Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 100206.doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100206
Special Issue: Advanced Cathode Materials for Secondary Batteries
• REVIEW • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shuang Wang1, Xiaoqi Fu2,*(
), Shanshan Yao1,*(
)
Received:2025-08-11
Revised:2025-09-21
Accepted:2025-10-21
Published:2026-01-23
Contact:
Email: xfu@ujs.edu.cn (Xiaoqi Fu)yaosshan@hotmail.com (Shanshan Yao)
Shuang Wang, Xiaoqi Fu, Shanshan Yao. Synergistic optimization of ion migration and electron transfer in sodium-ion battery cathode materials[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2026, 42(5), 100206. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100206
Fig 2
The RDS of the electrochemical performance: (a) Calculated projected density of states of Na24Cu6Fe9Mn12O54, Na24Li1Cu6Fe9Mn11O54, and Na24Li1Cu6Fe9Mn11O53F1. (b) Electronic conductivity values of the prepared samples. (c) Galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) voltage profile during the first charging process and the corresponding diffusion coefficients. Discharge curves at different cutoff voltages (4.3 and 4.0 V) are plotted. (d) In situ XRD contour plot of the first charge process and the corresponding structural distribution throughout the process, with each square representing a different long-range ordered phase. (e) The rate capability of Na3(VOPO4)2F(NVOPF) electrode at various rates ranging from 0.1C to 15C. (f) Rate capability of NVOPF with different Ketjen black (KB) contents at rates ranging from 0.1C to 20C. (g) Enlarged two-dimensional (2D) contour XRD images and volume variations for HSPB. (a, b) adapted with permission from Ref. [31], Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (c, d) adapted with permission from Ref. [32], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (e, f) adapted with permission from Ref. [33], Copyright 2021, The Author(s). (g) adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright 2025, The Author(s)."
Fig 4
(a) Turning waste into treasure: schematic mechanism of functional structural construction of tunnels. (b) FTIR spectroscopy results. (c) ABF-STEM images of NaNFM@NMO. (d) Cycling performance during 50 cycles of NaNFM and NaNFM@NMO at 1C. (e) Diagrammatic representation of the structure evolution during Na+ extraction/insertion. (f) Schematic diagram of the interfacial spinel interlocking strategy. (g) ABF-STEM image of NaMCM-700 material. (h) Cycling performance of NaMCM-600, NaNCN-650, and NaMCM-700 during 100 cycles at 0.1C. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [38], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (e–h) adapted with permission from Ref. [39], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society."
Fig 6
(a) Schematic diagram of the effect of Nb doping on crystal structure of the P2-NaMNNb and P2-NaMN cathode material, and (b) the protective effect on the bulk structure. (c) The AC-HAADF-STEM image and (d, e) annular bright field (ABF-STEM) images of the P2-NaMNNb, (f) after 30 cycles at 92 mA g−1 and 25 ℃ in coin cell. (g) Cationic potential of representative P2- and O3-type Na-ion layered oxides, considering the Na content, oxidation state of transition metals, and TM composition. (a–f) adapted with permission from Ref. [44], Copyright 2022, Springer Nature. (g) adapted with permission from Ref. [46], Copyright 2020, The American Association for the Advancement of Science."
Fig 8
(a) Schematic diagram of structural modification with PO43− insertion and the improvements in both electrochemical performance and air stability. (b) The formation energy of NFS and a series of NFSP-x configurations, XRD patterns of (c) NFS and (d) NFSP-0.5 before and after air exposure for 1 week. (e) Schematic illustration of NVFP-Mo(0.06) crystal structure. (f) Cycling stability of NVP, NVFP-Mo(0) and VFP-Mo(0.06) cathodes at 30C. (g) SEM image, (h) TEM image, (i) EDS mapping images of NVFP-Mo(0.06) cathode. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [50], Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (e–i) adapted with permission from Ref. [51], Copyright 2025, Elsevier Inc."
Fig 9
(a) The mechanochemical synthesis of Na3(VOPO4)2F nanoparticles starting from NaVO3. (b) Rietveld-refined profiles of as-synthesized NVOPF, and the schematic diagram of NVOPF structure. (c) The cycling performance of bare NVOPF and NVOPF/8% Ketjen black (KB) electrode at 20C. (a–c) adapted with permission from Ref. [33], Copyright 2021, The Author(s)."
Fig 10
(a) The schematic illustration depicts the preparation process of x-NFPP/C through the spray drying technique, (b) high-resolution image of 1.4-NFPP/C, (c) the crystal structure and cycling performance of 1.4-NFPP/C, (d) Rietveld refinement of 1.4-NFPP/C. (e) XRD Rietveld refinement of NVFP–VO. (f) Crystal structure illustration of NVFP and V2O3. (g) 3D plots for comparison between NVFP–VO and other reported polyanionic cathodes. (h) SEM image of NVFP–VO, (i) HAADF-STEM image of the heterostructure. (j) TEM images of the carbon layer and intergrown interfaces. (k) HADDF-STEM image enlargement of phase 1. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [60], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (e–k) adapted with permission from Ref. [61], Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry."
Fig 12
(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process and (b) design concept of Ni0.1Mn1.9HCF. (c) XRD patterns of MnHCF, Ni0.1Mn1.9HCF, Ni0.3Mn1.7HCF, and NiHCF. (d) Long-term cycling stability at 500 mA g−1. (e) Investigation of phase transitions of Na1.73Fe[Fe(CN)6]·3.8H2O sample with rhombohedral structure during cycling. A 2D contour plot of (012) reflection plane. (f) Normalized volume during charge–discharge process obtained from synchrotron in situ PXRD patterns of rhombohedral PB-S3. (g) (012), (110)/(104), and (024) reflection planes of synchrotron in situ PXRD patterns. (h) Schematic three-phase evolutions during cycling of rhombohedral PB-S3. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [67], Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (e–h) adapted with permission from Ref. [68], Copyright 2020, The Author(s)."
Fig 13
(a) Schematic illustration of the conversion reaction mechanism of the AgHCF@CNTs electrode. (b) Na+ migration pathways in Ag3Fe(CN)6. (c) The corresponding energy profiles of Na+ migration via different pathways. (d) EDS element mapping images of AgHCF@CNTs. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [69], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society."
