锂离子电池硅基负极用功能粘结剂的研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202306006

Abstract

Abstract:

Silicon (Si) has a high theoretical gravimetric capacity (3579 mAh∙g⁻¹ for Li₁₅Si₄), which is almost ten times higher than that of graphite (372 mAh∙g⁻¹) anode. Besides, it has low electrochemical potentials (0.4 V vs. Li⁺/Li), and abundant reserves. Thus, Si becomes a key anode material for the development of high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Nano-Si, typically compounded with graphite, has opened its commercialization. But the specific capacity of commercial Si/graphite composites is generally below 600 mAh∙g⁻¹, which is far below the theoretical specific capacity of Si. In the meanwhile, the high cost, high specific surface area and low tap density of nano-Si limit its volumetric energy density and large-scale production further. Compared to the above materials, micro-Si (1–10 μm) is gaining industry attention for its low cost, as it does not require high-energy ball milling to reduce the particle size. Also, low specific surface area and high tap density conduce to reducing interfacial side reactions and increasing volumetric energy density. Therefore, micro-Si has a particular advantage over application in high volumetric energy density storage devices. However, due to the huge stress caused by significant volume change (300%), there are more severe problems such as particle pulverization, electrode disintegration, conductive network failure and uncontrolled growth of solid electrolyte interphases, which greatly hinder its commercialization. Binders are essential in adapting to Si volume changes to ensure the integrity of the electrode and keeping the tight contact among the active material, conductive additive and current collector to provide a stable conductive network. The development of high-capacity and high-stability micro-Si-based anodes poses greater challenges to the design of binders. In this review, we first clarify the binding mechanism of binders, factors that influence the bonding forces, and design strategies of binders for relieving the volume change of Si electrodes. As a major part, we systematically discuss the strategies and corresponding mechanisms of functional binders for silicon-based anodes from aspects of self-healing binders, conductive binders, ion-conductive binders, and the facilitating effect of functional binders on the stable SEI (Solid Electrolyte Interphase) formation. Finally, the existing problems and challenges are pointed out in terms of long-cycle stability, initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and binder ratio under commercial loading. We put forward the promising directions for developing functional binders towards the practical use of micro-Si anode: an ideal binder should be multifunctional and helpful to robust electron/ion conductive networks and stable SEI throughout the long cycling life of micro-Si, where the polymer molecular structure of functional binders can be systematically designed by artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies.

Key words: Lithium-ion battery, Silicon-based anode, Functional binder, Self-healing polymer, Conductive polymer

Jingshuo Zhang, Yue Zhai, Ziyun Zhao, Jiaxing He, Wei Wei, Jing Xiao, Shichao Wu, Quan-Hong Yang. Research Progress of Functional Binders in Silicon-Based Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2024, 40(6), 2306006. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202306006

Figures/Tables 13

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Table 1

Brief summary of electrochemical performances of functional binders."

