高压锂电池正极电解质界面研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202308048

Abstract

Abstract:

Achieving high energy density batteries is currently a key focus in the field of energy storage. Lithium batteries, due to their high energy density, have garnered significant attention in research. Increasing the upper limit of the battery's cut-off voltage can boost the energy density of lithium batteries. However, high-voltage conditions can lead to irreversible phase transitions and side reactions in cathode materials, which can degrade battery performance and even result in safety risks, including explosions. The electrolyte can also decompose, causing capacity loss and releasing flammable gases when subjected to high voltage, which can lead to battery swelling and potential combustion and explosions. Designing an ideal cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the cathode's surface to regulate the electrode-electrolyte interface reaction can effectively enhance the cycling stability of the battery, reduce irreversible phase transitions in the cathode, and improve the oxidation stability of the electrolyte. The ideal CEI should possess high ion conductivity, high thermal stability, and should minimize interface side reactions to ensure optimal battery performance. Understanding the formation and development of CEI is crucial for enhancing battery performance under high voltage. Apart from creating artificial CEI, modifying electrolytes has gained significant attention. By altering the electrolyte recipe, an ideal CEI can be achieved. Electrolyte engineering is considered an effective strategy for attaining an ideal CEI and enhancing the stability of high nickel positive electrodes. This approach is simple, cost-effective, and holds great promise for achieving higher energy density in lithium batteries. To provide a better understanding of CEI in lithium ion batteries (LIBs), this article reviews the latest advancements in CEI, including the formation mechanism of CEI, the key factors influencing CEI, methods for modifying CEI, and techniques for characterizing CEI. Additionally, it summarizes the current status of artificial CEI development and in situ CEI generation through electrolyte design. The aim is to offer fundamental guidance for future research and the design of high-voltage battery CEI. Finally, the article outlines the opportunities and challenges in electrolyte engineering for modified CEI, pointing towards the future direction of constructing an ideal CEI.

Key words: High-voltage cathode, Cathode electrolyte interphase, Electrolyte engineering, Electrolyte additive, Lithium battery

Jiandong Liu, Zhijia Zhang, Kamenskii Mikhail, Volkov Filipp, Eliseeva Svetlana, Jianmin Ma. Research Progress on Cathode Electrolyte Interphase in High-Voltage Lithium Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2025, 41(2), 100011. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202308048

