6% (150 min) | ||
| Co | BiOBrxCl1−x | Visible light | RhB degradation E. coli bacteria inactivation | 0.024 min−1/0.0096 min−1; – | |||
| Co | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation Norfloxacin (NOR) degradation Cr reduction | 98.9%/69.3% (5 min) 82.3%/48.1% (7 min) 81.5%/62.7% (7 min) | |||
| Co | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | Bisphenol A (BPA) degradation | 95%/20% (120 min) | |||
| Cu | 0.73 Å | BiOCl | 400 nm ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | RhB degradation | 99.1%/68.6% (120 min) | ||
| Cu | Bi2Se3 | Sunlight | MB degradation malachite green (MG) degradation | 0.123 min−1/0.043 min−1 0.151 min−1/0.041 min−1 | |||
| Cu | BiOBr | λ > 420 nm | NOR degradation | 0.64 min−1/0.28 min−1 | |||
| Zn | 0.74 Å | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 0.46019 min−1/0.17055 min−1 | ||
| Mo | 0.62 Å | BiVO4 | Sunlight | Water splitting | – | ||
| Ag | 1 Å | Bi2WO6 | Visible light | RhB degradation | 94%/50% (120 min) | ||
| Ag | BiOI | Daylight | MB degradation | 96.8%/81.89% (100 min) | |||
| Au | 0.84 Å | Bi2MoO6 | Visible light | RhB degradation | 0.0107 min−1/0.00193 min−1 | ||
| Pd | 0.64 Å | Bi2MoO6 | Visible light | RhB degradation | 97.12%/38.36% (240 min) | ||
| Rare earth metals | La | 1.03 Å | Bi2O3CO3 | λ > 420 nm | NO oxidation | 49.8%/15.2% (30 min) | |
| La | BiOCl | Visible light | RhB degradation Cr reduction | 94.7%/45.2% (18 min) 94.3%/7.1% (120 min) | |||
| La Sm | 1.03 Å 0.96 Å | Bi5O7I | λ ≥ 420 nm | Tetracycline (TC) degradation RhB degradation | 100%/50% (40 min) 93%/0 (40 min) | ||
| Ce | 1.20 Å | BiPO4 | UV light | MB degradation | 90%/− (120 min) | ||
| Ce | BiOBr | 380 nm ≤ λ ≤ 780 nm | RhB degradation | 99.22%/71.04% (40 min) | |||
| Pr | 0.99 Å | α-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation 2, 4-dichlorophenol degradation | 70.8%/48.7% (120 min) 81.8%/42.8% (120 min) | ||
| Sm | 0.96 Å | BiFeO3 | λ ≥ 420 nm | Methyl orange (MO) degradation | 86.9%/58.8% (120 min) | ||
| Eu | 0.95 Å | BiVO4 | Visible light | MB degradation RhB degradation | 90.1%/60.8% (90 min) 60.1%/40.5% (90 min) | ||
| Eu | Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | − | |||
| Gd | 0.94 Å | Bi2Fe4O9 | Visible light | MB degradation | 77%/50% (80 min) | ||
| Gd | β-Bi2O3 | λ > 400 nm | MO degradation RhB degradation Phenol degradation | 993.%/70.1% (28 min) 98.2%/29.8% (120 min) 97.2%/72.3% (195 min) | |||
| Rare earth metals | Er | 0.89 Å | BiOBr | Visible light | RhB degradation | 92.7%/59.3% (100 min) | |
| Er | BiOI0.5Cl0.5 | λ > 420 nm | Acid Red1 degradation | 0.0909 min−1/0.0513 min−1 | |||
| Er Yb | 0.89 Å 0.98 Å | Bi2MoO6 | Solar light | RhB degradation | – | ||
| Gd Er Lu | 0.94 Å 0.89 Å 0.86 Å | Bi2MoO6 | λ > 420 nm | TC degradation RhB degradation 4-Chlorophenol degradation | − | ||
| Self-doping | Bi vacancies | Bi2WO6 | λ > 420 nm | Water splitting | 100.13 μmol∙g −1∙h−1/ 38.01 μmol∙g −1∙h−1 | ||
| Bi vacancies | BiOBr | Solar light | CO2 reduction | 20.1 μmol∙g −1∙h−1/5.3 μmol∙g −1∙h−1 |
表2
"
| Types of nonmetal doping | Dopants | Ionic radius | Pristine materials | Light source | Application | Enhanced photocatalytic Activity/pristine | Ref. |
| Halogen | Cl | 1.8 Å (Cl)/ 1.4 Å (O) | BiOI | λ > 420 nm | MB degradation | 0.01203 min−1/0.00148 min−1 | |
| Cl | Bi2O2CO3 | Sunlight | RhB degradation | 0.1679 min−1/0.0708 min−1 | |||
| Br | 1.9 Å | BiOCOOH | λ > 420 nm | NO oxidation | 37.8%/almost no activity | ||
| Br | Bi2MoO6 | λ ≥ 420 nm | N2 reduction | 1.60 μmol∙h−1/0.68 μmol∙h−1 | |||
| I | 2.20 Å | Bi12O17Cl2 | λ > 420 nm | MO degradation | 96.1%/33.7% (60 min) | ||
| I | BiOIO3 | λ > 420 nm | Bisphenol AF degradation Bisphenol A (BPA) degradation | 0.02787 min−1/0.00002 min−1 0.06764 min−1/0.00004 min−1 | |||
| I | Bi2O2CO3 | λ > 400 nm | MO degradation | About 20%/13.0% (35 min) | |||
| I | BiOIO3 | λ > 420 nm | Propylparaben degradation | 97.2%/barely change (60 min) | |||
