棒状金属有机框架结构PCN-222(Cu)/TiO2复合材料的制备及其高效光催化CO2还原性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905086

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

受环境污染和能源短缺的双重压迫，光催化CO₂还原技术引起了人们的广泛关注。低成本光催化材料的开发对于实现有效的太阳能-燃料转换至关重要。TiO₂作为光催化剂在光催化CO₂还原中被广泛采用。然而，较宽的禁带宽度和光生载流子的复合限制了它的进一步应用。在这项工作中，我们使用棒状PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料作为光催化剂，使用简单的水热法报告了二氧化碳的光化学还原。经过对PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂进行一系列X射线衍射(XRD)，扫描电子显微镜(SEM)，紫外-可见漫反射光谱(DRS)，傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)，光电化学(PEC)和光致发光光谱(PL)等表征结果证明成功制备了该复合材料。SEM证实，TiO₂颗粒均匀分布在棒状PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂的表面上。XRD结果表明，成功制备了具有良好晶体结构的PCN-222(Cu)和PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合光催化剂。DRS显示制备的PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料在可见光区域出现金属卟啉的特征吸收峰。PL和瞬态光电流响应和电化学阻抗谱(EIS)进一步证实了棒状PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂具有更好的电子-空穴对分离效率。通过控制PCN-222(Cu)和TiO₂的质量比，经CO₂还原性能测试表明，10% PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料具有最佳的催化活性。在氙灯照射下，棒状PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂表现出比TiO₂纳米颗粒更好的光催化CO₂活性，这归因于电荷传输和较好的电子-空穴分离能力。10% PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料的催化效率最高，产率分别为13.24 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ CO和1.73 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ CH₄。此外，经过三个循环的测试，PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂光催化剂的催化活性基本保持不变，在连续8小时光照下，催化剂的还原产率持续增加，表明PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料具有好的稳定性。禁带宽度和Mote-Schottky (M-S)曲线结果表明，PCN-222(Cu)的LUMO位比TiO₂的导带(CB)更负，因此提出了PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料可能的光催化反应机理。该研究为金属有机骨架和氧化物半导体复合材料光催化体系提供了新的策略。

关键词: 复合材料, 金属有机框架, PCN-222(Cu), 光催化CO₂还原, TiO₂

Abstract:

The photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ has attracted considerable attention owing to the dual suppression of environmental pollution and energy shortage. The technology uses solar energy to convert carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuel, which is of great significance for achieving the carbon cycle. The development of low-cost photocatalytic materials is critical to achieving efficient solar energy to fuels conversion. One of the most commonly employed photocatalysts is TiO₂. However, it suffers from broad band gap as well as the recombination of photo-excited holes and electron. Hence, in this work, we report the photochemical reduction of CO₂ using rod-like PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composites as photocatalyst through a simple hydrothermal method, in which TiO₂ nanoparticles are anchored at the interface of the SiC rod PCN-222(Cu). Multiple characterization techniques were used to analyze the structure, morphology, and properties of the PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composite. A series of characterizations including X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, photo-electrochemical, and photoluminescence (PL) confirm the successful preparation of PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composites. SEM reveals that the TiO₂ nanoparticles are uniformly distributed on the surface of the rod-shaped PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂. XRD results show that PCN-222(Cu) and PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composite photocatalysts with good crystal structure were successfully synthesized. According to the DRS results, the prepared PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composite samples exhibit characteristic absorption peaks of metalloporphyrins in the visible region. PL spectroscopy, transient photocurrent response, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy further confirm that the rod-like PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ samples have high electron-hole pair separation efficiency. By controlling the mass ratio of PCN-222(Cu) and TiO₂, the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction performance test shows that the 10% PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composite achieves optimal catalytic performance, yielding 13.24 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ CO and 1.73 μmol·g⁻¹·h⁻¹ CH₄, respectively. All the rod-like PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composites exhibit better photocatalytic CO₂ activity than that of TiO₂ nanoparticles or PCN-222(Cu) under the illumination of xenon lamps, which is attributed to charge transport and electron-hole separation capabilities. After three test cycles, the catalytic activity of PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ photocatalyst was virtually unchanged. The reduction yield of the catalyst increased for 8 h under continuous illumination, indicating that PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composites have acceptable stability. The estimation of the band gap curve and the Mote-Schottky curve test show that the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital position of PCN-222(Cu) is more negative than the TiO₂ of the conduction band; hence, a possible photocatalytic reaction mechanism of the PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ composite is proposed. This study provides a new strategy for the integration of metal-organic frameworks and oxide semiconductors to construct efficient photocatalytic systems.

