CO2水合物在砂中生成和分解的核磁共振弛豫响应

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704194

物理化学学报 >> 2017, Vol. 33 >> Issue (8): 1599-1604.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704194

CO₂水合物在砂中生成和分解的核磁共振弛豫响应

陈合龙.^1,²,韦昌富.^1,*(),田慧会.¹,魏厚振.¹

¹ 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉430071
² 中国科学院大学,北京100049

收稿日期:2017-03-13 发布日期:2017-06-14
通讯作者: 韦昌富. E-mail:cfwei@email.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41572295);国家自然科学基金项目(41502301);和中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2015272)

NMR Relaxation Response of CO₂ Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Sand

He-Long. CHEN^1,²,Chang-Fu. WEI^1,*(),Hui-Hui. TIAN¹,Hou-Zhen. WEI¹

¹ State Key Laboratory of Geomechanical and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, P. R. China
² University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. China

Received:2017-03-13 Published:2017-06-14
Contact: Chang-Fu. WEI E-mail:cfwei@email.com
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41572295);The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41502301);The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(2015272)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水合物在沉积物中生成和分解的定量和表征对于含水合物沉积物的物理性质的研究有重要意义。基于核磁共振（NMR）技术研究了水合物在砂中的形成和分解行为，以一种简便的方式计量了孔隙空间中各组分的含量，包括气体、液态水和水合物，并确定了水合数。在水合物形成和分解过程中试样的弛豫行为并没有发生突变，此外，对于含或不含水合物的试样，平均对数T2₂时间都与含水量成比例关系，直接的解释是液态水始终保持与颗粒表面的接触，弛豫主要发生在颗粒表面，表明水合物以孔隙填充或胶结的形式而不是颗粒涂层的方式存在。

关键词: 核磁共振, 水合物饱和度, 水合数, 水合物分布, 弛豫行为

Abstract:

Quantification and characterization of hydrate formation and dissociation in sediments are highly important in the study of the physical properties of hydrate-bearing sediments. In this paper, the behavior of CO₂ hydrate formation and dissociation in sand is studied using the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique. The components of the pore space, including gas, liquid water, and hydrate, were quantified using a convenient method by which the hydration number was determined. No abrupt change in the relaxation behavior of the sample was found during hydrate formation and dissociation. In addition, the value of mean-log T2₂ appeared to be proportional to the liquid water content of the sample with or without the pore hydrate. A straightforward explanation is that the liquid water in the pore space remains in contact with grain surfaces, and relaxation occurs mainly at the grain surface. The results suggest that, rather than coating the grains, the hydrate is pore-filling or cementing.

Key words: Nuclear magnetic resonance, Hydrate saturation, Hydration number, Hydrate distribution, Relaxation behavior

陈合龙.,韦昌富.,田慧会.,魏厚振.. CO₂水合物在砂中生成和分解的核磁共振弛豫响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8), 1599-1604. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704194

He-Long. CHEN,Chang-Fu. WEI,Hui-Hui. TIAN,Hou-Zhen. WEI. NMR Relaxation Response of CO₂ Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Sand[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33(8), 1599-1604. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704194