Fig 14
(a) XRD pattern of M-HSPB. (b) Element mapping and corresponding SEM image of M-HSPB. (c) Cycling performance of HC | | M-HSPB 18650-type cell at room temperature. (d) Schematic illustration of the phase transition mechanisms. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry."
Fig 15
The main factors affecting ion migration or electron transfer. (a) In situ XRD patterns of P2-type Na2/3Li1/4Sb1/12Mn2/3O2 (LS) during the initial two cycles between 1.5 and 4.5 V at the current density of 30 mA g−1. (b) Schematic of the influence of Sb/Ti substitution in TM sites on TM-O bonding. (c) and (d) Crystal structure illustration of NVFP, V2O3, and NaV2O3. (e) The corresponding migration energy barriers. (f) Fourier transforms of the Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra of the samples. The three significant peaks belonged to the Fe-C, Fe-N, and Fe-Fe shells. (g) TGA curves. (h) SEM images of pristine HSPB electrode. (i) SEM images of HSPB electrode after 100 cycles. (a, b) adapted with permission from Ref. [71], Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (c–e) adapted with permission from Ref. [61], Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry. (f–i) adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright 2025, the Author(s)."
Fig 16
The differential and common impacts of the laws of electron and ion transport on LTMOs, PACs and PBAs. Local images of (a) pristine and (b) 4.5 V charged LS, extracted from the corresponding HAADF-STEM images. Total and partial DOS of (c) NVP and (d) NVFP. (e) The corresponding calculated DNa+ of the three samples when charging. (a, b) adapted with permission from Ref. [71], Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (c, d) adapted with permission from Ref. [61], Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) adapted with permission from Ref. [34], Copyright 2025, the Author(s)."
Table 2
Part of LTMOs, PACs, PBAs cathodes cited"
| Cathode | Anode | Cycle performance (cycle/rentention) | Voltage (V) | Capacity (mAh g−1) | Na+ diffusion Coefficient | Conductivity | Elyctrolyte | Ref. | |||
| Na3.08Fe2.44(P2O6.98)2F0.04 | half-cell: Na | 50C, 20000, 86.3%; 1C, 300, 94.3% | 1.8–4.2 | 54.4–116.4C | 10−10–10−9 cm2 s−1 | Band gap dropped from 4.43 eV to 3.19 eV | 1 mol L−1 NaPF6 in PC + 2 vol% FEC | 72 | |||
| full-cell: HC | – | – | 88.3C | ||||||||
| P2-Na2/3Ni1/3Mn2/3O2 | half-cell: Na | – | 2.0–4.3 | 69.1– 89.9C | 10−10 cm2 s−1 | – | 1 mol L−1 NaPF6 in PC + 2 vol% FEC | 84 | |||
| P2/O3-Na0.80Li0.13Ni0.20Fe0.10Mn0.57O2 | half-cell: Na | 1C, 100, 88.60% | 2.0–4.5 | 152.4–172.02C | 10−12 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC : PC = 1 : 2 + 5 vol% FEC | 85 | |||
| layered-tunnel intergrowth Na0.6MnO2 (LT-NaMO) | half-cell: Na | 5C, 300, 70.5% | 2.0–4.0 | 98.7–179.4C | Fast Kinetics | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in PC + 5 vol% FEC | 86 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 100, 85.0% | 1.9–3.9 | 162.3C | ||||||||
| P2-Na0.7Mg0.05 [Mn0.6Ni0.2Mg0.15]O2 | half-cell: Na | 1C, 1000, 79% | 1.5–4.2 | 130C | enhanced | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC : PC (1 : 1) | 45 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 0.2C, 50, 85% | 2.0–4.0 | 63C | ||||||||
| P'2-Na0.653Ni0.081Mn0.799Ti0.120O2 | full-cell: HC | 250 mA g−1, 500, 87.2% | 1.8–4.3 | 185C | 10−11–10−10 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | – | 41 | |||
| NaNi0.3Cu0.1Fe0.2Mn0.3Ti0.1O2 (NCFMT) | half-cell: Na | 1C, 500, 85%; 45 ℃, 1C, 500, 80% | 2.0–4.0 | 141.5C | twice that of NCFMS | Better than NCFMS | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in PC/EC/DMC (1 : 1 : 1) + 2 vol% FEC | 42 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 682, 80%; 4.15 V, 1C–2C, 67.2% | 0.5–4.0; 0.5–4.15 | – | ||||||||
| [Na0.89Li0.05Cu0.11Ni0.11Fe0.3 Mn0.43O1.97F0.03] (LCNFM) | half-cell: Na full-cell: HC | 1C, 300, 80% 1C, 200, 81.6% | 1.5–4.0 1.0–4.0 | 138.6C 134.5C | 10−10–10−9 cm2 s−1 | Better than CNFM | – | 31 | |||
| NaNi0.2Fe0.2Mn0.35Cu0.05Zn0.1Sn0.1O2 | full-cell: HC | 3.0C, 500, 87%; 1.0C, 300, 80% | 0.5–4.0 | 64–122C | 10−11–10−10 cm2 s−1 | Narrow band gap 0.14 eV | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC/PC/DMC (4.5 : 4.5 : 0.1) + 3 wt% FEC | 78 | |||
| Na0.78Ni0.31Mn0.67Nb0.02O2 (P2-NaMNNb) | half-cell: Na | −40 ℃, 368 mA g−1, 1800, 76%; 25 ℃, 9.2 A g−1, 65% | 2.4–4.15 | 66–97C | 10−9–10−6 cm2 s−1 | Band gap dropped from 0.500 eV to 0.332 eV | 1 mol L−1 NaPF6 in diglyme | 44 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 25 ℃, 920 mA g−1, 300, 84%; −40 ℃, 92 mA g−1, 100, 89% | 2.3–4.14 | 20–60C | ||||||||
