高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池膜电极中磷酸分布及调控策略研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010071

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (9): 2010071.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010071

所属专题：燃料电池

高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池膜电极中磷酸分布及调控策略研究进展

张巨佳, 张劲, 王海宁, 相艳, 卢善富()

北京航空航天大学空间与环境学院，仿生能源材料与器件北京市重点实验室，北京 100191

收稿日期:2020-10-29 录用日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-12-07
通讯作者: 卢善富 E-mail:lusf@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:Shanfu Lu, Email: lusf@buaa.edu.cn
卢善富, 1980年生。2008年于武汉大学获得博士学位。现为北京航空航天大学研究员、博士生导师, 国家优秀青年基金获得者。主要从事电化学能量储存与转化关键材料及器件(燃料电池、液流电池等)研究
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1502303);国家自然科学基金(21722601);国家自然科学基金(U19A2017)

Advancement in Distribution and Control Strategy of Phosphoric Acid in Membrane Electrode Assembly of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

Jujia Zhang, Jin Zhang, Haining Wang, Yan Xiang, Shanfu Lu()

Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-inspired Energy Materials and Devices, School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2020-10-29 Accepted:2020-12-01 Published:2020-12-07
Contact: Shanfu Lu E-mail:lusf@buaa.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Key R·D Program of China(2018YFB1502303);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21722601);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U19A2017)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池(HT-PEMFC)由于其较高的运行温度(140–200 ℃)而具有较快的电极反应动力学和良好的抗CO等杂质气体毒化能力以及简化水热管理等优势，是PEMFC的重要发展方向之一。HT-PEMFC的核心部件为基于磷酸掺杂聚合物电解质膜(HT-PEM)组装的膜电极(MEA)。在高温膜电极(HT-MEA)中，一方面聚合物电解质膜和催化层中的离子传导极大地依赖于磷酸的含量；而另一方面磷酸分子填充在高分子链周围会引起聚合物膜力学性能的下降，迁移进催化层中的磷酸容易导致阴阳极催化层的“酸淹”以及在铂催化剂表面吸附而降低催化剂活性。因此，研究磷酸在高温聚合物电解质膜电极中的分布状态和迁移过程，对构建高性能和高稳定性的HT-PEMFC至关重要。基于此，本文对近年来HT-MEA中磷酸的分布、动态迁移过程的研究现状进行了梳理分析，对HT-MEA(包括高温聚合物电解质膜和催化层)中磷酸分布和迁移的调节与优化策略研究进展进行了较全面的综述，并对其未来发展趋势进行了评述和展望。

关键词: 燃料电池, 膜电极, 高温聚合物电解质膜, 催化层, 磷酸

Abstract:

High-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs) have the unique advantages of fast electrode reaction kinetics, high CO tolerance, and simple water and thermal management at their operating temperature (140–200 ℃), which are considered as one of the important research directions of PEMFCs. Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs), as the core component of HT-PEMFCs, are usually fabricated by sandwiching phosphoric acid (PA)-doped polymer membrane (HT-PEM) between two electrodes. Technically, high PA content is required in HT-PEMs to ensure fast proton conduction, since PA acts as a proton transport carrier, while a high content of PA decreases the interaction among polymer molecules, thus enhancing the movement of the polymer molecules and leading to a decrease in the mechanical strength of the polymer membranes. In addition, PA is driven into catalyst layers owing to capillary force caused by micropore structures, crack connectivity, and accessibility. The PA content in the electrodes is also affected by the hydrophilic/hydrophobic characteristics of the catalyst layers and the surface tension of the acid when it is in close contact with the catalyst layers. Furthermore, PA plays an important role in the construction of electrochemical triple-phase boundaries to promote electrochemical reactions in the catalyst layers. Simultaneously, as a liquid or "free molecule", the migration of PA may be accelerated by the current and the water produced, owing to the formation of charged phosphates or hydronium ions. This process encourages the redistribution of PA within the catalyst layers, and results in acid flooding of the catalytic layers and adsorption on the surface of the platinum catalyst, leading to increased mass transfer resistance for the gas reaction and reduced catalyst activity. Moreover, the increase in supplied absolute flow rate and the temperature elevation in the HT-PEMFC process could accelerate the evaporation of PA from the electrolyte membrane, resulting in a decrease in the stability of HT-PEMFC and corrosion of the metal end plate. Therefore, it is crucial to regulate the distribution and migration of PA in MEAs for the construction of HT-PEMFCs with high performance and stability. Hence, this paper reviews the research status of PA distribution in HT-PEM electrodes in recent years, and summarizes the corresponding regulations and optimization strategies as well as its future development trend.

