石墨烯导热研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101013

物理化学学报 >> 2022, Vol. 38 >> Issue (1): 2101013.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101013

所属专题：石墨烯的功能与应用

石墨烯导热研究进展

宋厚甫¹, 康飞宇¹^,²^,³^,*()

¹ 清华大学，清华-伯克利深圳学院，广东深圳 518055
² 清华大学深圳国际研究生院，广东省热管理工程与材料重点实验室，广东深圳 518055
³ 清华大学深圳国际研究生院，深圳盖姆石墨烯研究中心，广东深圳 518055

收稿日期:2021-01-07 录用日期:2021-02-08 发布日期:2021-02-25
通讯作者: 康飞宇 E-mail:fykang@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介:康飞宇，1962年出生。获香港科技大学博士学位; 现任清华大学深圳国际研究生院副院长，清华大学教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为新型碳材料的制备、表征和应用，特别是石墨、石墨烯及其在锂离子电池与其它储能器件中的应用
基金资助:
广东省科技计划项目(2020B1212060015)及深圳盖姆石墨烯研究中心资助

Recent Progress on Thermal Conduction of Graphene

Houfu Song¹, Feiyu Kang¹^,²^,³^,*()

¹ Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (TBSI), Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong Province, China
² Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Management Engineering & Materials, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong Province, China
³ Shenzhen Geim Graphene Research Center, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2021-01-07 Accepted:2021-02-08 Published:2021-02-25
Contact: Feiyu Kang E-mail:fykang@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn
About author:Feiyu Kang. Email: fykang@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn
Supported by:
广东省科技计划项目(2020B1212060015)及深圳盖姆石墨烯研究中心资助

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

石墨烯具有目前已知材料中最高的热导率，在电子器件、信息技术、国防军工等领域具有良好的应用前景。石墨烯导热的理论和实验研究具有重要意义，在最近十年间取得了长足的发展。本文综述了石墨烯本征热导率的研究进展及应用现状。首先介绍应用于石墨烯热导率测量的微纳尺度传热技术，包括拉曼光谱法、悬空热桥法和时域热反射法。然后展示了石墨烯热导率的理论研究成果，并总结了石墨烯本征热导率的影响因素。随后介绍石墨烯在导热材料中的应用，包括高导热石墨烯膜、石墨烯纤维及石墨烯在热界面材料中的应用。最后对石墨烯导热研究的成果进行总结，提出目前石墨烯热传导研究中存在的机遇与挑战，并展望未来可能的发展方向。

关键词: 石墨烯, 热导率, 声子, 热界面材料, 悬空热桥法, 尺寸效应

Abstract:

With the irreversible trend of miniaturization and the pursuit of a high power density in electronic devices, heat dissipation has become crucial for designing next-generation electronic products. Graphene, which has the highest thermal conductivity among all discovered solid materials, has attracted attention from both academia and the industry. As a two-dimensional material with atom-scale thickness, graphene is suitable for investigating the phonon transport behavior at reduced dimensions. The mass production technique of graphene makes it a promising material for thermal management in consumer electronics, information technology, medical devices, and new energy automobiles. In this review, we summarize the recent progress on the thermal conduction of graphene. In the first part, we introduce the thermal conductivity measurement methods for graphene, including the optothermal Raman method, suspended-pad method, and time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) method. The thermal measurement of graphene with high accuracy is key to understanding the heat transfer mechanism of graphene; however, it is still a significant challenge. Despite the development of measurement methods, the thermal measurement of suspended single-layer graphene is limited by the graphene transfer technique, estimation of the thermal contact resistance, sensitivity to the in-plane thermal conductivity in the thermal model, and other factors. In the second part, we discuss the theoretical study of the thermal conductivity of graphene via first principle calculations and molecular dynamics simulation. The "selection rule" of phonon scattering explains the thickness-dependent thermal conductivity of few-layer graphene, and the understanding of the contribution of phonon modes to the thermal conductivity of graphene has been updated recently by taking multiple-phonon scattering into consideration. The size effect on the thermal conductivity of graphene is discussed in this section for a better understanding of the phonon transport behavior of graphene. In the third part, we conclude with the thermal management applications of graphene, including a highly thermally conductive graphene film, graphene fiber, and graphene-enhanced thermal interface materials. For graphene films, which are the pioneering thermal management applications in industrial use, we focus on the challenge of fabricating highly thermally conductive graphene films with large thicknesses and propose possible technical methods. For graphene-enhanced thermal interface materials, we summarize the main factors affecting the thermal properties and discuss the tradeoff between the high thermal conductivity of graphene flakes and the dispersibility of graphene in the polymer matrix. It was demonstrated that a 3D thermal conductive network is essential for efficient heat dissipation in graphene-based composites. Finally, a summary of opportunities and challenges in the thermal study of graphene is presented at the end of the review. Research on the thermal properties of graphene has made immense progress since the discovery of the thermal conductivity of graphene more than a decade ago, and will continue in order to address the urgent requirements of thermal management.