| I | Bi2GdO4Cl | λ ≥ 420 nm | Water splitting | 14.8 μmol∙h−1/3.4 μmol∙h−1 | |||
| Cl, Br, I | Bi2O2(OH)(NO3) | Solar irradiation | CO2 reduction | 8.12 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 (Br)/ 0.11 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 | |||
| I | Bi4Ti3O12 | Solar irradiation | CO2 reduction | 10.8 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 (Br)/ 1.7 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 | |||
| Cl, Br, I | Bi2MoO6 | Solar irradiation | N2 reduction | 10.56 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 (I)/ 3.00 µmol∙g−1∙h−1 | |||
| Non halogen | B | 0.27 Å | Bi3O4Cl | 420 nm ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | Ciprofloxacin degradation | 91.2 %/barely change (12 h) | |
| C | 0.16 Å | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | NO oxidation | 40.6%/5.4% (5 min) | ||
| C | Bi3O4Cl | λ ≥ 420 nm | Water splitting | 80%/0.6% | |||
| C | Bi2MoO6 | Visible light | NO oxidation | 60.0%/29.9% (230 min) | |||
| C | BiOI | Sunlight Visible light | N2 reduction MO degraddation | 311 µmol∙L−1∙g−1∙h−1/83.6 µmol∙L−1∙g−1∙h−1 0.136 min−1/0.025 min−1 | |||
| N | 1.71 Å (N3−) | Bi2WO6 | λ > 290 nm | RhB degradation | 90%/30%–45% (60 min) | ||
| Si | 0.42 Å | Bi2O2CO3 | Visible light | RhB degradation MO degradation MB degradation | 50%/− 10%/− 80%/− | ||
| P | 0.34 Å | BiOx | Visible light | Cr degradation RhB degradation | 84%/67% (180 min) 96%/81% (120 min) | ||
| P | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | TC degradation | 81.0%/29.1% (30 min) |
表3
"
| Dopants | Pristine materials | Light source | Application | Enhanced photocatalytic Activity/pristine | Ref. |
| Ni and F | α-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 0.0215 min−1/0.0071 min−1 | |
| In and S | BiOCl | λ > 420 nm | TC degradation | 81%/53.2% (120 min) | |
| La and B | BiVO4 | λ > 420 nm | MO degradation | 0.030 min−1/0.004 min−1 | |
| Mo and S | BiOCl | λ ≥ 420 nm | RhB degradation TC-HCl degradation | 97.24%/20.4% (60 min) 0.0059 min−1/0.0005 min−1 | |
| Ti and N | TiO2/Bi2WO6 | UV light | MB degradation | 98%/65% (50 min) | |
| Te and V | δ-Bi2O3 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 0.0212 min−1/0.0097 min−1 | |
| Te and Ti | Bi3Nb17O47 | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 95%/Greater than 35% (240 min) | |
| Sn and C | bismuth titanate | Sunlight | MG degradation | 90%/− | |
| Eu and F | BiVO4 | Visible light | MB degradation | 0.025 min−1/0.01594 min−1 | |
| Ag and C | Bi2WO6 | λ > 420 nm | MB degradation | 95.1%/56.2% (3 h) |
表4
"
| Deposition | Pristine materials | Light source | Application | Enhanced photocatalytic Activity/pristine | Ref. |
| Au Pd | BiVO4 | λ > 420 nm | O2 reduction | 1.37 mmol∙L−1/9.88 μmol∙L−1 | |
| Au | BiOX (X = Cl, Br) | λ > 420 nm | RhB degradation | 92%/85% (60 min) | |
| Au | Bi2MoO6 | λ > 420 nm | CO2 reduction | 37.6 μmol∙g−1∙L−1/1.3 μmol∙g−1∙L−1 | |
| Au | BiOI | Visible light | Oxytetracycline degradation | Almost no change | |
| Ag | BiPO4/BiOBr/BiFeO3 | UV light Visible light NIR light | Norfloxacin degradation | 99.1%/85.6% (45 min) 98.3%/− (90 min) 30.2%/− (120 min) | |
| Ag | BiVO4 | λ = 470 nm | 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic degradation | 90%/40% (240 min) | |
| Ag | Bi2O2CO3 | λ > 420 nm | NO oxidation | 54%/22% (35 min) | |
| Au | Bi24O31Br10 | Sunlight | MO degradation | 91%/55% (120 min) | |
| Pt or Pd or Ag | BiVO4 | Visible light | BPA degradation | 0.028 min−1 or 0.013 min−1 or 0.005 min−1 | |
| Pt | Bi2MoO6 | λ > 420 nm | 2, 4-dibromophenol degradation | 3.86%/1.32% (quantum efficiency) | |
| Ag | RGO/Bi2MoO6 | 310 nm < λ < 800 nm | Phenol degradation | 97.5%/26.5% (300 min) |
| 1 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127877 |
| 2 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137757 |
| 3 |
doi: 10.1039/D1NR05797A |
| 4 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.121039 |
