电容去离子除氯电极的构建及其脱盐性能研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006037

Abstract

Abstract:

Sustainable freshwater supply is a grave challenge to the society because of the severe water scarcity and global pollution. Seawater is an inexhaustible source of industrial and potable water. The relevant desalination technologies with a high market share include reverse osmosis and thermal distillation, which are energy-intensive. Capacitive deionization (CDI) is a desalination technology that is gaining extensive attention because of its low energy consumption and low chemical intensity. In CDI, charged species are removed from the aqueous environment via applying a voltage onto the anode and cathode. For desalination, Na⁺ and Cl^- ions are removed by the cathode and anode, respectively. With the boom in electrode materials for rechargeable batteries, the Na⁺ removal electrode (cathode) has evolved from a carbon-based electrode to a faradaic electrode, and the desalination performance of CDI has also been significantly enhanced. A conventional carbon-based electrode captures ions in the electrical double layer (EDL) and suffers from low charge efficiency, thus being unsuitable for use in water with high salinity. On the other hand, a faradaic electrode stores Na⁺ ions through a reversible redox process or intercalation, leading to high desalination capacity.However, the Cl^- removal electrode (anode) has not yet seen notable development. Most research groups employ activated carbon to remove Cl^-, and therefore, summarizing Cl^- storage electrodes for CDI is necessary to guide the design of electrode systems with better desalination performance. First, this review outlines the evolution of CDI configuration based on the electrode materials, suggesting that the anode and cathode are of equal importance in CDI. Second, a systematic summary of the anode materials used in CDI and a comparison of the characteristics of different electrodes, including those based on Ag/AgCl, Bi/BiOCl, 2-dimensional (2D) materials (layered double hydroxide (LDH) and MXene), redox polymers, and electrolytes, are presented. Then, the underlying mechanism for Cl^- storage is refined. Similar to the case of Na⁺ storage, traditional carbon electrodes store Cl- via electrosorption based on the EDL. Ag/AgCl and Bi/BiOCl remove Cl^- through a conversion reaction, i.e., phase transformation during the reaction with Cl^-. 2D materials store Cl^- in the space between adjacent layers, a process referred as ion intercalation, with layered double hydroxide (LDH) and MXene showing higher Cl^- storage potential. Redox polymers and electrolytes allow for Cl^- storage via redox reactions. Among all the materials mentioned above, Bi/BiOCl and LDH are the most promising for the construction of CDI anodes because of their high capacity and low cost. Finally, to spur the development of novel anodes for CDI, the electrodes applied in a chlorine ion battery are introduced. This is the first paper to comb through reports on the development of anode materials for CDI, thus laying the theoretical foundation for future materials design.

Key words: Capacitive deionization, Desalination, Anode, Chlorine ion, Battery

Yuecheng Xiong, Fei Yu, Jie Ma. Research Progress in Chlorine Ion Removal Electrodes for Desalination by Capacitive Deionization[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(5), 2006037. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006037

