锂氧电池有机电解液的研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059

物理化学学报 >> 2024, Vol. 40 >> Issue (7): 2305059.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059

所属专题：电化学前沿

锂氧电池有机电解液的研究进展

陈浩¹^,², 杨冬月¹^,², 黄岗¹^,²^,*(), 张新波¹^,²^,*()

¹ 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所, 长春 130022
² 中国科学技术大学应用化学与工程学院, 合肥 230026

收稿日期:2023-05-31 修回日期:2023-08-17 录用日期:2023-08-26 发布日期:2023-12-01
通讯作者: Email: ghuang@ciac.ac.cn (黄岗)xbzhang@ciac.ac.cn (张新波)
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2020YFE0204500); 国家重点研发计划(2021YFF0500600); 国家自然科学基金(52171194); 国家自然科学基金(52271140); 中国科学院稳定支持基础研究领域青年团队计划(YSBR-058); 中国科学院青年创新促进会(2020230); 中国科学院青年创新促进会(2021223); 长春市科技发展计划(21ZY06)

Progress on Liquid Organic Electrolytes of Li-O₂ Batteries

Hao Chen¹^,², Dongyue Yang¹^,², Gang Huang¹^,²^,*(), Xinbo Zhang¹^,²^,*()

¹ Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
² School of Applied Chemistry and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2023-05-31 Revised:2023-08-17 Accepted:2023-08-26 Published:2023-12-01
Contact: Email: ghuang@ciac.ac.cn (Gang Huang)xbzhang@ciac.ac.cn (Xinbo Zhang)
Supported by:
the National Key R&D Program of China(2020YFE0204500); the National Key R&D Program of China(2021YFF0500600); the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52171194); the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52271140); the CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research(YSBR-058); the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences(2020230); the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences(2021223); the Changchun Science and Technology Development Plan Funding Project(21ZY06)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着消费类电子产品和新能源汽车产业的迅速发展，传统的锂离子电池已经不能满足日益增长的能源需求。为了应对这一挑战，许多高比能电池被提出和研发。其中，锂氧电池以其超高的能量密度引起了广泛的关注，但其可逆性较差问题严重限制了锂氧电池的进一步发展。在锂氧电池中，电解液是一个重要的组成部分，其组分和配比对电池的放电容量、倍率性能和负极稳定性等方面具有至关重要的影响。本文以电解液的组分为线索，对锂氧电池有机电解液的发展历程以及最新研究成果进行了梳理和总结。同时，对于降低过电势和抑制电解液分解的展望，也为锂氧电池的未来发展指明了方向。

关键词: 锂氧电池, 有机电解液, 溶剂, 锂盐, 添加剂

Abstract:

Li-O₂ batteries have garnered significant attention due to their ultrahigh theoretical energy density, comparable to that of gasoline. However, despite this promise, several challenges have hindered the commercial application of Li-O₂ batteries. These challenges include poor reversibility, unsatisfactory cycling duration, and high overpotential during battery operation. The key factor behind the poor reversibility of current Li-O₂ batteries is the occurrence of side reactions between various battery components and discharge products or intermediates. The electrolyte, an essential component in Li-O₂ batteries, plays a crucial role in charge transport and mass transfer within the battery. Among the available electrolytes used in Li-O₂ batteries, liquid organic electrolytes have been predominantly investigated as potential options. However, they suffer from insufficient chemical and electrochemical stability, which contributes to the overall poor reversibility. Substantial progress has been made in understanding the factors that lead to the degradation of liquid organic electrolytes and in enhancing their stability. However, there is still a need for more significant improvements to achieve practical performance. This review comprehensively introduces the development of liquid organic electrolytes for Li-O₂ batteries, focusing on solvents, lithium salts, and additives. It outlines the specific requirements of electrolytes for Li-O₂ batteries and highlights the importance of reducing charge overpotentials as a critical strategy to mitigate both electrochemical and chemical degradation. The review proceeds to detail the composition of liquid organic electrolytes, beginning with solvents. Carbonates, ethers, amides, and ionic liquids are discussed, along with their respective advantages, disadvantages, and strategies to overcome limitations. The role of lithium salts is then examined, with an emphasis on the relationship between the properties of lithium salts, such as donor number and anion polarity, and electrolyte performance. Some lithium salts are highlighted for their additional functions, such as forming stable solid electrolyte interfaces (SEI) on the anode side and reducing overpotential during charging. Additives in liquid organic electrolytes are also discussed. Redox mediators and singlet oxygen quenchers are discussed as representative additives, showcasing their significance in Li-O₂ batteries. Redox mediators can influence the reaction mechanism, leading to lower overpotentials in both discharge and charge processes and increased capacity. Notably, classical redox mediators like LiI are introduced, and criteria for selecting appropriate redox mediators are outlined. On the other hand, singlet oxygen quenchers convert aggressive singlet oxygen into harmless triplet oxygen, thereby suppressing unwanted side reactions in Li-O₂ batteries. The mechanism behind singlet oxygen generation is also addressed. In summary, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the progress in liquid organic electrolytes for Li-O₂ batteries. It highlights the need for better electrolyte design by addressing various aspects such as solvents, lithium salts, and additives. This comprehensive understanding will guide future research efforts towards developing more stable and efficient electrolytes for Li-O₂ batteries, thereby advancing their practical applicability.