Key words: Graphene, Thermal conductivity, Phonon, Thermal interface material, Suspended pad, Size effect

宋厚甫, 康飞宇. 石墨烯导热研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(1), 2101013. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101013

Houfu Song, Feiyu Kang. Recent Progress on Thermal Conduction of Graphene[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(1), 2101013. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101013

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202101013

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V38/I1/2101013

图/表 8

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

表2

图5

表3

参考文献 123

1	Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. ; Morozov S. V. ; Jiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Dubonos S. V. ; Grigorieva I. V. ; Firsov A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896
2	Castro Neto A. H. ; Guinea F. ; Peres N. M. R. ; Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
3	Lee C. ; Wei X. ; Kysar J. W. ; Hone J. Science 2008, 321, 385. doi: 10.1126/science.1157996
4	Grigorenko A. N. ; Polini M. ; Novoselov K. S. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 749. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.262
5	Novoselov K. ; Mishchenko O. A. ; Carvalho O. A. ; Neto A. C. Science 2016, 353, 6298. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9439
6	Balandin A. A. ; Ghosh S. ; Bao W. ; Calizo I. ; Teweldebrhan D. ; Miao F. ; Lau C. N. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902. doi: 10.1021/nl0731872
7	Lindsay L. ; Broido D. ; Mingo N. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 115427. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115427
8	Seol J. H. ; Jo I. ; Moore A. L. ; Lindsay L. ; Aitken Z. H. ; Pettes M. T. ; Li X. ; Yao Z. ; Huang R. ; Broido D. ; et al Science 2010, 328, 213. doi: 10.1126/science.1184014
9	Akbari A. ; Cunning B. V. ; Joshi S. R. ; Wang C. H. ; Camacho-Mojica D. C. ; Chatterjee S. ; Modepalli V. ; Cahoon C. ; Bielawski C. W. ; Bakharev P. ; et al Matter 2020, 2, 1198. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.02.014
10	Peng L. ; Xu Z. ; Liu Z. ; Guo Y. ; Li P. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700589. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700589
11	Ji H. ; Sellan D. P. ; Pettes M. T. ; Kong X. ; Ji J. ; Shi L. ; Ruoff R. S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1185. doi: 10.1039/c3ee42573h
12	Chen Z. L. ; Gao P. ; Liu Z. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1907004.
	陈召龙; 高鹏; 刘忠范. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1907004. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907004
13	Shi L. ; Li D. ; Yu C. ; Jang W. ; Kim D. ; Yao Z. ; Kim P. ; Majumdar A. J. Heat Transf. 2003, 125, 881. doi: 10.1115/1.1597619
14	Cahill D. G. ; Katiyar M. ; Abelson J. R. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 6077. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.50.6077
15	Cahill D. G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2004, 75, 5119. doi: 10.1063/1.1819431
16	Faugeras C. ; Faugeras B. ; Orlita M. ; Potemski M. ; Nair R. R. ; Geim A. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1889. doi: 10.1021/nn9016229
17	Cai W. ; Moore A. L. ; Zhu Y. ; Li X. ; Chen S. ; Shi L. ; Ruoff R. S. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1645. doi: 10.1021/nl9041966
18	Fan A. ; Hu Y. ; Ma W. ; Wang H. ; Zhang X. J. Therm. Sci. 2019, 28, 159. doi: 10.1007/s11630-019-1084-x
19	Zhou H. ; Zhu J. ; Liu Z. ; Yan Z. ; Fan X. ; Lin J. ; Wang G. ; Yan Q. ; Yu T. ; Ajayan P. M. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 1232. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0486-z
20	Sahoo S. ; Gaur A. P. ; Ahmadi M. ; Guinel M. J.-F. ; Katiyar R. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 9042. doi: 10.1021/jp402509w
21	Yan R. ; Simpson J. R. ; Bertolazzi S. ; Brivio J. ; Watson M. ; Wu X. ; Kis A. ; Luo T. ; Hight Walker A. R. ; Xing H. G. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 986. doi: 10.1021/nn405826k
22	Peimyoo N. ; Shang J. ; Yang W. ; Wang Y. ; Cong C. ; Yu T. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 1210. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0602-0
23	Kim P. ; Shi L. ; Majumdar A. ; McEuen P. L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 215502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.215502
24	Wang Z. ; Xie R. ; Bui C. T. ; Liu D. ; Ni X. ; Li B. ; Thong J. T. L. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 113. doi: 10.1021/nl102923q
25	Pettes M. T. ; Jo I. ; Yao Z. ; Shi L. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1195. doi: 10.1021/nl104156y
26	Xu X. ; Pereira L. F. C. ; Wang Y. ; Wu J. ; Zhang K. ; Zhao X. ; Bae S. ; Bui C. T. ; Xie R. ; Thong J. T. L. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4689
27	Jo I. ; Pettes M. T. ; Kim J. ; Watanabe K. ; Taniguchi T. ; Yao Z. ; Shi L. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 550. doi: 10.1021/nl304060g
