Pt@Au/Al2O3核壳纳米粒子的制备和表征及其在催化氧化甲苯中的应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907057

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用种子生长法，在不存在保护剂和结构导向剂的情况下，成功制备Pt@Au核壳结构纳米颗粒，即在Pt纳米颗粒表面，AuCl⁴⁻被H₂还原成Au(0)，并沉积在Pt核纳米颗粒上。通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)，能量色散X射线光谱(EDS)，高分辨率TEM (HRTEM)，傅里叶变换(FFT)和X射线粉末衍射(XRD)，X射线光电子能谱(XPS)，红外光谱(IR)和H₂-程序升温还原(H₂-TPR)等表征证实了核壳结构。所制得的Pt@Au_x/Al₂O₃催化剂在常压下由固定床反应器测定其在甲苯氧化中的活性。相比于单金属催化剂Pt/Al₂O₃与Au/Al₂O₃，Pt@Au_x/Al₂O₃核壳催化剂显示出更高的催化活性，且Pt₁@Au₁/Al₂O₃对于甲苯氧化具有最好的催化活性，这归因于Au和Pt之间的电子交换促进了Au上活性氧的形成。Pt@Au_x/Al₂O₃对甲苯氧化良好的催化性能和高选择性与其较高的吸附氧物质浓度，较好的低温还原性和强相互作用有关。

关键词: 催化剂, 协同作用, 纳米材料, 核壳结构, VOCs

Abstract:

Customizing core-shell nanostructures is considered to be an efficient approach to improve the catalytic activity of metal nanoparticles. Various physiochemical and green methods have been developed for the synthesis of core-shell structures. In this study, a novel liquid-phase hydrogen reduction method was employed to form core-shell Pt@Au nanoparticles with intimate contact between the Pt and Au particles, without the use of any protective or structure-directing agents. The Pt@Au core-shell nanoparticles were prepared by depositing Au metal onto the Pt core; AuCl⁴⁻ was reduced to Au(0) by H₂ in the presence of Pt nanoparticles. The obtained Pt@Au core-shell structured nanoparticles were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), high-resolution TEM, fast Fourier transform, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and H₂-temperature programmed reduction (H₂-TPR) analyses. The EDX mapping results for the nanoparticles, as obtained from their scanning transmission electron microscopy images in the high-angle annular dark-ﬁeld mode, revealed a Pt core with Au particles grown on its surface. Fourier transform measurements were carried out on the high-resolution structure to characterize the Pt@Au nanoparticles. The lattice plane at the center of the nanoparticles corresponded to Pt, while the edge of the particles corresponded to Au. With an increase in the Au content, the intensity of the peak corresponding to Pt in the FTIR spectrum decreased slowly, indicating that the Pt nanoparticles were surrounded by Au nanoparticles, and thus confirming the core-shell structure of the nanoparticles. The XRD results showed that the peak corresponding to Pt shifted gradually toward the Au peak with an increase in the Au content, indicating that the Au particles grew on the Pt seeds; this trend was consistent with the FTIR results. Hence, it can be stated that the Pt@Au core-shell structure was successfully prepared using the liquid-phase hydrogen reduction method. The catalytic activity of the nanoparticles for the oxidation of toluene was evaluated using a fixed-bed reactor under atmospheric pressure. The XPS and H₂-TPR results showed that the Pt₁@Au₁/Al₂O₃ catalyst had the best toluene oxidation activity owing to its lowest reduction temperature, lowest Au 4d & 4f and Pt 4d & 4f binding energies, and highest Au⁰/Au^δ⁺ and Pt⁰/Pt²⁺ proportions. The Pt₁@Au₂Al₂O₃ catalyst showed high stability under dry and humid conditions. The good catalytic performance and high selectivity of Pt@Au/Al₂O₃ for toluene oxidation could be attributed to the high concentration of adsorbed oxygen species, good low-temperature reducibility, and strong interaction.

Key words: Catalyst, Synergy, Nanomaterials, Core-shell structure, VOCs

张超, 李思汉, 吴辰亮, 李小青, 严新焕. Pt@Au/Al₂O₃核壳纳米粒子的制备和表征及其在催化氧化甲苯中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8), 1907057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907057

Chao Zhang, Sihan Li, Chenliang Wu, Xiaoqing Li, Xinhuan Yan. Preparation and Characterization of Pt@Au/Al₂O₃ Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Toluene Oxidation Reaction[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2020, 36(8), 1907057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907057

