组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212064

物理化学学报 >> 2023, Vol. 39 >> Issue (12): 2212064.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212064

组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能

刘真¹^,²^,³, 孟祥福⁴^,⁵, 古万苗¹^,³, 查珺¹^,²^,³, 闫楠¹^,³, 尤青¹^,³, 夏楠¹^,³, 王辉⁴^,⁵^,*(), 伍志鲲¹^,³^,*()

¹ 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院固体物理研究所, 中国科学院材料物理重点实验室, 安徽省纳米材料与技术重点实验室, 中国科学院纳米卓越中心, 合肥 230031
² 中国科学技术大学研究生院科学岛分院, 合肥 230026
³ 安徽大学物质科学与信息技术研究院, 合肥 230601
⁴ 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院强磁场实验室, 合肥 230031
⁵ 中国科学技术大学材料科学与工程系, 合肥微尺度物理科学国家实验室, 合肥 230026

收稿日期:2022-12-31 录用日期:2023-02-14 发布日期:2023-07-31
通讯作者: 王辉,伍志鲲 E-mail:hw39@hmfl.ac.cn;zkwu@issp.ac.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21829501);国家自然科学基金(21925303);国家自然科学基金(22171267);国家自然科学基金(22171268);国家自然科学基金(21771186);国家自然科学基金(21222301);国家自然科学基金(21171170);国家自然科学基金(21528303);安徽省自然科学基金(2008085MB31);安徽省自然科学基金(2108085MB56);中国科学院合肥研究院院长基金(BJPY2019A02);中国科学院合肥科学中心协同创新项目(2020HSC-CIP005);中国科学院合肥科学中心协同创新项目(2022HSC-CIP018)

Introducing Novel, Multiple Cd Coordination Modes into Gold Nanoclusters by Combined Doping for Enhancing Electrocatalytic Performance

Zhen Liu¹^,²^,³, Xiangfu Meng⁴^,⁵, Wanmiao Gu¹^,³, Jun Zha¹^,²^,³, Nan Yan¹^,³, Qing You¹^,³, Nan Xia¹^,³, Hui Wang⁴^,⁵^,*(), Zhikun Wu¹^,³^,*()

¹ Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Anhui Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Institute of Solid State Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
² Science Island Branch, Graduate School of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
³ Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
⁴ High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
⁵ Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Science at Microscale, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2022-12-31 Accepted:2023-02-14 Published:2023-07-31
Contact: Hui Wang, Zhikun Wu E-mail:hw39@hmfl.ac.cn;zkwu@issp.ac.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21829501);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21925303);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22171267);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22171268);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21771186);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21222301);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21171170);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21528303);Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation(2008085MB31);Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation(2108085MB56);CASHIPS Director's Fund(BJPY2019A02);Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center, CAS(2020HSC-CIP005);Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center, CAS(2022HSC-CIP018)

1. WHXB202212064SI.zip(1899KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高金纳米团簇电催化还原二氧化碳生成一氧化碳的电流密度，本文引入了一种组合掺杂法(同时掺入硫和镉)，合成一种新型Au-Cd纳米团簇—Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃，并对其组成结构进行了精确表征。单晶结构表明，它包含一个双二十面体的Au₂₃内核，所有的镉原子都掺杂在外壳层中且具有多种配位环境，外层staple (类订书针结构)除两个常见的Au₃(SR)₄三聚体外，还有两条独特的Au₅Cd₂(SR)₉S长staple交叉覆盖在内核顶部，此外还发现了(S-Au-S)₂(CdS-S-CdS)四聚体，这种两个Cd原子通过S原子直接相连的结构也为首次报道。与“同核异壳”的Au₃₈(SCH₂Ph)₂₄团簇相比，Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃表现出更高的法拉第效率(−0.7 V电位时达99.3%)和更高的CO分电流密度(−0.9 V电位时为120 mA∙cm⁻²)。利用理论计算结果对Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃的高催化活性进行了解释，揭示Cd-Cd是最高活性位点，离内核最远的Au-Cd位点在同时考虑活性和选择性的情况下是最优的活性位点。本工作提供了一种提高金纳米团簇催化性能的策略，对金纳米团簇的合成、结构及构效关系研究具有重要的启发意义，有望推动相关研究的开展。