| Na3.5V1.5Fe0.5(PO4)3–V2O3 (NVFP–VO) | half-cell: Na | 100C, 100, 000, 72.6% | 2.0–4.1 | 82–130C | 10−8 cm2 s−1 | Band gap about 1.18 eV | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in PC + 5 vol% FEC | 61 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 500, 77.38% | 1.7–4.1 | – | ||||||||
| Na3V1.8Mn0.2(PO4)3/C (NVMP/C) | half-cell: Na | 1C, 100, 90% | 2.0–4.0 | 107C | 10−11 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC : PC (1 : 1) | 80 | |||
| Na3V2(PO4)3 (NVP-E700) | half-cell: Na | 0.2C, 200, 99.6%; 10 C, 82.8% | 2.0–4.5 | 83–180C | 10−11 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | – | 47 | |||
| Na2.5Fe2(SO4)2.5(PO4)0.5 (NFSP-0.5) | half-cell: Na | 10C, 10000, 88.8% | 2.0–4.5 | 80–112C | 10−11 cm2 s−1 | Band gap dropped from 3.63 eV to 3.35 eV | – | 50 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 1000, 85.9% | – | – | ||||||||
| Na3V1.44Fe0.5Mo0.06(PO4)3 (NVFP-Mo (0.06)) | half-cell: Na | 30C, 2500, 92%; 0.2C, 50, 97.7% | 2.2–4.2 | 123.4c | 10−10–10−8 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in PC + 5 vol% FEC | 51 | |||
| Na3Cr0.5V1.5(PO4)3/rGO (VC/C-G) | half-cell: Na | 0.2C, 100, 80.4% | 1.5–4.5 | 95–176C | 10−11–10−8 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | – | 57 | |||
| Na3.4Fe2.4(PO4)1.4P2O7/C (1.4-NFPP/C) | half-cell: Na | 10C, 1000, 97.7%; 1C, 300, 100% | 1.7–4.1 | 112.2c | 10−11 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC : PC (1 : 1) + 5 vol% FEC | 60 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 1000, 87.7% | 1.7–4.1 | 106.3c | ||||||||
| Na3Fe2(PO4)P2O7/rGO (NFPP/rGO) | half-cell: Na | 20C, 8000, 72.4%; 10C, 2000, 88.0% | 1.5–4.0 | 42–106C | 10−10 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC/DEC (1 : 1) | 64 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 100 mA g−1, 500, 85.2% | – | 86.2C | ||||||||
| Na4VMn0.75Mg0.25(PO4)3 (Mg-NVMP) | half-cell: Na | 78 mAh g−1, 100, 96% | 3.8–2.75 | 80C | 10−4 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC/PC/DMC (4.5 : 4.5 : 0.1) + 3 wt% FEC | 59 | |||
| Na3.75VMn0.75Al0.25(PO4)3 (Al-NVMP) | half-cell: Na | 92 mAh g−1, 100, 96% | 3.8–2.75 | 80–89C | 10−4 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | |||||
| Na4Fe3(PO4)2P2O7 (NFPP-Si₀.₀₅) | half-cell: Na | 50C, 5000, 84.2% | 1.5–4.0 | 61–119C | 10−11–10−9 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC/DEC (1 : 1) + 5% FEC | 87 | |||
| Na1.97Fe[Fe(CN)6]0.986 (Fe-HCF-5) | half-cell: Na | 1C, 100, 80.6% | 2.0–4.2 | 112–152C | enhanced | enhanced | – | 70 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 0.1C, 50, 83.24% | 2.0–3.6 | 89.0C | ||||||||
| Na1.68Fe0.92Cu0.08[Fe(CN)6]0.86· 1.43H2O (Cu-FeHCF) | half-cell: Na | 100 mA g−1, 100, 83.6%; 2 A g−1, 500, 76.5% | 2.0–4.2 | 82–127C | 10−10 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | – | 75 | |||
| K0.95Ag3.05Fe(CN)6@CNTs (AgHCF@CNTs) | half-cell: Na | 500 mA g−1, 500, 74% | 1.1–4.1 | 152c | 10−14–10−10 cm2 s−1 | enhanced | – | 69 | |||
| a core–shell structure of cobalt hexacyanoferrate (CoFeHCF) | half-cell: Na | 100 mA g−1, 300, 89% | 2.0–4.2 | 94–160C | enhanced | – | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in PC | 93 | |||
| high sodium content PBAs (HSPB) | half-cell: Na | 50 mA g−1, 200, 65.7% | 2.0–4.2 | 136.9C | – | – | 1 mol L−1 NaClO4 in EC : DEC (1 : 1) + 5 wt% FEC | 34 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 1000, 80% | 2.0–3.6 | – | ||||||||
| K0.24(VO)0.58[Fe(CN)6]·2.59H2O (FeVO-PBA) | half-cell: Na | – | 1.6–4.0 | 56.1– 48.9C | 10−12–10−8 cm2 s−1 | Exhibit metallic properties | ether-based electrolyte | 89 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 100, 85.0% | 1.9–3.9 | 138.0–162.3C | ||||||||
| PB-PA3 | half-cell: Na | 1C, 200, 94%; 10C, 2500, 79%; 20C, 4000, 79% | 2.0–4.2 | 94.8–143.9C | 10−14–10−13 cm2 s−1 | – | – | 66 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 1C, 300, 85%; 5C, 1000, 84% | 2.0–3.8 | 108–133C | ||||||||
| Na1.7Ni0.04Fe0.48Mn0.48[Fe(CN)6]0.92 (NFM-PB-1) | half-cell: Na | 100 mA g−1, 1000, 85.19% | 2.0–4.2 | 102.7–131.0C | 10−11 cm2 s−1 | – | – | 65 | |||
| full-cell: HC | 100 mA g−1, 250, 79.35% | – | 88.9C | ||||||||
| Na0.28K1.55Fe[Fe(CN)6]·1.53H2O (NKPB-3) | half-cell: Na | 150 mA g−1, 300, 83.5% | 2.0–4.2 | 10−12–10−8 cm2 s−1 | – | 66 | |||||
Fig 17
Strategies and methods for preparing high-performance cathode materials. (a) Schematic of NVFP-VO. (b) Crystal structure illustration of NVFP and V2O3. (c) 3D plots for comparison between NVFP-VO and other reported polyanionic cathodes. (d) SEM image of NVFP-VO. (e) TEM images of the carbon layer. (f) HADDF-STEM image enlargement of phase 1. (g) XRD Rietveld refinement of NVFP-VO. (a–g) adapted with permission from Ref. [61], Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry."