Key words: Li-O₂ battery, Liquid organic electrolyte, Solvent, Li salt, Additive

陈浩, 杨冬月, 黄岗, 张新波. 锂氧电池有机电解液的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(7), 2305059. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059

Hao Chen, Dongyue Yang, Gang Huang, Xinbo Zhang. Progress on Liquid Organic Electrolytes of Li-O₂ Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2024, 40(7), 2305059. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V40/I7/2305059

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 92

1	Wu F. ; Maier J. ; Yu Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1569. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00863e
2	Manthiram A. ; Fu Y. ; Chung S. H. ; Zu C. ; Su Y. S. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751. doi: 10.1021/cr500062v
3	Lu J. ; Li L. ; Park J. B. ; Sun Y. K. ; Wu F. ; Amine K. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5611. doi: 10.1021/cr400573b
4	Chen K. ; Yang D. Y. ; Huang G. ; Zhang X. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 632. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00772
5	Kwak W. J. ; Rosy ; Sharon D. ; Xia C. ; Kim H. ; Johnson L. R. ; Bruce P. G. ; Nazar L. F. ; Sun Y. K. ; Frimer A. A. et al. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6626. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609
6	Freunberger S. A. ; Chen Y. ; Drewett N. E. ; Hardwick L. J. ; Barde F. ; Bruce P. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8609. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102357
7	Liu T. ; Leskes M. ; Yu W. ; Moore A. J. ; Zhou L. ; Bayley P. M. ; Kim G. ; Grey C. P. Science 2015, 350, 530. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7730
8	Lu J. ; Lee Y. J. ; Luo X. ; Lau K. C. ; Asadi M. ; Wang H. H. ; Brombosz S. ; Wen J. ; Zhai D. ; Chen Z. et al. Nature 2016, 529, 377. doi: 10.1038/nature16484
9	Xia C. ; Kwok C. Y. ; Nazar L. F. Science 2018, 361, 777. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9343
10	Chen Y. ; Xu J. ; He P. ; Qiao Y. ; Guo S. ; Yang H. ; Zhou H. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 2449. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.11.027
11	Luntz A. C. ; McCloskey B. D. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17056. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.56
12	Zhang P. ; Ding M. ; Li X. ; Li C. ; Li Z. ; Yin L. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001789. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202001789
13	Li Y. ; Wang X. ; Dong S. ; Chen X. ; Cui G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600751. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600751
14	Chi X. ; Li M. ; Di J. ; Bai P. ; Song L. ; Wang X. ; Li F. ; Liang S. ; Xu J. ; Yu J. Nature 2021, 592, 551. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03410-9
15	Wu X. ; Li Z. ; Song C. ; Chen L. ; Dai P. ; Zhang P. ; Qiao Y. ; Huang L. ; Sun S.-G. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 682. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00756
16	Liang Z. J. ; Wang W. W. ; Lu Y.-C. Joule 2022, 6, 2458. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.10.008
17	Yao X. ; Dong Q. ; Cheng Q. ; Wang D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11344. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601783
18	Chen Y. ; Freunberger S. A. ; Peng Z. ; Fontaine O. ; Bruce P. G. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 489. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1646
19	Sun Z. ; Lin X. ; Wang C. ; Hu A. ; Hou Q. ; Tan Y. ; Dou W. ; Yuan R. ; Zheng M. ; Dong Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207570. doi: 10.1002/anie.202207570
20	Guo H. ; Luo W. ; Chen J. ; Chou S. ; Liu H. ; Wang J. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018, 2, 1700183. doi: 10.1002/adsu.201700183
21	McCloskey B. D. ; Bethune D. S. ; Shelby R. M. ; Mori T. ; Scheffler R. ; Speidel A. ; Sherwood M. ; Luntz A. C. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 3043. doi: 10.1021/jz301359t
22	Wandt J. ; Jakes P. ; Granwehr J. ; Gasteiger H. A. ; Eichel R. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6892. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602142