28	Wang C. ; Guo J. ; Dong L. ; Aiyiti A. ; Xu X. ; Li B. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25334. doi: 10.1038/srep25334
29	Jo I. ; Pettes M. T. ; Ou E. ; Wu W. ; Shi L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 201902. doi: 10.1063/1.4876965
30	Zhao Y. ; Zheng M. ; Wu J. ; Huang B. ; Thong J. T. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 225702. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab7647
31	Lee S. ; Yang F. ; Suh J. ; Yang S. ; Lee Y. ; Li G. ; Choe H. S. ; Suslu A. ; Chen Y. ; Ko C. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9573
32	Aiyiti A. ; Bai X. ; Wu J. ; Xu X. ; Li B. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 452. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.02.022
33	Feldman A. High Temp. High Press. 1999, 31, 293. doi: 10.1068/htrt171
34	Wang Y. ; Park J. Y. ; Koh Y. K. ; Cahill D. G. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 043507. doi: 10.1063/1.3457151
35	Zhang H. ; Chen X. ; Jho Y.-D. ; Minnich A. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1643. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04499
36	Taylor R. Philos. Mag. 1966, 13, 157. doi: 10.1080/14786436608211993
37	Klemens P. G. ; Pedraza D. F. Carbon 1994, 32, 735. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90096-5
38	Feser J. P. ; Cahill D. G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2012, 83, 104901. doi: 10.1063/1.4757863
39	Rodin D. ; Yee S. K. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2017, 88, 014902. doi: 10.1063/1.4973297
40	Qian X. ; Ding Z. ; Shin J. ; Schmidt A. J. ; Chen G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2020, 91, 064903. doi: 10.1063/5.0003770
41	Sun B. ; Gu X. ; Zeng Q. ; Huang X. ; Yan Y. ; Liu Z. ; Yang R. ; Koh Y. K. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1603297. doi: 10.1002/adma.201603297
42	Jang H. ; Wood J. D. ; Ryder C. R. ; Hersam M. C. ; Cahill D. G. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 8017. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503466
43	Zhu G. ; Liu J. ; Zheng Q. ; Zhang R. ; Li D. ; Banerjee D. ; Cahill D. G. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13211. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13211
44	Chiritescu C. ; Cahill D. G. ; Nguyen N. ; Johnson D. ; Bodapati A. ; Keblinski P. ; Zschack P. Science 2007, 315, 351. doi: 10.1126/science.1136494
45	Kang K. ; Koh Y. K. ; Chiritescu C. ; Zheng X. ; Cahill D. G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008, 79, 114901. doi: 10.1063/1.3020759
46	Schmidt A. J. ; Cheaito R. ; Chiesa M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2009, 80, 094901. doi: 10.1063/1.3212673
47	Liu J. ; Choi G.-M. ; Cahill D. G. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 233107. doi: 10.1063/1.4904513
48	Shen B. ; Zhai W. T. ; Zheng W. G. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4542. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201400079
49	Song H. ; Liu J. ; Liu B. ; Wu J. ; Cheng H.-M. ; Kang F. Joule 2018, 2, 442. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.006
50	Wang Y. ; Xu N. ; Li D. ; Zhu J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201604134
51	Wu X. ; Tang W. ; Xu X. Acta Phys. Sin. 2020, 69, 196602.
	吴祥水; 汤雯婷; 徐象繁. 物理学报, 2020, 69, 196602. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200709
52	Ward A. ; Broido D. ; Stewart D. A. ; Deinzer G. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 125203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.125203
53	Nika D. ; Pokatilov E. ; Askerov A. ; Balandin A. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 155413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155413
54	Nika D. L. ; Ghosh S. ; Pokatilov E. P. ; Balandin A. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 203103. doi: 10.1063/1.3136860
55	Klemens P. G. Int. J. Thermophys. 2001, 22, 265. doi: 10.1023/A:1006776107140
56	Lindsay L. ; Broido D. ; Mingo N. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 235428. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.235428
57	Feng T. ; Ruan X. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 045202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045202
58	Zou J.-H. ; Ye Z.-Q. ; Cao B.-Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 134705. doi: 10.1063/1.4963918
59	Cepellotti A. ; Fugallo G. ; Paulatto L. ; Lazzeri M. ; Mauri F. ; Marzari N. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6400. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7400
60	Wang H. ; Hu S. ; Takahashi K. ; Zhang X. ; Takamatsu H. ; Chen J. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15843
61	Ghosh S. ; Bao W. ; Nika D. L. ; Subrina S. ; Pokatilov E. P. ; Lau C. N. ; Balandin A. A. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 555. doi: 10.1038/nmat2753