Fig 18
The element optimization strategy examples. (a) Cycling performance and structural schematic diagram of NNZM and NNZM@0.06ZnO. (b) XRD patterns of NNZM, NNZM@0.03ZnO, NNZM@0.06ZnO, and NNZM@0.09ZnO. (c) Cycling performance and schematic diagram of NVFP/C and NVMP/C. (d) XRD patterns NVFP/C and NVMP/C. Rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffraction patterns of (e) NFPP and (f) NFPP-Si0.1. (g) Schematic illustration for crystal structure change from NFPP to NFPP-Si0.1. (a, b) adapted with permission from Ref. [72], Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (c, d) adapted with permission from Ref. [80], Copyright 2022, The Authors. (e–g) adapted with permission from Ref. [30], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society."
Fig 19
The structure design strategy examples. (a−c) TEM images of the the layered-tunnel intergrowth Na0.6MnO2 (LT-NaMO) cathode material. (d) Schematic diagram of the layered-tunnel intergrowth LT-NaMO cathode material. (e) Strategy for the Preparation of the Optimized K0.24(VO)0.58[Fe(CN)6]∙2.59H2O (FeVO-PBA). (f) STEM-EDS elemental mappings of FeVO-PBA. (g) Schematic diagram for the mechanism of Fe−V coupling realizing the high-capacity and zero-strain characteristics of FeVO-PBA. (h) XRD pattern and corresponding Rietveld refinement profile. (i) Schematics of Co or Fe partial occupancies determined from Rietveld refinement (iron atom, green; cobalt atom, yellow; nitrogen atom, red; carbon atom, orange). LSFe4a(0.80) designates that the occupancy factor of Fe on 4a sites is 0.80 and Co on 4a sites is 0.20. (j) TGA weight loss profile in different temperature regions for a core–shell structure of cobalt and iron hexacyanoferrate (CoFeHCF) sample. (k) coordination environment of CoFeHCF. (a–d) adapted with permission from Ref. [86], Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (e–g) adapted with permission from Ref. [89], Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (h–k) adapted with permission from Ref. [93], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society."
Fig 20
The composite and surface engineering strategy examples. HRTEM images of (a) NVFP/C, and (b) NVMP/C materials. (c) Schematic diagram of material design and structural evolution. (d) HRTEM of NVP/C. (e) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of NMCN-CS samples and the internal structure of the half-cell. (f) SEM micrograph of NMCN-CS and elemental mapping spectra of Na, Mn, Ni, Co, and O. (a, b) adapted with permission from Ref. [80], Copyright © 2022 The Authors. (c, d) adapted with permission from Ref. [98], Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (e, f) adapted with permission from Ref. [100], Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society."
Fig 21
Green synthesis examples. (a) The capacity and cycle performance of the polycrystalline and molten-salt derived materials. (b) Evolution of charge/discharge capacity curves starting from the second cycle up to the 100th cycle for the polycrystalline and molten-salt derived materials. (c) Schematic diagram of Na3V2(PO4)3 material synthesis process: like-sol-gel method combined with the coating drying method. (d) The cycling performance of NVP-1 and NVP-2 at 10 C. (e) Reaction scheme for the synthesis of PB, followed by its conversion into PW. (f) Comparison of XRD spectra between the PB and PW samples before and after drying. (a, b) adapted permission from Ref. [101], Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (c, d) adapted permission from Ref. [102], Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (e, f) adapted permission from Ref. [104], Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society."
| 1 |
M.M. Thackeray, K. Amine. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 933.
doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00860-3 |
| 2 |
C. Zhao, H. Jeong, I. Hwang, T.Y. Li, Y. Wang, J.M. Bai, L.X. Li, S.Y. Zhou, C.C. Su, W.Q. Xu, et al.. Joule 2024, 8, 3397.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2024.09.004 |
| 3 |
D.K. Saini, C. Muniyappa, A. Yadav, S. Zaphar, Energ. Source. Part A 2025, 47, 12247.
doi: 10.1080/15567036.2025.2507096 |
| 4 |
C.X. Li, J.Y. Yue, W.J. Wang, C. Li, Energ. Source. Part A 2025, 47, 11976.
doi: 10.1080/15567036.2025.2504542 |
| 5 |
X.C. Hu, Q.Y. Xia, F. Yue, X.Y. He, Z.H. Mei, J.S. Wang, H. Xia, X.D. Huang. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2309046.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309046 |
| 6 |
H. Chen, D.Y. Yang, G. Huang, X.B. Zhang. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2305059.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202305059 |
| 7 |
R. Yang, H. Li, Q.F. Meng, W.J. Li, J.L. Wu, Y.J. Fang, C. Huang, Y.L. Cao. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2308053.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202308053 |
| 8 |
D. Wang, X.B. Yin, J.F. Wu, Y.Q. Luo, S.Q. Shi. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2307029.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202307029 |
| 9 |
L.Y. Zhu, Y. Cao, T. Xu, H.B. Yang, L.Y. Wang, L. Dai, F.S. Pan, C.J. Chen, C.L. Si. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 5675.
doi: 10.1039/d5ee00494b |
| 10 |
V. Verma, B. Kumar, Energ. Source. Part A 2025, 47, 161.
doi: 10.1080/15567036.2024.2442068 |
| 11 |
Y. Akbas, M. Petranikova, B. Ebin. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 376, 134056.
doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134056 |
| 12 |
H.D. Chen, Y.C. Qiu, Z.Y. Cai, W.H. Liang, L. Liu, M.M. Li, X.H. Hou, F.M. Chen, X.Z. Zhou, T.F. Cheng, et al.. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202423357.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202423357 |
| 13 |
Y.X. Zhang, Z.Y. Liu, J.H. Wang, H. Du, Q. Sun, R.T. Gao, Z.M. Xu. Waste Manage. 2025, 198, 95.