Figures/Tables 7

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 1

References 79

1	Hoekstra A. Y. ; Mekonnen M. M. ; Chapagain A. K. ; Mathews R. E. ; Richter B. D. PLoS One 2012, 7, e32688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032688
2	Shannon M. A. ; Bohn P. W. ; Elimelech M. ; Georgiadis J. G. ; Marinas B. J. ; Mayes A. M. Nature 2008, 452, 301. doi: 10.1038/nature06599
3	Subramani A. ; Jacangelo J. G. Water Res. 2015, 75, 164. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.032
4	Porada S. ; Zhao R. ; van der Wal A. ; Presser V. ; Biesheuvel P. M. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58, 1388. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.005
5	Tan C. ; He C. ; Fletcher J. ; Waite T. D. Water Res. 2020, 168, 115146. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115146
6	Zhou X. ; Zhao F. ; Guo Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Yu G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1985. doi: 10.1039/c8ee00567b
7	Liu Y. ; Jiang Z. ; Zhang X. ; Shen P. K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 20037. doi: 10.1039/c8ta07587e
8	Suss M. E. ; Porada S. ; Sun X. ; Biesheuvel P. M. ; Yoon J. ; Presser V. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2296. doi: 10.1039/c5ee00519a
9	Cao J. ; Wang Y. ; Chen C. ; Yu F. ; Ma J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 518, 69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.019
10	Ma J. ; Wang L. ; Yu F. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 263, 40. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.041
11	Suss M. E. ; Presser V. Joule 2018, 2, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.12.010
12	Zhang C. ; He D. ; Ma J. ; Tang W. ; Waite T. D. Water Res. 2018, 128, 314. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.024
13	Yu F. ; Wang L. ; Wang Y. ; Shen X. ; Cheng Y. ; Ma J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15999. doi: 10.1039/c9ta01264h
14	Ma J. ; Xiong Y. ; Dai X. ; Yu F. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 118. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00027
15	Pasta M. ; Wessells C. D. ; Cui Y. ; La Mantia F. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 839. doi: 10.1021/nl203889e
16	Cao J. ; Wang Y. ; Wang L. ; Yu F. ; Ma J. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 823. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04006
17	Wang K. ; Liu Y. ; Ding Z. ; Li Y. ; Lu T. ; Pan L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 12126. doi: 10.1039/c9ta01106d
18	Ma J. ; Wang L. ; Yu F. ; Dai X. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 938. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.243
19	Ding Z. ; Xu X. ; Li Y. ; Wang K. ; Lu T. ; Pan L. Desalination 2019, 468, 114078. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114078
20	Zhao Y. ; Liang B. ; Wei X. ; Li K. ; Lv C. ; Zhao Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 10464. doi: 10.1039/c8ta12433g
21	Yin H. ; Zhao S. ; Wan J. ; Tang H. ; Chang L. ; He L. ; Zhao H. ; Gao Y. ; Tang Z. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6270. doi: 10.1002/adma.201302223
22	Lee J. ; Kim S. ; Kim C. ; Yoon J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3683. doi: 10.1039/c4ee02378a
23	Chen F. ; Huang Y. ; Guo L. ; Ding M. ; Yang H. Y. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 10101. doi: 10.1039/c7nr01861d
24	Nam D. H. ; Choi K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11055. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01119
25	Chen F. ; Huang Y. ; Guo L. ; Sun L. ; Wang Y. ; Yang H. Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2081. doi: 10.1039/c7ee00855d
26	Biesheuvel P. M. ; van der Wal A. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346, 256. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.043
27	Wu T. ; Wang G. ; Wang S. ; Zhan F. ; Fu Y. ; Qiao H. ; Qiu J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Let. 2018, 5, 98. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00540
28	Xi W. ; Li H. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 764. doi: 10.1039/c9en01238a
29	Smith K. C. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 230, 333. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.006
30	Arulrajan A. C. ; Ramasamy D. L. ; Sillanpaa M. ; van der Wal A. ; Biesheuvel P. M. ; Porada S. ; Dykstra J. E. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1806937. doi: 10.1002/adma.201806937
31	Huang Z. H. ; Yang Z. ; Kang F. ; Inagaki M. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 470. doi: 10.1039/c6ta06733f
32	Wang L. ; Yu F. ; Ma J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1338.
	王雷; 于飞; 马杰. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1338. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704113
33	Liu Y. ; Nie C. ; Liu X. ; Xu X. ; Sun Z. ; Pan L. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15205. doi: 10.1039/c4ra14447c
34	Tang K. ; Hong T. Z. X. ; You L. ; Zhou K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26693. doi: 10.1039/c9ta08663c
35	Srimuk P. ; Su X. ; Yoon J. ; Aurbach D. ; Presser V. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 517. doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-0193-1
36	Sun Z. ; Chai L. ; Liu M. ; Shu Y. ; Li Q. ; Wang Y. ; Wang Q. ; Qiu D. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 191, 424. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.015
37	Zhao W. ; Guo L. ; Ding M. ; Huang Y. ; Yang H. Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40540. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b14014
38	Zhao W. ; Ding M. ; Guo L. ; Yang H. Y. Small 2019, 15, 1805505. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805505
39	Yue Z. ; Ma Y. ; Zhang J. ; Li H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16892. doi: 10.1039/c9ta03570b
40	Srimuk P. ; Husmann S. ; Presser V. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 14849. doi: 10.1039/c9ra02570g
41	Ahn J. ; Lee J. ; Kim S. ; Kim C. ; Lee J. ; Biesheuvel P. M. ; Yoon J. Desalination 2020, 476, 114216. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114216
42	Min X. ; Zhu M. ; He Y. ; Wang Y. ; Deng H. ; Wang S. ; Jin L. ; Wang H. ; Zhang L. ; Chai L. Chemosphere 2020, 251, 126319. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126319
