
物理化学学报 >> 2022, Vol. 38 >> Issue (3): 2002024.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202002024
收稿日期:2020-02-20
录用日期:2020-04-09
发布日期:2020-04-20
通讯作者:
董晓燕
E-mail:d_xy@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:第一联系人:†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
Miaomiao Liu, Wenjuan Wang, Xiuping Hao, Xiaoyan Dong(
)
Received:2020-02-20
Accepted:2020-04-09
Published:2020-04-20
Contact:
Xiaoyan Dong
E-mail:d_xy@tju.edu.cn
About author:Xiaoyan Dong, Email: d_xy@tju.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-22-27404981Supported by:摘要:
阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)是常见的由蛋白质错误折叠引起的疾病,作为与此二者相关的致病蛋白,淀粉样β蛋白(Aβ)和人胰岛淀粉样多肽(hIAPP)的交叉聚集行为暗示了AD和T2DM的相关性。然而,Aβ和hIAPP在体内的交叉聚集过程尚不明确。为了更好地模拟体内环境特征,即同时存在不同形式的淀粉样蛋白聚集体,且少量的聚集体附着在血管壁上会成为聚集过程的种子,本文以硫代黄素T荧光测定,原子力显微镜,圆二色光谱,石英晶体微天平以及MTT法作为研究手段,探究了Aβ和hIAPP在溶液和固体表面的成核与交叉成核聚集行为。结果表明,少量的Aβ40和hIAPP种子(单体浓度的1/50)即可显著改变异源聚集的聚集路径,形成具有不同形态且含有更多β-折叠结构的异源聚集体,导致更高的细胞毒性。溶液和固体表面上的结果均证明异源成核聚集效率低于同源聚集,且异源聚集的特征很大程度上取决于种子类型。此外,不同于溶液中所得结果,hIAPP种子在固体表面的交叉成核聚集效率显著高于Aβ40种子,证明了界面性质对交叉聚集过程的影响。这些结论对于理解淀粉样蛋白交叉聚集过程具有重要意义。
刘苗苗, 王文娟, 郝秀萍, 董晓燕. Aβ40和hIAPP在溶液和表面的成核与交叉成核聚集行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3), 2002024. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202002024
Miaomiao Liu, Wenjuan Wang, Xiuping Hao, Xiaoyan Dong. Seeding and Cross-Seeding Aggregations of Aβ40 and hIAPP in Solution and on Surface[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(3), 2002024. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202002024
Fig 1
Aggregation kinetics of hIAPP and Aβ40 monomers incubated with or without seeds by ThT assays. (a) Kinetic traces for Aβ40 in the absence (black) or presence of 5% hIAPP seeds (red), Aβ40 seeds (blue). (b) Kinetic traces for hIAPP in the absence (black) or presence of 5% hIAPP seeds (red), Aβ40 seeds (blue). Incubation of 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomers with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP seeds in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) 25 μmol·L-1 ThT at 37 ℃ for 72 h. (n = 3)."
Table 1
Lag phase time (Tlag) and apparent first-order aggregation constant (k) of Aβ or hIAPP aggregation kinetics in different conditions."
| Samples | Tlag/h | k/h-1 |
| Aβ40 alone | 38.2 ± 2.21 | 0.492 ± 0.321 |
| Aβ40 + hIAPP seeds | 21.1 ± 1.03 | 0.542 ± 0.0841 |
| Aβ40 + Aβ40 seeds | 4.86 ± 1.49 | 0.244 ± 0.0339 |
| hIAPP alone | 10.2 ± 1.22 | 0.152 ± 0.0316 |
| hIAPP + Aβ40 seeds | 12.8 ± 2.94 | 0.471 ± 0.132 |
| hIAPP + hIAPP seeds | 8.79 ± 0.142 | 0.180 ± 0.0627 |
Fig 2
AFM images of Aβ or hIAPP in situ incubated for 72 h in the absence and presence of seeds. (a)Aβ40 alone, (b) Aβ40 with Aβ40 seeds, (c) Aβ40 with hIAPP seeds, (d) hIAPP alone, (e) hIAPP with Aβ40 seeds, (f) hIAPP with hIAPP seeds. Incubation of 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomers with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP seeds in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) 25 μmol·L-1 ThT at 37 ℃ for 72 h."