62	Sadeghi M. M. ; Jo I. ; Shi L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 16321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306175110
63	Gu X. ; Wei Y. ; Yin X. ; Li B. ; Yang R. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 041002. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.041002
64	Nika D. L. ; Askerov A. S. ; Balandin A. A. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3238. doi: 10.1021/nl301230g
65	Lee W. ; Kihm K. D. ; Kim H. G. ; Shin S. ; Lee C. ; Park J. S. ; Cheon S. ; Kwon O. M. ; Lim G. ; Lee W. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2361. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05269
66	Mortazavi B. ; Ahzi S. Carbon 2013, 63, 460. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.017
67	Chen S. ; Wu Q. ; Mishra C. ; Kang J. ; Zhang H. ; Cho K. ; Cai W. ; Balandin A. A. ; Ruoff R. S. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 203. doi: 10.1038/nmat3207
68	Chien S. K. ; Yang Y. T. ; Chen C. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 033107. doi: 10.1063/1.3543622
69	Murakami M. ; Nishiki N. ; Nakamura K. ; Ehara J. ; Okada H. ; Kouzaki T. ; Watanabe K. ; Hoshi T. ; Yoshimura S. Carbon 1992, 30, 255. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90088-E
70	Chen H. ; Müller M. B. ; Gilmore K. J. ; Wallace G. G. ; Li D. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3557. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800757
71	Chen C. M. ; Huang J. Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Gong W. Z. ; Yang Q. H. ; Wang M. Z. ; Yang Y. G. Carbon 2012, 50, 659. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.022
72	Liu Y. ; Li P. ; Wang F. ; Fang W. ; Xu Z. ; Gao W. ; Gao C. Carbon 2019, 155, 462. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.021
73	Pei S. ; Cheng H.-M. Carbon 2012, 50, 3210. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010
74	Rozada R. ; Paredes J. I. ; Villar-Rodil S. ; Martínez-Alonso A. ; Tascón J. M. Nano Res. 2013, 6, 216. doi: 10.1007/s12274-013-0298-6
75	Wu H. ; Drzal L. T. Carbon 2012, 50, 1135. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.026
76	Xin G. ; Sun H. ; Hu T. ; Fard H. R. ; Sun X. ; Koratkar N. ; Borca-Tasciuc T. ; Lian J. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4521. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400951
77	Kumar P. ; Shahzad F. ; Yu S. ; Hong S. M. ; Kim Y.-H. ; Koo C. M. Carbon 2015, 94, 494. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.032
78	Teng C. ; Xie D. ; Wang J. ; Yang Z. ; Ren G. ; Zhu Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201700240
79	Cai X. ; Luo Y. ; Liu B. ; Cheng H. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6224. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00254a
80	Luo C. ; Yeh C. N. ; Baltazar J. M. L. ; Tsai C. L. ; Huang J. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706229. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706229
81	Zhang X. ; Guo Y. ; Liu Y. ; Li Z. ; Fang W. ; Peng L. ; Zhou J. ; Xu Z. ; Gao C. Carbon 2020, 167, 249. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.051
82	Liu Y. ; Liang C. ; Wei A. ; Jiang Y. ; Tian Q. ; Wu Y. ; Xu Z. ; Li Y. ; Guo F. ; Yang Q. Mater. Today Nano 2018, 3, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2018.09.005
83	Lin S. ; Zhong Y. ; Zhao X. ; Sawada T. ; Li X. ; Lei W. ; Wang M. ; Serizawa T. ; Zhu H. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803004. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803004
84	Xu Z. ; Liu Z. ; Sun H. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3249. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300774
85	Meng Y. ; Zhao Y. ; Hu C. ; Cheng H. ; Hu Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Shi G. ; Qu L. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2326. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300132
86	Cheng Y. ; Wang K. ; Qi Y. ; Liu Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2006046.
	程熠; 王坤; 亓月; 刘忠范. 物理化学学报, 202, 38, 2006046. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006046
87	Jian M. ; Zhang Y. ; Liu Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2007093.
	蹇木强; 张莹莹; 刘忠范. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2007093. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007093
88	Xu Z. ; Liu Y. ; Zhao X. ; Peng L. ; Sun H. ; Xu Y. ; Ren X. ; Jin C. ; Xu P. ; Wang M. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6449. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506426
89	Xin G. ; Yao T. ; Sun H. ; Scott S. M. ; Shao D. ; Wang G. ; Lian J. Science 2015, 349, 1083. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6502
90	Wang Q. ; Xia H. ; Zhang C. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80, 1478. doi: 10.1002/app.1239
91	Ji J. ; Chiang S.-W. ; Liu M. ; Liang X. ; Li J. ; Gan L. ; He Y. ; Li B. ; Kang F. ; Du H. Thermochim. Acta 2020, 690, 178649. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2020.178649