Key words: Composite, Metal-organic frameworks, PCN-222(Cu), Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction, TiO₂

段树华,巫树锋,王磊,佘厚德,黄静伟,王其召. 棒状金属有机框架结构PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料的制备及其高效光催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3), 1905086. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905086

Shuhua Duan,Shufeng Wu,Lei Wang,Houde She,Jingwei Huang,Qizhao Wang. Rod-Shaped Metal Organic Framework Structured PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ Composites for Efficient Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2020, 36(3), 1905086. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905086

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905086

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I3/1905086

图/表 8

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

参考文献 45

1	Wang C. -C. ; Zhang Y. -Q. ; Li J. ; Wang P. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1083, 127. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.11.036
2	Ran J. ; Jaroniec M. ; Qiao S. Z. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704649. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704649
3	Lingampalli S. R. ; Ayyub M. M. ; Rao C. N. R. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2740. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00721
4	Zhou M. ; Wang S. ; Yang P. ; Luo Z. ; Yuan R. ; Asiri A. M. ; Wakeel M. ; Wang X. Chem. 2018, 24, 18529. doi: 10.1002/chem.201803250
5	Sadeghi N. ; Sharifnia S. ; Sheikh Arabi M. J. CO₂ Utilization 2016, 16, 450. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2016.10.006
6	Li R. ; Hu J. ; Deng M. ; Wang H. ; Wang X. ; Hu Y. ; Jiang H.L. ; Jiang J. ; Zhang Q. ; Xie Y. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4783. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400428
7	She H. ; Zhou H. ; Li L. ; Zhao Z. ; Jiang M. ; Huang J. ; Wang L. ; Wang Q. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 6, 650. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04250
8	Tian H. ; Shen K. ; Hu X. ; Qiao L. ; Zheng W. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 691, 369. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.261
9	Li X. ; Xiong J. ; Huang J. ; Feng Z. ; Luo J. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 774, 768. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.034
10	Kuang P. ; Su Y. ; Li N. ; Luo N. ; Xing S. ; Liu Z. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 296 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.066
11	Tian H. ; Liu M. ; Zheng W. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 225, 468. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.019
12	Li X. ; Xiong J. ; Xu Y. ; Feng Z. ; Huang J. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 424. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63183-3
13	Ning X. ; Li J. ; Yang B. ; Zhen W. ; Li Z. ; Tian B. ; Lu G. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 212, 129. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.074
14	Zhu C. ; Liu C. ; Zhou Y. ; Fu Y. ; Guo S. ; Li H. ; Zhao S. ; Huang H. ; Liu Y. ; Kang Z. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 216, 114. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.049
15	She H. ; Li L. ; Sun Y. ; Wang L. ; Huang J. ; Zhu G. ; Wang Q. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 457, 1167. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.045
16	Wang Q. ; Niu T. ; Wang L. ; Yan C. ; Huang J. ; He J. ; She H. ; Su B. ; Bi Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 506. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017012.126
17	Xu H. Q. ; Hu J. ; Wang D. ; Li Z. ; Zhang Q. ; Luo Y. ; Yu S. H. ; Jiang H. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13440. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08773
18	Sanz-Perez E. S. ; Murdock C. R. ; Didas S. A. ; Jones C. W. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11840. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173
19	Wang Y. ; Zhao J. ; Li Y. ; Wang C. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 226, 544. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.005
20	Pelaez M. ; Nolan N. T. ; Pillai S. C. ; Seery M. K. ; Falaras P. ; Kontos A. G. ; Dunlop P. S. M. ; Hamilton J. W. J. ; Byrne J. A. ; O'Shea K. ; et al Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2012, 125, 331. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036
21	Li N. ; Liu M. ; Yang B. ; Shu W. ; Shen Q. ; Liu M. ; Zhou J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 2923. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12683
22	Ning X. ; Li J. ; Yang B. ; Zhen W. ; Li Z. ; Tian B. ; Lu G. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 212, 129. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.074
23	Ong W. -J. ; Tan L. -L. ; Chai S. -P. ; Yong S. -T. ; Mohamed A. R. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 1528. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0514-z
24	Rengifo-Herrera J. A. ; Kiwi J. ; Pulgarin C. J. Photochem. Photobio. A 2009, 205, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.04.015
25	Li K. ; Lin L. ; Peng T. ; Guo Y. ; Li R. ; Zhang J. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12443. doi: 10.1039/c5cc03812j
26	Xu F. ; Zhang J. ; Zhu B. ; Yu J. ; Xu J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 230, 194. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.042
27	Shen K. ; Xue X. ; Wang X. ; Hu X. ; Tian H. ; Zheng W. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 23319. doi: 10.1039/c7ra01856h
28	Lian X. ; Fang Y. ; Joseph E. ; Wang Q. ; Li J. ; Banerjee S. ; Lollar C. ; Wang X. ; Zhou H. -C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3386. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00058h
29	Feng D. ; Gu Z. Y. ; Li J. R. ; Jiang H. L. ; Wei Z. ; Zhou H. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10307. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204475
30	Jiao L. ; Wan G. ; Zhang R. ; Zhou H. ; Yu S. H. ; Jiang H. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8525. doi: 10.1002/anie.201803262
31	Jiao L. ; Wang Y. ; Jiang H. L. ; Xu Q. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703663. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703663
32	Zhang H. ; Wei J. ; Dong J. ; Liu G. ; Shi L. ; An P. ; Zhao G. ; Kong J. ; Wang X. ; Meng X. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14310. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608597
33	Yang Q. ; Xu Q. ; Jiang H. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4774. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00724d
34	Chen Y. Z. ; Wang Z. U. ; Wang H. ; Lu J. ; Yu S. H. ; Jiang H. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2035. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12074
35	Liu M. ; Xue X. ; Yu S. ; Wang X. ; Hu X. ; Tian H. ; Chen H. ; Zheng W. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03911-6
36	Wang L. ; Duan S. ; Jin P. ; She H. ; Huang J. ; Lei Z. ; Zhang T. ; Wang Q. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 239, 599. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.007
37	Wang L. ; Jin P. ; Duan S. ; She H. ; Huang J. ; Wang Q. Sci. Bul. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.05.012
38	Wang Q. ; He J. ; Wang L. ; Shi Y. ; Zhang S. ; Niu T. ; She H. ; Bi Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 326, 411. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.171
39	Xu X. ; Liu R. ; Cui Y. ; Liang X. ; Lei C. ; Meng S. ; Ma Y. ; Lei Z. ; Yang Z. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017, 210, 484. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.021
40	Safaei E. ; Mohebbi S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3933. doi: 10.1039/c5ta09357k
41	Chen D. ; Wang K. ; Hong W. ; Zong R. ; Yao W. ; Zhu Y. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 166, 366. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.050
42	Wei M. ; Wan J. ; Hu Z. ; Peng Z. ; Wang B. ; Wang H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 267. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.161
43	Zhou S. ; Yue P. ; Huang J. ; Wang L. ; She H. ; Wang Q. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 885. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.124
44	Li X. ; Pi Y. ; Hou Q. ; Yu H. ; Li Z. ; Li Y. ; Xiao J. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1917. doi: 10.1039/c7cc09072b
45	Yan S. ; Ouyang S. ; Xu H. ; Zhao M. ; Zhang X. ; Ye J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15126. doi: 10.1039/c6ta04620g