43	Kong H. ; Yang M. ; Miao Y. ; Zhao X. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1900835. doi: 10.1002/ente.201900835
44	Li D. ; Wang S. ; Wang G. ; Li C. ; Che X. ; Wang S. ; Zhang Y. ; Qiu J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 31200. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b10307
45	Srimuk P. ; Kaasik F. ; Krüner B. ; Tolosa A. ; Fleischmann S. ; Jäckel N. ; Tekeli M. C. ; Aslan M. ; Suss M. E. ; Presser V. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 18265. doi: 10.1039/c6ta07833h
46	Khan A. I. ; O'Hare D. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 3191. doi: 10.1039/b204076j
47	Long X. ; Wang Z. ; Xiao S. ; An Y. ; Yang S. Mater. Today 2016, 19, 213. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.006
48	Lv L. ; Yang Z. ; Chen K. ; Wang C. ; Xiong Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803358. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201803358
49	Wang Q. ; O'Hare D. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4124. doi: 10.1021/cr200434v
50	Wang L. ; Wang D. ; Dong X. Y. ; Zhang Z. J. ; Pei X. F. ; Chen X. J. ; Chen B. ; Jin J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3556. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05420h
51	Wimalasiri Y. ; Fan R. ; Zhao X. S. ; Zou L. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 134, 127. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.129
52	Quan W. ; Tang Z. L. ; Wang S. T. ; Hong Y. ; Zhang Z. T. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3694. doi: 10.1039/c5cc08744a
53	Cai P. ; Zheng H. ; Wang C. ; Ma H. ; Hu J. ; Pu Y. ; Liang P. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 213-214, 100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.069
54	Wang J. ; Gao F. ; Du X. ; Ma X. ; Hao X. ; Ma W. ; Wang K. ; Guan G. ; Abudula A. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135288. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135288
55	Ren Q. ; Wang G. ; Wu T. ; He X. ; Wang J. ; Yang J. ; Yu C. ; Qiu J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 6417. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04983
56	Hu C. ; Dong J. ; Wang T. ; Liu R. ; Liu H. ; Qu J. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 475. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.167
57	Wang X. ; Kajiyama S. ; Iinuma H. ; Hosono E. ; Oro S. ; Moriguchi I. ; Okubo M. ; Yamada A. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6544. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7544
58	Naguib M. ; Mochalin V. N. ; Barsoum M. W. ; Gogotsi Y. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304138
59	Pang J. ; Mendes R. G. ; Bachmatiuk A. ; Zhao L. ; Ta H. Q. ; Gemming T. ; Liu H. ; Liu Z. ; Rummeli M. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 72. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00324f
60	Ihsanullah I. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 72. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-0411-9
61	Shen X. ; Xiong Y. ; Hai R. ; Yu F. ; Ma J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4554. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05759
62	Wang D. ; Gao Y. ; Liu Y. ; Gogotsi Y. ; Meng X. ; Chen G. ; Wei Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24720. doi: 10.1039/c7ta09057a
63	Cui H. ; Li Q. ; Qian Y. ; Tang R. ; An H. ; Zhai J. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5736. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.049
64	Silambarasan K. ; Joseph J. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1800601. doi: 10.1002/ente.201800601
65	Li Y. ; Ding Z. ; Li J. ; Wang K. ; Lu T. ; Pan L. Desalination 2020, 481, 114379. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114379
66	Shi Y. ; Zhou X. ; Yu G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2642. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00402
67	Wang Z. ; Xu X. ; Kim J. ; Malgras V. ; Mo R. ; Li C. ; Lin Y. ; Tan H. ; Tang J. ; Pan L. ; et al Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 1433. doi: 10.1039/c9mh00306a
68	Dai J. ; Wang J. ; Hou X. ; Ru Q. ; He Q. ; Srimuk P. ; Presser V. ; Chen F. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 2792. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202000188
69	Dai J. ; Pyae N. L. W. ; Chen F. ; Liang M. ; Wang S. ; Ramalingam K. ; Zhai S. ; Su C. ; Shi Y. ; Tan S. C. ; et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 25728. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c02822
70	Zhao X. ; Ren S. ; Bruns M. ; Fichtner M. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 706. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.001
71	Gao P. ; Reddy M. A. ; Mu X. ; Diemant T. ; Zhang L. ; Zhao-Karger Z. ; Chakravadhanula V. S. ; Clemens O. ; Behm R. J. ; Fichtner M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4285. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509564
72	Lakshmi K. P. ; Janas K. J. ; Shaijumon M. M. J. Power Sources 2019, 433, 126685. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.091
73	Zhao X. ; Zhao Z. ; Yang M. ; Xia H. ; Yu T. ; Shen X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2535. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b14755
74	Zhao Z. ; Yu T. ; Miao Y. ; Zhao X. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 270, 30. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.077
75	Yu T. ; Yang R. ; Zhao X. ; Shen X. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 1761. doi: 10.1002/celc.201801803
76	Yang R. ; Yu T. ; Zhao X. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 788, 407. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.234
77	Chen F. ; Leong Z. Y. ; Yang H. Y. Energy Storage Mater. 2017, 7, 189. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.02.001
78	Hu X. ; Chen F. ; Wang S. ; Ru Q. ; Chu B. ; Wei C. ; Shi Y. ; Ye Z. ; Chu Y. ; Hou X. ; et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9144. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b21652
79	Yin Q. ; Rao D. ; Zhang G. ; Zhao Y. ; Han J. ; Lin K. ; Zheng L. ; Zhang J. ; Zhou J. ; Wei M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1900983. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201900983