Fig 3
Far-UV circular dichroism spectra of Aβ and hIAPP aggregates formed in the absence or presence of 0.5 μmol·L-1 seeds. Incubation of 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomers with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP seeds in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) 25 μmol·L-1 ThT at 37 ℃ for 72 h (n = 3)."
Table 2
The contents of secondary structure in Aβ and hIAPP aggregates."
| Samples | α-helix/% | β-sheet/% | Turn/% | Others/% |
| Aβ40 alone | 4.3 ± 2.5 | 46 ± 5.8 | 7.3 ± 0.62 | 42 ± 4.7 |
| Aβ40 + Aβ40 seeds | 0 ± 1.5 | 60 ± 7.1 | 7.9 ± 2.4 | 32 ± 3.2 |
| Aβ40 + hIAPP seeds | 0.84 ± 0.61 | 54 ± 5.7 | 0.74 ± 0.53 | 44 ± 3.9 |
| hIAPP alone | 1.2 ± 0.74 | 52 ± 4.9 | 1.4 ± 0.83 | 46 ± 5.4 |
| hIAPP + Aβ40 seeds | 10 ± 3.7 | 79 ± 7.8 | 11 ± 3.5 | 0 ± 1.6 |
| hIAPP + hIAPP seeds | 34 ± 7.1 | 50 ± 6.5 | 16 ± 3.9 | 0 ± 0.51 |
Fig 4
Frequency change (ΔF) of the quartz crystal oscillator during the absorption of (a) Aβ40 monomers (b) hIAPP monomers to the chips without seeds fibrils (control, black line) and chips immobilized with Aβ40 seeds (red line) or hIAPP seeds (blue line). The resonance frequency and dissipation were recorded at the 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th and 11th overtone corresponding to 15, 25, 35, 45 and 55 MHz, respectively, 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomer solution in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) over the chips immobilized with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 seeds at constant 37 ± 0.050 ℃, and a maintained flow rate of 50 μL·min-1 for 30 min (n = 3)."
Fig 5
Growth of Aβ40 and hIAPP monomers on immobilized seeds. (Aβ stands for Aβ, hI stands for hIAPP) (a) Change of molar density during the adsorption of Aβ40 monomers on immobilized Aβ40 seeds (black) and hIAPP seeds (pink), hIAPP monomers (25 μmol·L-1) on immobilized Aβ40 seeds (red) and hIAPP seeds (blue). (b) The average adsorption rate for adsorption of Aβ40 and hIAPP monomers on seeds. 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomer solution in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) over the chips immobilized with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 seeds at constant 37 ± 0.050 ℃, and a maintained flow rate of 50 μL·min-1 for 30 min (n = 3)."
Fig 6
Change of dissipation (ΔD) versus frequency change (ΔF) during the adsorption of Aβ40 monomers on immobilized Aβ40 seeds (black) and hIAPP seeds (pink), hIAPP monomers on immobilized Aβ40 seeds (red) and hIAPP seeds (blue). 25 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomer solution in 30 mmol·L-1 HEPES (pH 7.4) over the chips immobilized with or without 0.5 μmol·L-1 seeds at constant 37 ± 0.050 ℃, and a maintained flow rate of 50 μL·min-1 for 30 min (n = 3)."
Fig 7
Cell viability assays (a) with preformed Aβ40 seeds and hIAPP seeds and (b) Aβ40 aggregates and hIAPP aggregates incubated with Aβ40 seeds and hIAPP seeds. The SH-SY5Y cell viability with aggregates of 5 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP monomer incubated with or without 0.1 μmol·L-1 Aβ40 or hIAPP seeds Statistical significance analyzed by one-way analysis of variance + Tukey's test, ^^^P < 0.001, compared to the control; **P < 0.01, compared to the Aβ40 alone group; ##P < 0.05, compared to the hIAPP alone group (n= 6)."
| 1 |
Westermark G. T. ; Fändrich M. ; Lundmark K. ; Westermark P. Csh. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8 (1), a024323.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a024323 |
| 2 |
Ren B. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang M. ; Liu Y. ; Zhang D. ; Gong X. ; Feng Z. ; Tang J. ; Chang Y. ; Zheng J. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7 (46), 7267.