Binder	Binder ratio	Areal capacity (mAh∙cm⁻²)	First discharge capacity (mAh∙g⁻¹)	ICE	Capacity retention	Rate performance (mAh∙g⁻¹)
PR-PAA	10%	2.67@0.64 mA∙cm⁻²	2971@0.1 A∙g⁻¹	91.2%	91%@150 cycles	1400@3 A∙g⁻¹
PAA-P(HEA-co-DMA)	10%	3.2@1 A∙g⁻¹	2850@0.4 A∙g⁻¹	89.3%	94%@220 cycles	1855@5 A∙g⁻¹
SHP	50%	2.1@0.2 A∙g⁻¹	3400@0.4 A∙g⁻¹*	78%*	80%@90 cycles	1400@2 A∙g⁻¹
3D SHP	33%	3.8@0.3 mA∙cm⁻² *	2620@0.42 A∙g⁻¹	92.0%	70%@140 cycles	–
SBR/CMC-PEG-Im-Zn²⁺	10%	2@0.65 A∙g⁻¹ *	640@0.65 A∙g⁻¹	–	100%@200 cycles *	261@1.3 A∙g⁻¹
PAA-BFPU	15%	3@0.8 A∙g⁻¹ *	3500@0.2 A∙g⁻¹	89.8%	86%@100 cycles	1309@6 A∙g⁻¹
SHPET	20%	3.6@0.84 A∙g⁻¹ *	3744@0.42 A∙g⁻¹	86.0%	63%@60 cycles *	1594@4.2 A∙g⁻¹
GCA	15%	3.6@2 A∙g⁻¹	4015@0.2 A∙g⁻¹	89%*	72%@100 cycles	2416@4 A∙g⁻¹
PAA-UPy	20%	2.1@0.84 A∙g⁻¹ *	4194@0.84 A∙g⁻¹	86.4%	74%@110 cycles	2662@21 A∙g⁻¹ discharge, 0.84 A∙g⁻¹ charge
DA-PAA	30%	1.4@0.42 A∙g⁻¹ *	2607@0.42 A∙g⁻¹	86.0%	48%@200 cycles *	2190@21 A∙g⁻¹
AXDY-PA	20%	2.5@0.5 A∙g⁻¹ *	4113@0.5 A∙g⁻¹	87.0%	75%@100 cycles	1446@8 A∙g⁻¹
GCS-OSA	20%	2.8@0.84 A∙g⁻¹ *	4581@0.84 A∙g⁻¹	77.1%	43%@200 cycles *	2185@21 A∙g⁻¹
PAA-DA/PVA	20%	–	3434.3@0.4 A∙g⁻¹	83.4%	73%@100 cycles	2168@4 A∙g⁻¹
PEFM	33%	0.6@0.092 mAh∙cm⁻² *	3750@0.092 mAh∙cm⁻²	70.0%	84%@50 cycles	2730@1.84 mAh∙cm⁻²
PF-COONa	33%	1.5@0.42 A∙g⁻¹ *	3500@0.42 A∙g⁻¹	68.4%	84%@100 cycles	1424@8.4 A∙g⁻¹
PEDOT: PSS-FA	20%	3.8@0.5 A∙g⁻¹	3685@0.5 A∙g⁻¹	77.5%	63%@100 cycles *	1550@5 A∙g⁻¹
PEDOT: PSS-GOPS	27.30%	2.9@1 A∙g⁻¹	3450@1 A∙g⁻¹	85.0%	70.8%@200 cycles	760@8 A∙g⁻¹
PPTU	20%	2@1 A∙g⁻¹ *	3950@0.2 A∙g⁻¹	80.1%	76.7%@300 cycles	620@8 A∙g⁻¹
Polyimine	5%	1.3@0.4 A∙g⁻¹ *	–	60.0%	80.4%@200 cycles	433@5 A∙g⁻¹
PVA-CS-CPDs	10%	5.4@0.42 A∙g⁻¹ *	3048@0.84 A∙g⁻¹	89.6%	60%@100 cycles *	1076@8.4 A∙g⁻¹
CG	10%	6.4@0.3 mA∙cm^{−2 *}	3788	80.0%	80%@300 cycles *	737@8.4 A∙g⁻¹
GG	15%	2.8@0.84 A∙g⁻¹ *	3364@2.1 A∙g⁻¹	88.3%	70%@30 cycles	980@12.6 A∙g⁻¹
N-P-LiPN	10%	5@0.84 A∙g⁻¹ *	3650@0.84 A∙g⁻¹	86.2%	70%@50 cycles *	2021@8.4 A∙g⁻¹
xPEG-GCS	20%	1.4@0.36 A∙g⁻¹	3332@0.36 A∙g⁻¹	82.2%	64.7%@150 cycles	2700@10.74 A∙g⁻¹
c-PEO-PEDOT: PSS/PEI	20%	~4@1 A∙g⁻¹	2440@1 A∙g⁻¹	82.0%	~100%@60cycles	1590@8 A∙g⁻¹
SHP-PEG	30%	1.1@1.79 A∙g⁻¹	2600@0.179 A∙g⁻¹	83.0%	80%@150 cycles	900@7.16 A∙g⁻¹
GG-g-PAM	5%	5.1@0.5 A∙g⁻¹	2600@0.15 A∙g⁻¹	84.5%	78.5%@60cycles	1249@8 A∙g⁻¹