Key words: Fuel cell, Membrane-electrode assembly, High temperature polymer electrolyte membrane, Catalyst layer, Phosphoric acid

张巨佳, 张劲, 王海宁, 相艳, 卢善富. 高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池膜电极中磷酸分布及调控策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9), 2010071. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010071

Jujia Zhang, Jin Zhang, Haining Wang, Yan Xiang, Shanfu Lu. Advancement in Distribution and Control Strategy of Phosphoric Acid in Membrane Electrode Assembly of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(9), 2010071. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010071

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010071

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I9/2010071

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

表2

图6

图7

参考文献 109

1	Karuppannan M. ; Kim Y. ; Gok S. ; Lee E. ; Hwang J. Y. ; Jang J. H. ; Cho Y. H. ; Lim T. ; Sung Y. E. ; Kwon O. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2820. doi: 10.1039/c9ee01000a
2	Breitwieser M. ; Klingele M. ; Vierrath S. ; Zengerle R. ; Thiele S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 8, 1701257. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701257
3	Aili D. ; Hansen M. K. ; Pan C. ; Li Q. ; Christensen E. ; Jensen J. O. ; Bjerrum N. J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 6985. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.058
4	Rosli R. E. ; Sulong A. B. ; Daud W. R. W. ; Zulkifley M. A. ; Husaini T. ; Rosli M. I. ; Majlan E. H. ; Haque M. A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 9293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.211
5	Tang H. ; Geng K. ; Hu Y. ; Li N. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 605, 118107. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118107
6	Teixeira F. C. ; de Sá A. I. ; Teixeira A. P. S. ; Rangel C. M. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 15249. doi: 10.1039/c9nj03405f
7	Lu S. ; Xu X. ; Zhang J. ; Peng S. ; Liang D. ; Wang H. ; Xiang Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1400842. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201400842
8	Cheng Y. ; Zhang J. ; Lu S. ; Kuang H. ; Bradley J. ; De Marco R. ; Aili D. ; Li Q. ; Cui C. Q. ; Jiang S. P. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 22487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.036
9	Li Q. ; Jensen J. O. ; Savinell R. F. ; Bjerrum N. J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 449. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.003
10	Xu C. ; Scott K. ; Li Q. ; Yang J. ; Wu X. Fuel Cells 2013, 13, 118. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201200149
11	Suwanmanee U. ; Saebea D. ; Hacker V. ; Assabumrungrat S. ; Arpornwichanop A. ; Authayanun S. Energy Convers. Manage. 2018, 171, 20. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.068
12	Yang.J. ; Li. Q. ; Cleemann. L. N. ; Jensen. J. O. ; Pan. C. ; Bjerrum. N. J. ; He R. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 622. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201200710
13	Jensen J. ; Li Q. ; Pan C. ; Vestbo A. ; Mortensen K. ; Nybopetersen H. ; Lausorensen C. ; Nedergaardclausen T. ; Schramm J. ; Bjerrum N. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 1567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.034
14	Authayanun S. ; Saebea D. ; Patcharavorachot Y. ; Arpornwichanop A. Energy 2015, 80, 331. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.075
15	Chang C. P. ; Wu Y. C. ; Chen W. Y. ; Pan C. ; Su Y. C. ; Huang Y. J. ; Tseng F. G. Renew. Energy 2020, 153, 530. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.137
16	Sánchez D. ; Muñoz de Escalona J. M. ; Monje B. ; Chacartegui R. ; Sánchez T. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 4355. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.060
17	Elumalai V. ; Annapooranan R. ; Ganapathikrishnan M. ; Sangeetha D. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45954. doi: 10.1002/app.45954
18	Zhang C. ; Zhang L. ; Zhou W. ; Wang Y. ; Chan S. H. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 149, 271. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.10.059
19	Li, Q.; Aili, D.; Hjuler., H. A.; Jensen, J. O. High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells; Springer: Cham, 2016; pp. 168–194.
20	Ma W. ; Zhao C. ; Yang J. ; Ni J. ; Wang S. ; Zhang N. ; Lin H. ; Wang J. ; Zhang G. ; Li Q. ; Na H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 doi: 10.1039/c2ee21521g
21	Angioni S. ; Villa D. C. ; Barco S. D. ; Quartarone E. ; Righetti P. P. ; Tomasi C. ; Mustarelli P. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 663. doi: 10.1039/c3ta12200j
22	Quartarone E. ; Angioni S. ; Mustarelli P. Materials (Basel) 2017, 10. doi: 10.3390/ma10070687
23	Bose S. ; Kuila T. ; Nguyen T. X. H. ; Kim N. H. ; Lau K. T. ; Lee J. H. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 813. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.003