[1]	陈瑶, 陈存, 曹雪松, 王震宇, 张楠, 刘天西. CO₂和N₂电还原中缺陷及界面工程的最新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212053 -0 .
[2]	赵信硕, 邱海燕, 邵依, 王攀捷, 余石龙, 李海, 周郁斌, 周战, 马录芳, 谭超良. 银纳米粒子修饰的二维金属-有机框架纳米片用于光热增强银离子释放抗菌[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2211043 -0 .
[3]	张怡宁, 高明, 陈松涛, 王会琴, 霍鹏伟. Ag/CN/ZnIn₂S₄ S型异质结等离子体光催化剂的制备及其增强光还原CO₂研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2211051 - .
[4]	罗铖, 龙庆, 程蓓, 朱必成, 王临曦. Pt-C₃N₄/BiOCl S型异质结应用于光催化CO₂还原的理论计算研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2212026 - .
[5]	项景超, 李静君, 杨雪, 高水英, 曹荣. 阳离子镍基MOF自组装CdS/PFC-8催化剂用于可见光光催化选择性苯甲醇氧化耦合产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2205039 -0 .
[6]	吕娜, 荆雪东, 许瑶, 鲁巍, 刘奎朝, 张振翼. 多组分纳米纤维体系中载流子动力学的有效级联调制及其高效光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2207045 -0 .
[7]	孔菁, 张金贵, 张素芬, 奚菊群, 沈明. 可见光激发的BiOI/ZnO纳米复合抗菌剂制备及其抗菌活性与机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2212039 - .
[8]	焦卓浩, 赵心远, 赵健, 谢瑶, 侯胜利, 赵斌. [Co₃]簇基金属有机框架材料实现“一石二鸟”高效催化CO₂转化为噁唑烷酮[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(11): 2301018 - .
[9]	杨越, 朱加伟, 王鹏彦, 刘海咪, 曾炜豪, 陈磊, 陈志祥, 木士春. 镶嵌于NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti)衍生氮掺多孔碳中的花状超细纳米TiO₂作为高活性和稳定性的锂离子电池负极材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106002 - .
[10]	彭景淞, 程群峰. 仿鲍鱼壳石墨烯多功能纳米复合材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2005006 - .
[11]	王键, 尹波, 高天, 王星懿, 李望, 洪兴星, 汪竹青, 何海勇. 还原氧化石墨烯改性少层剥离石墨增强石墨基钾离子电池负极稳定性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012088 - .
[12]	张梦迪, 陈蓓, 吴明铂. 石墨烯作为硫载体在锂硫电池中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2101001 - .
[13]	何科林, 沈荣晨, 郝磊, 李佑稷, 张鹏, 江吉周, 李鑫. 纳米SiC基光催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2201021 - .
[14]	周易, 欧阳威龙, 王岳军, 王海强, 吴忠标. 核壳结构NH₂-UiO-66@TiO₂的制备及其可见光下的甲苯降解性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009045 - .
[15]	贾晓庆, 白晓宇, 吉喆喆, 李轶, 孙妍, 秘雪岳, 展思辉. 二维层状NiO/g-C₃N₄复合材料在无铁光电类芬顿体系中有效去除环丙沙星的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2010042 - .

棒状金属有机框架结构PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料的制备及其高效光催化CO₂还原性能

Rod-Shaped Metal Organic Framework Structured PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ Composites for Efficient Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0