Table 1

References 69

1	Yin H. Y. ; Yu Y. ; Li Z. C ; Zhang G. H. ; Feng Y. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1341.
	殷鸿尧; 于跃; 李宗诚; 张港鸿; 冯玉军. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1341. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042
2	Kwon T. W. ; Choi J. W. ; Coskun A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2145. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00858a
3	Tan D. H. S. ; Chen Y.-T. ; Yang H. ; Bao W. ; Sreenarayanan B. ; Doux J.-M. ; Li W. ; Lu B. ; Ham S.-Y. ; Sayahpour B. ; et al Science 2021, 373, 1494. doi: 10.1126/science.abg7217
4	Kovalenko I. ; Zdyrko B. ; Magasinski A. ; Hertzberg B. ; Milicev Z. ; Burtovyy R. ; Luzinov I. ; Yushin G. Science 2011, 334, 75. doi: 10.1126/science.1209150
5	Choi S. ; Kwon T.-W. ; Coskun A. ; Choi J. W. Science 2017, 357, 279. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4373
6	Xiao J. ; Han J. ; Kong D. ; Shi H. ; Du X. ; Zhao Z. ; Chen F. ; Lan P. ; Wu S. ; Zhang Y. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 50, 554. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.034
7	Ren Y. ; Xiang L. ; Yin X. ; Xiao R. ; Zuo P. ; Gao Y. ; Yin G. ; Du C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110046. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202110046
8	Pan S. ; Han J. ; Wang Y. ; Li Z. ; Chen F. ; Guo Y. ; Han Z. ; Xiao K. ; Yu Z. ; Yu M. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2203617. doi: 10.1002/adma.202203617
9	Mu T. ; Sun Y. ; Wang C. ; Zhao Y. ; Doyle-Davis K. ; Liang J. ; Sui X. ; Li R. ; Du C. ; Zuo P. ; et al Nano Energy 2022, 103, 107829. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107829
10	Han J. ; Tang D. M. ; Kong D. ; Chen F. ; Xiao J. ; Zhao Z. ; Pan S. ; Wu S. ; Yang Q. H. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65, 1563. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.018
11	Wu H. ; Chan G. ; Choi J. W. ; Ryu I. ; Yao Y. ; McDowell M. T. ; Lee S. W. ; Jackson A. ; Yang Y. ; Hu L. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 310. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.35
12	Yu Y. ; Gu L. ; Zhu C. ; Tsukimoto S. ; van Aken P. A. ; Maier J. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2247. doi: 10.1002/adma.200903755
13	Hu Y. S. ; Demir-Cakan R. ; Titirici M. M. ; Muller J. O. ; Schlogl R. ; Antonietti M. ; Maier J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1645. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704287
14	Magasinski A. ; Dixon P. ; Hertzberg B. ; Kvit A. ; Ayala J. ; Yushin G. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 353. doi: 10.1038/nmat2725
15	Zhao Z. ; Han J. ; Chen F. ; Xiao J. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Kong D. ; Weng Z. ; Wu S. ; Yang Q. H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103565. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103565
16	Chen F. ; Han J. ; Kong D. ; Yuan Y. ; Xiao J. ; Wu S. ; Tang D. M. ; Deng Y. ; Lv W. ; Lu J. ; et al Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, 12. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab012
17	Chen J. ; Fan X. ; Li Q. ; Yang H. ; Khoshi M. R. ; Xu Y. ; Hwang S. ; Chen L. ; Ji X. ; Yang C. ; et al Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 386. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0601-1
18	Zhu T. ; Sternlicht H. ; Ha Y. ; Fang C. ; Liu D. ; Savitzky B. H. ; Zhao X. ; Lu Y. ; Fu Y. ; Ophus C. ; et al Nat. Energy 2023, 8, 129. doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01176-6
19	McBrayer J. D. ; Rodrigues M.-T. F. ; Schulze M. C. ; Abraham D. P. ; Apblett C. A. ; Bloom I. ; Carroll G. M. ; Colclasure A. M. ; Fang C. ; Harrison K. L. ; et al Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 866. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00883-w
20	Wang Q. ; Zhu M. ; Chen G. ; Dudko N. ; Li Y. ; Liu H. ; Shi L. ; Wu G. ; Zhang D. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2109658. doi: 10.1002/adma.202109658
21	Lopez J. ; Mackanic D. G. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 312. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0103-6
22	Li P. ; Kim H. ; Myung S.-T. ; Sun Y.-K. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 35, 550. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.028
23	Zhao Y. M. ; Yue F. S. ; Li S. C. ; Zhang Y. ; Tian Z. R. ; Xu Q. ; Xin S. ; Guo Y. G. InfoMat 2021, 3, 460. doi: 10.1002/inf2.12185