24	Zhang J. ; Liu J. ; Lu S. ; Zhu H. ; Aili D. ; De Marco R. ; Xiang Y. ; Forsyth M. ; Li Q. ; Jiang S. P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31922. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b09591
25	Lu S. F. ; Peng S. K. ; Xiang Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 1859.
	卢善富; 彭思侃; 相艳. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 1859. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201606022
26	Kim D. K. ; Kim H. ; Park H. ; Oh S. ; Ahn S. H. ; Kim H. J. ; Kim S. K. J. Power Sources 2019, 438, 227022. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227022
27	Zagoraiou E. ; Paloukis F. ; Neophytides S. G. ; Daletou M. K. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 356, 136778. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136778
28	Guo Z. ; Xiu R. ; Lu S. ; Xu X. ; Yang S. ; Xiang Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8847. doi: 10.1039/c5ta00415b
29	Kerres J. ; Atanasov V. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 14723. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.054
30	Jeong Y. H. ; Jung J. H. ; Choi E. ; Han S. ; Begley A. I. ; Yoo S. J. ; Jang J. H. ; Kim H. J. ; Nam S. W. ; Lee K. Y. ; Kim J. Y. J. Power Sources 2015, 299, 480. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.015
31	Lang S. ; Kazdal T. J. ; Kühl F. ; Hampe M. J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 1163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.041
32	Xu X. ; Wang H. ; Lu S. ; Guo Z. ; Rao S. ; Xiu R. ; Xiang Y. J. Power Sources 2015, 286, 458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.028
33	Razaq M. ; Razaq A. ; Yeager E. J. Electrochem. Soc 1987, 136, 385. doi: 10.1149/1.2096641
34	Myles T. ; Bonville L. ; Maric R. Catalysts 2017, 7, 16. doi: 10.3390/catal7010016
35	Hu Y. ; Jiang Y. ; Jensen J. O. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Li Q. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.054
36	Novitski D. ; Holdcroft S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27314. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08720
37	Fleige M. ; Holst-Olesen K. ; Wiberg G. K. H. ; Arenz M. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 399. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.048
38	Lobato J. ; Cañizares P. ; Rodrigo M. A. ; Linares J. J. ; Pinar F. J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 1347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.091
39	Heider E. ; Jusys Z. ; Behm R. J. ; Jörissen L. ; Zeis R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 18859. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03858
40	Zhou F. ; Singdeo D. ; Kær S. K. Fuel Cells 2019, 19, 2. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201700144
41	Liu S. ; Rasinski M. ; Rahim Y. ; Zhang S. ; Wippermann K. ; Reimer U. ; Lehnert W. J. Power Sources 2019, 439, 227090. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227090
42	Yan W. M. ; Chen C. Y. ; Liang C. H. Energy 2019, 186, 115836. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.166
43	Matar S. ; Higier A. ; Liu H. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 181. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.084
44	Li R. ; Cai Y. ; Wippermann K. ; Lehnert W. J. Power Sources 2019, 434, 226718. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226718
45	Mack F. ; Heissler S. ; Laukenmann R. ; Zeis R. J. Power Sources 2014, 270, 627. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.171
46	Zeis R. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 68. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.6.8
47	Vilčiauskas L. ; Tuckerman M. E. ; Bester G. ; Paddison S. J. ; Kreuer K. D. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 461. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1329
48	Krueger R. A. ; Vilciauskas L. ; Melchior J. P. ; Bester G. ; Kreuer K. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 15866. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09684
49	Ma Y. L. ; Wainright J. S. ; Litt M. H. ; Savinell R. F. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A8. doi: 10.1149/1.163003
50	Lee K. S. ; Spendelow J. S. ; Choe Y. K. ; Fujimoto C. ; Kim Y. S. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16120. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.120
51	Kannan A. ; Li Q. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Jensen J. O. Fuel Cells 2018, 18, 103. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201700181
52	Martin S. ; Li Q. ; Steenberg T. ; Jensen J. O. J. Power Sources 2014, 272, 559. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.112
53	Becker H. ; Reimer U. ; Aili D. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Jensen J. O. ; Lehnert W. ; Li Q. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, F863. doi: 10.1149/2.1201810jes
54	Eberhardt S. H. ; Marone F. ; Stampanoni M. ; Buchi F. N. ; Schmidt T. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 162, F310. doi: 10.1149/2.0801608jes