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.049 |
| 14 |
J. Xia, L. Gao, M.L. Cao, C.K. Zhang, M.S. Tan, Q. Wang, F. Lv, L.J. Tao. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 695, 162888.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162888 |
| 15 |
J. Cheon, J.E. Gozum, G.S. Girolami. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 1847.
doi: 10.1021/cm970138p |
| 16 |
X.F. Wang, X. Shen, Z.X. Wang, R.C. Yu, L.Q. Chen. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11394.
doi: 10.1021/nn505501v |
| 17 |
R. Mahlouji, W.M.M. Kessels, A.A. Sagade, A.A. Bol. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 4718.
doi: 10.1039/d3na00387f |
| 18 |
J.K. Liang, H.X. Li, L. Chen, M.N. Ren, O.A. Fakayode, J.Y. Han, C.S. Zhou. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2023, 193, 116214.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116214 |
| 19 |
Y.Y. Wang, W.T. Li, X.T. Hu, X.N. Zhang, X.W. Huang, Z.H. Li, M.Y. Li, X.B. Zou, J.Y. Shi. Food Chem. 2021, 352, 129352.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129352 |
| 20 |
X.D. Gao, X.Y. Zhang, X.Y. Liu, Y.F. Tian, Q.Y. Cai, M. Jia, X.H. Yan. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2300152.
doi: 10.1002/smtd.202300152 |
| 21 |
Z. Naseem, J. Iqbal, M. Zahid, A. Shaheen, S. Hussain, W. Yaseen. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 1487.
doi: 10.1007/s11694-020-00744-2 |
| 22 |
Y. Gao, H. Zhang, X.H. Liu, Z. Yang, X.X. He, L. Li, Y. Qiao, S.L. Chou. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101751.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101751 |
| 23 |
H. Zhang, X.P. Tan, H.H. Li, S. Passerini, W. Huang. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 5788.
doi: 10.1039/d1ee01392k |
| 24 |
X.L. Yu, Y.W. Yao, X.X. Wang, S.X. Cen, D.C. Li, H.R. Ma, J.J. Chen, D.J. Wang, Z.Y. Mao, C.L. Dong. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 54, 221.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.038 |
| 25 |
K. Nakamoto, R. Sakamoto, Y. Sawada, M. Ito, S. Okada. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800220.
doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800220 |
| 26 |
T. Kim, S.H. Hyeok Ahn, Y.Y. Song, B.J. Jin Park, C. Lee, A. Choi, M.H. Kim, D.H. Seo, S.K. Jung, H.W. Lee. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202309852.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202309852 |
| 27 |
X.Y. Zhang, M.J. Hou, J.Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, F.P. Li, K. Ren, X.T. Feng, P.Y. Dou, S.C. Bi, K. Hayashi, et al.. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 700, 138337.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.138337 |
| 28 |
X.Y. Xiao, Z.Q. Jin, B.C. Wang, Y.Z. Ye, A. Xu, X.T. Xie, M.X. Pei, J. Lu, W.K. Wang, Y.Q. Huang. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 698, 137985.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137985 |
| 29 |
D.L. Chen, Z.R. Ye, P. Jia, Z.Y. Zhao, J.W. Lin, X. Wang, Z.Z. Ye, T.T. Li, L.Q. Zhang, J.G. Lu. Small Methods 2024, 8, 2301423.
doi: 10.1002/smtd.202301423 |
| 30 |
X.C. Ge, L. He, C.H. Guan, X. Wang, J. Li, Y.Q. Lai, Z. Zhang. ACS Nano 2023, 18, 1714.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c10319 |
| 31 |
F.X. Ding, H.B. Wang, Q.H. Zhang, L.R. Zheng, H. Guo, P.F. Yu, N. Zhang, Q.B. Guo, F. Xie, R.B. Dang, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 13592.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c00879 |
| 32 |
K. Fang, J.H. Yin, G.F. Zeng, Z.X. Wu, Y.L. Tang, D.Y. Yu, H.Y. Luo, Q.R. Liu, Q.H. Zhang, T. Qiu, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 31860.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c11049 |
| 33 |
X. Shen, Q. Zhou, M. Han, X.G. Qi, B. Li, Q.Q. Zhang, J.M. Zhao, C. Yang, H.Z. Liu, Y.S. Hu. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2848.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23132-w |
| 34 |
H. Zhang, J.Y. Li, J.H. Liu, Y. Gao, Y.M. Fan, X.H. Liu, C.F. Guo, H.X. Liu, X.D. Chen, X.Q. Wu, et al.. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2520.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57663-3 |
| 35 |
H.H. Zhang, S.Y. Lin, C.Y. Shu, Z.X. Tang, X.W. Wang, Y.P. Wu, W. Tang. Mater. Today 2025, 85, 231.
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2025.02.014 |
| 36 |
S.H. Guo, J. Yi, Y. Sun, H.S. Zhou. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2978.
doi: 10.1039/C6EE01807F |
| 37 |
D.W. Hou, E. Gabriel, K. Graff, T.Y. Li, Y. Ren, Z.H.B. Wang, Y.Z. Liu, H. Xiong. J. Mater. Res. 2022, 37, 1156.
doi: 10.1557/s43578-022-00519-z |
| 38 |
L.Y. Kong, J.Y. Li, H.X. Liu, Y.F. Zhu, J.Q. Wang, Y.F. Liu, X.Y. Zhang, H.Y. Hu, H.H. Dong, Z.C. Jian, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 32317.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c04766 |
| 39 |
J.Y. Li, H.Y. Hu, H.W. Li, Y.F. Liu, Y. Su, X.B. Jia, L.F. Zhao, Y.M. Fan, Q.F. Gu, H. Zhang, et al.. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 12945.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c00966 |
| 40 |
Y. Xiao, H.R. Wang, H.Y. Hu, Y.F. Zhu, S. Li, J.Y. Li, X.W. Wu, S.L. Chou. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202695.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202202695 |
| 41 |
M. Ren, S. Zhao, S.N. Gao, T. Zhang, M.C. Hou, W. Zhang, K. Feng, J. Zhong, W.B. Hua, S. Indris. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 224.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09725 |
| 42 |
F.X. Ding, P.X. Ji, Z. Han, X.Y. Hou, Y. Yang, Z.L. Hu, Y.S. Niu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, X.H. Rong, et al.. Nat. Energy 2024, 9, 1529.