24	Kwon T.-W. ; Choi J. W. ; Coskun A. Joule 2019, 3, 662. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.006
25	An H. ; Jiang L. ; Li F. ; Wu P. ; Zhu X. ; Wei S. ; Zhou Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905034.
	安惠芳; 姜莉; 李峰; 吴平; 朱晓舒; 魏少华; 周益明. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905034. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905034
26	Zhao Z. ; Chen F. ; Han J. ; Kong D. ; Pan S. ; Xiao J. ; Wu S. ; Yang Q. H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2300367. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300367
27	Chen H. ; Ling M. ; Hencz L. ; Ling H. Y. ; Li G. ; Lin Z. ; Liu G. ; Zhang S. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 8936. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00241
28	Liu G. ; Zheng H. ; Song X. ; Battaglia V. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A214. doi: 10.1149/2.024203jes
29	Hernandez C. R. ; Etiemble A. ; Douillard T. ; Mazouzi D. ; Karkar Z. ; Maire E. ; Guyomard D. ; Lestriez B. ; Roué L. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701787. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701787
30	Zhu S. ; Li H. ; Hu Z. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhao J. ; Zhang L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2103052.
	朱思颖; 李辉阳; 胡忠利; 张桥保; 赵金保; 张力. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2103052. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202103052
31	Wu S. ; Yang Y. ; Liu C. ; Liu T. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang B. ; Luo D. ; Pan F. ; Lin Z. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 6, 290. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02342
32	Lee H. A. ; Shin M. ; Kim J. ; Choi J. W. ; Lee H. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007460. doi: 10.1002/adma.202007460
33	Han D. Y. ; Han I. K. ; Son H. B. ; Kim Y. S. ; Ryu J. ; Park S. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213458. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202213458
34	Xu Z. ; Yang J. ; Zhang T. ; Nuli Y. ; Wang J. ; Hirano S.-I. Joule 2018, 2, 950. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.012
35	Li Z. ; Wu G. ; Yang Y. ; Wan Z. ; Zeng X. ; Yan L. ; Wu S. ; Ling M. ; Liang C. Hui K. N., et al. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2201197. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202201197
36	Li B. ; Cao P. F. ; Saito T. ; Sokolov A. P. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 701. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00575
37	Wang C. ; Wu H. ; Chen Z. ; McDowell M. T. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 1042. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1802
38	Li C. H. ; Zuo J. L. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1903762. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903762
39	Kim J. ; Park K. ; Cho Y. ; Shin H. ; Kim S. ; Char K. ; Choi J. W. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004290. doi: 10.1002/advs.202004290
40	Zhang L. ; Zhang L. ; Chai L. ; Xue P. ; Hao W. ; Zheng H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 19036. doi: 10.1039/c4ta04320k
41	Ying H. ; Zhang Y. ; Cheng J. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3218. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4218
42	Chen Z. ; Wang C. ; Lopez J. ; Lu Z. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401826. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401826
43	Jiao X. ; Yin J. ; Xu X. ; Wang J. ; Liu Y. ; Xiong S. ; Zhang Q. ; Song J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 31, 2005699. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202005699
44	Kim S.-M. ; Kim M. H. ; Choi S. Y. ; Lee J. G. ; Jang J. ; Lee J. B. ; Ryu J. H. ; Hwang S. S. ; Park J.-H. ; Shin K. et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1538. doi: 10.1039/c5ee00472a
45	Zhao H. ; Wei Y. ; Qiao R. ; Zhu C. ; Zheng Z. ; Ling M. ; Jia Z. ; Bai Y. ; Fu Y. ; Lei J. ; et al Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7927. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03003
46	Liu X. ; Xu Z. ; Iqbal A. ; Chen M. ; Ali N. ; Low C. ; Qi R. ; Zai J. ; Qian X. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 54. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00564-5