92	Pashayi K. ; Fard H. R. ; Lai F. ; Iruvanti S. ; Plawsky J. ; Borca-Tasciuc T. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 104310. doi: 10.1063/1.4716179
93	Gou Y. ; Liu Z. ; Zhang G. ; Li Y. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 74, 358. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.009
94	Li H. ; Chen W. ; Xu J. ; Li J. ; Gan L. ; Chu X. ; Yao Y. ; He Y. ; Li B. ; Kang F. Thermochim. Acta 2019, 676, 198. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2019.04.008
95	Chen H. ; Ginzburg V. V. ; Yang J. ; Yang Y. ; Liu W. ; Huang Y. ; Du L. ; Chen B. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 59, 41. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001
96	Yu A. ; Ramesh P. ; Itkis M. E. ; Bekyarova E. ; Haddon R. C. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 7565. doi: 10.1021/jp071761s
97	Ganguli S. ; Roy A. K. ; Anderson D. P. Carbon 2008, 46, 806. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.008
98	Shahil K. M. ; Balandin A. A. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 861. doi: 10.1021/nl203906r
99	Bigg D. M. Polym. Compos. 1986, 7, 125. doi: 10.1002/pc.750070302
100	Zhu Y. ; Chen K. ; Kang F. Solid State Commun. 2013, 158, 46. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.01.013
101	Stankovich S. ; Dikin D. A. ; Piner R. D. ; Kohlhaas K. A. ; Kleinhammes A. ; Jia Y. ; Wu Y. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034
102	Coleman J. N. ; Lotya M. ; O'Neill A. ; Bergin S. D. ; King P. J. ; Khan U. ; Young K. ; Gaucher A. ; De S. ; Smith R.J. ; et al Science 2011, 331, 568. doi: 10.1126/science.1194975
103	Nicolosi V. ; Chhowalla M. ; Kanatzidis M. G. ; Strano M. S. ; Coleman J. N. Science 2013, 340, 1226419. doi: 10.1126/science.1226419
104	Guo Y. ; Xu G. ; Yang X. ; Ruan K. ; Ma T. ; Zhang Q. ; Gu J. ; Wu Y. ; Liu H. ; Guo Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 3004. doi: 10.1039/c8tc00452h
105	Zhang Y. ; Choi J. R. ; Park S.-J. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 109, 498. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.001
106	Shen X. ; Wang Z. ; Wu Y. ; Liu X. ; Kim J.-K. Carbon 2016, 108, 412. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.042
107	Teng C.-C. ; Ma C.-C. M. ; Lu C.-H. ; Yang S.-Y. ; Lee S.-H. ; Hsiao M.-C. ; Yen M.-Y. ; Chiou K.-C. ; Lee T.-M. Carbon 2011, 49, 5107. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.095
108	Huang X. ; Zhi C. ; Jiang P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 23812. doi: 10.1021/jp308556r
109	Zeng X. ; Ye L. ; Yu S. ; Li H. ; Sun R. ; Xu J. ; Wong C. P. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6774. doi: 10.1039/c5nr00228a
110	Ding P. ; Zhang J. ; Song N. ; Tang S. ; Liu Y. ; Shi L. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 109, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.015
111	Xu J. ; Gao B. ; Du H. ; Kang F. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2016, 104, 348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.12.023
112	Xiong Y. H. ; Wu H. ; Gao J. S. ; Chen W. ; Zhang J. C. ; Yue Y. N. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1150.
	熊扬恒; 吴昊; 高建树; 陈文; 张景超; 岳亚楠. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1150. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201901002
113	Chen Z. ; Ren W. ; Gao L. ; Liu B. ; Pei S. ; Cheng H.-M. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424. doi: 10.1038/nmat3001
114	Shi L. ; Chen K. ; Du R. ; Bachmatiuk A. ; Rümmeli M. H. ; Xie K. ; Huang Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Liu Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6360. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b02262
115	Chen Z. ; Xu C. ; Ma C. ; Ren W. ; Cheng H. M. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1296. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204196
116	Pettes M. T. ; Ji H. ; Ruoff R. S. ; Shi L. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2959. doi: 10.1021/nl300662q
117	Kholmanov I. ; Kim J. ; Ou E. ; Ruoff R. S. ; Shi L. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11699. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02917
118	Cong H.-P. ; Ren X.-C. ; Wang P. ; Yu S.-H. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2693. doi: 10.1021/nn300082k
119	Lv W. ; Zhang C. ; Li Z. ; Yang Q.-H. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 658. doi: 10.1021/jz502655m
120	Sun H. ; Xu Z. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2554. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204576
121	Xu Y. ; Sheng K. ; Li C. ; Shi G. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324. doi: 10.1021/nn101187z
122	Lian G. ; Tuan C. C. ; Li L. Y. ; Jiao S. L. ; Wang Q. L. ; Moon K. S. ; Cui D. L. ; Wong C. P. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 6096. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01595
123	Idowu A. ; Boesl B. ; Agarwal A. Carbon 2018, 135, 52. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.024