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704194

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V33/I8/1599

参考文献

1	Sloan E.D. Koh C. A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases 3rd ed. CRC Press: New York, 2008.
2	Makogon Y. F. ; Holditch S. A. ; Makogon T. Y. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2007, 56, 14.
3	Kvenvolden K. A. Rev. Geophys 1993, 31, 173.
4	Mienert, J. ; Posewang, J. ; Baumann, M. Gas hydrates along thenortheastern Atlantic margin: possible hydrate-bound marginsinstabilities and possible release of methane. In Gas Hydrates: Relevance to World Margin Stability and Clima Change; Henriet, J. P. , Mienert, J. Eds. ; Geological Society: London, 1998; Vol. 134, pp275-291 (Special Publication). doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.137.01.22
5	Sultan N. ; Cochonat P. ; Foucher J. P. ; Mienert J. Mar. Geol. 2004, 213, 379.
6	Waite W. F. ; Santamarina J. C. ; Cortes D. D. ; Dugan B. ; Espinoza D. N. ; Germaine J. ; Jang J. ; Jung J. W. ; Kneafsey T. J. ; Shine H. ; Soga K. ; Winters W. J. ; Yun T. S. Rev. Geophys. 2009, 47, RG4003.
7	Helgerud M. B. ; Dvorkin J. ; Nur A. ; Sakai A. ; Collett T. S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1999, 26, 2021.
8	Priest J. A. ; Rees E. V. L. ; Clayton C. R. I. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, B11205.
9	Ersland G. ; J. Husebo A. ; Graue B. A. ; Howard B. J. ; Stevens J. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 25.
10	Kneafsey T. J. ; Tomutsa L. ; Moridis G. J. ; Seol Y. ; Freifeld B. M. ; Taylor C. E. ; Gupta A. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2007, 56, 108.
11	Zhao J. ; Yang L. ; Xue K. ; Lam W. ; Li Y. ; Song Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 612, 124.
12	Rees E. V.L. ; Priest J. A. ; Clayton C. R. I. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 2011, 28, 1283.
13	Kerkar P. B. ; Horvat K. ; Jones K. W. ; Mahajan D. Geochem. Geophys. Geosy. 2014, 15, 4759.
14	Chaouachi M. ; Falenty A. ; Sell K. ; Enzmann F. ; Kersten M. ; Haberthür D. ; Kuhs W. F. Geochem. Geophys. Geosy. 2015, 16, 1711.
15	Bagherzadeh S. A. ; Moudrakovski I. L. ; Ripmeester J. A. ; Englezos P. Energ. Fuel. 2015, 25, 3083.
16	Kleinberg R. L. ; Flaum C. ; Griffin D. D. ; Brewer P. G. ; Malby G. E. ; Peltzer E. T. ; Yesinowski J. P. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 2508.
17	Kleinberg, R. L. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, In Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences; Wong, P. Z. Eds. ; AcademicPress: San Diego, USA, 1999; pp 337-385. doi: 10.1016/S0076-695X(08)60420-2
18	Costabel S. ; Yaramanci U. Near Surf. Geophys. 2011, 9 (2), 155.
19	Diamond L. W. ; Akinfiev N. N. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2003, 208, 265.
20	Sun R. ; Duan Z. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2005, 69 (18), 4411.
21	Yan R.T. ; Wei H. Z. ; Wu E. L. ; Wang S. Y. ; Wei C. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27, 295.
21	颜荣涛.; 魏厚振.; 吴二林.; 王淑云.; 韦昌富.. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27, 295.
22	Geng C. Y. ; Ding L. Y. ; Han Q. Z. ; Wen H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2008, 24, 595.
22	耿春宇.; 丁丽颖.; 韩清珍.; 温浩.. 物理化学学报, 2008, 24, 595.
23	Guo G. ; Rodger P. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 6498.
24	Gao S. ; Chapman W. G. ; House W. J. Magn. Reson. 2009, 197, 208.

[1]	李超, 沈明, 胡炳文. 面向金属离子电池研究的固体核磁共振和电子顺磁共振方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1902019 - .
[2]	李诗涵,赵侦超,李世坤,邢友东,张维萍. DFT计算结合固体NMR研究富铝SSZ-13的铝分布和Brønsted酸性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1903021 - .
[3]	石峰,胡丽丽,任进军,杨秋红. 固体核磁共振研究碱土金属磷硅酸盐玻璃的六配位硅结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1902018 - .
[4]	纪毅, 梁力鑫, Changmiao Guo, 包信和, Tatyana Polenova, 侯广进. 固体核磁共振高速魔角旋转条件下对称性脉冲零量子同核重耦技术[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905029 - .
[5]	刘小龙, 王强, 王超, 徐君, 邓风. Silicalite-1分子筛氢键诱导晶化机制的固体核磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905035 - .
[6]	邓静,马涛,常自伟,赵伟静,杨俊. 基于固体核磁共振方法的蛋白质组装体三维结构解析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905019 - .
[7]	李玉红,吴新平,刘聪,王萌,宋本腾,郁桂云,杨刚,侯文华,龚学庆,彭路明. 部分还原二氧化钛的NMR和EPR研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905021 - .
[8]	史永超, 唐明学. 可充电池的磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905004 - .
[9]	张宗辉, 任进军, 胡丽丽. 利用固态核磁共振研究100LiO_1/2-(100-x)PO_5/2-xTeO₂快离子导电玻璃的结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 2001048 - .
[10]	薛智敏,严传玉,赵新辉,于东琨,牟天成. Hofmeister离子对水溶液中热响应聚合物的局域环境的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 49 -57 .
[11]	李申慧,李静,郑安民,邓风. 固体酸催化剂结构与催化反应机理的核磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(2): 270 -282 .
[12]	叶斌,张健,高才,唐景春. 双碳醇水溶液的¹H NMR实验与理论分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(10): 1978 -1988 .
[13]	王孝杰,THAMARATH Smitha Surendran,ALIA A.,BODE BelaE.,MATYSIK Jörg. 固态Photo-CIDNP效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(2): 399 -404 .
[14]	曹朝暾, 魏佰影, 曹晨忠. 取代基效应对N-4-取代苯亚甲基苯胺与N-4-取代苯亚甲基环己胺NMR和UV光谱影响的差异性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(2): 204 -210 .
[15]	朱云城, 王二琼, 马国林, 康彦彪, 赵林泓, 刘扬中. 铜转运蛋白C端金属结合域与Ag⁺及Hg²⁺的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(1): 1 -7 .

CO₂水合物在砂中生成和分解的核磁共振弛豫响应

NMR Relaxation Response of CO₂ Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Sand

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0