doi: 10.1039/c9tb01871a |
| 3 |
Lim K. H. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 158.
doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00158 |
| 4 |
Hardy J. ; Selkoe D. J. Science 2002, 297 (5580), 353.
doi: 10.1126/science.1072994 |
| 5 |
Ono K. ; Takahashi R. ; Ikeda T. ; Yamada M. J. Neurochem. 2012, 122 (5), 883.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07847.x |
| 6 |
Palotay J. L. ; Howard C. F. Vet. Pathol. 1982, 19 (Suppl. 7), 181.
doi: 10.1177/030098588201907s14 |
| 7 |
Despa F. ; Goldstein L. B. ; Biessels G. J. Ann. Neurol. 2019, 87 (3), 486.
doi: 10.1002/ana.25668 |
| 8 |
Baram M. ; Atsmon-Raz Y. ; Ma B. ; Nussinov R. ; Miller Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18 (4), 2330.
doi: 10.1039/c5cp03338a |
| 9 |
Zhu H. ; Tao Q. ; Ang T. F. A. ; Massaro J. ; Gan Q. ; Salim S. ; Zhu R.-Y. ; Kolachalama V.B. ; Zhang X. ; Devine S. ; et al JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2 (8), e199826.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9826 |
| 10 |
Biessels G. J. ; Strachan M. W. J. ; Visseren F. L. J. ; Kappelle L. J. ; Whitmer R. A. Lancet Diabetes Endo. 2014, 2 (3), 246.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70088-3 |
| 11 |
Verdile G. ; Keane K. N. ; Cruzat V. F. ; Medic S. ; Sabale M. ; Rowles J. ; Wijesekara N. ; Martins R. N. ; Fraser P. E. ; Newsholme P. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 105828.
doi: 10.1155/2015/105828 |
| 12 |
Schultz N. ; Byman E. ; Wennström M. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 69, 94.
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.05.003 |
| 13 |
Eisenberg D. ; Nelson R. ; Sawaya M. R. ; Balbirnie M. ; Sambashivan S. ; Ivanova M. I. ; Madsen A. O. ; Riekel C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39 (9), 568.
doi: 10.1021/ar0500618 |
| 14 |
Roostaei T. ; Nazeri A. ; Felsky D. ; De Jager P. L. ; Schneider J. A. ; Pollock B. G. ; Bennett D. A. ; Voineskos A. N. Mol. Psychiatr. 2017, 22 (2), 287d.
doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.35 |
| 15 |
Jackson K. ; Barisone G. A. ; Diaz E. ; Jin L. W. ; DeCarli C. ; Despa F. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74 (4), 517.
doi: 10.1002/ana.23956 |
| 16 |
Soto C. ; Pritzkow S. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21 (10), 1332.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0235-9 |
| 17 |
Armiento V. ; Spanopoulou A. ; Kapurniotu A. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2020, 59 (9), 3372.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201906908 |
| 18 |
Jucker M. ; Walker L. C. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 70 (4), 532.
doi: 10.1002/ana.22615 |
| 19 |
Kiriyama Y. ; Nochi H. Cells 2018, 7 (8), 95.
doi: 10.3390/cells7080095 |
| 20 |
O'Nuallain B. ; Williams A. D. ; Westermark P. ; Wetzel R. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279 (17), 17490.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311300200 |
| 21 |
Mulder H. ; Leckstrom A. ; Uddman R. ; Ekblad E. ; Westermark P. ; Sundler F. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15 (11), 7625.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07625.1995 |
| 22 |
Fawver J. N. ; Ghiwot Y. ; Koola C. ; Carrera W. ; Rodriguez-Rivera J. ; Hernandez C. ; Dineley K. T. ; Kong Y. ; Li J. R. ; Jhamandas J. ; et al Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2014, 11 (10), 928.
doi: 10.2174/1567205011666141107124538 |
| 23 |
Banks W. A. ; Kastin A. J. Peptides 1998, 19 (5), 883.
doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(98)00018-7 |
| 24 |
Hu R. D. ; Zhang M. Z. ; Chen H. ; Jiang B. B. ; Zheng J. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6 (10), 1759.
doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00192 |
| 25 |
Yan L. -M. ; Velkova A. ; Tatarek-Nossol M. ; Andreetto E. ; Kapurniotu A. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2007, 46 (8), 1246.
doi: 10.1002/anie.200604056 |
| 26 |
Moreno-Gonzalez I. ; Edwards G. ; Salvadores N. ; Shahnawaz M. ; Diaz-Espinoza R. ; Soto C. Mol. Psychiatr. 2017, 22 (9), 1327.
doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.230 |
| 27 |
Kakinen A. ; Sun Y. X. ; Javed I. ; Faridi A. ; Pilkington E. H. ; Faridi P. ; Purcell A. W. ; Zhou R. H. ; Ding F. ; Lin S. J. ; et al Sci. Bull. 2019, 64 (1), 26.
doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.11.012 |
| 28 |
Seeliger J. ; Weise K. ; Opitz N. ; Winter R. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 421 (2-3), 348.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.048 |
| 29 |
Hao X. P. ; Zheng J. ; Sun Y. ; Dong X. Y. Langmuir 2019, 35 (7), 2821.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03599 |
| 30 | Naiki H. ; Nakakuki K. Lab. Invest. 1996, 74 (2), 374. |
| 31 |
Nielsen L. ; Khurana R. ; Coats A. ; Frokjaer S. ; Brange J. ; Vyas S. ; Uversky V. N. ; Fink A. L. Biochemistry 2001, 40 (20), 6036.
doi: 10.1021/bi002555c |
| 32 |
Syed S. B. ; Khan F. I. ; Khan S. H. ; Srivastava S. ; Hasan G. M. ; Lobb K. A. ; Islam A. ; Hassan M. I. ; Ahmad F. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 1252.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.025 |
| 33 |
Wang C. G. ; Xu L. ; Cheng F. ; Wang H. Q. ; Jia L. Y. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (38), 30197.
doi: 10.1039/c5ra02314a |
| 34 |
Sauerbrey G. Z. Phys. 1959, 155 (2), 206.
doi: 10.1007/BF01337937 |
| 35 |
Michaels T. C. T. ; Buell A. K. ; Terentjev E. M. ; Knowles T. P. J. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5 (4), 695.
doi: 10.1021/jz4024833 |
| 36 |
Voinova M. V. ; Rodahl M. ; Jonson M. ; Kasemo B. Phys. Scr. 1999, 59 (5), 391.
doi: 10.1238/Physica.Regular.059a00391 |
| 37 | Li S. ; Liu F. F. ; Yu L. L. ; Zhao Y. J. ; Dong X. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32 (6), 1391. |
|
李松; 刘夫锋; 余林玲; 赵彦娇; 董晓燕; 物理化学学报, 2016, 32 (6), 1391.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603221 |
|
| 38 | Deng J. ; Ma T. ; Chang Z. W. ; Zhao W. Z. ; Yang J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36 (4), 1905019. |
|
邓静; 马涛; 常自伟; 赵伟静; 杨俊; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36 (4), 1905019.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905019 |
|
| 39 | Mao X. B. ; Wang C. X. ; Liu L. ; Ma X. J. ; Niu L. ; Yang Y. L. ; Wang C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2010, 26 (4), 850. |
|
毛晓波; 王晨轩; 刘磊; 马晓晶; 牛琳; 杨延莲; 王琛; 物理化学学报, 2010, 26 (4), 850.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100440 |
|
| 40 |
Qahwash I. M. ; Boire A. ; Lanning J. ; Pytel T. K. P. ; Meredith S. C. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282 (51), 36987.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702146200 |
| 41 |
Trigg B. J. ; Lee C. F. ; Vaux D. J. ; Jean L. Biochem. J. 2013, 456 (1), 67.
doi: 10.1042/BJ20130605 |
| 42 | He C. X. ; Yuan A. P. ; Zhang Q. L. ; Ren X. Z. ; Li C. H. ; Liu J. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2012, 28 (11), 2721. |
|
何传新; 袁安朋; 张黔玲; 任祥忠; 李翠华; 刘剑洪; 物理化学学报, 2012, 28 (11), 2721.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201207191 |
|
| 43 |
Saraiva A. M. ; Pereira M. C. ; Brezesinski G. Langmuir 2010, 26 (14), 12060.
