
物理化学学报 >> 2023, Vol. 39 >> Issue (8): 2212053.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212053
所属专题: 能源与环境催化
陈瑶1, 陈存1, 曹雪松2, 王震宇2, 张楠1,*(
), 刘天西1,*(
)
收稿日期:2022-12-17
录用日期:2023-01-29
发布日期:2023-03-23
通讯作者:
张楠,刘天西
E-mail:nzhang@jiangnan.edu.cn;txliu@jiangnan.edu.cn
作者简介:第一联系人:†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
Yao Chen1, Cun Chen1, Xuesong Cao2, Zhenyu Wang2, Nan Zhang1,*(
), Tianxi Liu1,*(
)
Received:2022-12-17
Accepted:2023-01-29
Published:2023-03-23
Contact:
Nan Zhang, Tianxi Liu
E-mail:nzhang@jiangnan.edu.cn;txliu@jiangnan.edu.cn
Supported by:摘要:
实现碳氮循环是人类社会发展的迫切要求,也是催化领域的热门研究课题。在可再生能源的推动下,电催化技术引起了人们的广泛关注,且可以通过改变反应电压获得不同的目标产品。基于此,电催化技术被认为是缓解当前能源危机和环境问题的有效策略,对实现碳中和具有重要意义。其中,电催化CO2还原反应(CO2RR)和N2还原反应(N2RR)是一种有前途的小分子转化策略。然而,CO2和N2均为线性分子,其中C=O和N≡N键的高解离能导致了它们高的化学惰性。此外,最高占据分子轨道(HOMO)和最低未占分子轨道(LUMO)之间的巨大能量间隙使它们具有高的化学稳定性;且CO2和N2的低质子亲和力使它们难以被直接质子化。另一方面,由于CO2RR和N2RR与析氢反应(HER)具有相近的氧化还原电位,造成其与HER之间存在竞争性关系,这也是致使催化剂在CO2RR和N2RR转化效率低的重要影响因素。因此,CO2RR和N2RR仍然面临着过电位高及法拉第效率低等问题。为了克服这些瓶颈,人们为提升CO2RR和N2RR电催化剂性能做出了很多努力。众所周知,电催化过程发生在催化剂表面,主要涉及质量传递和电子转移等过程。由此可见,催化剂的性能与其质量和电子传输能力密切相关,而调控催化剂表面结构可以优化活性点的质量和电子转移行为。电催化剂的缺陷和界面工程可通过表面原子工程来实现电子结构调控,对于提高气体吸附能力、抑制HER、富集气体及稳定中间产物等具有重要意义。到目前为止,所报道的各种缺陷和复合电催化剂在提高CO2RR和N2RR催化性能等方面均表现出巨大的潜力。在此,我们综述了CO2RR和N2RR中催化剂缺陷工程及界面工程的最新进展;首先讨论了四种不同的缺陷(空位、高指数晶面、晶格应变和晶格无序)对CO2RR和N2RR性能的影响;然后,总结了界面工程在聚合物-无机复合材料催化剂中的重要作用,并给出了典型实例;最后,展望了原子级电催化剂工程的发展前景,提出了开发和设计高效CO2RR和N2RR电催化剂的未来发展方向。
陈瑶, 陈存, 曹雪松, 王震宇, 张楠, 刘天西. CO2和N2电还原中缺陷及界面工程的最新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8), 2212053. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212053
Yao Chen, Cun Chen, Xuesong Cao, Zhenyu Wang, Nan Zhang, Tianxi Liu. Recent Advances in Defect and Interface Engineering for Electroreduction of CO2 and N2[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(8), 2212053. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212053
Fig 3
EDX mappings of (a) LeFeO3, (b) La0.95FeO3−δ, and (c) La0.9FeO3−δ. (d) Schematic illustration of oxygen vacancies in A-site-deficient LaxFeO3−δ. (e) NH3 yield rates at applied potentials over the different catalysts. (f) Illustration of the synthesis route for porous lava-like high-entropy perovskite oxide of Bax(FeCoNiZrY)0.2O3−δ (x = 0.9, 1). (g) XRD patterns of Bax(FeCoNiZrY)0.2O3−δ (x = 0.9, 1). (h, i) SEM images of Ba0.9(FeCoNiZrY)0.2O3−δ. (j) d-band centers of Fe, Co, Ni, Zr, and Y for Bax(FeCoNiZrY)0.2O3−δ (x = 0.9, 1)-(110). (k) Charge density difference induced by oxygen vacancies. (a–e) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 37. (f–k) Adapted from Springer Link Publications publisher 40."