Figures/Tables 11

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 1

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

References 80

1	Goodenough J. B. ; Park K. -S J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 1167. doi: 10.1021/ja3091438
2	Jia H. ; Xu W. Trends Chem 2022, 4, 627. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2022.04.010
3	Wu Y. ; Liu X. ; Wang L. ; Feng X. ; Ren D. ; Li Y. ; Rui X. ; Wang Y. ; Han X. ; Xu G -L. ; et al Energy Storage Mater 2021, 37, 77. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.001
4	Pham H. Q. ; Chung G. J. ; Han J. ; Hwang E.-H. ; Kwon Y.-G. ; Song S. -W J. Chem. Phys 2020, 152, 094709. doi: 10.1063/1.5144280
5	Zhang J. ; Wang P. ; Wang P. -F. ; Bai P. ; Wan H. ; Liu S. ; Hou S. ; Pu X. ; Xia J. ; Zhang W. ; Wang Z. ; et al Adv. Mater 2022, 34, 2108353. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108353
6	Li W. ; Song B. ; Manthiram A Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 3006. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00875E
7	Kong D. ; Hu J. ; Chen Z. ; Song K. ; Li C. ; Weng M. ; Li M. ; Wang R. ; Liu T. ; Liu J. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater 2019, 9, 1901756. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201901756
8	Ren X. ; Chen S. ; Lee H. ; Mei D. ; Engelhard M. H. ; Burton S. D. ; Zhao W. ; Zheng J. ; Li Q. ; Ding M. S. ; et al Chem 2018, 4, 1877. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.002
9	Song S. H. ; Cho M. ; Park I. ; Yoo J.-G. ; Ko K.-T. ; Hong J. ; Kim J. ; Jung S. -K. ; Avdeev M. ; Ji S. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater 2020, 10, 2000521. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000521
10	Piao Z. ; Gao R. ; Liu Y. ; Zhou G. ; Cheng H. -M Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2206009. doi: 10.1002/adma.202206009
11	Qin Y. ; Cheng H. ; Zhou J. ; Liu M. ; Ding X. ; Li Y. ; Huang Y. ; Chen Z. ; Shen C. ; Wang D. ; et al Energy Storage Mater 2023, 57, 411. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.02.022
12	Sun H. H. ; Kim U.-H. ; Park J.-H. ; Park S.-W. ; Seo D.-H. ; Heller A. ; Mullins C. B. ; Yoon C. S. ; Sun Y. -K Nat. Commun 2021, 12, 6552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26815-6
13	Zhou K. ; Xie Q. ; Li B. ; Manthiram A Energy Storage Mater 2021, 34, 229. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.015
14	Li J. ; Li W. ; Wang S. ; Jarvis K. ; Yang J. ; Manthiram A Chem. Mater 2018, 30, 3101. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01077
15	Xie Q. ; Li W. ; Dolocan A. ; Manthiram A Chem. Mater 2019, 31, 8886. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02916
16	Nisar U. ; Muralidharan N. ; Essehli R. ; Amin R. ; Belharouak I Energy Storage Mater 2021, 38, 309. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.015
17	Woo S. U. ; Yoon C. S. ; Amine K. ; Belharouak I. ; Sun Y. K J. Electrochem. Soc 2007, 154, A1005. doi: 10.1149/1.2776160
18	Ahmed B. ; Xia C. ; Alshareef H. N Nano Today 2016, 11, 250. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.004
19	Li W. ; Liu X. ; Celio H. ; Smith P. ; Dolocan A. ; Chi M. ; Manthiram A Adv. Energy Mater 2018, 8, 1703154. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201703154
20	You Y. ; Celio H. ; Li J. ; Dolocan A. ; Manthiram A Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 6480. doi: 10.1002/anie.201801533
21	Gao S. ; Zhan X. ; Cheng Y. -T -T. J. Power Sources 2019, 410-411, 45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.094
22	Shu Y. ; Xie Y. ; Yan W. ; Meng S. ; Sun D. ; Jin Y. ; Xiang L Ceramics Int 2020, 46, 14840. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint
23	Mou J. ; Deng Y. ; He L. ; Zheng Q. ; Jiang N. ; Lin D Electrochim. Acta 2018, 260, 101. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta
24	Cao G. ; Jin Z. ; Zhu J. ; Li Y. ; Xu B. ; Xiong Y. ; Yang J J. Alloys Compd 2020, 832, 153788. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom
25	Zhang Z. ; Yang J. ; Huang W. ; Wang H. ; Zhou W. ; Li Y. ; Li Y. ; Xu J. ; Huang W. ; Chiu W. ; et al Matter 2021, 4, 302. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.021
26	Chen D. ; Mahmoud M. A. ; Wang J.-H. ; Waller G. H. ; Zhao B. ; Qu C. ; El-Sayed M. A. ; Liu M Nano Lett 2019, 19, 2037. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00179
27	Wang S. ; Dai A. ; Cao Y. ; Yang H. ; Khalil A. ; Lu J. ; Li H. ; Ai X J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 11623. doi: 10.1039/D1TA02563E