23	Petit Y. K. ; Mourad E. ; Prehal C. ; Leypold C. ; Windischbacher A. ; Mijailovic D. ; Slugovc C. ; Borisov S. M. ; Zojer E. ; Brutti S. et al. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 465. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00643-z
24	Mahne N. ; Schafzahl B. ; Leypold C. ; Leypold M. ; Grumm S. ; Leitgeb A. ; Strohmeier G. A. ; Wilkening M. ; Fontaine O. ; Kramer D. et al. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17036. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.36
25	McCloskey B. D. ; Bethune D. S. ; Shelby R. M. ; Girishkumar G. ; Luntz A. C. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 1161. doi: 10.1021/jz200352v
26	Xu K. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4303. doi: 10.1021/cr030203g
27	Ogasawara T. ; Debart A. ; Holzapfel M. ; Novak P. ; Bruce P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1390. doi: 10.1021/ja056811q
28	Mizuno F. ; Nakanishi S. ; Kotani Y. ; Yokoishi S. ; Iba H. Electrochemistry 2010, 78, 403. doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.78.403
29	Freunberger S. A. ; Chen Y. ; Peng Z. ; Griffin J. M. ; Hardwick L. J. ; Barde F. ; Novak P. ; Bruce P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 8040. doi: 10.1021/ja2021747
30	Veith G. M. ; Dudney N. J. ; Howe J. ; Nanda J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 14325. doi: 10.1021/jp2043015
31	Chen K. ; Du J. Y. ; Wang J. ; Yang D. Y. ; Chu J. W. ; Chen H. ; Zhang H. R. ; Huang G. ; Zhang X. B. Chin. J. Chem. 2022, 41, 314. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202200498
32	Peng Z. ; Freunberger S. A. ; Chen Y. ; Bruce P. G. Science 2012, 337, 563. doi: 10.1126/science.1223985
33	Xu D. ; Wang Z. L. ; Xu J. J. ; Zhang L. L. ; Zhang X. B. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6948. doi: 10.1039/c2cc32844e
34	Mozhzhukhina N. ; Méndez De Leo L. P. ; Calvo E. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 18375. doi: 10.1021/jp407221c
35	Feng S. ; Huang M. ; Lamb J. R. ; Zhang W. ; Tatara R. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhu Y. G. ; Perkinson C. F. ; Johnson J. A. ; Shao-Horn Y. Chem 2019, 5, 2630. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.003
36	Nishioka K. ; Saito M. ; Ono M. ; Matsuda S. ; Nakanishi S. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 4404. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03999
37	Lee H. ; Lee D. J. ; Lee J.-N. ; Song J. ; Lee Y. ; Ryou M.-H. ; Park J.-K. ; Lee Y. M. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 123, 419. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.042
38	Lai J. ; Xing Y. ; Chen N. ; Li L. ; Wu F. ; Chen R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2974. doi: 10.1002/anie.201903459
39	Wu Z. ; Tian Y. ; Chen H. ; Wang L. ; Qian S. ; Wu T. ; Zhang S. ; Lu J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 8045. doi: 10.1039/d2cs00003b
40	Read J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A96. doi: 10.1149/1.2131827
41	Jung H. G. ; Hassoun J. ; Park J. B. ; Sun Y. K. ; Scrosati B. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 579. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1376
42	Qiao L. ; Judez X. ; Rojo T. ; Armand M. ; Zhang H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 070534. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7aa0
43	Sharon D. ; Hirshberg D. ; Afri M. ; Frimer A. A. ; Aurbach D. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3269. doi: 10.1039/c6cc09086a
44	Bryantsev V. S. ; Faglioni F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 7128. doi: 10.1021/jp301537w
45	Adams B. D. ; Black R. ; Williams Z. ; Fernandes R. ; Cuisinier M. ; Berg E. J. ; Novak P. ; Murphy G. K. ; Nazar L. F. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1400867. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201400867
46	Gao X. ; Chen Y. ; Johnson L. ; Bruce P. G. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 882. doi: 10.1038/nmat4629
47	Lai J. ; Liu H. ; Xing Y. ; Zhao L. ; Shang Y. ; Huang Y. ; Chen N. ; Li L. ; Wu F. ; Chen R. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2101831. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202101831
48	Bryantsev V. S. ; Giordani V. ; Walker W. ; Blanco M. ; Zecevic S. ; Sasaki K. ; Uddin J. ; Addison D. ; Chase G. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 12399. doi: 10.1021/jp2073914