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907057

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I8/1907057

图/表 10

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

参考文献 47

1	Zhang Q. ; Lee I. ; Joo J. B. ; Zaera F. ; Yin Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 46, 1816. doi: 10.1021/ar300230s
2	Sun Q. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Wang Y. ; Lu A. H. Chin. J. Catal. 2015, 36, 683. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60298-9
3	Lee J. ; Yoo J. K. ; Kim J. ; Sohn Y. ; Rhee C. K. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 290, 244. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.078
4	Shim K. ; Lee W. C. ; Park M. S. ; Shahabuddin M. ; Yamauchi Y. ; Hossain M. S. A. ; Shim Y. B. ; Kim J. H. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2019, 278, 88. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.048
5	Zhou S. ; McIlwrath K. ; Jackson G. ; Eichhorn B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1780. doi: 10.1021/ja056924
6	Jiang R. ; Tung S. O. ; Tang Z. ; Li L. ; Ding L. ; Xi X. ; Liu Y. ; Zhang L. ; Zhang J. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 12, 260. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.11.005
7	Jiang L. ; Yuan X. ; Liang J. ; Zhang J. ; Wang H. ; Zeng G. J. Power Sources 2016, 331, 408. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.054
8	Campani V. ; Giarra S. ; De Rosa G. OpenNano 2018, 3, 5. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2017.12.001
9	Chen G. ; Wang Y. ; Xie R. ; Gong S. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2018, 130, 58. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.008
10	Zhang N. ; Liu S. ; Xu Y. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 2227. doi: 10.1039/c2nr00009a
11	Tada H. ; Suzuki F. ; Ito S. ; Akita T. ; Tanaka K. ; Kawahara T. ; Kobayashi H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 8714. doi: 10.1021/jp0202690
12	Yoon J. ; Baik H. ; Lee S. ; Kwon S. J. ; Lee K. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6434. doi: 10.1039/c4nr00551a
13	Yang C. ; Zhang F. ; Lei N. ; Yang M. ; Liu F. ; Miao Z. ; Sun Y. ; Zhao X. ; Wang A. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 1366. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(18)63103-1
14	Zhang Y. ; Liu Y. ; Xie S. ; Huang H. ; Guo G. ; Dai H. ; Deng J. Environ. Int. 2019, 128, 335. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.062
15	Qi Y. ; Shen L. ; Zhang J. ; Yao J. ; Lu R. ; Miyakoshi T. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 810. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.057
16	Morin J. ; Gandolfo A. ; Temime-Roussel B. ; Strekowski R. ; Brochard G. ; Bergé. V% Gligorovski S. ; Wortham H. Build. Environ. 2019, 156, 225. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.031
17	Song M. ; Liu X. ; Zhang Y. ; Shao M. ; Lu K. ; Tan Q. ; Feng M. ; Qu Y. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 201, 28. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.019
18	Kim K. ; Boo S. ; Ahn H. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 15, 92. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.09.005
19	Zhu A. ; Zhou Y. ; Wang Y. ; Zhu Q. ; Liu H. ; Zhang Z. ; Lu H. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jre.2018.03.032
20	Feng Z. ; Ma Y. ; Natarajan V. ; Zhao Q. ; Ma X. ; Zhan J. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2018, 255, 884. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.138
21	Gaálová J. ; Topka P. ; Kaluža L. ; Soukup K. ; Barbier J. Catal. Today. 2019, 333, 190. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.005
22	Vallejos S. ; Gràcia I. ; Bravo J. ; Figueras E. ; Hubálek J. ; Cané C. Talanta 2015, 139, 27. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.02.034
23	Usón L. ; Colmenares M. G. ; Hueso J. L. ; Sebastián V. ; Balas F. ; Arruebo M. ; Santamaría J. Catal. Today 2014, 227, 179. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.014
24	Mori M. ; Nishimura H. ; Itagaki Y. ; Sadaoka Y. ; Traversa E. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2009, 143, 56. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.09.001
25	Li J. H. ; Ao P. ; Li X. Q. ; Xu X. S. ; Xu X. X. ; Gao X. ; Yan X. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31, 173. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201411131
	李加衡; 敖平; 李小青; 许响生; 徐潇潇; 高翔; 严新焕. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31, 173. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201411131
26	Sun S. ; Wang Y. ; Wang L. N. ; Guo T. ; Yuan X. ; Zhang D. ; Xue Z. ; Zhou X. ; Lu X. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 793, 635. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.212
27	Peng C. ; Pan N. ; Qian Z. ; Wei X. ; Shao G. Talanta 2017, 175, 114. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.005
28	Takahashi S. ; Todoroki N. ; Myochi R. ; Nagao T. ; Taguchi N. ; Ioroi T. ; Feiten F. E. ; Wakisaka Y. ; Asakura K. ; Sekizawa O. ; et al J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 842, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.04.053
29	Lewis L. N. ; Krafft T. A. ; Huffman J. C. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3555. doi: 10.1021/ic00043a014
30	Kristian N. ; Wang X. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.011
31	Grzelczak M. ; Pérez-Juste J. ; Rodríguez-González B. ; Liz-Marzán L. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 3946. doi: 10.1039/b606887a
32	Liao M. ; Li W. ; Xi X. ; Luo C. ; Gui S. ; Jiang C. ; Mai Z. ; Chen B. H. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 791, 124. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.03.024
33	Cao R. ; Xia T. ; Zhu R. ; Liu Z. ; Guo J. ; Chang G. ; Zhang Z. ; Liu X. ; He Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 840. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.104
34	Nishita M. ; Park S. Y. ; Nishio T. ; Kamizaki K. ; Wang Z. ; Tamada K. ; Takumi T. ; Hashimoto R. ; Otani H. ; Pazour G. J. ; et al Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
35	Guo S. ; Li J. ; Dong S. ; Wang E. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 15337. doi: 10.1021/jp104942d
36	Yang H. ; Deng J. ; Liu Y. ; Xie S. ; Wu Z. ; Dai H. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2016, 414, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.12.010
37	Pei W. ; Liu Y. ; Deng J. ; Zhang K. ; Hou Z. ; Zhao X. ; Dai H. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 256, 117814. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117814
38	He G. ; Song Y. ; Liu K. ; Walter A. ; Chen S. ; Chen S. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 831. doi: 10.1021/cs400114s
39	Zhang X. ; Li Z. ; Zhao J. ; Cui Y. ; Tan B. ; Wang J. ; Zhang C. ; He G. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1. doi: 10.1007/s11814-017-0092-3
40	Lefèvre G. ; Duc M. ; Lepeut P. ; Caplain R. ; Fédoroff M. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7530. doi: 10.1021/la025651i
41	Meng T. ; Wang L. ; Jia H. ; Gong T. ; Feng Y. ; Li R. ; Wang H. ; Zhang Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 536, 424. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.076
42	Cao Z. ; Bu J. ; Zhong Z. ; Sun C. ; Zhang Q. ; Wang J. ; Chen S. ; Xie X. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2019, 578, 105. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.04.006
43	Chenakin S. ; Kruse N. J. Catal. 2018, 358, 224. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.12.010
44	Figueiredo N. M. ; Carvalho N. J. M. ; Cavaleiro A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 5793. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.104
45	Nartova A. V. ; Gharachorlou A. ; Bukhtiyarov A. V. ; Kvon R. I. ; Bukhtiyarov V. I. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 401, 341. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.179
46	Smirnov M. Y. ; Kalinkin A. V. ; Vovk E. I. ; Simonov P. A. ; Gerasimov E. Y. ; Sorokin A. M. ; Bukhtiyarov V. I. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 428, 972. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.205
47	Ousmane M. ; Liotta L. F. ; Carlo G. D. ; Pantaleo G. ; Venezia A. M. ; Deganello G. ; Retailleau L. ; Boreave A. ; Giroir-Fendler A. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2011, 101, 629. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.004

