分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091

物理化学学报 >> 2018, Vol. 34 >> Issue (8): 912-919.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091

所属专题：绿色化学

分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响

陈文琼¹,关永吉¹,张晓萍^1,*(),邓友全^2,*()

¹ 兰州大学信息科学与工程学院现代通信技术研究所，兰州 730000
² 中国科学院兰州化学物理研究所，绿色化学与催化研究发展中心，兰州 730000

收稿日期:2017-12-01 发布日期:2018-04-03
通讯作者: 张晓萍,邓友全 E-mail:zxp@lzu.edu.cn;ydeng@licp.cas.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFA0403101)

Influence of External Electric Field on Vibrational Spectrum of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids Probed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Wenqiong CHEN¹,Yongji GUAN¹,Xiaoping ZHANG^1,*(),Youquan DENG^2,*()

¹ Institute of Modern Communication, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China
² Centre for Green Chemistry and Catalysis, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China

Received:2017-12-01 Published:2018-04-03
Contact: Xiaoping ZHANG,Youquan DENG E-mail:zxp@lzu.edu.cn;ydeng@licp.cas.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program(2017YFA0403101)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文利用分子动力学模拟研究了外电场对咪唑类离子液体1-乙基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐(EMIMPF₆)从0到4000 cm⁻¹范围内振动谱的影响。研究结果表明，在没有外电场时利用分子动力学模拟计算得到的从400到4000 cm⁻¹的振动带可以重现实验测得的谱。当外电场从0到9 V·nm⁻¹变化时，在50.0和199.8 cm⁻¹处的振动带强度持续增强然后趋于饱和，而从400到4000 cm⁻¹的振动带强度明显减弱并最终消失。此外，在外电场从0变到2 V·nm⁻¹时，50.0 cm⁻¹的振动带红移了16.7 cm⁻¹，然后当外电场变化到3 V·nm⁻¹及更大时，该振动带红移增大到33.3 cm⁻¹。在外电场从0变到3 V·nm⁻¹时，3396.6 cm⁻¹的振动带红移大约16.7 cm⁻¹,然后当外电场增大到4 V·nm⁻¹甚至更大时，该振动带红移33.3 cm⁻¹,但是从0到4000 cm⁻¹的其他振动带的位置几乎没有变化。基于对模拟结果和先前报道文献的进一步分析，对于50.0 cm⁻¹的振动带，增加的外电场增强了阳离子和阴离子之间的极性使阳离子和阴离子间的偶极矩增大，因此该振动带的强度不断增大然后达到饱和。对于199.8 cm⁻¹的振动带增加的外电场增强了乙基链的扭转，使该振动带的强度增大并达到饱和。对于从400到4000 cm⁻¹的其他振动带，增加的外电场使EMIMPF₆中的阳离子和阴离子的取向更一致，并且可以推测这种更一致的取向可能会削弱振动带的强度甚至使它们消失。50.0 cm⁻¹处振动带的红移可能是由于外电场破坏了EMIMPF₆内部的静电场分布进而减弱了阳离子和阴离子间的相互作用。3396.6 cm⁻¹处振动带的红移可归功于外电场减弱了氮原子与阳离子咪唑环上酸性氢原子间形成的氢键的拉伸振动。对于其他的振动带，由于官能团固有的拉伸、弯曲、转动振动不受外电场的影响，外电场没有改变振动带的位置。

关键词: 振动谱, 外电场, 离子液体, 分子动力学模拟

Abstract:

In this study, the influence of an external electric field (EEF) on the vibrational spectra of an imidazolium-based ionic liquid, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexfluorophosphate (EMIMPF₆), in the wavenumber range from 0 to 4000 cm⁻¹ was probed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation at 350 K. The results showed that the experimentally obtained spectrum could be reproduced by the calculated vibrational bands (VBs) in the wavenumber range from 400 to 4000 cm⁻¹ using MD simulation without any EEF. When the EEF applied increased from 0 to 9 V·nm⁻¹, the VB intensities at 50.0 and 199.8 cm⁻¹ increased continuously and then tended to be saturated, while the VB intensities from 400 to 4000 cm⁻¹ decrease and eventually disappear. Moreover, the VB at 50.0 cm⁻¹ was red-shifted to ~16.7 cm⁻¹ and then increased to 33.3 cm⁻¹ as the EEF was increased from 0 to 2 and then to 3 V·nm⁻¹ and higher. The VB at 3396.6 cm⁻¹ was redshifted to ~16.7 cm⁻¹ and then increased to 33.3 cm⁻¹ as the EEF was increased from 0 to 3 and then to 4 V·nm⁻¹ and higher; however, the position of other VBs from 0 to 4000 cm⁻¹ remain almost unchanged. Based on further analysis of the simulation results and previously reported studies, for the VB at 50.0 cm⁻¹, the increasing EEF enhances the polarity between cations and anions; thus, the difference in dipole moment between the cations and the anions increases, which continually increases the VB intensity until saturation is reached. For the VB at 199.8 cm⁻¹, the increasing EEF intensifies the twisting of the ethyl chain, which enhances the VB intensity until saturation. For the other VBs from 400 to 4000 cm⁻¹, the increasing EEF makes the orientation of the cations and anions in EMIMPF₆ more consistent; thus, it can be conjectured that such consistent orientation may weaken the VB intensities and can even make them disappear. The redshift of VB at 50.0 cm⁻¹ may occur because the EEF breaks the distribution of the electrostatic field inside EMIMPF₆ and then weakens the interactions between cations and anions. The redshift of VB at 3396.6 cm⁻¹ may be attributed to the EEF weakening the stretching vibration of the hydrogen bonds formed between the N atoms and the acidic hydrogen atoms on the cationic imidazolium rings. The EEF does not change the positions of the other VBs because the inherent stretching, bending, and rocking vibration of functional groups are not affected by the EEF.

Key words: Vibrational spectrum, External electric field, Ionic liquid, Molecular dynamics simulation

陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8), 912-919. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091

Wenqiong CHEN,Yongji GUAN,Xiaoping ZHANG,Youquan DENG. Influence of External Electric Field on Vibrational Spectrum of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids Probed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34(8), 912-919. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801091

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V34/I8/912

参考文献

1	Gan W. ; Wu D. ; Zhang Z. ; Feng R. R. ; Wang H. F. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 114705.
2	Paesani F. ; Xantheas S. S. ; Voth G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 13118.
3	Praprotnik M. ; Jane?ic? D. ; Mavri J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 11056.
4	Austen Angell C. ; Ansari Y. ; Zhao Z. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 154, 9.
5	Ott L. S. ; Cline M. L. ; Deetlefs M. ; Seddon K. R. ; Finke R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5758.
6	Plechkova N. V. ; Seddon K. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 123.
7	Zhang S. G. ; Zhang J. H. ; Zhang Y. ; Deng Y. Q. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6755.
8	He X. D. ; Shao Q. F. ; Cao P. F. ; Kong W. J. ; Sun J. Q. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. Lab Chip 2015, 15, 1311.
9	Hu X. D. ; Zhang S. G. ; Qu C. ; Zhang Q. H. ; Lu L. J. ; Ma X. Y. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 5941.
10	Kong W. J. ; Cheng L. ; He X. D. ; Xu Z. H. ; Ma X. Y. ; He Y. D. ; Lu L. J. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2014, 18, 1299.
11	Shao Q. F. ; Jia J. J. ; Guan Y. J. ; He X. D. ; Zhang X. P. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 124703.
12	Guan Y. J. ; Shao Q. F. ; Chen W. Q. ; Liu S. M. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 23716.
13	Hu X. D. ; Zhang S. G. ; Liu Y. ; Qu C. ; Lu L. J. ; Ma X. Y. ; Zhang X. P. ; Deng Y. Q. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 213505.
14	Jeon Y. ; Sung J. ; Seo C. ; Lim H. ; Cheong H. ; Kang M. ; Moon B. ; Ouchi Y. ; Kim D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 4735.
15	Bhargava B. L. ; Balasubramanian S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 417, 486.
16	Katsyuba S. A. ; Zvereva E. E. ; Vidis A. ; Dyson P. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 352.
17	Ricks-Laskoski H. L. ; Snow A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12402.
18	Martinez L. ; Andrade R. ; Birgin E. G. ; Martinez J. M. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2157.
19	Humphrey W. ; Dalke A. ; Schulten K. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33.
20	Todorov I. T. ; Smith W. ; Trachenko K. ; Dove M. T. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 1911.
21	Lopes J. N. C. ; Pádua A. l. A. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 16893.
22	Jorgensen W. L. ; Maxwell D. S. ; Tirado-Rives J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225.
23	Kaminski G. ; Jorgensen W. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18010.
24	Essmann U. ; Perera L. ; Berkowitz M. L. ; Darden T. ; Lee H. ; Pedersen L. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577.
25	Hoover W. G. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695.
26	Nosé S. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 511.
27	Heimer N. E. ; Del Sesto R. E. ; Meng Z. ; Wilkes J. S. ; Carper W. R. J. Mol. Liq. 2006, 124, 84.
28	Talaty E. R. ; Raja S. ; Storhaug V. J. ; Do1lle A. ; Carper W. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13177.
29	Fumino K. ; Wittler K. ; Ludwig R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 9507.
30	Fumino K. ; Wulf A. ; Ludwig R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3830.