55	Halter J. ; Thomas S. ; Kær S.K. ; Schmidt T. J. ; Büchi. F. N. J. Power Sources 2018, 399, 151. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.090
56	Eberhardt S. H. ; Toulec M. ; Marone F. ; Stampanoni M. ; Buchi F. N. ; Schmidt T. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, F310. doi: 10.1149/2.0751503jes
57	Kwon K. ; Park J. O. ; Yoo D. Y. ; Yi J. S. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 6570. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.031
58	Kaserer S. ; Caldwell K. M. ; Ramaker D. E. ; Roth C. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 6210. doi: 10.1021/jp311924q
59	Li X. ; Ma H. ; Wang P. ; Liu Z. ; Peng J. ; Hu W. ; Jiang Z. ; Liu B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 30735. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b06808
60	Rao S. S. ; Hande V. R. ; Sawant S. M. ; Praveen S. ; Rath S. K. ; Sudarshan K. ; Ratna D. ; Patri M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 37013. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b09405
61	Hooshyari K. ; Rezania H. ; Vatanpour V. ; Salarizadeh P. ; Askari M. B. ; Beydaghi H. ; Enhessari M. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 612, 118436. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118436
62	Bai H. ; Wang H. ; Zhang J. ; Wu C. ; Zhang J. ; Xiang Y. ; Lu S. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 558, 26. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.039
63	Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Bai, H.; Lu, S.; Xiang, Y.; Jiang, S. P. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.082
64	Dai Y. ; Wang J. ; Tao P. ; He R. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 553, 503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.020
65	Zhang J. ; Zhang J. ; Bai H. ; Tan Q. ; Wang H. ; He B. ; Xiang Y. ; Lu S. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 572, 496. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.035
66	Bai H. ; Wang H. ; Zhang J. ; Zhang J. ; Lu S. ; Xiang Y. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 592, 117395. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117395
67	Sood R. ; Donnadio A. ; Giancola S. ; Kreisz A. ; Jones D. J. ; Cavaliere S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 16897. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b02713
68	Henkensmeier D. ; Duong N. M. H. ; Brela M. ; Dyduch K. ; Michalak A. ; Jankova K. ; Cho H. ; Jang J. H. ; Kim H. J. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Li Q. ; Jensen J. O. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 14389. doi: 10.1039/c5ta01936b
69	Bu F. ; Zhang Y. ; Hong L. ; Zhao W. ; Li D. ; Li J. ; Na H. ; Zhao C. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 545, 167. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.072
70	Li X. ; Wang P. ; Liu Z. ; Peng J. ; Shi C. ; Hu W. ; Jiang Z. ; Liu B. J. Power Sources 2018, 393, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.011
71	Li N. ; Wang C. ; Lee S. Y. ; Park C. H. ; Lee Y. M. ; Guiver M. D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9158. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102057
72	Wu W. ; Li Y. ; Liu J. ; Wang J. ; He Y. ; Davey K. ; Qiao S. Z. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1707516. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707516
73	Adamski M. ; Skalski T. J. G. ; Britton B. ; Peckham T. J. ; Metzler L. ; Holdcroft S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9058. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703916
74	Bai H. ; Peng H. ; Xiang Y. ; Zhang J. ; Wang H. ; Lu S. ; Zhuang L. J. Power Sources 2019, 443, 227219. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227219
75	Lee K. S. ; Maurya S. ; Kim Y. S. ; Kreller C. R. ; Wilson M. S. ; Larsen D. ; Elangovan S. E. ; Mukundan R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 979. doi: 10.1039/c7ee03595k
76	Mustarelli P. ; Quartarone E. ; Grandi S. ; Carollo A. ; Magistris A. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1339. doi: 10.1002/adma.200701767
77	Zhang X. ; Fu X. ; Yang S. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang R. ; Hu S. ; Bao X. ; Zhao F. ; Li X. ; Liu Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15288. doi: 10.1039/c9ta03666k
78	Chen H. ; Wang S. ; Liu F. ; Wang D. ; Li J. ; Mao T. ; Liu G. ; Wang X. ; Xu J. ; Wang Z. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 596, 117722. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117722
79	Halter J. ; Bevilacqua N. ; Zeis R. ; Schmidt T. J. ; Büchi F. N. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 859, 1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113832
80	Halter J. ; Gloor T. ; Amoroso B. ; Schmidt T. J. ; Büchi F. N. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 13126. doi: 10.1039/c9cp02149c
81	Halter J. ; Marone F. ; Schmidt T. J. ; Büchi. F. N. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, F1176. doi: 10.1149/2.0501814jes