49	Walker W. ; Giordani V. ; Uddin J. ; Bryantsev V. S. ; Chase G. V. ; Addison D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2076. doi: 10.1021/ja311518s
50	Yu Y. ; Huang G. ; Du J.-Y. ; Wang J.-Z. ; Wang Y. ; Wu Z.-J. ; Zhang X.-B. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3075. doi: 10.1039/d0ee01897j
51	Kuboki T. ; Okuyama T. ; Ohsaki T. ; Takami N. J. Power Sources 2005, 146, 766. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.082
52	Elia G. A. ; Hassoun J. ; Kwak W. J. ; Sun Y. K. ; Scrosati B. ; Mueller F. ; Bresser D. ; Passerini S. ; Oberhumer P. ; Tsiouvaras N. et al. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6572. doi: 10.1021/nl5031985
53	Xie J. ; Dong Q. ; Madden I. ; Yao X. ; Cheng Q. ; Dornath P. ; Fan W. ; Wang D. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8371. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04097
54	Cai Y. ; Hou Y. ; Lu Y. ; Zhang Q. ; Yan Z. ; Chen J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, e202218014. doi: 10.1002/anie.202218014
55	Hansen B. B. ; Spittle S. ; Chen B. ; Poe D. ; Zhang Y. ; Klein J. M. ; Horton A. ; Adhikari L. ; Zelovich T. ; Doherty B. W. et al. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1232. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00385
56	Geng L. ; Wang X. ; Han K. ; Hu P. ; Zhou L. ; Zhao Y. ; Luo W. ; Mai L. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 7, 247. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02088
57	Li C. L. ; Huang G. ; Yu Y. ; Xiong Q. ; Yan J. M. ; Zhang X. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 5827. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11711
58	Laoire C. O. ; Mukerjee S. ; Abraham K. M. ; Plichta E. J. ; Hendrickson M. A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9178. doi: 10.1021/jp102019y
59	Xu D. ; Wang Z. L. ; Xu J. J. ; Zhang L. L. ; Wang L. M. ; Zhang X. B. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11674. doi: 10.1039/c2cc36815c
60	Boisset A. ; Menne S. ; Jacquemin J. ; Balducci A. ; Anouti M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 20054. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53406e
61	Sharon D. ; Hirsberg D. ; Salama M. ; Afri M. ; Frimer A. A. ; Noked M. ; Kwak W. ; Sun Y. K. ; Aurbach D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5300. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b11483
62	Burke C. M. ; Pande V. ; Khetan A. ; Viswanathan V. ; McCloskey B. D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 9293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505728112
63	Oswald S. ; Mikhailova D. ; Scheiba F. ; Reichel P. ; Fiedler A. ; Ehrenberg H. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 691. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4646-z
64	Sharon D. ; Hirsberg D. ; Afri M. ; Chesneau F. ; Lavi R. ; Frimer A. A. ; Sun Y. K. ; Aurbach D. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 16590. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04145
65	Rosy ; Akabayov S. ; Leskes M. ; Noked M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 29622. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b10054
66	Tong B. ; Huang J. ; Zhou Z. ; Peng Z. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704841. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704841
67	Xiong Q. ; Huang G. ; Yu Y. ; Li C. L. ; Li J. C. ; Yan J. M. ; Zhang X. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202116635. doi: 10.1002/anie.202116635
68	Dou Y. ; Xie Z. ; Wei Y. ; Peng Z. ; Zhou Z. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac040. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac040
69	Bergner B. J. ; Schurmann A. ; Peppler K. ; Garsuch A. ; Janek J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15054. doi: 10.1021/ja508400m
70	Gao X. ; Chen Y. ; Johnson L. R. ; Jovanov Z. P. ; Bruce P. G. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17118. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.118
71	Zhang C. ; Dandu N. ; Rastegar S. ; Misal S. N. ; Hemmat Z. ; Ngo A. T. ; Curtiss L. A. ; Salehi-Khojin A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000201. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000201