关键词: 金属纳米团簇, 组合掺杂, 镉配位方式, 构效关系, 电催化CO₂还原

Abstract:

In recent years, gold nanoclusters have been widely used in catalysis, and alloying has become one of the most important methods for improving the catalytic performance of gold nanoclusters. As for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ (CO₂RR), although many gold nanoclusters show fairly good Faraday efficiencies through Cd-doping, they still exhibit low current density. Furthermore, as an increasing number of Au-Cd alloy nanoclusters are reported, there is a growing interest in understanding the correlation between Cd coordination and catalysis performance. In most cases, Cd atoms are typically doped in the outer staples and connect with Au atoms through S coordinations. Are there any other unreported Cd coordination modes? Can novel or numerous Cd coordination modes be introduced into gold nanoclusters to increase the current density in the CO₂RR? This study investigates these questions.Inspired by our previous work on surface sulfur doping, we employed a combined doping (S + Cd doping) strategy, developed a two-step synthesis method, and successfully synthesized a novel Au-Cd nanocluster—Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃. Precise formula and structure were determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), thermalgravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and single-crystal X-ray crystallography (SCXC). SCXC shows that the nanocluster contains a biicosahedral Au₂₃ kernel, and all the Cd atoms are doped in the outer staples, providing a variety of coordination environments for Cd atoms. In addition to two common Au₃(SR)₄ trimers in the outer staples, two unusual Au₅Cd₂(SR)₉S long staples were discovered cross-covering the top of the kernel, and a (S-Au-S)₂(CdS-S-CdS) tetramer staple with two Cd atoms directly linked through S was also discovered for the first time. This alloy cluster shows robust stability in both high-temperature and oxidation environments. Compared with the "homo-kernel-hetero-staples" nanocluster Au₃₈(SCH₂Ph)₂₄, Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃ exhibits distinct UV-Vis/NIR absorption and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) results, indicating that the differences in the outer staples have a significant effect on the optical and electronic properties of gold nanoclusters. When used as an electrocatalyst, the Au₄₁Cd₆S₂(SCH₂Ph)₃₃ exhibits a higher Faradaic efficiency for the CO₂RR (99.3% at −0.7 V) and a higher CO partial current density (120 mA∙cm⁻² at −0.9 V) than Au₃₈(SCH₂Ph)₂₄, providing an ideal platform for investigating the roles of different Cd coordination modes in outer staples on CO₂RR. DFT calculations interpret the experimental finding that Cd doping improves the catalytic performance and reveal that the Cd-Cd site is the most active site and the Au-Cd site furthest away from the kernel is the best-performing catalytic site given the consideration of both selectivity and activity.This work introduces a novel strategy to enhance the catalytic performance of gold nanoclusters, having important implications for future research on the syntheses and structural properties of metal nanoclusters, and is expected to inspire more work in related areas.

Key words: Metal Nanocluster, Combined doping, Cd-coordination mode, Structure-property correlation, Electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂

刘真, 孟祥福, 古万苗, 查珺, 闫楠, 尤青, 夏楠, 王辉, 伍志鲲. 组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12), 2212064. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212064

Zhen Liu, Xiangfu Meng, Wanmiao Gu, Jun Zha, Nan Yan, Qing You, Nan Xia, Hui Wang, Zhikun Wu. Introducing Novel, Multiple Cd Coordination Modes into Gold Nanoclusters by Combined Doping for Enhancing Electrocatalytic Performance[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(12), 2212064. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212064