doi: 10.1021/la101203h |
| 44 |
Haataja L. ; Gurlo T. ; Huang C. J. ; Butler P. C. Endocr. Rev. 2008, 29 (3), 303.
doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0037 |
| 45 |
Zhang Y. C. ; Lu L. ; Jia J. P. ; Jia L. F. ; Geula C. ; Pei J. J. ; Xu Z. Q. ; Qin W. ; Liu R. Q. ; Li D. ; et al PLoS One 2014, 9 (1), e85885.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085885 |
| [1] | 邱江源, 于涛, 陈均鑫, 李文轩, 张晓萱, 李金生, 郭瑞, 黄在银, 刘宣文. FeOOH调节Bi12O17Cl2@FeOOH异质结中Bi12O17Cl2的表面势阱深度以增强压电电荷转移和压电自芬顿催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100157 - . |
| [2] | 梁英, 邓羽恒, 余士律, 程家豪, 宋嘉伟, 姚俊, 杨亦辰, 张万雷, 周文靖, 张欣, 沈文剑, 梁桂杰, 李彬, 彭勇, 胡润, 李望南. 机器学习辅助减反膜结构设计与界面修饰协同优化的高效稳定钙钛矿太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100098 - . |
| [3] | 祝鑫彤, 曹斌, 闫崇, 唐城, 陈爱兵, 张强. 锂离子电池石墨负极包覆研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100096 - . |
| [4] | 洪佳楠, 许辰宇, 刘烟, 黎昌棋, 王梦琳, 张彦威. 通过边缘活性位点调控解析光热催化中析氢与二氧化碳还原的界面竞争[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100099 - . |
| [5] | 吴琦, 王长华, 李莹莹, 张昕彤. 增强g-C3N4@BN范德华异质结界面上的三重态电子转移增强光催化合成H2O2[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100107 - . |
| [6] | 彭羽, 陈嘉威, 殷悦, 曹永杰, 廖莫愁, 王丛笑, 董晓丽, 夏永姚. 无碳酸乙烯酯电解液定向构筑正极电解质界面相实现高电压钴酸锂的宽温域稳定运行[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100087 - . |
| [7] | 曹雪婷, 察爽爽, 龚鸣. 电催化反应中的界面双电层:理论、表征与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100041 - . |
| [8] | 黄奥羽, 许君, 黄玉, 储圭, 王卯, 王黎丽, 孙永奇, 蒋臻, 朱晓波. 通过简单的浆料添加剂调整电极-电解液界面以实现稳定的高电压锂离子电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100037 - . |
| [9] | 王毅锴, 蒋晓林, 宋浩鸣, 魏楠, 王逸凡, 徐新军, 李翠红, 路皓, 刘亚辉, 薄志山. 氰基修饰的苝二酰亚胺衍生物作为膜厚不敏感型阴极界面材料用于高效有机太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100027 - . |
| [10] | 刘建东, 张志佳, Mikhail Kamenskii, Filipp Volkov, Svetlana Eliseeva, 马建民. 高压锂电池正极电解质界面研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100011 - . |
| [11] | 刘崇静, 夏雨健, 张鹏军, 魏世强, 曹登丰, 圣蓓蓓, 褚勇衡, 陈双明, 宋礼, 刘啸嵩. 近常压X射线光电子能谱研究固-气和固-液界面[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100013 - . |
| [12] | 马浩桐, 衡明宇, 许杨, 毕炜, 缪应纯, 肖舒宁. 微波合成铜负载的碳掺杂氮化硼光催化材料及其大气浓度下CO2还原性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(11): 100132 - . |
| [13] | 陈晓睿, 罗轩, 苏通明, 谢新玲, 陈柳云, 宾月景, 秦祖赠, 纪红兵. Ga掺杂Cu/γ-Al2O3双功能界面位点促进CO2加氢直接合成二甲醚[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(10): 100126 - . |
| [14] | 韩卓, 张丹丰, 王海先, 郑国瑞, 柳明, 贺艳兵. 长寿命高镍锂电池界面重构电解液添加剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2307034 - . |
| [15] | 蔡宇珊, 肖方兴. MXenes基光催化剂的进展、挑战和展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2306048 - . |
|
||