47	Chiang C. K. ; Fincher C. R. ; Park Y. W. ; Heeger A. J. ; Shirakawa H. ; Louis E. J. ; Gau S. C. ; MacDiarmid A. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1977, 39, 1098. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1098
48	Chen S. ; Song Z. ; Wang L. ; Chen H. ; Zhang S. ; Pan F. ; Yang L. Accounts Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 2088. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00259
49	Liu G. ; Xun S. ; Vukmirovic N. ; Song X. ; Olalde-Velasco P. ; Zheng H. ; Battaglia V. S. ; Wang L. ; Yang W. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4679. doi: 10.1002/adma.201102421
50	Zhao H. ; Wang Z. ; Lu P. ; Jiang M. ; Shi F. ; Song X. ; Zheng Z. ; Zhou X. ; Fu Y. ; Abdelbast G. ; et al Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6704. doi: 10.1021/nl503490h
51	Wu M. ; Xiao X. ; Vukmirovic N. ; Xun S. ; Das P. K. ; Song X. ; Olalde-Velasco P. ; Wang D. ; Weber A. Z. ; Wang L. W. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12048. doi: 10.1021/ja4054465
52	Zhu T. ; Liu G. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 050533. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/abff01
53	Liu D. ; Zhao Y. ; Tan R. ; Tian L.-L. ; Liu Y. ; Chen H. ; Pan F. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 206. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.043
54	Higgins T. M. ; Park S. H. ; King P. J. ; Zhang C. J. ; McEvoy N. ; Berner N. C. ; Daly D. ; Shmeliov A. ; Khan U. ; Duesberg G. ; et al ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3702. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00218
55	Tsai C.-Y. ; Liu Y.-L. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 379, 138180. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138180
56	Munaoka T. ; Yan X. ; Lopez J. ; To J. W. F. ; Park J. ; Tok J. B. H. ; Cui Y. ; Bao Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703138. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201703138
57	Hu Y. ; Shao D. ; Chen Y. ; Peng J. ; Dai S. ; Huang M. ; Guo Z.-H. ; Luo X. ; Yue K. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 10886. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c01849
58	Cai Y. ; Liu C. ; Yu Z. ; Ma W. ; Jin Q. ; Du R. ; Qian B. ; Jin X. ; Wu H. ; Zhang Q. ; et al Adv. Sci. 2023, doi: 10.1002/advs.202205590
59	Liu H. ; Wu Q. ; Guan X. ; Liu M. ; Wang F. ; Li R. ; Xu J. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 4934. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00329
60	Garsuch R. R. ; Le D.-B. ; Garsuch A. ; Li J. ; Wang S. ; Farooq A. ; Dahn J. R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, A721. doi: 10.1149/1.2956964
61	Li Z. ; Zhang Y. ; Liu T. ; Gao X. ; Li S. ; Ling M. ; Liang C. ; Zheng J. ; Lin Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903110. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903110
62	Liu J. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhang T. ; Li J.-T. ; Huang L. ; Sun S.-G. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3599. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201500589
63	Zeng W. ; Wang L. ; Peng X. ; Liu T. ; Jiang Y. ; Qin F. ; Hu L. ; Chu P. K. ; Huo K. ; Zhou Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702314. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702314
64	Oh D. Y. ; Nam Y. J. ; Park K. H. ; Jung S. H. ; Kim K. T. ; Ha A. R. ; Jung Y. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802927. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201802927
65	Zhu J. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhao S. ; Westover A. S. ; Belharouak I. ; Cao P. F. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003836. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202003836
66	Nguyen C. C. ; Yoon T. ; Seo D. M. ; Guduru P. ; Lucht B. L. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 12211. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b03357
67	Parikh P. ; Sina M. ; Banerjee A. ; Wang X. ; D'Souza M. S. ; Doux J.-M. ; Wu E. A. ; Trieu O. Y. ; Gong Y. ; Zhou Q. ; et al Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 2535. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05020
68	Browning K. L. ; Browning J. F. ; Doucet M. ; Yamada N. L. ; Liu G. ; Veith G. M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 17356. doi: 10.1039/c9cp02610j
69	Browning K. L. ; Sacci R. L. ; Doucet M. ; Browning J. F. ; Kim J. R. ; Veith G. M. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 10018. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b22382