Fig 4
(a) NH3 yield and FE of N2RR performance for Vr-ReSe2@CBC and Vp-ReSe2@CBC. (b) Schematic illustration of the preparation of CBC/Vr-ReSe2@CBC/CBC membrane. (c) Overall mechanism for the selectivity and enhancement of N2RR process by encapsulating Vr-ReSe2@CBC NFs in the hydrophobic CBC layer. (d) EDX elemental mapping images of CBC/Vr-ReSe2@CBC/CBC membrane. (e) NH3 yield and FE of N2RR performance for CBC/Vr-ReSe2@CBC/CBC membrane. (f) 1H NMR analysis of the membrane filled with 14N2 and 15N2 gases after N2RR process. (g) NH3 yield and FE under different temperatures at −0.25 V (vs. RHE). (h) STEM image, EDS mappings and (i) HRTEM image of the activated Bi2Te3 nanoplates/C. (j) Schematic illustration for electrochemical reduction reaction of small molecules by the activated Bi2Te3 nanoplates. (a–g) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 42. (h–j) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 43."
Fig 5
(a) TEM image, (b) HRTEM image of Rh2Sb RNRs. (c) NH3 yield of Rh2Sb RNRs/C, Rh2Sb SNRs/C and Rh NPs/C at various applied potentials. (d) EXAFS spectra of Rh K-edge of Rh powder, Rh2O3 powder, Rh2Sb RNRs/C and Rh2Sb SNRs/C. (e) N2-TPD profiles for the Rh2Sb RNRs/C and Rh2Sb SNRs/C. (f) SEM image and (g) HRTEM image of PdCuAuAgBiIn HEAAs. (h) FE of different products for PdCuAuAgBiIn HEAAs during CO2RR. (i) Schematic illustration for boosted HCOOH generation on PdCuAuAgBiIn HEAAs. (a–e) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 47. (f–i) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 71."
Fig 7
(a) Schematic illustration of interface microenvironment inside the catalyst layer with added PTFE. (b) CO partial current density of Ni-N-C and Ni-N-C 60% PTFE electrodes at various current densities under a 20 standard-state cubic centimeter per minute (sccm) CO2 flow rate. (c–e) Schematic illustration of different catalyst microenvironments and reaction interfaces. (f) Partial current densities for CO2RR on the Cu/C and Cu/C/PTFE electrodes with a CO2 gas flow rate of 4 sccm. (g) Schematic diagram of improving N2RR by using proton filtered COF with excellent N2 permeation flux. (h) H2 yields of BCP, ECOF@BCP and PVDF@BCP; inset: FEH2 of different electrodes. (a, b) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 85. (c–f) Adapted from Nature Publications publisher 86. (g, h) Adapted from Nature Publications publisher 87."
Fig 8
(a) Schematic diagram of POCs used as an additive to enhance the CO2 diffusion in flow cell catalyst layers. (b) Current density and (c) FE of C2+ products over Cu-nr/CC3 and Cu-nr. (d) Enrichment of CO2 species in the local reaction environment enabled by SSC ionomer conformably surrounding Cu surface. (e) Dominancy of the CO2RR over the HER upon SSC ionomer modification. (f) Ethylene FE for SSC-modified Cu/PTFE, and ethylene FE and partial current density for tetrahydro-phenanthrolinium/SSC-modified Cu/PTFE (red line), and ethylene partial current density for unmodified Cu/PTFE (yellow line). (g) Schematic illustration of the N2-microextractor. (h) FE of NH3 using NME@WE and common WE. Color online. (a–c) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 90. (d–f) Adapted from ACS Publications publisher 92. (g, h) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 93."