28	Thomas M. G. S. R. ; Bruce P. G. ; Goodenough J. B J. Electrochem. Soc 1985, 132, 1521. doi: 10.1149/1.2114158
29	Kanamura K. ; Toriyama S. ; Shiraishi S. ; Ohashi M. ; Takehara Z. -I J. Electroanal. Chem 1996, 419, 77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04862-0
30	Zhou Q. ; Ma J. ; Dong S. ; Li X. ; Cui G Adv. Mater 2019, 31, 1902029. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902029
31	Aikens D. A J. Chem. Edu 1983, 60, A25. doi: 10.1021/ed060pA25.1
32	Fang S. ; Jackson D. ; Dreibelbis M. L. ; Kuech T. F. ; Hamers R. J J. Power Sources 2018, 373, 184. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.050
33	Zhang J.-N. ; Li Q. ; Wang Y. ; Zheng J. ; Yu X. ; Li H Energy Storage Mater 2018, 14, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.016
34	Zhang Z. ; Qin C. ; Wang K. ; Han X. ; Li J. ; Sui M. ; Yan P J. Energy Chem 2023, 81, 192. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.01.046
35	Zhou Y.-N. ; Ma J. ; Hu E. ; Yu X. ; Gu L. ; Nam K.-W. ; Chen L. ; Wang Z. ; Yang X. -Q. Nat. Commun 2014, 5, 5381. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6381
36	Chen M. ; Wang W. ; Shi Z. ; Liu Z. ; Shen C Appl. Surf. Sci 2022, 600, 154119. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154119
37	Tallman K. R. ; Wheeler G. P. ; Kern C. J. ; Stavitski E. ; Tong X. ; Takeuchi K. J. ; Marschilok A. C. ; Bock D. C. ; Takeuchi E. S J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 58. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08095
38	Yang Y. ; Wang H. ; Zhu C. ; Ma J Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2023, 62, e202300057. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300057
39	Liu J. ; Wu M. ; Li X. ; Wu D. ; Wang H. ; Huang J. ; Ma J Adv. Energy Mater 2023, 13, 2300084. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300084
40	Frisch M. J. ; Trucks G. W. ; Schlegel H. B. ; Scuseria G. E. ; Robb M. A. ; Cheeseman J. R. ; Scalmani G. ; Barone V. ; Petersson G. A. ; Nakatsuji H. ; et al Gaussian 16 Rev. B.01, Wallingford, Wallingford, CT 2016,
41	Neese F WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci 2018, 8, e1327. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1327
42	Perdew J. P. ; Burke K. ; Ernzerhof M Phys. Rev. Lett 1996, 77, 3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
43	Hutter J. ; Iannuzzi M. ; Schiffmann F. ; VandeVondele J WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci 2014, 4, 15. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1159
44	Fan X. ; Chen L. ; Borodin O. ; Ji X. ; Chen J. ; Hou S. ; Deng T. ; Zheng J. ; Yang C. ; Liou S. -C. ; et al -C., et al. Nat. Nanotechnol 2018, 13, 715. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0183-2
45	Li X. ; Liu J. ; He J. ; Wang H. ; Qi S. ; Wu D. ; Huang J. ; Li F. ; Hu W. ; Ma J Adv. Funct. Mater 2021, 31, 2104395. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202104395
46	Kim S. C. ; Oyakhire S. T. ; Athanitis C. ; Wang J. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhang W. ; Boyle D. T. ; Kim M. S. ; Yu Z. ; Gao X. ; et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2023, 120, e2214357120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214357120
47	Zhao L. ; Chen G. ; Weng Y. ; Yan T. ; Shi L. ; An Z. ; Zhang D Chem. Eng. J 2020, 401, 126138. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126138
48	Qiao Y. ; Zhou Z. ; Chen Z. ; Du S. ; Cheng Q. ; Zhai H. ; Fritz N. J. ; Du Q. ; Yang Y Nano Energy 2018, 45, 68. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.036
49	Wu Z. ; Li R. ; Zhang S. ; lv L. ; Deng T. ; Zhang H. ; Zhang R. ; Liu J. ; Ding S. ; Fan L. ; et al Chem 2023, 9, 650. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.10.027
50	Li X. ; Zhang K. ; Mitlin D. ; Paek E. ; Wang M. ; Jiang F. ; Huang Y. ; Yang Z. ; Gong Y. ; Gu L. ; et al Small 2018, 14, 1802570. doi: 10.1002/smll.201802570
51	Bai Y. ; Jiang K. ; Sun S. ; Wu Q. ; Lu X. ; Wan N Electrochim. Acta 2014, 134, 347. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.155
52	Yao L. ; Liang F. ; Jin J. ; Chowdari B. V. R. ; Yang J. ; Wen Z Chem. Eng. J 2020, 389, 124403. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124403
53	Gao X.-W. ; Deng Y.-F. ; Wexler D. ; Chen G.-H. ; Chou S.-L. ; Liu H.-K. ; Shi Z.-C. ; Wang J. -Z J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 404. doi: 10.1039/C4TA04018J
54	Ding J.-F. ; Xu R. ; Yao N. ; Chen X. ; Xiao Y. ; Yao Y.-X. ; Yan C. ; Xie J. ; Huang J. -Q Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 11442. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101627