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212064

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V39/I12/2212064

图/表 6

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 52

1	Liu Y. ; Tsunoyama H. ; Akita T. ; Tsukuda T. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (4), 550. doi: 10.1039/b921082b
2	Zhu J. ; Xia L. ; Yu R. ; Lu R. ; Li J. ; He R. ; Wu Y. ; Zhang W. ; Hong X. ; Chen W. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (34), 15529. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03982
3	Lian C. ; Zhang K. ; Wang Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (5), 984.
	连超; 张垲; 王远; 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (5), 984. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201702084
4	Yu Y. ; Rao P. ; Feng S. ; Chen M. ; Deng P. ; Li J. ; Miao Z. ; Kang Z. ; Shen Y. ; Tian X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39, 2210039.
	于彦会; 饶鹏; 封苏阳; 陈民; 邓培林; 李静; 苗政培; 康振烨; 沈义俊; 田新龙; 物理化学学报, 2023, 39, 2210039. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202210039
5	Wang M. ; Wu Z. ; Yang J. ; Wang G. ; Wang H. ; Cai W. Nanoscale 2012, 4 (14), 4087. doi: 10.1039/c2nr30169e
6	Xia N. ; Yang J. ; Wu Z. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (22), 10013. doi: 10.1039/c5nr00705d
7	Lu T. Q. ; Xu H. ; Cheng L. T. ; Wang X. T. ; Chen C. ; Cao L. ; Zhuang G. L. ; Zheng J. ; Zheng X. Y. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61 (23), 8861. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00898
8	Yang J. ; Xia N. ; Wang X. ; Liu X. ; Xu A. ; Wu Z. ; Luo Z. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (44), 18464. doi: 10.1039/c5nr06421j
9	Li Q. ; Wang F. ; Shi L. ; Tang Q. ; Li B. ; Wang X. ; Jin Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (33), 37280. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c05944
10	Pang Z. ; Yan W. ; Yang J. ; Li Q. ; Guo Y. ; Zhou D. ; Jiang X. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (10), 16019. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c03752
11	Yu W. ; Zuo H. ; Lu C. ; Li Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Chen W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31 (3), 425.
	俞炜铃; 左会文; 陆春海; 李奕; 章永凡; 陈文凯; 物理化学学报, 2015, 31 (3), 425. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201501191
12	Sagadevan A. ; Ghosh A. ; Maity P. ; Mohammed O. F. ; Bakr O. M. ; Rueping M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (27), 12052. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02218
13	Gao Z. H. ; Wei K. ; Wu T. ; Dong J. ; Jiang D. E. ; Sun S. ; Wang L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (12), 5258. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c00725
14	Yang B. ; Chen L. ; Xue S. ; Sun H. ; Feng K. ; Chen Y. ; Zhang X. ; Xiao L. ; Qin Y. ; Zhong J. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2022, 13 (1), 5122. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32740-z
15	Levi-Kalisman Y. ; Jadzinsky P. D. ; Kalisman N. ; Tsunoyama H. ; Tsukuda T. ; Bushnell D. A. ; Kornberg R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (9), 2976. doi: 10.1021/ja109131w
16	Zhou Y. ; Li Z. ; Zheng K. ; Li G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34 (7), 786.
	周洋; 李志敏; 郑凯; 李杲; 物理化学学报, 2018, 34 (7), 786. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201709292
17	Zhu M. ; Li M. ; Yao C. ; Xia N. ; Zhao Y. ; Yan N. ; Liao L. ; Wu Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34 (7), 792.
	祝敏; 李漫波; 姚传好; 夏楠; 赵燕; 闫楠; 廖玲文; 伍志鲲; 物理化学学报, 2018, 34 (7), 792. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201710091
18	Xia N. ; Wu Z. Chem. Sci. 2020, 12 (7), 2368. doi: 10.1039/d0sc05363e
19	Guan Z. J. ; Li J. J. ; Hu F. ; Wang Q. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (51), e202209725. doi: 10.1002/anie.202209725
20	Wu Z. K. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (10), 1930.
	伍志鲲; 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (10), 1930. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201706026
21	Wang Z. ; Senanayake R. ; Aikens C. M. ; Chen W. M. ; Tung C. H. ; Sun D. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (45), 18905. doi: 10.1039/c6nr06615a
22	Jin R. C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35 (3), 245.
	金荣超; 物理化学学报, 2019, 35 (3), 245. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201803213
23	Li G. ; Sui X. ; Cai X. ; Hu W. ; Liu X. ; Chen M. ; Zhu Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (19), 10573. doi: 10.1002/anie.202100071
24	Xie S. ; Tsunoyama H. ; Kurashige W. ; Negishi Y. ; Tsukuda T. ACS Catal. 2012, 2 (7), 1519. doi: 10.1021/cs300252g
25	Ma X. ; Sun F. ; Qin L. ; Liu Y. ; Kang X. ; Wang L. ; Jiang D. E. ; Tang Q. ; Tang Z. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13 (34), 10149. doi: 10.1039/d2sc02886g