| 5 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125217 |
| 6 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.202005256 |
| 7 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.037 |
| 8 |
doi: 10.1002/sstr.202200188 |
| 9 |
胡程; 黄洪伟. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39, 2212048.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212048 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138599 |
| 11 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134104 |
| 12 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149970 |
| 13 |
doi: 10.1039/D1NR03187B |
| 14 |
doi: 10.1080/01614940.2022.2057044 |
| 15 |
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111843 |
| 16 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142694 |
| 17 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141271 |
| 18 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140157 |
| 19 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139456 |
| 20 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139819 |
| 21 |
doi: 10.1039/D2TA08812F |
| 22 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127554 |
| 23 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121319 |
| 24 |
doi: 10.1002/smll.201901008 |
| 25 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.099 |
| 26 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.003 |
| 27 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160391 |
| 28 |
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800980 |
| 29 |
doi: 10.1039/C7TA00315C |
| 30 |
doi: 10.1002/cctc.201000314 |
| 31 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.165 |
| 32 |
doi: 10.1007/s12274-018-2404-x |
| 33 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121879 |
| 34 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109581 |
| 35 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.11.029 |
| 36 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125147 |
| 37 |
doi: 10.1007/s12274-021-3431-y |
| 38 |
doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b02200 |
| 39 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00772 |
| 40 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.053 |
| 41 |
doi: 10.3390/ma15030961 |
| 42 |
doi: 10.1080/02726351.2019.1570991 |
| 43 |
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135171 |
| 44 |
doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.11.041 |
| 45 |
doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.08.043 |
| 46 |
doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030[98]00452-3 |
| 47 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.070 |
| 48 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137729 |
| 49 |
doi: 10.1021/es101006s |
| 50 |
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.119 |
| 51 |
doi: 10.1007/s10854-019-01869-x |
| 52 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123457 |
| 53 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.036 |
| 54 |
doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121953 |
| 55 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.103 |
| 56 |
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067[18]63056-6 |
| 57 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119911 |
| 58 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126012 |
| 59 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.05.053 |
| 60 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.201705628 |
| 61 |
doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.203 |
| 62 |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127616 |
| 63 |
doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c03042 |
| 64 |
doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.165 |
| 65 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.02.012 |
| 66 |
doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1865-0 |
| 67 |
doi: 10.18178/ijmmm.2018.6.3.383 |
| 68 |
doi: 10.1007/s41779-021-00665-3 |
| 69 |
doi: 10.1007/s41779-022-00765-8 |