72	Lim H. D. ; Song H. ; Kim J. ; Gwon H. ; Bae Y. ; Park K. Y. ; Hong J. ; Kim H. ; Kim T. ; Kim Y. H. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3926. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400711
73	Kwak W. J. ; Hirshberg D. ; Sharon D. ; Shin H. J. ; Afri M. ; Park J. B. ; Garsuch A. ; Chesneau F. F. ; Frimer A. A. ; Aurbach D. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8855. doi: 10.1039/c5ta01399b
74	Burke C. M. ; Black R. ; Kochetkov I. R. ; Giordani V. ; Addison D. ; Nazar L. F. ; McCloskey B. D. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 747. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00328
75	Tułodziecki M. ; Leverick G. M. ; Amanchukwu C. V. ; Katayama Y. ; Kwabi D. G. ; Bardé F. ; Hammond P. T. ; Shao-Horn Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1828. doi: 10.1039/c7ee00954b
76	Liu T. ; Kim G. ; Jónsson E. ; Castillo-Martinez E. ; Temprano I. ; Shao Y. ; Carretero-González J. ; Kerber R. N. ; Grey C. P. ACS Catal. 2018, 9, 66. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02783
77	Wang A. ; Wu X. ; Zou Z. ; Qiao Y. ; Wang D. ; Xing L. ; Chen Y. ; Lin Y. ; Avdeev M. ; Shi S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, e202217354. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217354
78	Kwak W. J. ; Kim H. ; Petit Y. K. ; Leypold C. ; Nguyen T. T. ; Mahne N. ; Redfern P. ; Curtiss L. A. ; Jung H. G. ; Borisov S. M. et al. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1380. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09399-0
79	Kwak W.-J. ; Freunberger S. A. ; Kim H. ; Park J. ; Nguyen T. T. ; Jung H.-G. ; Byon H. R. ; Sun Y.-K. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9914. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01337
80	Chen Y. ; Gao X. ; Johnson L. R. ; Bruce P. G. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 767. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03204-0
81	Cao D. ; Shen X. ; Wang A. ; Yu F. ; Wu Y. ; Shi S. ; Freunberger S. A. ; Chen Y. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 193. doi: 10.1038/s41929-022-00752-z
82	Ahn S. ; Zor C. ; Yang S. ; Lagnoni M. ; Dewar D. ; Nimmo T. ; Chau C. ; Jenkins M. ; Kibler A. J. ; Pateman A. et al. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 1022. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01203-3
83	Schurmann A. ; Luerssen B. ; Mollenhauer D. ; Janek J. ; Schroder D. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 12445. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00139
84	Hassoun J. ; Croce F. ; Armand M. ; Scrosati B. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 3055. doi: 10.1002/ange.201006264
85	Mahne N. ; Renfrew S. E. ; McCloskey B. D. ; Freunberger S. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5529. doi: 10.1002/anie.201802277
86	Mourad E. ; Petit Y. K. ; Spezia R. ; Samojlov A. ; Summa F. F. ; Prehal C. ; Leypold C. ; Mahne N. ; Slugovc C. ; Fontaine O. et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2559. doi: 10.1039/c9ee01453e
87	Dong S. ; Yang S. ; Chen Y. ; Kuss C. ; Cui G. ; Johnson L. R. ; Gao X. ; Bruce P. G. Joule 2022, 6, 185. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.012
88	Petit Y. K. ; Leypold C. ; Mahne N. ; Mourad E. ; Schafzahl L. ; Slugovc C. ; Borisov S. M. ; Freunberger S. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6535. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901869
89	Liang Z. ; Zou Q. ; Xie J. ; Lu Y.-C. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 2870. doi: 10.1039/d0ee01114b
90	Jiang Z. ; Huang Y. ; Zhu Z. ; Gao S. ; Lv Q. ; Li F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022, 119, e2202835119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202835119
91	Wu C. ; Zhou Y. ; Zhu X. ; Zhan M. ; Yang H. ; Qian J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2008044.
	吴晨; 周颖; 朱晓龙; 詹忞之; 杨汉西; 钱江锋. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2008044. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008044
92	Kwak W.-J. ; Chae S. ; Feng R. ; Gao P. ; Read J. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Zhong L. ; Xu W. ; Zhang J.-G. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2182. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00809