[1]	Xintong Zhu, Bin Cao, Chong Yan, Cheng Tang, Aibing Chen, Qiang Zhang. Advances in coating strategies for graphite anodes in lithium-ion batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(9): 100096-.
[2]	Liangliang Song, Haoyan Liang, Shunqing Li, Bao Qiu, Zhaoping Liu. Challenges and strategies on high-manganese Li-rich layered oxide cathodes for ultrahigh-energy-density batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100085-.
[3]	Aoyu Huang, Jun Xu, Yu Huang, Gui Chu, Mao Wang, Lili Wang, Yongqi Sun, Zhen Jiang, Xiaobo Zhu. Tailoring Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces via a Simple Slurry Additive for Stable High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(4): 100037-.
[4]	Xueyu Lin, Ruiqi Wang, Wujie Dong, Fuqiang Huang. Rational Design of Bimetallic Oxide Anodes for Superior Li⁺ Storage [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(3): 100021-.
[5]	Chenyue Huang, Hongfei Zheng, Ning Qin, Canpei Wang, Liguang Wang, Jun Lu. Single-Crystal Nickel-Rich Cathode Materials: Challenges and Strategies [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(9): 2308051-.
[6]	Xuechen Hu, Qiuying Xia, Fan Yue, Xinyi He, Zhenghao Mei, Jinshi Wang, Hui Xia, Xiaodong Huang. Electrochemical Characteristics of LiNbO₃ Anode Film and Its Applications in All-Solid-State Thin-Film Lithium-Ion Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(2): 2309046-.
[7]	Siyu Zhang, Kunhong Gu, Bing'an Lu, Junwei Han, Jiang Zhou. Hydrometallurgical Processes on Recycling of Spent Lithium-lon Battery Cathode: Advances and Applications in Sustainable Technologies [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(10): 2309028-.
[8]	Hangyu Lu, Ruilin Hou, Shiyong Chu, Haoshen Zhou, Shaohua Guo. Progress on Modification Strategies of Layered Lithium-Rich Cathode Materials for High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(7): 2211057-0.
[9]	Ru Wang, Zhikang Liu, Chao Yan, Long Qie, Yunhui Huang. Interface Strengthening of Composite Current Collectors for High-Safety Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(2): 2203043-0.
[10]	Siying Zhu, Huiyang Li, Zhongli Hu, Qiaobao Zhang, Jinbao Zhao, Li Zhang. Research Progresses on Structural Optimization and Interfacial Modification of Silicon Monoxide Anode for Lithium-Ion Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2103052-.
[11]	Yue Yang, Jiawei Zhu, Pengyan Wang, Haimi Liu, Weihao Zeng, Lei Chen, Zhixiang Chen, Shichun Mu. NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti) Derived Flower-Like Fine TiO₂ Nanoparticles Implanted in N-doped Porous Carbon as an Anode with High Activity and Long Cycle Life for Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2106002-.
[12]	Ying Mo, Kuikui Xiao, Jianfang Wu, Hui Liu, Aiping Hu, Peng Gao, Jilei Liu. Lithium-Ion Battery Separator: Functional Modification and Characterization [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2107030-.
[13]	Xuewei Liu, Ying Niu, Ruixiong Cao, Xiaohong Chen, Hongyan Shang, Huaihe Song. Is there a Demand of Conducting Agent of Acetylene Black for Graphene-Wrapped Natural Spherical Graphite as Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries? [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(2): 2012062-.
[14]	Yaokun Ye, Zongxiang Hu, Jiahua Liu, Weicheng Lin, Taowen Chen, Jiaxin Zheng, Feng Pan. Research Progress of Theoretical Studies on Polarons in Cathode Materials of Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2011003-.
[15]	Huifang An, Li Jiang, Feng Li, Ping Wu, Xiaoshu Zhu, Shaohua Wei, Yiming Zhou. Hydrogel-Derived Three-Dimensional Porous Si-CNT@G Nanocomposite with High-Performance Lithium Storage [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(7): 1905034-.

Research Progress of Functional Binders in Silicon-Based Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

RichHTML

Full text @ ScienceDirect

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 69

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0