[1]	曹冲, 张裴, 曹立冬, 刘铭鑫, 宋玉莹, 陈鹏, 黄啟良, 韩布兴. 液滴在超疏水植物叶面的沉积：实验和分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2207006 - .
[2]	王欢, 吴云雁, 赵燕飞, 刘志敏. 离子液体介导CO₂化学转化研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2010022 - .
[3]	陈文琼, 关永吉, 张姣, 裴俊捷, 张晓萍, 邓友全. 外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2001004 - .
[4]	吴智伟, 丁伟璐, 张雅琴, 王艳磊, 何宏艳. 咪唑类离子液体与酪氨酸相互作用及机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2002021 - .
[5]	刘璐, 徐玉萍, 陈霞, 洪梅, 佟静. 1-烷基-3-甲基咪唑氯化物焓变的热重分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 2004014 - .
[6]	惠淑荣, 赵丽薇, 刘青山, 宋大勇. [C₃mim][NTf₂]/DEC/[Li][NTf₂]体系的基础性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 1910067 - .
[7]	胡益民, 韩杰, 郭荣. 非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C₁₆imC₈Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1909049 - .
[8]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840 -849 .
[9]	杨康,帅骁睿,杨化超,严建华,岑可法. 基于室温离子液体的活化石墨烯粉末超级电容储能性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 755 -765 .
[10]	许谢君,肖兴庆,徐首红,刘洪来. 亮氨酸拉链型脂肽对脂质体温敏性调节的分子模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 598 -606 .
[11]	潘明光,赵永升,曾小勤,邹建新. 偶氮苯基型离子液体溶液对空气中湿度的变色响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 624 -629 .
[12]	吕康杰,彭燕秋,肖丽,陆君涛,庄林. 醇/水混合溶剂中碱性聚合物电解质独特的溶解行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 378 -384 .
[13]	杨化超,薄拯,帅骁睿,严建华,岑可法. 润湿特性对超级电容器储能动力学的影响机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 200 -207 .
[14]	龚燕燕,刘海春,张朵,佟静. 醚基功能化离子液体[MOEMIm]Cl和[EOEMIm]Cl热力学性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(11): 1224 -1231 .
[15]	胡之楠,左剑涛,夏美晨,房大维,臧树良. Pitzer方程应用于离子液体[C_nmim][H₂PO₄](n= 3, 4, 5, 6)溶解焓研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 933 -937 .

分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响

Influence of External Electric Field on Vibrational Spectrum of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids Probed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0