26	Zhuang S. ; Chen D. ; Liao L. ; Zhao Y. ; Xia N. ; Zhang W. ; Wang C. ; Yang J. ; Wu Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (8), 3073. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912845
27	Li S. ; Nagarajan A. V. ; Alfonso D. R. ; Sun M. ; Kauffman D. R. ; Mpourmpakis G. ; Jin R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (12), 6351. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016129
28	Sun Y. ; Liu X. ; Xiao K. ; Zhu Y. ; Chen M. ACS Catal. 2021, 11 (18), 11551. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02193
29	Li Q. ; Lambright K. J. ; Taylor M. G. ; Kirschbaum K. ; Luo T. Y. ; Zhao J. ; Mpourmpakis G. ; Mokashi-Punekar S. ; Rosi N. L. ; Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (49), 17779. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11491
30	Zhang W. ; Zhuang S. ; Liao L. ; Dong H. ; Xia N. ; Li J. ; Deng H. ; Wu Z. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (9), 5388. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00125
31	Fan J. Q. ; Yang Y. ; Tao C. B. ; Li M. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (6), e202215741. doi: 10.1002/anie.202215741
32	Yao C. ; Xu C. Q. ; Park I. H. ; Zhao M. ; Zhu Z. ; Li J. ; Hai X. ; Fang H. ; Zhang Y. ; Macam G. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (21), 8270. doi: 10.1002/anie.202001034
33	Zhu M. ; Wang P. ; Yan N. ; Chai X. ; He L. ; Zhao Y. ; Xia N. ; Yao C. ; Li J. ; Deng H. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (17), 4500. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800877
34	Gan Z. ; Chen J. ; Wang J. ; Wang C. ; Li M. B. ; Yao C. ; Zhuang S. ; Xu A. ; Li L. ; Wu Z. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14739. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14739
35	Gan Z. ; Chen J. ; Liao L. ; Zhang H. ; Wu Z. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9 (1), 204. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02982
36	Gan Z. ; Liu Y. ; Wang L. ; Jiang S. ; Xia N. ; Yan Z. ; Wu X. ; Zhang J. ; Gu W. ; He L. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 5572. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19377-6
37	Meng X. ; Pan G. ; Liu H. ; Qian Y. ; Wang X. ; Wang C. ; Hu L. ; Wang H. ; Chen Q. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (15), 17240. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c00050
38	Wang Y. ; Wang Z. ; Dinh C.-T. ; Li J. ; Ozden A. ; Golam Kibria M. ; Seifitokaldani A. ; Tan C.-S. ; Gabardo C. M. ; Luo M. ; et al Nat. Catal. 2019, 3 (2), 98. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0397-1
39	Kresse G. ; Hafner J. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47 (1), 558. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.47.558
40	Kresse G. ; Hafner J. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49 (20), 14251. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.49.14251
41	Kresse G. ; Furthmüller J. Comp. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6 (1), 15. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
42	Kresse G. ; Furthmüller J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54 (16), 11169. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.54.11169
43	Blöchl P. E. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50 (24), 17953. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.50.17953
44	Kresse G. ; Joubert D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 1758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
45	Perdew J. P. ; Burke K. ; Ernzerhof M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77 (18), 3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
46	Chadi D. J. Phys. Rev. B 1977, 16 (4), 1746. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.1746
47	Qian H. ; Eckenhoff W. T. ; Zhu Y. ; Pintauer T. ; Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (24), 8280. doi: 10.1021/ja103592z
48	Zhuang S. ; Liao L. ; Zhao Y. ; Yuan J. ; Yao C. ; Liu X. ; Li J. ; Deng H. ; Yang J. ; Wu Z. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9 (9), 2437. doi: 10.1039/c7sc05019d
49	Yang D. ; Wang J. ; Wang Q. ; Yuan Z. ; Dai Y. ; Zhou C. ; Wan X. ; Zhang Q. ; Yang Y. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (10), 15681. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c06059
50	Seong H. ; Efremov V. ; Park G. ; Kim H. ; Yoo J. S. ; Lee D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (26), 14563. doi: 10.1002/anie.202102887
51	Wang J. ; Xu F. ; Wang Z. Y. ; Zang S. Q. ; Mak T. C. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (32), e202207492. doi: 10.1002/anie.202207492
52	Zhuang S. ; Chen D. ; Fan W. ; Yuan J. ; Liao L. ; Zhao Y. ; Li J. ; Deng H. ; Yang J. ; Yang J. ; et al Nano Lett. 2022, 22 (17), 7144. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02290