| 70 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153914 |
| 71 |
doi: 10.3390/catal9020198 |
| 72 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122462 |
| 73 |
doi: 10.1039/D1NA00223F |
| 74 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.098 |
| 75 |
doi: 10.1039/C9TC00215D |
| 76 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.197 |
| 77 |
doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.04.025 |
| 78 |
doi: 10.1016/0925-8388[96]02293-1 |
| 79 |
doi: 10.1007/s10853-020-04802-4 |
| 80 |
doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4344-0 |
| 81 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201802685 |
| 82 |
doi: 10.1039/D1NR05691C |
| 83 |
doi: 10.1039/D0TA09729B |
| 84 |
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00444 |
| 85 |
doi: 10.1039/D1QI01623G |
| 86 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.146 |
| 87 |
doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.046 |
| 88 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.137 |
| 89 |
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129960 |
| 90 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.116970 |
| 91 |
doi: 10.1111/ijac.13600 |
| 92 |
doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.04.019 |
| 93 |
doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.03.005 |
| 94 |
doi: 10.1002/jctb.4034 |
| 95 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2013.10.028 |
| 96 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.015 |
| 97 |
doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.05.029 |
| 98 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.254 |
| 99 |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137540 |
| 100 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.051 |
| 101 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.124 |
| 102 |
doi: 10.1007/s12666-016-0897-5 |
| 103 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.078 |
| 104 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123174 |
| 105 |
doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b14300 |
| 106 |
doi: 10.1039/C7CC02890C |
| 107 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.066 |
| 108 |
doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b08109 |
| 109 |
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067[15]61054-3 |
| 110 |
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009 |
| 111 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.201900546 |
| 112 |
doi: 10.3390/molecules201019189 |
| 113 |
doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.12.023 |
| 114 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.101 |
| 115 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.022 |
| 116 |
doi: 10.1002/chem.202202004 |
| 117 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126543 |
| 118 |
doi: 10.1002/anie.202106310 |
| 119 |
doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00847 |
| 120 |
doi: 10.1039/D0QI00673D |
| 121 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231990 |
| 122 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.057 |
| 123 |
doi: 10.1039/C3NR03597B |
| 124 |
doi: 10.1021/jp0756350 |
| 125 |
doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.068 |
| 126 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134683 |
| 127 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118309 |
| 128 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130364 |
| 129 |
doi: 10.1007/s40195-013-0009-z |
| 130 |
doi: 10.1142/s1793292014500945 |
| 131 |
doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.011 |
| 132 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.101 |
| 133 |
doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067[20]63612-9 |
| 134 |
doi: 10.1002/adma.201600301 |
| 135 |
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703923 |
| 136 |
doi: 10.1007/s11467-016-0577-2 |
| 137 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.03.091 |
| 138 |
doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aae633 |
| 139 |
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108066 |
| 140 |
doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101279 |
| 141 |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137742 |
| 142 |
doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.205 |
| 143 |
doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100228 |
| 144 |
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721[12]60373-1 |
| 145 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153172 |
| 146 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.122 |
| 147 |
doi: 10.1039/d2nj03655j |
| 148 |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.042 |
| 149 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.067 |
| 150 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136429 |
| 151 |
doi: 10.1021/cr3000626 |
| 152 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.060 |
| 153 |
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124778 |
| 154 |
doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.06.010 |
| 155 |
doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201600300 |
| 156 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.016 |
| 157 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117625 |
| 158 |
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.024 |
| 159 |
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12853-8 |
| 160 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133540 |
| 161 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112163 |
| 162 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.006 |
| 163 |
doi: 10.1039/c4dt00427b |
| 164 |
doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113888 |
| 165 |
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124946 |
| 166 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123686 |
| 167 |
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122810 |
| 168 |
doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108693 |
| [1] | 罗雅丹, 郑浩, 李鑫, 李锋民, 唐华, 佘希林. 调节O, S共掺杂C3N4中的活性氧生成以促进光催化降解微塑料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(6): 100052 - . |
| [2] | 肖林锋, 任婉璐, 沈诗诗, 陈梦姗, 廖润华, 周英棠, 李喜宝. 调控ZnIn2S4/Bi2O3 S型异质结的电子结构和润湿性增强光催化析氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2308036 - . |
| [3] | Faizan Muhammad, 赵国琪, 张天旭, 王啸宇, 贺欣, 张立军. 空位有序双钙钛矿A2BX6的弹性和热电性质的第一性原理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303004 - . |
| [4] | 罗耀武, 王定胜. 单原子催化剂电子结构调控实现高效多相催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212020 -0 . |
| [5] | 唐甜蜜, 王振旅, 管景奇. 调控单位点M-N-C电催化剂的电子结构提升二氧化碳还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2208033 -0 . |
| [6] | 郑书逸, 吴佳, 王可, 胡梦晨, 文欢, 尹诗斌. 钴掺杂电子调控Ni-Mo-O多孔纳米棒选择性氧化5-羟甲基糠醛耦合制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2301032 - . |
| [7] | 陈鹏, 周莹, 董帆. 二维光催化材料电子结构和性能调控策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2010010 - . |
| [8] | 李亚文, 那广仁, 罗树林, 贺欣, 张立军. 全无机卤化铅钙钛矿的结构、热力学稳定性和电子性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(4): 2007015 - . |
| [9] | 郑堂飞, 蒋金霞, 王健, 胡素芳, 丁炜, 魏子栋. 基于限域特性的电催化剂调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(11): 2011027 - . |
| [10] | 施俊杰, 胡子琦, 杨逸豪, 步宇翔, 施祖进. 内嵌金属碳氮化物团簇富勒烯的稳定性与生成机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 1907077 - . |
| [11] | 王亦清,沈少华. 非金属掺杂石墨相氮化碳光催化的研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905080 - . |
| [12] | 毕富珍,郑晓,任志勇. 甲胺基-甲脒基混合钙钛矿的第一性原理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 69 -75 . |
| [13] | 奚晋扬,中村悠马,赵天琦,王冬,帅志刚. 石墨炔与锡烯层状体系的形变势和电声耦合及载流子传输理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(9): 961 -976 . |
| [14] | 尹玥琪,蒋梦绪,刘春光. Keggin型多酸负载的单原子催化剂(M1/POM, M = Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, POM = [PW12O40]3-)活化氮气分子的密度泛函理论计算研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 270 -277 . |
| [15] | 申海波,江浩,刘易斯,郝佳瑜,李文章,李洁. 氮、硫共掺杂的碳负载的钴@碳化钴:一种高效的非贵金属氧还原电催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1811 -1821 . |
|
||