Sample	Thermal conductivity (W·m^-1·K^-1)	Measurement method	Preparation method
Suspended
Single-layer graphene ⁶	5300 ± 480	Raman	Mechanical exfoliation
Single-layer graphene ¹⁷	2500 + 1100/-1050	Raman	CVD
2-layer graphene ²⁵	620 ± 80	Suspended-pad	Mechanical exfoliation
Single-layer graphene ²⁶	1689 ± 100	Suspended-pad	CVD
Supported
Single-layer graphene ⁸	579 ± 34	Suspended-pad	Mechanical exfoliation, SiO₂ substrate
Single-layer graphene ¹⁶	630	Raman	Mechanical exfoliation, SiO₂ substrate
Single-layer graphene ¹⁷	370 + 650/-320	Raman	CVD, Au/SiNx substrate
3-layer graphene ²⁴	327	Suspended-pad	Mechanical exfoliation, SiNx substrate
Bulk
Multi-layer graphene ³⁵	1930 ± 1400	TDTR	Mechanical exfoliation, thickness 194 nm
HOPG ³⁸	1800	TDTR	Bulk
HOPG ³⁹	1861 ± 744	TDTR	Bulk
HOPG ⁴⁰	1843	TDTR	Bulk
Graphene film ⁴⁸	1100	Laser flash	Reduced graphene oxide
Graphene film ¹⁰	1940	Laser flash	Reduced graphene oxide