82	Lee E. ; Kim D. H. ; Pak C. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145461. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145461
83	Zhang J. ; Bai H. ; Yan W. ; Zhang J. ; Wang H. ; Xiang Y. ; Lu S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 114501. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9fe0
84	Jin H. ; Nayeem M. O. G. ; Lee S. ; Matsuhisa N. ; Inoue D. ; Yokota T. ; Hashizume D. ; Someya T. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 7905. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02297
85	Xia L. ; Li X. ; Wu Y. ; Hu S. ; Liao Y. ; Huang L. ; Qing Y. ; Lu X. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122325. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122325
86	Mack F. ; Klages M. ; Scholta J. ; Jörissen L. ; Morawietz T. ; Hiesgen R. ; Kramer D. ; Zeis R. J. Power Sources 2014, 255, 431. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.032
87	Kim M. ; Jeong G. ; Eom K. ; Cho E. ; Ryu J. ; Kim H. J. ; Kwon H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 12335. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.019
88	Lin H. L. ; Wu T. J. ; Lin Y. T. ; Wu H. C. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.034
89	Zhang S. ; Zhang J. ; Zhu Z. ; Liu P. ; Cao F. ; Chen J. ; He Q. ; Dou M. ; Nan S. ; Lu S. J. Power Sources 2020, 473, 228616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228616
90	Kannan A. ; Li Q. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Jensen J. O. Fuel Cells 2018, 18, 103. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201700181
91	Kim J. H. ; Kim H. J. ; Lim T. H. ; Lee H. I. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.082
92	Su A. ; Ferng Y. M. ; Tsai X. Y. Int. J. Energy Res. 2013, 37, 1213. doi: 10.1002/er.2996
93	Zhai Y. ; Zhang H. ; Zhang Y. ; Xing D. J. Power Sources 2007, 169, 259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.004
94	Jeong G. ; Kim M. ; Han J. ; Kim H. J. ; Shul Y. G. ; Cho E. J. Power Sources 2016, 323, 142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.042
95	Su H. ; Jao T. C. ; Pasupathi S. ; Bladergroen B. J. ; Linkov V. ; Pollet B. G. J. Power Sources 2014, 246, 63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.062
96	Lobato J. ; Rodrigo M. A. ; Linares J. J. ; Scott K. J. Power Sources 2006, 157, 284. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.040
97	Lee W. J. ; Lee J. S. ; Park H. Y. ; Park H. S. ; Lee S. Y. ; Song K. H. ; Kim H. J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 32825. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.095
98	Wang S. B. ; Xie X. F. ; Wang Y. W. ; Wang J. H. ; Shang Y. M. ; Li W. W. ; Fang M. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2012, 31, 343.
	王树博; 谢晓峰; 王要武; 王金海; 尚玉明; 李薇薇; 方谋. 化工进展, 2012, 31, 343. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2012.s1.022
99	Barron O. ; Su H. ; Linkov V. ; Pollet B. G. ; Pasupathi S. J. Power Sources 2015, 278, 718. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.139
100	Oh H. S. ; Cho Y. ; Lee W. H. ; Kim H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2578. doi: 10.1039/c2ta00492e
101	Tian L. L. ; Zhang W. Q. ; Xie Z. ; Peng K. ; Ma Q. ; Xu Q. ; Pasupathi S. ; Su H. N. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009049.
	田立亮; 张玮琦; 解政; 彭凯; 马强; 徐谦; SivakumarPasupathi; 苏华能. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009049. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20200904
102	Martin S. ; Li Q. ; Jensen J. O. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.031
103	Martin S. ; Jensen J. O. ; Li Q. ; Garcia-Ybarra P. L. ; Castillo J. L. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 28273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.073
104	Lobato J. ; Cañizares P. ; Ubeda D. ; Pinar F. J. ; Rodrigo M. A. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2011, 106, 174. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.05.022
105	Park H. ; Kim D. K. ; Kim H. ; Oh S. ; Jung W. S. ; Kim S. K. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145444. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145444
106	He Q. ; Mukerjee S. ; Zeis R. ; Parres-Esclapez S. ; Illán-Gómez M. J. ; Bueno-López A. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 381, 54. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.03.044
107	Holst-Olesen K. ; Reda M. ; Hansen H. A. ; Vegge T. ; Arenz M. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 7104. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01584
108	Hu Y. ; Jensen J. O. ; Pan C. ; Cleemann L. N. ; Shypunov I. ; Li Q. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 234, 357. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.056
109	Cheng Y. ; He S. ; Lu S. ; Veder J. P. ; Johannessen B. ; Thomsen L. ; Saunders M. ; Becker T. ; De Marco R. ; Li Q. ; et al Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1802066. doi: 10.1002/advs.201802066