[1]	孙浩宇, 李敦, 闵媛媛, 王莹莹, 马艳芸, 郑逸群, 黄宏文. 多级钯-铜-银多孔纳米花作为高效电催化剂催化CO₂还原为C₂₊产物[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(6): 2307007 - .
[2]	冯磊, 朱泽敏, 杨颖, 何宗兵, 邹家丰, 李漫波, 赵燕, 伍志鲲. 长期探寻的Au₂₃(S-Adm)₁₆结构及未曾预期的掺杂效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(5): 2305029 - .
[3]	罗耀武, 王定胜. 单原子催化剂电子结构调控实现高效多相催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212020 -0 .
[4]	吴明亮, 章烨晖, 付战照, 吕之阳, 李强, 王金兰. 原子尺度钴基氮碳催化剂对析氧反应的构效关系的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2207007 -0 .
[5]	马明军, 冯志超, 张小委, 孙超越, 王海青, 周伟家, 刘宏. 基于微生物作为智能模板的电催化剂制备与应用研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106003 - .
[6]	李超, 沈明, 胡炳文. 面向金属离子电池研究的固体核磁共振和电子顺磁共振方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1902019 - .
[7]	史永超, 唐明学. 可充电池的磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905004 - .
[8]	刘太宏, 苗荣, 彭浩南, 刘静, 丁立平, 房喻. 薄膜基荧光气体传感器中的涂层化学[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1908025 - .
[9]	陈明树. 催化剂活性位本质和构效关系的模型催化研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(12): 2424 -2437 .
[10]	陆阳. TiO₂光催化剂的晶面效应研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(9): 2185 -2196 .
[11]	林峰,付新梅,王超,蒋思宇,王景辉,张述伟,杨凌,李燕. 3C-like蛋白酶抑制剂的构效关系、分子对接和分子动力学[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(11): 2693 -2708 .
[12]	钱海城, KANWAL Shahid, 贾青竹, 王强, 计惠芬, 朱志臣, 夏淑倩, 马沛生. 基于范数指数定量构效关系预测β-环糊精络合常数[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(5): 893 -898 .
[13]	张淑贞,郑超,朱长进. 芳香噻嗪类衍生物作为选择性醛糖还原酶抑制剂的分子对接和基于受体的三维定量构效关系研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(12): 2395 -2404 .
[14]	刘海春,卢帅,冉挺,张艳敏,徐金星,熊潇,徐安阳,陆涛,陈亚东. 基于分子对接和QSAR方法预测B-Raf II型抑制剂活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(11): 2191 -2206 .
[15]	朱志臣, 王强, 贾青竹, 夏淑倩, 马沛生. 多种类杂环化合物的药理和毒理活性系数构效关系[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(6): 1086 -1090 .

组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能

Introducing Novel, Multiple Cd Coordination Modes into Gold Nanoclusters by Combined Doping for Enhancing Electrocatalytic Performance

RichHTML

PDF

赞

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0