Material	Thermal conductivity/(W·m^-1·K^-1)	Preparation method
GO ⁹	2025	Doctor-blade, 3000 ℃ annealing reduction +3000 ℃ second annealing reduction
GO ¹⁰	1940	Casting, 3000 ℃ annealing reduction
GO ⁴⁸	1100	Evaporation, 2000 ℃ annealing reduction
GO ⁷⁶	1283–1434	Electro-spray deposition，2850 ℃ annealing reduction
GO ⁷⁷	1390	Vacuum filtration, HI reduction
Graphene ⁷⁸	1529	Ball milling，2850 ℃ annealing reduction
GO ⁸¹	1224	Doctor-blade, film paste Hot pressing + 2800 ℃ annealing reduction

Fillers	Loading	Thermal conductivity/(W·m^-1·K^-1)	Method
rGO ⁹⁶	25% (x)	6.4	Mixing
rGO ⁹⁷	20% (w)	5.8	Silane functionalized
Graphene ⁹⁸	10% (x)	5.1	Sodium cholate functionalized
rGO ¹⁰⁴	5% (w)	1.1	[polyimide] NH₂-functionalized, in situ polymerization
Expanded graphite ¹⁰⁵	25% (w)	3.8	Silane functionalized
rGO ¹⁰⁷	4% (w)	1.9	Pyrene derivatives functionalized
Graphene + CNT ¹⁰⁸	20% (x) + 20% (x)	6.3	GNP, multi-walled carbon nanotube
GO ¹¹⁰	10% (w)	0.2	Hot pressed
Graphene 3D network ¹¹	1.23% (x)	3.2	[Wax] CVD grown, annealed
Graphene + CNT 3D network ¹¹⁷	15.8% (x) (in total)	4.1	[Erythritol] CVD grown, annealed

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	吕浩亮, 王雪杰, 杨宇, 刘涛, 张留洋. 还原氧化石墨烯包覆MOF衍生In₂Se₃用于钠离子电池负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2210014 -0 .
[3]	傅焰鹏, 朱昌宝. 钠离子电池电极材料的设计策略——固态离子学视角[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209002 -0 .
[4]	王正慜, 洪庆玲, 王晓慧, 黄昊, 陈煜, 李淑妮. 氮掺杂石墨烯气凝胶锚定RuP纳米粒子用于水合肼氧化辅助产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2303028 - .
[5]	廖珺豪, 赵一萱, 胡兆宁, 补赛玉, 陆琪, 尚明鹏, 贾开诚, 裘晓辉, 谢芹, 林立, 刘忠范. 光刻胶辅助的石墨烯晶圆无损转移[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2306038 - .
[6]	亓月, 孙禄钊, 刘忠范. 超级蒙烯材料：石墨烯家族的新成员[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307028 - .
[7]	杨嘉炜, 郑春阳, 庞亚会, 纪仲阳, 李雨芮, 胡嘉仪, 朱江瑞, 陆琪, 林立, 刘忠范, 胡清梅, 关宝璐, 尹建波. 耦合蝶形天线的石墨烯室温太赫兹探测器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307012 - .
[8]	高振飞, 宋清泉, 肖志华, 李兆龙, 李涛, 罗家俊, 王珊珊, 周万立, 李兰英, 于俊荣, 张锦. 亚微米尺寸、高结晶度石墨烯增强间位芳纶纤维力学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(10): 2307046 - .
[9]	刘若娟, 刘冰之, 孙靖宇, 刘忠范. 气相助剂辅助绝缘衬底上石墨烯生长：现状与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2111011 -0 .
[10]	贺文娅, 程虎虎, 曲良体. 烯碳纤维基能源器件的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2203004 - .
[11]	刘汉卿, 周锋, 师晓宇, 史全, 吴忠帅. 石墨烯基纤维储能器件的研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204017 - .
[12]	何文倩, 邸亚, 姜南, 刘遵峰, 陈永胜. 石墨烯诱导水凝胶成核的高强韧人造蛛丝[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2204059 - .
[13]	夏洲, 邵元龙. 湿法纺制石墨烯纤维：工艺、结构、性能与智能应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(9): 2103046 - .
[14]	彭景淞, 程群峰. 仿鲍鱼壳石墨烯多功能纳米复合材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2005006 - .
[15]	毛赫南, 王晓工. 影响高浓度氧化石墨烯分散液流变行为的重要因素及群体平衡动力学分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2004025 - .

石墨烯导热研究进展

Recent Progress on Thermal Conduction of Graphene

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 123

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0