55	Wang Z. ; Zhu C. ; Liu J. ; Hu X. ; Yang Y. ; Qi S. ; Wang H. ; Wu D. ; Huang J. ; He P. ; et al Adv. Funct. Mater 2023, 33, 2212150. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202212150
56	Huang J. ; Liu J. ; He J. ; Wu M. ; Qi S. ; Wang H. ; Li F. ; Ma J Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 20717. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107957
57	Jiang G. ; Liu J. ; Wang Z. ; Ma J Adv. Funct. Mater 2023, 2300629. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202300629
58	Rath P. C. ; Wang Y.-W. ; Patra J. ; Umesh B. ; Yeh T.-J. ; Okada S. ; Li J. ; Chang J. -K Chem. Eng. J 2021, 415, 128904. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128904
59	Zheng X. ; Liao Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhu J. ; Ren F. ; He H. ; Xiang Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Yang Y J. Energy Chem 2020, 42, 62. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.023
60	Etacheri V. ; Haik O. ; Goffer Y. ; Roberts G. A. ; Stefan I. C. ; Fasching R. ; Aurbach D Langmuir 2012, 28, 965. doi: 10.1021/la203712s
61	Xia J. ; Petibon R. ; Xiao A. ; Lamanna W. M. ; Dahn J. R J. Electrochem. Soc 2016, 163, A1637. doi: 10.1149/2.0831608jes
62	Fan X. ; Wang C Chem. Soc. Rev 2021, 50, 10486. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00450F
63	Xu N. ; Shi J. ; Liu G. ; Yang X. ; Zheng J. ; Zhang Z. ; Yang Y. J Power Sources Adv 2021, 7, 100043. doi: 10.1016/j.powera.2020.100043
64	Wang T. ; Rao L. ; Jiao X. ; Choi J. ; Yap J. ; Kim J. -H ACS Appl. Energy Mater 2022, 5, 7346. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00861
65	Song Y. ; Mao Q. ; Li Q. ; Huang Z. ; Wan Y. ; Hong B. ; Zhong Q ACS Appl. Energy Mater 2023, 6, 4271. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c00196
66	Wu F. ; Schür A. R. ; Kim G. -T. ; Dong X. ; Kuenzel M. ; Diemant T. ; D'Orsi G. ; Simonetti E. ; De Francesco M. ; Bellusci M. ; et al Energy Storage Mater 2021, 42, 826. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.08.030
67	Xu M. ; Liu Y. ; Li B. ; Li W. ; Li X. ; Hu S Electrochem. Commun 2012, 18, 123. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.02.037
68	Pham T. D. ; Faheem A. B. ; Kim J. ; Kwak K. ; Lee K. -K Electrochim. Acta 2023, 142496. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142496
69	Winter E. ; Briccola M. ; Schmidt T. J. ; Trabesinger S Appl. Res 2022, e202200096. doi: 10.1002/appl.202200096
70	Ma Q. ; Zhang X. ; Wang A. ; Xia Y. ; Liu X. ; Luo J Adv. Funct. Mater 2020, 30, 2002824. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202002824
71	Yang Y.-P. ; Jiang J.-C. ; Huang A.-C. ; Tang Y. ; Liu Y.-C. ; Xie L.-J. ; Zhang C.-Z. ; Wu Z.-H. ; Xing Z.-X. ; Yu F Process Saf. Environ. Prot 2022, 160, 80. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.02.018
72	Zhang C.-M. ; Li F. ; Zhu X.-Q. ; Yu J. -G Molecules 2022, 27, 3107. doi: 10.3390/molecules.27103107
73	Li Y. ; Li W. ; Shimizu R. ; Cheng D. ; Nguyen H. ; Paulsen J. ; Kumakura S. ; Zhang M. ; Meng Y. S Adv. Energy Mater 2022, 12, 2103033. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103033
74	Martinez A. C. ; Rigaud S. ; Grugeon S. ; Tran-Van P. ; Armand M. ; Cailleu D. ; Pilard S. ; Laruelle S Electrochim. Acta 2022, 426, 140765. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140765
75	Fu A. ; Lin J. ; Zhang Z. ; Xu C. ; Zou Y. ; Liu C. ; Yan P. ; Wu D.-Y. ; Yang Y. ; Zheng J ACS Energy Lett 2022, 7, 1364. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00316
76	Xu M. ; Zhou L. ; Dong Y. ; Chen Y. ; Garsuch A. ; Lucht B. L J. Electrochem. Soc 2013, 160, A2005. doi: 10.1149/2.053311jes
77	Xu M. ; Zhou L. ; Dong Y. ; Chen Y. ; Demeaux J. ; MacIntosh A. D. ; Garsuch A. ; Lucht B. L Energy Environ. Sci 2016, 9, 1308. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03360H
78	Yang X. ; Lin M. ; Zheng G. ; Wu J. ; Wang X. ; Ren F. ; Zhang W. ; Liao Y. ; Zhao W. ; Zhang Z. ; et al Adv. Funct. Mater 2020, 30, 2004664. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202004664
79	Liu F. ; Zhang Z. ; Yu Z. ; Fan X. ; Yi M. ; Bai M. ; Song Y. ; Mao Q. ; Hong B. ; Zhang Z. ; et al Chem. Eng. J 2022, 434, 134745. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134745
80	Zhang Q.-K. ; Zhang X.-Q. ; Wan J. ; Yao N. ; Song T.-L. ; Xie J. ; Hou L.-P. ; Zhou M.-Y. ; Chen X. Li B ; Li B. -Q. ; et al Nat. Energy 2023, 8, 725. doi: 10.1038/s41560-023-01275-y