Mechanisms	Anode (Cl^- removal)	Cathode (Na⁺ removal)	Current density/(mA∙g^-1)	Initial NaCl concentration/(mg∙L^-1)	Applied voltage/V	Cl^- removal capacity/(mg∙g^-1)	Ref.
Electrosorption	GAC	graphite	–	1000	1.2*	5.60	35
Conversion reactions	AgCl	Na_0.44MnO₂	100	890	-1.0 – 1.5	34.78	23
	AgCl	Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃@C	100	1000	-1.4 – 1.4	59.39	36
	AgCl@GA	Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃@GA	100	1000	-1.4 – 1.4	65.17	37
	Ag@rGO	Na_1.1V₃O_7.9@rGO	–	2000	1.4*	49.81	38
	Ag	AgCl	100	35100	-0.1 – 0.1	69.69	39
	Ag	AgCl	1 mA∙cm^-2	29250	-0.2 – 0.2	51.51	40
	Bi	NaTi₂(PO₄)₃	1 mA∙cm^-2	35100	0–1.1	169.6 (theoretical)	24
	BiOCl	Na_0.44MnO₂	100	760	-1.4 – 1.5	41.51	25
	Bi/rGO	AC	–	585	-1.2/1.2*	37.93	41
Ion intercalation	CuAl-LDO//AC	AC	–	1000	1.2*	38.78	28
Ion intercalation	Ti₃C₂T_x	Ti₃C₂T_x	–	293	0/1.2*	7.88	60
Redox reactions	PTMA	AC	–	250	0/1.2*	8.42	64