[1]	张慧, 赵子健, 王雅静, 倪凯, 王彦飞, 朱亮, 刘建允, 赵晓昱. 通过热压法构建具有高效离子传输路径的无溶剂LiFePO₄卤水提锂电极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(2): 100130 - .
[2]	马千里, 宋天兵, 何天乐, 张熙荣, 熊焕明. 硫掺杂的碳点作为双功能电解液添加剂实现高性能水系锌离子电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100106 - .
[3]	彭羽, 陈嘉威, 殷悦, 曹永杰, 廖莫愁, 王丛笑, 董晓丽, 夏永姚. 无碳酸乙烯酯电解液定向构筑正极电解质界面相实现高电压钴酸锂的宽温域稳定运行[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100087 - .
[4]	黄奥羽, 许君, 黄玉, 储圭, 王卯, 王黎丽, 孙永奇, 蒋臻, 朱晓波. 通过简单的浆料添加剂调整电极-电解液界面以实现稳定的高电压锂离子电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100037 - .
[5]	刘建东, 张志佳, MikhailKamenskii, FilippVolkov, SvetlanaEliseeva, 马建民. 高压锂电池正极电解质界面研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100011 - .
[6]	姜羊林, 陈明卿, 梁民, 尧奕歌, 张燕, 王鹏, 张建平. 4′-N,N-二乙氨基-3-羟基苯并黄酮激发态分子内质子转移机制的溶剂极性效应——实验和理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100012 - .
[7]	韩卓, 张丹丰, 王海先, 郑国瑞, 柳明, 贺艳兵. 长寿命高镍锂电池界面重构电解液添加剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2307034 - .
[8]	杨睿, 李惠, 孟庆飞, 李文杰, 吴际良, 方永进, 黄驰, 曹余良. PC基电解液对Li/CrO_x一次电池高倍率性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2308053 - .
[9]	屈卓研, 张笑银, 肖茹, 孙振华, 李峰. 有机硫化合物在锂硫电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2301019 -0 .
[10]	韩慧贤, 陈澜, 赵建成, 于海涛, 汪洋, 闫何恋, 王英雄, 薛智敏, 牟天成. 生物质基酸性低共熔溶剂用于高效溶解木质素及溶解机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212043 -0 .
[11]	刘欢, 马宇, 曹斌, 朱奇珍, 徐斌. MXenes在水系锌离子电池中的应用研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2210027 -0 .
[12]	徐铭礼, 刘猛闯, 杨泽洲, 吴晨, 钱江锋. 高比能钠离子电池预钠化技术研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2210043 -0 .
[13]	齐亚娥, 夏永姚. 电解液调控策略提升水系锌离子电池正极材料电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2205045 -0 .
[14]	张涛, 龚思敏, 陈平, 陈琪, 陈立桅. 利用多氟丙烯酸酯添加剂提升准二维钙钛矿发光二极管性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2301024 - .
[15]	薄拯, 孔竞, 杨化超, 郑周威, 陈鹏鹏, 严建华, 岑可法. 基于混合溶剂有机电解液的超低温孔洞石墨烯超级电容[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2005054 - .

锂氧电池有机电解液的研究进展

Progress on Liquid Organic Electrolytes of Li-O₂ Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 92

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

锂氧电池有机电解液的研究进展

Progress on Liquid Organic Electrolytes of Li-O2 Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 92

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

Progress on Liquid Organic Electrolytes of Li-O₂ Batteries