Membranes	Phosphoric acid doping level (PA molecules per repeat unit)	Tensile stress (MPa)	Acid retention capability (%)	Proton conductivity (mS?cm^?1)	References
SiO₂/Cross-linked PBI	23.1	15.0 ± 4.0	57	199@160 ℃	59
α-ZrP/ABPBI	6.5	36.0 ± 3.0	–	49@180 ℃	60
C₃N₄/PES-PVP	6.1	6.0	–	120@180 ℃	62
HPW/PES-PVP	6.6	2.1	–	144@160 ℃	63
carbon dots/PES-PVP	146 a	11.9 ± 1.5	–	86@180 ℃	64
TDAP-PSU	186.4 ^a	2.1	–	46@160 ℃	65
P-g-V-3.82	220.3 ^a	7.94	–	127@160 ℃	66
1,2,3-triazole-functionalized PSU	5.0	13.0	–	27.3@140 ℃	67
g-PBI-20	22.1	6.5	–	154@160 ℃	69
PPT	159.9 ^a	12.0±0.3	82	96@180 ℃	74
ABPBI/IL@SNR	3.4	-	67%	48@180 ℃	77
PBI-SC-5	6.8	8±0.4	82	78@160 ℃	78

Catalyst	Fabrication method	Binder	Addition	Phosphoric acid content (mg?cm^?2)	Gas flow of anode and cathode (L?min^?1)	Current density at 0.6 V@160 ℃ (mA?cm^?2)	References
40% (w) Pt/C	Coating	Phosphonated polysulfones	–	–	0.2/0.2 H₂/O₂	~140	5
40% (w) Pt/C	Spraying	PBI	–	1.125	0.134/0.4 H₂/Air	~100	38
40% (w) Pt/C	Spraying	PBI	–	0.225	0.134/0.4 H₂/Air	~130	38
48.3% (w) PtCo/C	Spraying	PTFE	–	3	0.3/1 H₂/Air	~410	81
40% (w) Pt/C	Ultrasonic Spraying	PTFE	CNT	–	0.10/0.40 H₂/O₂	492	83
40% (w) Pt/C	Spraying	PTFE	Zirconium hydrogen phosphate	–	0.5/1 H₂/Air	400	84
20% Pt/C	Ultrasonic Spraying	PTFE	–	–	λ(H₂) : λ(O₂) = 1.4:2	~200	87
20% (w) Pt/C	Coating	PTFE	–	–	λ(H₂) : λ(O₂) = 1.4:2	~200	87
40% (w) Pt/C	Spraying	PVDF/PBI	–	0.81	0.2/0.2 H₂/O₂	~340	88
40% (w) Pt/C	Spraying	PVDF/PBI	–	0.13	0.2/0.2 H₂/O₂	~120	88