Fig 9
(a) Schematic illustrations of the CO2RR on Cu and Cu-PANI electrodes. FE of H2, C1 and C2+ production for (b) Cu electrode and (c) Cu-PANI electrode. (d) Schematic illustration of the poly-N-(6-aminohexyl)acrylamide (P1) and Cu co-electroplating on the GDL. (e) In situ electrochemical Raman spectroscopy obtained from Cu–P1 at OCP (blue) and a cathode potential of −0.47 V (orange). (f) Scheme for preparation of Cu NPs. (g) Cu LMM Auger spectra for Cu NPs. (h) Raman spectra of SPVP-Cu NPs, DPVP-Cu NPs, and NPVP-Cu NPs. (a–c) Adapted from ACS Publications publisher 97. (d, e) Adapted from Nature Publications publisher 98. (f–h) Adapted from Wiley Publications publisher 100."
| 1 |
De Luna P., Hahn C., Higgins D., Jaffer S. A., Jaramillo T. F., Sargent E. H. Science 2019, 364, eaav3506.
doi: 10.1126/science.aav3506 |
| 2 |
Zhu D. D., Liu J. L., Qiao S. Z. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3423.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201504766 |
| 3 |
Chu S., Majumdar A. Nature 2012, 488, 294.
doi: 10.1038/nature11475 |
| 4 |
Armaroli N., Balzani V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 52.
doi: 10.1002/anie.200602373 |
| 5 |
Martín A. J., Shinagawa T., Pérez-Ramírez J. Chem 2019, 5, 263.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.10.010 |
| 6 |
Tang C., Qiao S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3166.
doi: 10.1039/C9CS00280D |
| 7 |
Liu H., Wei L., Liu F., Pei Z., Shi J., Wang Z.-J., He D., Chen Y. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5245.
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00994 |
| 8 |
Fan L., Xia C., Yang F., Wang J., Wang H., Lu Y. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay3111.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3111 |
| 9 |
Han N., Ding P., He L., Li Y., Li Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902338.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902338 |
| 10 |
Vasileff A., Xu C., Jiao Y., Zheng Y., Qiao S. Z. Chem 2018, 4, 1809.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.001 |
| 11 |
Qing G., Ghazfar R., Jackowski S. T., Habibzadeh F., Ashtiani M. M., Chen C.-P., Smith III M. R., Hamann T. W. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 5437.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00659 |
| 12 |
Li L., Li X., Sun Y., Xie Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1234.
doi: 10.1039/D1CS00893E |
| 13 |
Shen H., Choi C., Masa J., Li X., Qiu J., Jung Y., Sun Z. Chem 2021, 7, 1708.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.01.009 |
| 14 |
Pan F., Yang Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 2275.
doi: 10.1039/D0EE00900H |
| 15 |
Lv J.-J., Yin R., Zhou L., Li J., Kikas R., Xu T., Wang Z.-J., Jin H., Wang X., Wang S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207252.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202207252 |
| 16 |
Ren Y., Yu C., Tan X., Huang H., Wei Q., Qiu J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1176.
doi: 10.1039/D0EE03596C |
| 17 |
Singh A. R., Rohr B. A., Schwalbe J. A., Cargnello M., Chan K., Jaramillo T. F., Chorkendorff I., Nørskov J. K. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 706.
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03035 |
| 18 |
Birdja Y. Y., Pérez-Gallent E., Figueiredo M. C., Göttle A. J., Calle-Vallejo F., Koper M. T. M. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 732.
doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y |
| 19 |
Yang C., Zhu Y., Liu J., Qin Y., Wang H., Liu H., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Hu W. Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105126.
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105126 |
| 20 |
Liang J., Liu Q., Alshehri A. A., Sun X. Nano Res. Energy 2022, 1, e9120010.
doi: 10.26599/NRE.2022.9120010 |
| 21 |
Liu, C.; Li, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Zhao, D.; Sun, S.; Luo, Y.; Alshehri, A. A.; Hamdy, M. S.; et al. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2022, 6, 3344.
doi: 10.1039/D2SE00557C |
| 22 |
Li Q., Shen P., Tian Y., Li X., Chu K. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 204.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.032 |
| 23 |
Chen, H.; Liang, J.; Dong, K.; Yue, L.; Li, T.; Luo, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, N.; Hamdy, M. S.; Alshehri, A. A.; et al Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 1514.