Methods	Advantage	Disadvantage
XPS	Provides the content of elements on the surface/ analyze the valence states of elements/ better quantitative ability	Not easy to focus/ the large irradiation area/ the detection limit
SEM	Simple to prepare samples/ dynamically observed/ high resolution	The lower resolution/ vacuum environment limits the type of sample/ only the surface morphology observed/ no height direction information/ not liquid samples
TEM	High resolution/ observing the crystal lattice on the crystal surface	Certain destructive effects on the sample/ high material requirements/ small observation range
Cryo-EM	Close to the living state/ observing microstructure of different split surfaces/ withstanding electron beam bombardment and long-term preservation	Artificial damage to samples/ Limitations of observation area selection
XRD	High analysis speed/ no extra changes in the chemical state/ measured repeatedly with good reproducibility/ simple sample preparation	Poor absolute analysis/ quantitative analysis needs standard samples/ less sensitive to light elements/ easily affected by mutual element interference and superposition peaks
AFM	True three-dimensional surface map/ not require any special treatment of the sample/ work well at atmospheric pressure	Small imaging range/ slow speed/ great influence of the probe
XAS	More accurate atomic structure identification/ the coordination environment and the chemical state/ low sample requirements/ nondestructive	Only the planar average structure and no three-dimensional information
ToF-SIMS	High resolution/ high sensitivity/ accurate mass measurement/ three-dimensional manner	Little damage to the sample/ mainly solid at present