[1]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[2]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[3]	张婧雯, 马华隆, 马军, 胡梅雪, 李启浩, 陈胜, 宁添姝, 葛创新, 刘晰, 肖丽, 庄林, 张熠霄, 陈立桅. 碱性聚合物电解质膜的表面锥形阵列结构提升燃料电池性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2111037 -0 .
[4]	崔同慧, 李航越, 吕泽伟, 王怡戈, 韩敏芳, 孙再洪, 孙凯华. 大尺寸固体氧化物燃料电池的电极过程解析方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2011009 - .
[5]	韩爱娣, 闫晓晖, 陈俊任, 程晓静, 章俊良. 分散溶剂对PEMFC催化层中超薄Nafion离聚物质子传导的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 1912052 - .
[6]	张月皎, 朱越洲, 李剑锋. 拉曼光谱在燃料电池领域的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2004052 - .
[7]	李孟婷, 郑星群, 李莉, 魏子栋. 碱性介质中氢氧化和析氢反应机理研究现状[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007054 - .
[8]	刘苗苗, 杨茅茂, 舒欣欣, 张进涛. 燃料电池碳基氧还原催化剂的设计与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007072 - .
[9]	黄磊, Zaman Shahid, 王志同, 牛慧婷, 游波, 夏宝玉. 铂基空心纳米框架的合成及其在直接醇燃料电池中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009035 - .
[10]	田立亮, 张玮琦, 解政, 彭凯, 马强, 徐谦, Pasupathi Sivakumar, 苏华能. 催化层掺杂共价有机框架材料提升高温聚电解质膜燃料电池性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009049 - .
[11]	罗芳, 潘书媛, 杨泽惠. 中高温质子交换膜燃料电池催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009087 - .
[12]	李峥嵘, 申涛, 胡冶州, 陈科, 陆贇, 王得丽. 有序金属间化合物电催化剂在燃料电池中的应用进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2010029 - .
[13]	王健, 丁炜, 魏子栋. 超低铂用量质子交换膜燃料电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009094 - .
[14]	薛延荣, 王兴栋, 张向前, 方锦杰, 许志远, 张宇烽, 刘雪瑞, 刘梦园, 朱威, 庄仲滨. 具有经济性的碱性膜燃料电池氢气氧化反应催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2009103 - .
[15]	丁亮, 唐堂, 胡劲松. 基于金属-氮-碳结构催化剂的质子交换膜燃料电池研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2010048 - .

高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池膜电极中磷酸分布及调控策略研究进展

Advancement in Distribution and Control Strategy of Phosphoric Acid in Membrane Electrode Assembly of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 109

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0