[1]	Shan Zhao, Xu Liu, Haotian Guo, Zonglin Liu, Pengfei Wang, Jie Shu, Tingfeng Yi. Synergistic design of high-entropy P2/O3 biphasic cathodes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2026, 42(1): 100129-.
[2]	Xintong Zhu, Bin Cao, Chong Yan, Cheng Tang, Aibing Chen, Qiang Zhang. Advances in coating strategies for graphite anodes in lithium-ion batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100096-.
[3]	Shuhong Xiang, Lv Yang, Yingsheng Xu, Guoxin Cao, Hongjian Zhou. Selective electrosorption of Cs(Ⅰ) from high-salinity radioactive wastewater using CNT-interspersed potassium zinc ferrocyanide electrodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100097-.
[4]	Jingping Li, Suding Yan, Jiaxi Wu, Qiang Cheng, Kai Wang. Improving hydrogen peroxide photosynthesis over inorganic/organic S-scheme photocatalyst with LiFePO₄ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100104-.
[5]	Qianli Ma, Tianbing Song, Tianle He, Xirong Zhang, Huanming Xiong. Sulfur-doped carbon dots: a novel bifunctional electrolyte additive for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100106-.
[6]	Minglei Sun, Zhong-Yong Yuan. Valorization strategies for electrodegradation of nitrogenous wastes in sewage [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100108-.
[7]	Liangliang Song, Haoyan Liang, Shunqing Li, Bao Qiu, Zhaoping Liu. Challenges and strategies on high-manganese Li-rich layered oxide cathodes for ultrahigh-energy-density batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100085-.
[8]	Caiyun Jin, Zexuan Wu, Guopeng Li, Zhan Luo, Nian-Wu Li. Phosphazene-based flame-retardant artificial interphase layer for lithium metal batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100094-.
[9]	Zeqiu Chen, Limiao Cai, Jie Guan, Zhanyang Li, Hao Wang, Yaoguang Guo, Xingtao Xu, Likun Pan. Advanced electrode materials in capacitive deionization for efficient lithium extraction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100089-.
[10]	Jun Huang, Pengfei Nie, Yongchao Lu, Jiayang Li, Yiwen Wang, Jianyun Liu. Efficient adsorption of hardness ions by a mordenite-loaded, nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanofiber cathode in capacitive deionization [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(7): 100066-.
[11]	Yihan Xue, Xue Han, Jie Zhang, Xiaoru Wen. Efficient capacitive desalination over NCQDs decorated FeOOH composite [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(7): 100072-.
[12]	Lingbang Qiu, Jiangmin Jiang, Libo Wang, Lang Bai, Fei Zhou, Gaoyu Zhou, Quanchao Zhuang, Yanhua Cui. In Situ Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Monitoring of the High-Temperature Double-Discharge Mechanism of Nb₁₂WO₃₃ Cathode Material for Long-Life Thermal Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(5): 100040-.
[13]	Yuyao Wang, Zhitao Cao, Zeyu Du, Xinxin Cao, Shuquan Liang. Research Progress of Iron-based Polyanionic Cathode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(4): 100035-.
[14]	Aoyu Huang, Jun Xu, Yu Huang, Gui Chu, Mao Wang, Lili Wang, Yongqi Sun, Zhen Jiang, Xiaobo Zhu. Tailoring Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces via a Simple Slurry Additive for Stable High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(4): 100037-.
[15]	Guoze Yan, Bin Zuo, Shaoqing Liu, Tao Wang, Ruoyu Wang, Jinyang Bao, Zhongzhou Zhao, Feifei Chu, Zhengtong Li, Yamauchi Yusuke, Melhi Saad, Xingtao Xu. Opportunities and Challenges of Capacitive Deionization for Uranium Extraction from Seawater [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(4): 100032-.

Research Progress in Chlorine Ion Removal Electrodes for Desalination by Capacitive Deionization

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 79

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0