doi: 10.1039/D2QI00140C |
| 24 |
Liu Q., Xu T., Luo Y., Kong Q., Li T., Lu S., Alshehri A. A., Alzahrani K. A., Sun X. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 29, 100766.
doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100766 |
| 25 | Xu T., Ma B., Liang J., Yue L., Liu Q., Li T., Zhao H., Luo Y., Lu S., Sun X. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009043. |
|
许桐, 马奔原, 梁杰, 岳鲁超, 刘倩, 李廷帅, 赵海涛, 罗永岚, 卢思宇, 孙旭平 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009043.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009043 |
|
| 26 | Hao D., Sun Z. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009033. |
|
郝磊端, 孙振宇 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009033.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009033 |
|
| 27 |
Wang Y., Han P., Lv X., Zhang L., Zheng G. Joule 2018, 2, 2551.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.021 |
| 28 |
Wang Q., Lei Y., Wang D., Li Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 1730.
doi: 10.1039/C8EE03781G |
| 29 |
Kong X., Peng H.-Q., Bu S., Gao Q., Jiao T., Cheng J., Liu B., Hong G., Lee C.-S., Zhang W. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 7457.
doi: 10.1039/D0TA01453B |
| 30 |
Yan D., Li H., Chen C., Zou Y., Wang S. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800331.
doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800331 |
| 31 |
Guo D., Wang S., Xu J., Zheng W., Wang D. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 65, 448.
doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.06.012 |
| 32 |
Li W., Wang D., Zhang Y., Tao L., Wang T., Zou Y., Wang Y., Chen R., Wang S. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907879.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201907879 |
| 33 |
Lu Y., Zhou L., Wang S., Zou Y. Nano Res. 2022,
doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-4858-5 |
| 34 |
Wang J., Liu J., Zhang B., Cheng F., Ruan Y., Ji X., Xu K., Chen C., Miao L., Jiang J. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 144.
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.022 |
| 35 |
Bai S., Zhang N., Gao C., Xiong Y. Nano Energy 2018, 53, 296.
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.058 |
| 36 |
Chen H.-J., Xu Z.-Q., Sun S., Luo Y., Liu Q., Hamdy M. S., Feng Z.-S., Sun X., Wang Y. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 4608.
doi: 10.1039/D2QI01173E |
| 37 |
Chu K., Liu F., Zhu J., Fu H., Zhu H., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Lai F., Liu T. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003799.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202003799 |
| 38 |
Zheng H., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Wu Z., Lai F., Chao G., Zhang N., Zhang L., Liu T. Small 2022,
doi: 10.1002/smll.202205625 |
| 39 |
Chu K., Ras M. D., Rao D., Martens J. A., Hofkens J., Lai F., Liu T. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 13347.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01510 |
| 40 |
Chu, K.; Qin, J.; Zhu, H.; De Ras, M.; Wang, C.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, N.; Martens, J. A.; Hofkens, J.; et al. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 2711.
doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2021-y |
| 41 |
Gao S., Sun Z., Liu W., Jiao X., Zu X., Hu Q., Sun Y., Yao T., Zhang W., Wei S., et al. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14503.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14503 |
| 42 |
Lai, F.; Zong, W.; He, G.; Xu, Y.; Huang, H.; Weng, B.; Rao, D.; Martens, J. A.; Hofkens, J.; Parkin, I. P.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 13320.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202003129 |
| 43 |
Zhang N., Zheng F., Huang B., Ji Y., Shao Q., Li Y., Xiao X., Huang X. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906477.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201906477 |
| 44 |
Tian N., Zhou Z.-Y., Sun S.-G., Ding Y., Wang Z. L. Science 2007, 316, 732.
doi: 10.1126/science.1140484 |
| 45 |
Bu L., Ding J., Guo S., Zhang X., Su D., Zhu X., Yao J., Guo J., Lu G., Huang X. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7204.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201502725 |
| 46 |
Bu L., Guo S., Zhang X., Shen X., Su D., Lu G., Zhu X., Yao J., Guo J., Huang X. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11850.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms11850 |
| 47 |
Zhang N., Li L., Wang J., Hu Z., Shao Q., Xiao X., Huang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8066.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201915747 |
| 48 |
Choi, C.; Kwon, S.; Cheng, T.; Xu, M.; Tieu, P.; Lee, C.; Cai, J.; Lee, H. M.; Pan, X.; Duan, X.; et al. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 804.
doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00504-x |
| 49 |
Jansonius R. P., Reid L. M., Virca C. N., Berlinguette C. P. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 980.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00191 |
| 50 |
Mistry H., Varela A. S., Kühl S., Strasser P., Cuenya B. R. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16009.
doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.9 |
| 51 |
Yu D., Gao L., Sun T., Guo J., Yuan Y., Zhang J., Li M., Li X., Liu M., Ma C., et al. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 1003.
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04051 |
| 52 |
Chen Y., Pei J., Chen Z., Li A., Ji S., Rong H., Xu Q., Wang T., Zhang A., Tang H., et al. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 7563.
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02572 |
| 53 |
Bu L., Zhang N., Guo S., Zhang X., Li J., Yao J., Wu T., Lu G. Ma J.-Y., Su D., et al. Science 2016, 354, 1410.
doi: 10.1126/science.aah6133 |
| 54 |
Xia Z., Guo S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3265.
doi: 10.1039/C8CS00846A |
| 55 |
Luo M., Guo S. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17059.
doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.59 |
| 56 |
Li H., Zhang N., Bai S., Zhang L., Lai F., Chen Y., Zhu X., Liu T. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 7995.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01917 |
| 57 |
Feng Y., Huang B., Yang C., Shao Q., Huang X. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904429.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904429 |
| 58 |
Pi Y., Xu Y., Li L., Sun T., Huang B., Bu L., Ma Y., Hu Z., Pao C.-W., Huang X. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004375.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202004375 |
| 59 |
Tao L., Sun M., Zhou Y., Luo M., Lv F., Li M., Zhang Q., Gu L., Huang B., Guo S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 10582.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03544 |
| 60 |
Han G., Li M., Liu H., Zhang W., He L., Tian F., Liu Y., Yu Y., Yang W., Guo S. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202943.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202202943 |
| 61 |
Wang H., Fang Q., Gu W., Du D., Lin Y., Zhu C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 52234.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c14007 |
| 62 |
Cai B., Eychmüller A. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804881.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201804881 |
| 63 |
Du R., Joswig J.-O., Hübner R., Zhou L., Wei W., Hu Y., Eychmüller A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8293.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201916484 |
| 64 |
Du R., Fan X., Jin X., Hübner R., Hu Y., Eychmüller A. Matter 2019, 1, 39.
doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.006 |
| 65 |
Jiang X., Du R., Hübner R., Hu Y., Eychmüller A. Matter 2021, 4, 54.
doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.001 |
| 66 |
Zhang Z., Hu J., Li B., Qi Q., Zhang Y., Chen J., Dong P., Zhang C., Zhang Y., Leung M. K. H. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 918, 165585.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165585 |
| 67 |
Zhai Y., Ren X., Wang B., Liu S. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2207536.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202207536 |
| 68 |
Löffler T., Ludwig A., Rossmeisl J., Schuhmann W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 26894.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202109212 |
| 69 |
Zhan C., Xu Y., Bu L., Zhu H., Feng Y., Yang T., Zhang Y., Yang Z., Huang B., Shao Q., et al. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6261.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26425-2 |
| 70 |
Hu J., Cao L., Wang Z., Liu J., Zhang J., Cao Y., Lu Z., Cheng H. Compos. Commun. 2021, 27, 100866.
doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100866 |
| 71 |
Li H., Huang H., Chen Y., Lai F., Fu H., Zhang L., Zhang N., Bai S., Liu T. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209242.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202209242 |
| 72 |
Wakerley D., Lamaison S., Ozanam F., Menguy N., Mercier D., Marcus P., Fontecave M., Mougel V. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1222.
doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0445-x |
| 73 |
Ge W., Chen Y., Fan Y., Zhu Y., Liu H., Song L., Liu Z., Lian C., Jiang H., Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 6613.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02486 |
| 74 |
Chen Y., Shen L., Wang C., Feng S., Zhang N., Xiang S., Feng T., Yang M., Zhang K., Yang B. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 274, 119112.
doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119112 |
| 75 |
Ma Y., Wang J., Yu J., Zhou J., Zhou X., Li H., He Z., Long H., Wang Y., Lu P., et al. Matter 2021, 4, 888.
doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.007 |
| 76 |
Liu H., Xiang K., Liu Y., Zhu F., Zou M., Yan X., Chai L. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 3991.
doi: 10.1002/celc.201801132 |
| 77 |
Zhang L., Wei Z., Thanneeru S., Meng M., Kruzyk M., Ung G., Liu B., He J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15834.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201909069 |
| 78 |
An, P.; Wei, L.; Li, H.; Yang, B.; Liu, K.; Fu, J.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Hu, J.; Lu, Y.-R.; et al. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 15936.
doi: 10.1039/D0TA03645E |
| 79 |
Ahn S., Klyukin K., Wakeham R. J., Rudd J. A., Lewis A. R., Alexander S., Carla F., Alexandrov V., Andreoli E. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4132.
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04347 |
| 80 |
Lee J. H., Kattel S., Xie Z., Tackett B. M., Wang J., Liu C.-J., Chen J. G. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804762.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804762 |
| 81 |
Zhou X., Liu H., Xia B. Y., Ostrikov K., Zheng Y., Qiao S. Z. SmartMat 2022, 3, 111.
doi: 10.1002/smm2.1109 |
| 82 |
Shi R., Shang L., Zhang T. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 1045.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02989 |
| 83 |
Niu Z.-Z., Gao F.-Y., Zhang X.-L., Yang P.-P., Liu R., Chi L.-P., Wu Z.-Z., Qin S., Yu X., Gao M.-R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 8011.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c01190 |
| 84 |
Buckley A. K., Lee M., Cheng T., Kazantsev R. V., Larson D. M., Goddard III W. A., Toste F. D., Toma F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7355.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13655 |
| 85 |
Sheng X., Ge W., Jiang H., Li C. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2201295.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202201295 |
| 86 |
Xing Z., Hu L., Ripatti D. S., Hu X., Feng X. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 136.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20397-5 |
| 87 |
Liu S., Qian T., Wang M., Ji H., Shen X., Wang C., Yan C. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 322.
doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00599-w |
| 88 |
Zheng W., Nayak S., Yuan W., Zeng Z., Hong X., Vincent K. A., Tsang S. C. E. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13901.
doi: 10.1039/C6CC07212G |
| 89 |
Wang J., Cheng T., Fenwick A. Q., Baroud T. N., Rosas-Hernández A., Ko J. H., Gan Q., Goddard III W. A., Grubbs R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2857.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12478 |
| 90 |
Chen C., Yan X., Wu Y., Liu S., Zhang X., Sun X., Zhu Q., Wu H., Han B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202202607.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202202607 |
| 91 |
Jeong S., Ohto T., Nishiuchi T., Nagata Y., Fujita J.-I., Ito Y. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 9962.
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02646 |
| 92 |
Ozden, A.; Li, F.; Garcı́a de Arquer, F. P.; Rosas-Hernández, A.; Thevenon, A.; Wang, Y.; Hung, S.-F.; Wang, X.; Chen, B.; Li, J.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2811.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01266 |
| 93 |
Shen X., Liu S., Xia X., Wang M., Ji H., Wang Z., Liu J., Zhang X., Yan C., Qian T. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2109422.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202109422 |
| 94 |
Sa Y. J., Lee C. W., Lee S. Y., Na J., Lee U., Hwang Y. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 6632.
doi: 10.1039/D0CS00030B |
| 95 |
Li F., Zhao S.-F., Chen L., Khan A., MacFarlane D. R., Zhang J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 216.
doi: 10.1039/C5EE02879E |
| 96 |
Li J., Li F., Liu C., Wei F., Gong J., Li W., Xue L., Yin J., Xiao L., Wang G., et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 4045.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01955 |
| 97 |
Wei X., Yin Z., Lyu K., Li Z., Gong J., Wang G., Xiao L., Lu J., Zhuang L. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4103.
doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00049 |
| 98 |
Chen X., Chen J., Alghoraibi N. M., Henckel D. A., Zhang R., Nwabara U. O., Madsen K. E., Kenis P. J. A., Zimmerman S. C., Gewirth A. A. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 20.
doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00547-0 |
| 99 |
Peterson A. A., Nørskov J. K. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 251.
doi: 10.1021/jz201461p |
| 100 |
Fan Q., Zhang X., Ge X., Bai L., He D., Qu Y., Kong C., Bi J., Ding D., Cao Y., et al. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101424.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101424 |
| [1] | 邱江源, 于涛, 陈均鑫, 李文轩, 张晓萱, 李金生, 郭瑞, 黄在银, 刘宣文. FeOOH调节Bi12O17Cl2@FeOOH异质结中Bi12O17Cl2的表面势阱深度以增强压电电荷转移和压电自芬顿催化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(1): 100157 - . |
| [2] | 梁英, 邓羽恒, 余士律, 程家豪, 宋嘉伟, 姚俊, 杨亦辰, 张万雷, 周文靖, 张欣, 沈文剑, 梁桂杰, 李彬, 彭勇, 胡润, 李望南. 机器学习辅助减反膜结构设计与界面修饰协同优化的高效稳定钙钛矿太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100098 - . |
| [3] | 祝鑫彤, 曹斌, 闫崇, 唐城, 陈爱兵, 张强. 锂离子电池石墨负极包覆研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100096 - . |
| [4] | 洪佳楠, 许辰宇, 刘烟, 黎昌棋, 王梦琳, 张彦威. 通过边缘活性位点调控解析光热催化中析氢与二氧化碳还原的界面竞争[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100099 - . |
| [5] | 吴琦, 王长华, 李莹莹, 张昕彤. 增强g-C3N4@BN范德华异质结界面上的三重态电子转移增强光催化合成H2O2[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(9): 100107 - . |
| [6] | 彭羽, 陈嘉威, 殷悦, 曹永杰, 廖莫愁, 王丛笑, 董晓丽, 夏永姚. 无碳酸乙烯酯电解液定向构筑正极电解质界面相实现高电压钴酸锂的宽温域稳定运行[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100087 - . |
| [7] | 曹雪婷, 察爽爽, 龚鸣. 电催化反应中的界面双电层:理论、表征与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100041 - . |
| [8] | 黄奥羽, 许君, 黄玉, 储圭, 王卯, 王黎丽, 孙永奇, 蒋臻, 朱晓波. 通过简单的浆料添加剂调整电极-电解液界面以实现稳定的高电压锂离子电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(4): 100037 - . |
| [9] | 王毅锴, 蒋晓林, 宋浩鸣, 魏楠, 王逸凡, 徐新军, 李翠红, 路皓, 刘亚辉, 薄志山. 氰基修饰的苝二酰亚胺衍生物作为膜厚不敏感型阴极界面材料用于高效有机太阳能电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100027 - . |
| [10] | 陈润华, 吴琼, 罗婧宸, 祖小龙, 朱姗, 孙永福. 缺陷态二维超薄材料用于光/电催化CO2还原的基础与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(3): 100019 - . |
| [11] | 刘崇静, 夏雨健, 张鹏军, 魏世强, 曹登丰, 圣蓓蓓, 褚勇衡, 陈双明, 宋礼, 刘啸嵩. 近常压X射线光电子能谱研究固-气和固-液界面[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100013 - . |
| [12] | 刘建东, 张志佳, Mikhail Kamenskii, Filipp Volkov, Svetlana Eliseeva, 马建民. 高压锂电池正极电解质界面研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(2): 100011 - . |
| [13] | 马浩桐, 衡明宇, 许杨, 毕炜, 缪应纯, 肖舒宁. 微波合成铜负载的碳掺杂氮化硼光催化材料及其大气浓度下CO2还原性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(11): 100132 - . |
| [14] | 陈晓睿, 罗轩, 苏通明, 谢新玲, 陈柳云, 宾月景, 秦祖赠, 纪红兵. Ga掺杂Cu/γ-Al2O3双功能界面位点促进CO2加氢直接合成二甲醚[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(10): 100126 - . |
| [15] | 韩卓, 张丹丰, 王海先, 郑国瑞, 柳明, 贺艳兵. 长寿命高镍锂电池界面重构电解液添加剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2307034 - . |
|
||