doi: 10.1038/s41560-024-01616-5 |
| 43 |
X.Y. Liu, S. Li, Y.F. Zhu, X.Y. Zhang, Y. Su, M.Y. Li, H.W. Li, B.B. Chen, Y.F. Liu, Y. Xiao. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2414130.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202414130 |
| 44 |
Q.H. Shi, R.J. Qi, X.C. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Li, Z.P. Yao, X. Wang, Q.Q. Li, X.G. Lu, J.J. Zhang, et al.. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3205.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30942-z |
| 45 |
Q.C. Wang, J.K. Meng, X.Y. Yue, Q.Q. Qiu, Y. Song, X.J. Wu, Z.W. Fu, Y.Y. Xia, Z. Shadike, J.P. Wu, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 840.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08638 |
| 46 |
C.L. Zhao, Q.D. Wang, Z.P. Yao, J.L. Wang, B. Sánchez-Lengeling, F.X. Ding, X.G. Qi, Y.X. Lu, X.D. Bai, B.H. Li, et al.. Science 2020, 370, 708.
doi: 10.1126/science.aay9972 |
| 47 |
H.Y. Ma, B.C. Zhao, J. Bai, P.Y. Wang, W.Y. Li, Y.J. Mao, X.G. Zhu, Z.G. Sheng, X.B. Zhu, Y. P Sun. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2203552.
doi: 10.1002/advs.202203552 |
| 48 |
H. Zhang, Z.Y. Gu, X.T. Wang, X.X. Zhao, Y.L. Heng, Y. Liu, J.L. Yang, S.H. Zheng, X.L. Wu. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2410797.
|
| 49 |
Z.W. Fan, W.D. Song, N. Yang, C.J. Lou, R.Y. Tian, W.B. Hua, M.X. Tang, F. Du. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202316957.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202316957 |
| 50 |
C.Y. Liu, K. Chen, F.M. Li, A.L. Zhao, P. Liu, Z.X. Chen, Y.J. Fang, Y.L. Cao. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 14635.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c02485 |
| 51 |
M. Xie, X.Y. Li, Y.F. Chen, X.Y. Liao, Q.J. Zheng, H. Zhang, K.H. Lam, D.M. Lin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 700, 138461.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.138461 |
| 52 |
H.M. Li, T.L. Wang, X. Wang, G.D. Li, J.X. Shen, J.L. Chai. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 9022.
doi: 10.1002/chem.202100096 |
| 53 |
X.G. Zeng, J. Peng, Y. Guo, H.F. Zhu, X. Huang. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 635.
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00635 |
| 54 |
Z.Y. Gu, X.X. Zhao, K. Li, J.M. Cao, X.T. Wang, J.Z. Guo, H.H. Liu, S.H. Zheng, D.H. Liu, H.Y. Wu, et al.. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2400690.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202400690 |
| 55 |
L.F. Wen, J.Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, L.F. Zhao, X. Wang, S. Wang, S.Y. Ma, W.B. Li, J. Luo, J.M. Ge, et al.. eScience 2025, 5, 100313.
doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2024.100313 |
| 56 |
J.H. Wang, C.J. Lou, Y.D. Lu, L.H. He, M.X. Tang, X.L. Wu, F.Q. Lu. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 512, 162741.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.162741 |
| 57 |
W. Zhang, Y.L. Wu, Z.M. Xu, H.X. Li, M. Xu, J.W. Li, Y.H. Dai, W. Zong, R.W. Chen, L. He, et al.. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201065.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202201065 |
| 58 |
B.C. Chen, J.H. Wang, Z.Y. Xu, J. Miao, Y. Lu, Z.H. Yan, K. Zhang, J. Chen. Adv. Mater. 2025, e09966.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202509966 |
| 59 |
S. Ghosh, N. Barman, P. Senguttuvan. Small 2020, 16, 2003973.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202003973 |
| 60 |
H.Y. Ding, X.L. Li, H. Li, J.F. He. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 10528.
doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c02890 |
| 61 |
Z.Y. Zou, Y.B. Mu, M.S. Han, Y.Q. Chu, J. Liu, K.X. Zheng, Q. Zhang, M.R. Song, Q.P. Jian, Y.L. Wang, et al.. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 2216.
doi: 10.1039/d4ee05110f |
| 62 |
L. Yang, W.G. Chang, C.G. Xie, J.C. Jin, Y.J. Xia, X.Q. Yuan. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 015527.
doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab67f3 |
| 63 |
M.Y. Zheng, Z.Y. Bai, Y.W. He, S.Q. Wu, Y. Yang, Z.Z. Zhu. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5192.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04213 |
| 64 |
H.M. Wang, Z.B. Pan, H.T. Zhang, C.R. Dong, Y. Ding, Y.L. Cao, Z.X. Chen. Small Methods 2021, 5, 2100372.
doi: 10.1002/smtd.202100372 |
| 65 |
X. Gao, L.L. Guo, S.J. Zhang, H.Q. Li, N. Chen, Y.H. Han, B.H. He, P.Y. Ma, W.S. Gao, Y.X. Bai. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202421916.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202421916 |
| 66 |
H. Zhang, Y. Gao, J. Peng, Y.M. Fan, L.F. Zhao, L. Li, Y. Xiao, W.K. Pang, J.Z. Wang, S.L. Chou. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202303953.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202303953 |
| 67 |
B.B. Kuang, W.C. Feng, Y.X. Shi, L. Chen, Z.L. Yang, Q. Li, W.T. Li, S.X. Wei, Y.W. Liu, Z. Liu, et al.. Inorg. Chem. 2025, 64, 15392.
doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c01143 |
| 68 |
W.L. Wang, Y. Gang, Z. Hu, Z.C. Yan, W.J. Li, Y.C. Li, Q.F. Gu, Z.X. Wang, S.L. Chou, H.K. Liu, et al.. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 980.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14444-4 |
| 69 |
X.Y. Zhao, N.B. Liu, M.X. Zheng, X.H. Wang, Y.N. Xu, J.W. Liu, F.J. Li, L.B. Wang. ACS Energy Lett. 2024, 9, 2748.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00976 |
| 70 |
J. Peng, J.Q. Huang, Y. Gao, Y. Qiao, H.H. Dong, Y. Liu, L. Li, J.Z. Wang, S.X. Dou, S.L. Chou. Small 2023, 19, 2300435.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202300435 |
| 71 |
X.Y. Cai, Z. Shadike, N. Wang, X.L. Li, Y. Wang, Q.F. Zheng, Y.X. Zhang, W.X. Lin, L.S. Li, L.W. Chen, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 5860.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c14587 |
| 72 |
F.P. Zhang, J.H. Liao, L. Xu, W.W. Wu, X.H. Wu. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 40695.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c12062 |
| 73 |
X.R. Qi, B.X. Hou, R.F. Zhang, X.C. Chen, Z.R. Fu, X. Zhou, H.Y. Liu, N.Z. Shang, S.H. Zhang, L.G. Wang, et al.. Carbon Energy 2025, 7, e70030.
doi: 10.1002/cey2.70030 |
| 74 |
H.K. Wang, X. Zhang, X.P. Wang, G.W. Zhang, W.H. Liu, P. Hu, C.H. Han. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 4297.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c00229 |
| 75 |
Z.Y. Chen, X.Y. Fu, L.L. Zhang, B. Yan, X.L. Yang. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 5506.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c23793 |
| 76 |
Z.H. Wu, Y.X. Ni, N. Jiang, J.H. Li, L.M. Zhou, L.H. He, L. Zhang, K. Zhang, F.Y. Cheng, J. Chen. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2419137.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202419137 |
| 77 |
X.N. Li, X.Y. Tang, M. Ge, M.D. Zhang, W.F. Liu, X.J. Liu, Y.T. Cui, H.S. Zhang, Y.H. Yin, S.T. Yang. Langmuir 2024, 40, 11116.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00676 |
| 78 |
B. Wang, J. Ma, K.J. Wang, D.K. Wang, G.J. Xu, X.G. Wang, Z.W. Hu, C.W. Pao, J.L. Chen, L. Du, et al.. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024, 14, 2401090.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202401090 |
| 79 |
L. Wang, L.L. Wang, H.C. Wang, H.H. Dong, W.W. Sun, L.P. Lv, C. Yang, Y. Xiao, F.X. Wu, Y. Wang, et al.. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2417258.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202417258 |
| 80 |
Y.B. Bhaskara Rao, K.R. Achary, L.N. Patro. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 48192.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06261 |
| 81 |
Y.Y. He, S.L. Dreyer, Y.Y. Ting, Y. Ma, Y. Hu, D. Goonetilleke, Y.S. Tang, T. Diemant, B. Zhou, P.M. Kowalski, et al.. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202315371.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202315371 |
| 82 |
H. Chen, Z.G. Wu, Y.J. Zhong, T.R. Chen, X.H. Liu, J. Qu, W. Xiang, J.T. Li, X.C. Chen, X.D. Guo, et al.. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 308, 64.
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.003 |
| 83 |
X.Y. Wang, J.J. Li, Q.M. Wang, H.M. Li, J.X. Liang, L.B. Zhang, X. Wang, K. Ding, H.M. Liu, Z.F. Ma, et al.. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2502300.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202502300 |
| 84 |
Y.S. Shi, P.F. Jiang, S.C. Wang, W.X. Chen, B. Wei, X.Y. Lu, G.Y. Qian, W.H. Kan, H.C. Chen, W. Yin, et al.. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7888.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35597-4 |
| 85 |
J.M. Feng, D. Fang, Z. Yang, J.J. Zhong, C.L. Zheng, Z.C. Wei, J.L. Li. J. Power Sources 2023, 553, 232292.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232292 |
| 86 |
Y. Su, N.N. Zhang, J.Y. Li, Y.F. Liu, H.Y. Hu, J.Q. Wang, H.W. Li, L.Y. Kong, X.B. Jia, Y.F. Zhu, et al.. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 44839.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c07164 |
| 87 |
M.Z. Liu, M. Li, B.L. Zhang, H.M. Li, J.X. Liang, X.Y. Hu, H.M. Liu, Z.F. Ma. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 18102.
doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c06667 |
| 88 |
Y.C. Liu, Q.Y. Shen, X.D. Zhao, J. Zhang, X.B. Liu, T.S. Wang, N. Zhang, L.F. Jiao, J. Chen, L.Z. Fan. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907837.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201907837 |
| 89 |
Z.X. Jing, L.T. Kong, M. Mamoor, L. Wang, B. Zhang, B. Wang, Y.J. Zhai, F.B. Wang, G.M. Qu, Y.Y. Kong, D.D. Wang, L.Q. Xu. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 3702.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c16031 |
| 90 |
N. Jiang, J.T. Yu, Z.H. Wu, J.H. Zhao, Y.Y. Zeng, H.X. Li, M. Meng, Y.T. He, P.X. Jiao, H.C. Pan, et al., J. Chen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 136, e202410080.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202410080 |
| 91 |
X.G. Yuan, Y.J. Guo, L. Gan, X.A. Yang, W.H. He, X.S. Zhang, Y.X. Yin, S. Xin, H.R. Yao, Z.G. Huang, et al.. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2111466.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202111466 |
| 92 |
P. Senguttuvan, G. Rousse, J. Oró-Solé, J.M. Tarascon, M.R. Palacín. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 15284.
doi: 10.1039/c3ta13756b |
| 93 |
P.K. Pathak, K.P. Agrim, C. Park, H. Ahn, R.R. Salunkhe. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2024, 7, 11352.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c03262 |
| 94 |
Q.Y. Shen, X.D. Zhao, Y.C. Liu, Y.P. Li, J. Zhang, N. Zhang, C.H. Yang, J. Chen. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2002199.
doi: 10.1002/advs.202002199 |
| 95 |
Y.J. Cao, X.P. Xia, Y. Liu, N. Wang, J.X. Zhang, D.Q. Zhao, Y.Y. Xia. J. Power Sources 2020, 461, 228130.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228130 |
| 96 |
W.C. Zhuo, J.L. Li, X.D. Li, L. Ma, G.H. Yan, H. Wang, S.Z. Tan, W.J. Mai. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 23, 100911.
doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100911 |
| 97 |
Q. Zhang, Q.F. Gu, Y. Li, H.N. Fan, W.B. Luo, H.K. Liu, S.X. Dou. iScience 2019, 19, 244.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.029 |
| 98 |
X. Ding, X.F. Yang, J. Li, Y.B. Yang, L.W. Liu, Y. Xiao, L.L. Han. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 35632.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c14284 |
| 99 |
Y. Liu, D.D. He, Y.J. Cheng, L. Li, Z.S. Lu, R. Liang, Y.Y. Fan, Y. Qiao, S.L. Chou. Small 2020, 16, 1906946.
doi: 10.1002/smll.201906946 |
| 100 |
H. Fu, J.L. Li, L.Y. Wang, X.J. Yang, X.S. Li, W. Lu. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 20196.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05700 |
| 101 |
J. Darga, A. Manthiram. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 52729.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c12098 |
| 102 |
X. Tang, H.Y. Ding, J.H. Teng, H.M. Zhao, J. Li, K.B. Zhang. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 8443.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c01195 |
| 103 |
J. Peng, Y. Gao, H. Zhang, Z.G. Liu, W. Zhang, L. Li, Y. Qiao, W.S. Yang, J.Z. Wang, S.X. Dou, et al.. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202205867.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202205867 |
| 104 |
C.Q.X. Lim, Z.K. Tan. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 6214.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00987 |
| 105 |
X. Zhou, F.F. Hong, S. Wang, T. Zhao, J.L. Peng, B. Zhang, W.F. Fan, W.Y. Xing, M.H. Zuo, P. Zhang, et al.. eScience 2024, 4, 100276.
doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2024.100276 |
| 106 |
S.L. Dreyer, F.M. Maddar, A. Kondrakov, J. Janek, I. Hasa, T. Brezesinski. Batteries Supercaps 2024, 7, e202300595.
doi: 10.1002/batt.202300595 |
| 107 |
H. Chen, J. Wu, M. Li, J. Zhao, Z. Li, M. Wang, X. Li, C. Li, X. Chen, X. Li, et al.. eScience 2025, 5, 100281.
doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2024.100281 |
| 108 |
Z.Y. Gu, J.M. Cao, J.Z. Guo, X.T. Wang, X.X. Zhao, S.H. Zheng, Z.H. Sun, J.L. Yang, K.Y. Zhang, H.J. Liang, et al.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 4652.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c11739 |
| [1] | Peicai Li, Xubin Wang, Qinghua Zhang, Bowen Wang, Xiaohui Rong, Yong-Sheng Hu, Zhongtao Li. High-rate and long-cycling P2-type cathode material for sodium-ion batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2026, 42(5): 100214-. |
| [2] | Liangliang Song, Haoyan Liang, Shunqing Li, Bao Qiu, Zhaoping Liu. Challenges and strategies on high-manganese Li-rich layered oxide cathodes for ultrahigh-energy-density batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100085-. |
| [3] | Xuejie Wang, Guoqing Cui, Congkai Wang, Yang Yang, Guiyuan Jiang, Chunming Xu. Research Progress on Carbon-based Catalysts for Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(5): 100044-. |
| [4] | Jianbao Mei, Bei Li, Shu Zhang, Dongdong Xiao, Pu Hu, Geng Zhang. Enhanced Performance of Ternary NASICON-Type Na3.5−xMn0.5V1.5−xZrx (PO4)3/C Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(12): 2407023-. |
| [5] | Doudou Qin, Junyang Ding, Chu Liang, Qian Liu, Ligang Feng, Yang Luo, Guangzhi Hu, Jun Luo, Xijun Liu. Addressing Challenges and Enhancing Performance of Manganese-based Cathode Materials in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(10): 2310034-. |
| [6] | Hangyu Lu, Ruilin Hou, Shiyong Chu, Haoshen Zhou, Shaohua Guo. Progress on Modification Strategies of Layered Lithium-Rich Cathode Materials for High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(7): 2211057-0. |
| [7] | Yae Qi, Yongyao Xia. Electrolyte Regulation Strategies for Improving the Electrochemical Performance of Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Cathodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(2): 2205045-0. |
| [8] | Yuke Song, Wenfu Xie, Mingfei Shao. Recent Advances in Integrated Electrode for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2101028-. |
| [9] | Sidong Zhang, Yuan Liu, Muyao Qi, Anmin Cao. Localized Surface Doping for Improved Stability of High Energy Cathode Materials [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2011007-. |
| [10] | Yaokun Ye, Zongxiang Hu, Jiahua Liu, Weicheng Lin, Taowen Chen, Jiaxin Zheng, Feng Pan. Research Progress of Theoretical Studies on Polarons in Cathode Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2011003-. |
| [11] | Zhenjie CHENG, Yayun MAO, Qingyu DONG, Feng JIN, Yanbin SHEN, Liwei CHEN. Fluoroethylene Carbonate as an Additive for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Effect on the Sodium Cathode [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(8): 868-875. |
| [12] | Jiangtao HU, Jiaxin ZHENG, Feng PAN. Research Progress into the Structure and Performance of LiFePO4 Cathode Materials [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(4): 361-370. |
| [13] | Lei. HE,Jun-Min. XU,Yong-Jian. WANG,Chang-Jin. ZHANG. LiFePO4-Coated Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 as Cathode Materials with High Coulombic Efficiency and Improved Cyclability for Li-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(8): 1605-1613. |
| [14] | Lu-Lu LI,Shuai LIU,Qin ZHANG,Nan-Tao HU,Liang-Ming WEI,Zhi YANG,Hao WEI. Advances in Covalent Organic Frameworks [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(10): 1960-1977. |
| [15] | HU Si, ZHANG Qing, YIN Qi, ZHANG Ya-Fei, GONG Yan-Jun, ZHANG Ying, WU Zhi-Jie, DOU Tao. Catalytic Conversion of Methanol to Propylene over HZSM-5 Modified by NaOH and (NH4)2SiF6 [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2015, 31(7): 1374-1382. |
|
||