[1]	Yu Peng, Jiawei Chen, Yue Yin, Yongjie Cao, Mochou Liao, Congxiao Wang, Xiaoli Dong, Yongyao Xia. Tailored cathode electrolyte interphase via ethylene carbonate-free electrolytes enabling stable and wide-temperature operation of high-voltage LiCoO₂ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100087-.
[2]	Hengrui Zhang, Xijun Xu, Xun-Lu Li, Xiangwen Gao. Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Battery Research: Current Status and Prospects [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(10): 100115-.
[3]	Zhuo Han, Danfeng Zhang, Haixian Wang, Guorui Zheng, Ming Liu, Yanbing He. Research Progress and Prospect on Electrolyte Additives for Interface Reconstruction of Long-Life Ni-Rich Lithium Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(9): 2307034-.
[4]	Jiandong Liu, Xin Li, Daxiong Wu, Huaping Wang, Junda Huang, Jianmin Ma. Anion-Acceptor Electrolyte Additive Strategy for Optimizing Electrolyte Solvation Characteristics and Electrode Electrolyte Interphases for Li\|\|NCM811 Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(6): 2306039-.
[5]	Qiuying Xia, Yu Cai, Wei Liu, Jinshi Wang, Chuanzhi Wu, Feng Zan, Jing Xu, Hui Xia. Direct Recycling of All-Solid-State Thin Film Lithium Batteries with Lithium Anode Failure [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(8): 2212051-0.
[6]	Qu Zhuoyan, Zhang Xiaoyin, Xiao Ru, Sun Zhenhua, Li Feng. Application of Organosulfur Compounds in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(8): 2301019-0.
[7]	Yongzhi Zhao, Chenyang Chen, Wenyi Liu, Weifei Hu, Jinping Liu. Research Progress of Interface Optimization Strategies for Solid-State Lithium Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(8): 2211017-0.
[8]	Huan Liu, Yu Ma, Bin Cao, Qizhen Zhu, Bin Xu. Recent Progress of MXenes in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(5): 2210027-0.
[9]	Yuanhao Shen, Qingyu Wang, Jie Liu, Cheng Zhong, Wenbin Hu. Spontaneous Reduction and Adsorption of K₃[Fe(CN)₆] on Zn Anodes in Alkaline Electrolytes: Enabling a Long-Life Zn-Ni Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2204048-0.
[10]	Xinyang Yue, Cui Ma, Jian Bao, Siyu Yang, Dong Chen, Xiaojing Wu, Yongning Zhou. Failure Mechanisms of Lithium Metal Anode and Their Advanced Characterization Technologies [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2005012-.
[11]	Haodong Shi, Yaguang Li, Pengfei Lu, Zhong-Shuai Wu. Single-Atom Cobalt Coordinated to Oxygen Sites on Graphene for Stable Lithium Metal Anodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2008033-.
[12]	Yi Yang, Chong Yan, Jiaqi Huang. Research Progress of Solid Electrolyte Interphase in Lithium Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2010076-.
[13]	Hongyi Pan, Quan Li, Xiqian Yu, Hong Li. Characterization Techniques for Lithium Metal Anodes at Multiple Spatial Scales [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(1): 2008091-.
[14]	Qin Ran, Tianyang Sun, Chongyu Han, Haonan Zhang, Jian Yan, Jinglun Wang. Natural Polyphenol Tannic Acid as an Efficient Electrolyte Additive for High Performance Lithium Metal Anode [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(11): 1912068-.
[15]	Zhenjie CHENG, Yayun MAO, Qingyu DONG, Feng JIN, Yanbin SHEN, Liwei CHEN. Fluoroethylene Carbonate as an Additive for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Effect on the Sodium Cathode [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(8): 868-875.

Research Progress on Cathode Electrolyte Interphase in High-Voltage Lithium Batteries

RichHTML

Full text @ ScienceDirect

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 80

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0