[1]	朱锐杰, 康磊磊, 李林, 潘晓丽, 王华, 苏杨, 李广亿, 程鸿魁, 李仁贵, 刘晓艳, 王爱琴. WO₃-TiO₂负载的Pt单原子催化剂光热协同催化丙烷和丙烯氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303003 - .
[2]	赖可溱, 李丰彦, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 金属-有机骨架衍生的Ni-CNT/ZnIn₂S₄异质结用于光催化产氢及其电荷转移途径的确定[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2304018 - .
[3]	罗耀武, 王定胜. 单原子催化剂电子结构调控实现高效多相催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212020 -0 .
[4]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[5]	何展军, 黄敏, 林铁军, 钟良枢. 光热催化甲烷干重整研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212060 -0 .
[6]	宋千伟, 何观朝, 费慧龙. 基于单原子催化剂的光热催化转化：原理和应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212038 -0 .
[7]	侯玉翠, 何卓森, 任树行, 吴卫泽. 均相催化剂催化氧气氧化生物质制备甲酸[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212065 -0 .
[8]	李萌, 杨甫林, 常进法, Schechter Alex, 冯立纲. MoP-NC纳米球负载Pt纳米粒子用于高效甲醇电解[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2301005 -0 .
[9]	高凤雨, 刘恒恒, 姚小龙, Sani Zaharaddeen, 唐晓龙, 罗宁, 易红宏, 赵顺征, 于庆君, 周远松. 球形表面富锰Mn_xCo_3−xO_4−ƞ尖晶石型催化剂选择性催化还原NO_x研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212003 -0 .
[10]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[11]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[12]	沈姗姗, 刘晓晖, 郭勇, 王艳芹. Fe的原位掺杂对Pt/Silicalite-1催化丙烷脱氢反应性能的提升作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2209043 -0 .
[13]	王晓愚, 程阳, 薛国栋, 周子琦, 赵孟泽, 马超杰, 谢瑾, 姚光杰, 洪浩, 周旭, 刘开辉, 刘忠范. 基于硒化镓纳米片填充的空芯光纤超高二次谐波增强[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212028 -0 .
[14]	王吉超, 乔秀, 史维娜, 贺景, 陈军, 张万庆. 多面体状Cu₂O修饰片状BiOI的S型异质结构筑及光催化水蒸气中CO₂转化性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2210003 - .
[15]	王晶晶, 曹贵强, 段瑞贤, 李向阳, 李喜飞. 金属单原子催化剂增强硫正极动力学的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212005 -0 .

Pt@Au/Al₂O₃核壳纳米粒子的制备和表征及其在催化氧化甲苯中的应用

Preparation and Characterization of Pt@Au/Al₂O₃ Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Toluene Oxidation Reaction

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0